logo
This simple ‘1% rule' could save you hundreds of dollars — and curb your dangerous impulse spending

This simple ‘1% rule' could save you hundreds of dollars — and curb your dangerous impulse spending

New York Post30-04-2025

Think twice before dropping that cash — your future self will thank you.
A budgeting hack known as the '1% rule' is gaining traction for helping people pump the brakes on pricey, impulsive purchases — and it's so simple, even your most shop-happy friend could use it.
If you're eyeing a non-essential splurge — say, Gen Z-coveted front-row concert tickets, a high-end espresso machine, a weekend getaway at a fancy resort, or a new gaming console — and it costs more than 1% of your annual income, hit the brakes.
Advertisement
4 If you're considering a non-essential purchase — like a designer kitchen appliance, a premium bicycle, a luxury fitness tracker, or a spa retreat — and it costs more than 1% of your annual income, it's time to pause.
Yingyaipumi – stock.adobe.com
Give yourself 24 hours to think it over before swiping your card. If you earn $50,000 a year, anything over $500 should trigger a 'cool-off' period.
Originally shared by Glen James of My Millennial Money via CNBC, the 1% rule helps put a mental speed bump between you and your next shopping spree — without requiring you to give up treats entirely.
Advertisement
4 While $500 might seem significant, it's easy to rationalize such purchases, particularly when you're scrolling through flash sales or tempted by a 'limited edition!' notification on your go-to shopping site.
Antonioguillem – stock.adobe.com
'It isn't anything 'official' that you need to stick to,' Bobbi Rebell, CFP and personal finance expert at CardRates, recently told Bustle.
'The 1% rule is also a good way to keep things in perspective and get a sense of whether it's going to derail your finances.'
Advertisement
And while $500 may feel like a lot, that kind of purchase can become dangerously easy to justify — especially when you're doom-scrolling through sales or seduced by a 'last one left!' tag on your favorite shopping app.
'This rule reminds you to stop and think the purchase through,' said Rebell. 'If you'll actually use the purchase, that's fine … but if it's just a heat-of-the-moment urge, that's when the 1% rule might help pass up the item — and ultimately save big.'
The strategy even works in reverse. Instead of spending that chunk of change, stash it away.
That way, 'you intentionally put the money into savings instead,' Rebell said.
Advertisement
'Think of it as a gift to your future self!' she said.
But fair warning: this isn't a license to 1% your way into debt.
4 Repeatedly applying the 1% rule can quickly lead to significant spending, experts say, but it's not meant to be used frequently; experts advise using it sparingly for maximum effectiveness.
Antonioguillem – stock.adobe.com
'If you apply the 1% rule over and over, you can end up spending a tremendous amount of money,' she cautioned.
'It's not a rinse and repeat kind of thing. It has to be used very sparingly.'
Of course, spending discipline doesn't stop at handbags. Even your grocery cart could probably use a budget-friendly makeover.
Enter Chef Will Coleman, who recently went viral for his '6-to-1 grocery shopping method' — a simple hack designed to help families save hundreds on food each month.
Advertisement
'Whenever you go grocery shopping … use the '6-to-1' method,' Coleman explained in a TikTok viewed nearly a million times.
'You grab six veggies, five fruits, four proteins, three starches, two sauces or spreads and one fun thing for yourself.'
4 The '1%' rule and '6-to-1' hack encourage you to pause and evaluate your purchases.
Monkey Business – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
He created the formula after realizing his shopping habits were draining his wallet — and wasting food.
'This makes grocery shopping way easier, way cheaper, and you get in and out, so you're not there all day long,' Coleman added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump-Musk feud could be one of the catalysts for a coming 10% stock correction, former JPMorgan strategist says
The Trump-Musk feud could be one of the catalysts for a coming 10% stock correction, former JPMorgan strategist says

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

The Trump-Musk feud could be one of the catalysts for a coming 10% stock correction, former JPMorgan strategist says

