Buying a home 5 times harder now than in 1980
Extensive PropTrack analysis over 45 years shows a typical house in Brisbane, which cost just $32,750 in 1980, is now valued at an astounding 420 per cent more in 2025 when adjusted for inflation.
That's because the $32,750 spent on a home in 1980 equates to about $174,600 today, but the current median house price has skyrocketed to $910,000.
The analysis reveals how much harder it is for the current generation to buy property compared to their parents' era, and has prompted experts to sound the alarm for first home buyers as saving for a deposit becomes more out of reach than ever before.
SEE WHAT HOMES REALLY USED TO COST IN YOUR SUBURB
PropTrack economist Angust Moore said young people were taking longer to enter the market, relying more on family support, or accessing government incentives to buy with a smaller deposit.
'The deposit hurdle is just unequivocally harder than it was four or five decades ago, and that has manifested in home ownership rates which have fallen over those years,' Mr Moore said.
He said lower interest rates now than the 1980s and early 1990s, when they surged to a high of 17 per cent, had helped drive up property prices in that time due to greater competition and demand.
Brisbane's median value surged from $32,750 in December 1980 to $95,000 in December 1990, $152,000 in 2000, $465,000 in 2010, and $910,000 by March 2025.
Brisbane units show a slightly less dramatic trend, rising from $38,750 in 1980 to $636,000 today.
The trend played out differently across suburbs, with blue-chip as well as entry-level areas included among the most striking examples of real price growth.
A typical home in inner-city Hawthorne, priced at $2.125m in 2025, is worth more than ten times its inflation-adjusted 1980 value of $164,500.
In Woodridge, homes cost $24,950 45 years ago – equal to about $133,000 today. But the Logan suburb's current median house price is $650,000.
The long boom on the back of the Covid-19 pandemic has seen prices rise even more sharply than in the 1990s, when rates plummeted and the real estate market flourished.
Newstead locals and engineers Toby Tremain and Georgia Stel, both 25, said they were being pushed out of their preferred suburb by astronomical house prices and currently preferred to rent and live in the city.
'We are both open to owning an apartment, we're not like we must have a house and live in the city,' Mr Tremain said.
'I understand that's not feasible.
'But I think the trade-off is, like living in this area right now for us is really enjoyable.'
Rising prices aren't exclusive to the capital, with regional and coastal centres also recording huge real growth.
On the Gold Coast, houses in Surfers Paradise were already more expensive than Brisbane in 1980 at $74,500. That figure would be equivalent to $397,200 considering rising living costs, yet a typical home in the Glitter Strip now costs $1.35m.
Another Gold Coast example, Ashmore, was closer to Brisbane's median in 1980 at $43,950 — $234,300 in today's dollars. Its current house price is $1.138m.
Further north, a house in Aitkenvale, Townsville had a median of $29,625 in December 1980, or $158,000 adjusted. It's now worth more than three times that amount at $514,000.
Real Estate Institue of Queensland (REIQ) CEO Antonia Mercorella said price growth was driven by a chronic undersupply of housing.
'Scarcity continues to put upward pressure on prices, particularly impacting first-home buyers who now face a vastly different affordability landscape than previous generations,' Ms Mercorella said.
'If we want to enable sustainable price growth and ensure future generations the same opportunity to own a home, housing policy must be squarely focused on supply.
'Any attempt to improve affordability without significantly increasing housing stock is doomed to fall short.'
MORE NEWS
Secret tactics of dodgy agents exposed
Real estate playboy spills on Aussie market
Byron Bay's Beach Hotel sold for $140m
Buyers agent Alex Pope said Baby Boomer and Gen X homeowners were unlocking equity in their properties to help younger family members buy through a guarantor loan.
'First-home buyers are often getting support from mum and dad, and in some ways it's very easy for the older generation who have fared really well from the market to do this,' Mr Pope said.
'As a young person who may have just started in a career, recently moved out of home and paying rent, you're in a really expensive time of life while your income is probably still quite low, so getting the deposit is the hardest part.'
Mr Pope advised young buyers to treat their first home as a stepping stone – 'your first home isn't your last, but it does catapult you to the next'.
By starting in a duplex, unit, or renovator, young buyers could build equity and eventually move into a more ideal property as their careers and incomes grew, he said.
Only a tiny number of suburbs across Greater Brisbane remained at 2000 or even 1990 prices. Russell Island was most frequently highlighted in the data as having current prices comparable to historical values of various other suburbs.
Prices in a handful of other outer suburbs including North Booval, Logan Central, Goodna and South Brisbane units were now on par with some values from 20-plus years ago.
But the overwhelming majority of homes had now well-surpassed those old benchmarks, cementing a major decline in affordability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
13 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Lawyers' picnic' looms over right to work from home
An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state.
News.com.au
14 hours ago
- News.com.au
NZ's house price crash - could it happen here?
