
These are the world's best cities for 2025, according to Oxford economists — see how New York fared
We're the best around, and nothing's ever going to keep us down.
New York City has been named the best city in the world for 2025 by Oxford Economics' Global Cities Index.
This marks the second consecutive year that the Big Apple has topped the annual list, which features more than 50 major metropolises across the globe.
Naturally, ranking the 'best' city on Earth might sound a bit loaded, but Oxford Economics tried to keep things objective by evaluating 1,000 of the most populous urban jungles on a variety of metrics encompassing five broad categories: economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance.
The metropolises were then given scores out of 100 based on their overall performance.
4 The Big Apple snagged the first spot with a perfect 100 score overall and in the economics sector.
Tierney – stock.adobe.com
With that method, Oxford Economics could glean 'a nuanced understanding of each city's strengths and weaknesses,' per the site.
This year, eight of the top 10 cities maintained their spots, which Oxford Economics experts felt demonstrated these hubs' remarkable resilience against current 'trade tensions' and other threats to 'economic growth worldwide.'
4 London ranked second, due in part to its high GDP.
Iryna – stock.adobe.com
The Big Apple snagged the 1st spot with a perfect 100 score overall and in the economics sector. Experts attributed this to the city's large gross domestic product (GDP), enviable income per person, and its abundance of corporate headquarters.
NYC didn't perform so well in the governance and environmental sectors — ranking 168th and 161st, respectively — with experts flagging its low economic diversity and high housing expenditures.
Coincidentally, the Big Apple boasts the most billionaires on Earth with a staggering 123 10-figure-plus hotshots worth a collective $759 billion.
4 The Big Apple boasts the most billionaires on Earth, with a whopping 123.
Luciano Mortula-LGM – stock.adobe.com
London, meanwhile, retained its second-place slot in this metropolitan Olympiad with an overall score of 98.5.
The UK powerhouse excelled in the human capital category, notching a perfect 100, which experts felt was due to the city's 'world-leading universities, diverse labor force, and large pool of international headquarters.'
Also enviable was their economic performance — a credit to the city's high GDP.
4 Paris scored high when it came to quality of life due to its 'plethora of world-renowned cultural sites and high life expectancy,' per the Index.
zigres – stock.adobe.com
Rounding out the top five were Paris, France; San Jose, California; and Seattle, Washington, with Oxford gurus noting that all three meccas have top economics scores.
Paris excelled in this regard 'due to the sheer size of its economy,' while 'tech hubs' San Jose and Seattle boasted 'high levels of GDP per person,' per the index.
They were also generally happier, according to the survey.
'While these three cities score slightly lower than New York and London on the human capital front, they outperform the top two cities in terms of quality of life,' the authors wrote.
San Jose and Seattle landed 91.5 and 88.1, respectively, in that area, compared to NYC's 83.8, while Paris nabbed a 93.2 quality-of-life rating.
'Paris benefits from its plethora of world-renowned cultural sites and high life expectancy, while residents of San Jose and Seattle have among the highest average incomes in the world.'
Further, the U.S. had eight cities in the top 20, with Los Angeles, California; Washington, D.C.; and Dallas, Texas, placing 11, 12 and 19, respectively.