Former JPMorgan chief market strategist Marko Kolanovic sees a stock market pullback in the cards, and the Trump-Musk feud could be one of the triggers that sets off a decline. Speaking on CNBC on Thursday, Kolanovic predicted a coming correction of 5%-10% that could be set off by a drop in Tesla's stock price. "It's a little bit of a sideshow. It's important for certain companies, and it can spill over," Kolanovic said of the president's fallout with Musk. "Tesla is one of the biggest holdings of retail investors. There's a little ecosystem of stocks around it. I think it could be a little bit of a catalyst." In a post on X on Thursday, Kolanovic pointed to popular retail stocks such as Tesla, Palantir, and Super Micro as potential triggers of a momentum crash. Tesla stock plunged 14% on Thursday as Trump responded to Musk's criticisms of the big GOP tax and budget bill. Back in February (2/19) drop of $PLTR on dod spending cut started market wide momentum crash. Today, we have several crowded retail names $TSLA $PLTR $SMCI that could start a similar development ... — Marko Kolanovic (@markoinny) June 5, 2025 However, Kolanovic also noted that the Trump-Musk fight would be one possible catalyst for a market pullback among many. Uncertainty in the economy and the trade war are also looming problems. "We're close to all-time highs, but we still have all the problems," Kolanovic said. "We have a trade war, we have signs of an economic slowdown." Valuations are stretched, he said, with the Nasdaq close to record highs even as rates remain elevated, and Kolanovic sees warning signs in the bond market. The risk-reward tradeoff for stocks versus bonds looks unattractive, as the 10-year Treasury yield hovers around 4.4%. That means equity investors aren't getting a great return in excess of the risk-free rate. There's also the lingering concern about Fed independence, with Trump repeatedly pressuring Powell to cut interest rates. Macro risks are mounting as well. Kolanovic pointed to the weak ADP jobs report earlier this week, which reported 37,000 new jobs compared to economists' expectations of 110,000. While the May jobs report showed higher-than-expected job growth, April and March numbers saw significant downward revisions. A correction could present a potential buying opportunity, but that's only if recession risks dissipate, Kolanovic said.

How Much Cash Does Each Generation Have in Their Emergency Funds?
How Much Cash Does Each Generation Have in Their Emergency Funds?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How Much Cash Does Each Generation Have in Their Emergency Funds?

One of the fundamental teachings of personal finance is to have an emergency fund stashed with three to six months' worth of living expenses. This fund is there to get you through unexpected monetary challenges, such as a job loss or an emergency medical expense, and can protect you from having to take on debt. Be Prepared: Read Next: Yet, not all Americans have one — and even those who do might not have enough in it. According to a recent Bread Financial report, the likelihood of having a sufficient emergency fund varies by generation. Here's a look at how much Americans in each generation have in their emergency funds. Baby boomers are the most likely to have sufficient emergency savings, the Bread Financial report found. One-fifth of all boomers (20%) have three to six months of expenses in an emergency fund and 33% have more than six months. They're also the least likely of the generations to have no emergency fund (30%) or less than three months of expenses in their fund (16%). Among Gen X, 39% have no emergency fund, 26% have three to six months' worth of expenses, 19% have less than three months and 16% have more than six months. They're the generation most likely to have no emergency fund at all. Millennials are the next most-likely to lack an emergency fund — 37% admit they have nothing saved for an emergency. On the plus side, a little short of half of all millennials do have sufficient emergency savings — 27% have three to six months saved and 13% have more than six months. An additional 22% have an emergency fund, but it has less than three months' worth of expenses in it. Although Gen Z has had the least time to build their emergency funds, they're faring relatively well. Nearly one-third (29%) have three to six months saved and 14% have more than six months. Twenty-two percent have less than three months saved, and 36% don't have an emergency fund. Explore More: As the report shows, the baby boomer generation — now ages 61 to 79 — are the most likely to have a fully funded emergency fund. There are several reasons for this. 'Boomers tend to be more mature and stable,' said Trae Bodge, personal finance expert and founder of True Trae. 'They've made their mistakes, but now they are close to retirement and less likely to play fast and loose with their money. Younger people can take more risks.' Younger generations have also had to deal with more financial hardships during their early earning years. 'Younger generations have endured a series of economic struggles, all while living and housing costs have soared, making it harder to save,' said Andrea Woroch, a money-saving expert. 'Boomers have had more time to save before a series of economic struggles ensued. 'Not to mention, boomers are also at an age where they may have paid off their mortgage and/or no longer have children living at home, reducing the total amount of monthly spending, which allows them to save more.' While three to six months of expenses is the typical guideline for emergency funds, some experts believe six months should be the goal for members of all generations. 'At least six months of expenses is a good target,' Bodge said. 'The hope is that in six months, you'll be able to right the ship after a job loss, illness or unexpected expense.' Woroch also believes that six months should be the goal. To come up with your ideal number, start making a list of all of your necessary living expenses. 'You also want to think about some of those wants that you may not want to live without when dealing with a financial emergency,' she said. 'This could be a gym membership to ensure you can stay healthy and boost your mood during a tough time, or even hair care services to keep up with your appearance for future job interviews. Build in these expenses into your monthly savings goal.' More From GOBankingRates 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on How Much Cash Does Each Generation Have in Their Emergency Funds? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