House prices and rents have plummeted across the ditch, but experts are warning there will not be a similar correction in the Australian market any time soon. In New Zealand, home values have fallen back to 2019 levels, after prices reached an all-time high during the pandemic. Rents have also declined this year for the first time since 2009 - meaning housing in New Zealand is more affordable whether buying or renting. Mortgage rates and construction have both declined in New Zealand as well, conditions that would usually drive prices up. But net overseas migration into New Zealand also fell - to its lowest point in the past two-and-a-half years - which was helping to stop demand from outpacing supply, according to Macrobusiness chief economist Leith van Onselen. Meanwhile in Australia, the latest PropTrack data showed national home prices reached a record high of $827,000 in July, rising 0.3 per cent last month and 4.9 per cent over the year. Mr van Onselen described the New Zealand slump as a 'beatiful house price crash' and said although the two markets shared similarities, with current policy settings the Australian market would only continue trending upward. 'We're still running a very strong migration program and the government intends to keep that going,' he told 'And more imporantly, the federal government has announced a whole bunch of policies to stimulate house prices.' Those policies included the Labor government's plan to allow all first-home buyers to purchase with a 5 per cent deposit. The program, available from January 2026, will mean the government guarantees up to 15 per cent of the loan value, eliminating the need for lenders mortgage insurance, which can cost more than $20,000. It is an extension of an existing scheme and will cover all Australian first home buyers, with no income caps or limits of the number of places available. Banks will also be allowed to overlook student loans in their debt calculations, after financial regulators updated their regulations at the request of the government. Although this push by the federal government was aimed at improving affordability, it would actually have the opposite effect, Mr van Onselen said. 'All these policies are about boosting demand and pushing up house prices.' During the boom in New Zealand, the Ardern government banned non-resident foreigners from buying homes, a move akin to Australia's ban on foreign buyers. It also scrapped a tax advantage for investors similar to negative gearing in Australia - the ability of landlords to deduct mortgage interest against their rental income. And it extended the threshold for the 'bright-line test,' which is a bit like a capital gains tax when properties other than the family home are sold. Mr van Onselen argued those changes had helped to rein in house prices, although the current Luxon government has since reversed the tax changes. 'Australian immigration is a lot stronger than New Zealand but the big one's really just the policy settings,' he said. 'For the next 12 months I think Australian house prices are going to go up pretty strongly - all the forces are for higher house prices.' But Mr van Onselen did hold out the possibility of a decline in future - if the government reversed some of its policies which, ironically, were aimed at making homes more affordable. 'The government might be forced to do something... Eventually, they're going to have to make some hard decisions to raise revenue, and one way would be to curb some of those concessions. 'That could eventually curb demand a bit, and if it goes far enough we could end up doing a New Zealand.' Australia's 'opposite' conditions Metropole Property Strategists founder Michael Yardney agreed that the correction in New Zealand was due to a number of factors that Australia doesn't share. Mr Yardney, who was the keynote speaker at the New Zealand Property Investors Federation last year, said after a pandemic-driven boom, the Kiwi market had slumped due to excess supply. 'A string of policies led to so-called 'up zoning' in Auckland, leading to the construction of significant new affordable housing. This oversupply of cheap accommodation caused decreased property values and lower rents,' Mr Yardney told Tax policies had also discouraged property investors from buying, and rising unemployment and weak economic conditions had also contributed to declining rents and cooling demand. Australia, on the other hand, had an 'almost opposite dynamic,' including high population growth, generous first-home buyer support and a generally strong economy, he said. 'Given these fundamental differences, it is unlikely Australia will follow New Zealand into a correction phase in the next couple of years. 'Unless something disrupts our supply-constrained market, such as a sharp economic shock, a steep rise in unemployment, or a sudden reversal of migration - none of which are obvious on the horizon - the balance of forces suggests ongoing moderate property price growth for the next few years.'
Courier-Mail
14 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Sydney price gap: chance to buy units for half cost of houses
New data has revealed the price chasm between units and houses in Sydney, flagging units to be the next growth frontier in Sydney's property cycle. PropTrack's latest Home Price Index revealed Sydney houses are almost double the price of apartments in many areas, with the citywide median house price at $1,564,000 and the median unit price at $860,000. There was a similar trend nationally. The median price of a house across the nation is now sitting at $915,000, with units at $678,000. The disparity between prices shows the median unit price in Sydney sitting at just 56 per cent of house prices, creating opportunity for homebuyers and investors, experts claim. MORE: Gone in hours: Sydney's most popular suburbs Metropole National Director Brett Warren said 'we're witnessing a pivotal moment in the Sydney property cycle'. 'Units in premium suburbs are trading up to 70 per cent cheaper than houses and yet they're offering similar lifestyle access and even comparable internal space,' he said. 'That's not just value – it's strategic advantage.' Mr Warren said investors and homebuyers should be paying attention as many units are dramatically undervalued relative to historical norms, particularly in high-amenity areas. 'The key here is long-term capital growth,' he said. According to Mr Warren, as affordability tightens and house prices continue to outpace income growth in Sydney, units in desirable locations are primed for a rebound. MORE: 'Bittersweet' sale helps next generation This comes as opportunity for units is being fuelled by strong lifestyle demand for newer development offerings. A Metropole release pointed to building data from the City of Sydney suggesting there is also recovery from a post-pandemic dip in apartment completions with large-scale precincts such as in Green Square, Redfern and the CBD once again showing signs of development momentum. 'A lower entry price, smaller deposit and manageable mortgage gives younger buyers a sustainable way to step onto the property ladder in our most expensive capital city,' he said. 'It can be a strategic platform for growth.' According to Mr Warren, homebuyers should also consider townhouses and three-bedroom apartments in price-gap suburbs that offer space, functionality and long-term value without the premium of detached dwellings. 'The savvy move right now is to find the product that's flying under the radar but poised to benefit as the market recalibrates,' he said. 'With the current price dynamics opening a narrow window of opportunity, those with a strategic lens – and a willingness to look beyond traditional housing narratives – could reap the rewards for years to come.' MORE: Home prices soar again: biggest winners revealed