Here are the top 10 cities:
New York, US (100) London, UK (98.5) Paris, France (94.4) San Jose, California, US (94.2) Seattle, US (91.8) Melbourne, Australia (90.7) Sydney, Australia (90.6) Boston, US (90.3) Tokyo, Japan (90.3) San Francisco, US (90.3).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The labor market is worse than than it appears: Chart of the Week
A string of jobs reports has told a similar story for months now, if you look at the headline numbers. It's a simple narrative: The labor market has cooled significantly over the past several years, but remains overall resilient from a broader slowdown. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Next week, the May jobs report is expected to bring more of the same headlines, as it's anticipated to show the US labor market added 130,000 jobs with the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.2%. More resiliency. But the story of job hunting in America has been far more bifurcated, masked by these broad figures. Behind the solid headline numbers is a hiring rate hovering near a decade low. So too is the rate at which Americans are quitting their jobs. As Fed Chair Jerome Powell put it on Jan 29, "It's a low hiring environment. So if you have a job, it's all good. But if you have to find a job, [the] hiring rates have come down." It's yet another tale of two economies, and one that's hammering a specific group: recent college grads. With the labor market stuck in neutral, the millions of students who walked off the campus quad for the final time this month are facing a challenging situation. The three-month moving average of the unemployment rate for recent graduates aged 22 to 27 currently sits at roughly 5.3%, well above the national average of 4.2%, per Oxford Economics. As our Chart of the Week shows, this is a historic anomaly. "It's a first sign of hitting a point where the labor market is at kind of a breaking point," Indeed economist Cory Stahle told Yahoo Finance. "Things overall are still solid, but the fact that we're seeing pockets like these younger workers starting to get hit harder is clearly very concerning." The story of these workers, why they aren't finding jobs, and whether or not they eventually will is at the crux of the current US labor market conundrum. "Right now, we're on a trend where we're facing a lot of headwinds," Stahle said. "The labor market is strong, but my prediction right now is some of these headwinds are going to start catching up to us." Big Tech's "efficiency" push has been a key driver of the recent graduate job-hunting slump. Recent research from Apollo Global Management's chief economist Torsten Sløk shows that employment in the Magnificent Seven tech cohort had increased at 13% or higher from 2011 to 2021. In the past three years, employment gains for the group were only around 3% in any given year. And these are the big, wealthy companies that are still growing and driving S&P 500 earnings. (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo Global Management.) This means fewer tech job openings for a generation of college students who have been increasingly majoring in areas like computer science. Job postings on Indeed's platform for software development jobs are down about 40% from February 2020, per Stahle. A far cry from the "learn to code" era. Add in that the broader labor market had already been cooling, many expect President Trump's tariffs to weigh on economic growth, and artificial intelligence is beginning to fill entry-level positions, and Oxford Economics US senior economist Matthew Martin described a "perfect storm" that's keeping college grads on the labor market sidelines. "There's just such a smaller pool of jobs to actually compete for, which means a lot of these recent grads are unfortunately staying unemployed as soon as they enter the labor force," Martin told Yahoo Finance. Martin added that the data isn't large enough to ominously change his economic forecast. But it is one of the dynamics under the surface that has economists predicting the likely path for the unemployment rate from here isn't lower. Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Calamos Announces Upside Cap Rates for CPSU and CPNJ: Structured Protection ETFs Providing Exposure to the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 with 100% Downside Protection Over One-Year
The Calamos S&P 500® Structured Alt Protection ETF® – June (CPSU) has announced an upside cap rate of 7.33% over its one-year outcome period following its launch on June 2, 2025. The Calamos Nasdaq-100® Structured Alt Protection ETF® — June (CPNJ) completed its first annual outcome period on May 30, 2025, and will reset on June 2, 2025, with a new cap rate of 7.65% over a one-year outcome period. The Calamos Structured Protection ETF® suite combines Calamos' decades-long alternatives, risk management and options investing expertise with the liquid, cost-effective and tax-efficient ETF structure. METRO CHICAGO, Ill., May 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Calamos Investments LLC ("Calamos"), a leading alternatives manager, today announced the upside cap rate for the launch of the Calamos S&P 500® Structured Alt Protection ETF® – June (CPSU) and the reset of the Calamos Nasdaq-100® Structured Alt Protection ETF® — June (CPNJ). Each provides 100% downside-protected exposure to their respective indexes with attractive upside cap ranges over a one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses. Calamos S&P 500® Structured Alt Protection ETF® – June (CPSU) Cap Rate 7.33 % Outcome Period 1 Year: 6/2/25 – 5/29/26 Reference Asset Price return of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (SPY), based on the S&P 500® Index Structured Protection 100% downside protection if held through the one-year