‘I just hope it resolves quickly': GOP prays for peace in the Trump-Musk war
‘I just hope it resolves quickly': GOP prays for peace in the Trump-Musk war

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘I just hope it resolves quickly': GOP prays for peace in the Trump-Musk war

Republicans are hoping for a détente between Donald Trump and Elon Musk after Thursday's blowup, warning that the fight between the two men could distract from the president's agenda and derail Congress' 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The battle between the president and the world's richest man escalated from a simmer to a full-on scorched-earth showdown over the course of the day on Thursday — starting with light criticism in the morning that escalated to Trump targeting Musk's pocket book and Musk saying the president was an associate of a notorious convicted sex criminal and suggesting he may need to be impeached. 'I just hope it resolves quickly, for the sake of the country,' Speaker Mike Johnson told CNBC's 'Squawk Box' on Friday morning. POLITICO reported Thursday night that White House aides were looking to broker a peace between the two men and were planning on scheduling a call between the two camps. 'Oh, it's OK,' Trump told POLITICO in a brief telephone call Thursday when asked about the very public breakup. 'It's going very well, never done better.' Trump went on to tout his favorability ratings saying, 'The numbers are through the roof, the highest polls I've ever had and I have to go.' A senior administration official and a person close to the White House — both granted anonymity to discuss the president's thinking around the blowup — said the president had been convinced Thursday night that continuing to engage with Musk would be counterproductive and a distraction from a host of good news the White House should be focused on, from his talks with Xi Jinping to negotiating a deal with Iran and ushering his 'big beautiful' reconciliation bill through Congress, which was the root cause of the blowup. But Trump has displayed some lingering frustration with his one-time benefactor. He told ABC News that Musk has "lost his mind" — and he is "not particularly" interested in talking to Musk. He also told CNN that 'the poor guy's got a problem.' Still, Republican legislators Friday are following Johnson's lead, keeping with the theme of deescalation in the fallout of the public fight. 'Both of them have paid a tremendous price personally for this country, and I think at the end of the day, they're both going to put the country first," said Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas). "And them working together is certainly far more better for the country.' Department of Government Efficiency caucus Chair Rep. Aaron Bean (R-Fla.) said Friday he was 'shocked and dismayed' to see his 'two friends fighting,' but remains an 'optimist' that the former allies can work it out. 'I believe there's a Diet Coke in their future, that they can settle it and cooler heads will prevail,' Bean said. 'We need them together. We need to be united, and we're stronger together. So I'm very optimistic that there will be a happy ending very soon.' But even as they seek to not escalate the fight, party faithfuls are still making clear where their allegiances lie. 'I don't tell my friend Elon how to — I don't argue with him about how to build rockets. And I wish he wouldn't argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,' Johnson told CNBC. He later told reporters on Capitol Hill that 'I hope they reconcile. I believe in redemption. … I think it's good for the party and the country if all this worked out. But I tell you what: do not doubt, do not second guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump.' Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) went a step further, saying he thinks 'Elon is getting too personal' in his attacks. 'It's getting out of control,' Nehls said Thursday. 'They got to stop it. I think it's, you know, it's not healthy. And some of the most recent comments, I think, Elon, you've lost your mind.' But Johnson — who was also targeted by Musk Thursday — largely on Friday kept his cool in responding to Musk, brushing off his claim that he landed Republicans their 2024 victory. 'Elon was a big contributor in the last election,' the speaker acknowledged to CNBC, 'but this was a whole team effort. I mean, President Trump is the most consequential political figure of his generation — of modern American history. He is the one responsible for that. But we all worked hard. We delivered the House majority." The speaker said he was with the president in the Oval Office for part of the showdown on X, a meeting reported earlier by POLITICO. Trump seemed 'disappointed' by Musk's attacks, the speaker said, reiterating that he is a 'huge fan and supporter of President Trump' for good measure. He told POLITICO Friday he hasn't spoken with Musk yet. The White House has sought to project an air of calm despite Musk's relentless attacks — but aides there remain wary of the Tesla CEO popping off two people close to the president said several Trump allies — including at least one White House official — tried to reach Musk by phone when he was on his rampage on X, but Musk was not taking calls for a time. The way Musk reacted to the president's comments made White House officials feel like they were dealing with an 'unhinged' situation, the senior administration official said Thursday — and that they had to just ignore what he was doing. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent via press or personal contact information for his companies. 'Everybody is just like, 'OK, this is manic and crazy,'' the official said, 'and we're just gonna move along and pass the bill. And that's kind of the feeling of everyone right now.' Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store