outcome period Annual Expense Ratio 0.69 % Portfolio Management Co-CIO Eli Pars and the Alternatives Team Benchmarks S&P 500® Index, Price Return MerQube Capital Protected US Large Cap Index – June Tax Application Gains in an ETF grow tax-deferred and will be taxed at long-term capital gain rates if held longer than one year Additionally, with the launch of CPSU, the Calamos Laddered S&P 500® Structured Alt Protection ETF® (CPSL) is now complete, offering S&P 500 equity market exposure while mitigating downside risk through a laddered portfolio of 12 underlying Calamos S&P 500® Structured Alt Protection ETFs®. Calamos Nasdaq-100® Structured Alt Protection ETF® — June (CPNJ) Cap Rate 7.65 % Outcome Period 1 Year: 6/2/25 – 5/29/26 Reference Asset Price return of Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, based on the Nasdaq-100® Index Structured Protection 100% downside protection if held through the one-year outcome period Annual Expense Ratio 0.69 % Portfolio Management Co-CIO Eli Pars and the Alternatives Team Benchmarks Nasdaq-100® Index, Price Return MerQube Capital Protected US Large Cap Tech Index – June Tax Application Gains in an ETF grow tax-deferred and will be taxed at long-term capital gain rates if held longer than one year Structured Protection ETFs® reset annually, offering investors a new upside cap with refreshed protection against negative returns of the benchmark over the subsequent 12-month period. If shares are held longer than one year, they can deliver significant tax alpha as potential gains will grow tax-deferred at long-term capital gains rates and can be held indefinitely. About Calamos Calamos Investments is a diversified global investment firm offering innovative investment strategies, including alternatives, multi-asset, convertible, fixed income, private credit, equity, and sustainable equity. With more than $40 billion in AUM, including more than $18 billion in liquid alternatives assets as of April 30, 2025, the firm offers strategies through ETFs, mutual funds, closed-end funds, interval funds, UCITS funds and separately managed portfolios. Clients include financial advisors, wealth management platforms, pension funds, foundations & endowments, and individuals, globally. Headquartered in the Chicago metropolitan area, the firm also has offices in New York, San Francisco, Milwaukee, Portland (Oregon), and the Miami area. For more information, visit us on LinkedIn, on Twitter (Calamos), on Instagram (@calamos_investments), or at The information in each fund's prospectus and statement of additional information) is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell the securities of any fund until such fund's registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. Each fund's prospectus and statement of additional information is not an offer to sell such fund's securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy such fund's securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. Before investing, carefully consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses. Please see the prospectus and summary prospectus containing this and other information which can be obtained by calling 1-866-363-9219. Read it carefully before investing. Calamos Investments LLC, referred to herein Calamos is a financial services company offering such services through its subsidiaries: Calamos Advisors LLC, Calamos Wealth Management LLC, Calamos Investments LLP, and Calamos Financial Services LLC. An investment in the Fund(s) is subject to risks, and you could lose money on your investment in the Fund(s). There can be no assurance that the Fund(s) will achieve its investment objective. Your investment in the Fund(s) is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. The risks associated with an investment in the Fund(s) can increase during times of significant market volatility. The Fund(s) also has specific principal risks, which are described below. More detailed information regarding these risks can be found in the Fund's prospectus. Investing involves risks. Loss of principal is possible. The Fund(s) face numerous market trading risks, including authorized participation concentration risk, cap change risk, capital protection risk, capped upside risk, cash holdings risk, clearing member default risk, correlation risk, derivatives risk, equity securities risk, investment timing risk, large-capitalization investing risk, liquidity risk, market maker risk, market risk, non-diversification risk, options risk, premium-discount risk, secondary market trading risk, sector risk, tax risk, trading issues risk, underlying ETF risk and valuation risk. For a detailed list of fund risks see the prospectus. There are no assurances the Fund(s) will be successful in providing the sought-after protection. The outcomes that the Fund(s) seeks to provide may only be realized if you are holding shares on the first day of the outcome period and continue to hold them on the last day of the outcome period, approximately one year. There is no guarantee that the outcomes for an outcome period will be realized or that the Fund(s) will achieve its investment objective. If the outcome period has begun and the underlying ETF has increased in value, any appreciation of the Fund(s) by virtue of increases in the underlying ETF since the commencement of the outcome period will not be protected by the sought-after protection, and an investor could experience losses until the underlying ETF returns to the original price at the commencement of the outcome period. Fund shareholders are subject to an upside return cap (the "Cap") that represents the maximum percentage return an investor can achieve from an investment in the fund(s) for the outcome period, before fees and expenses. If the outcome period has begun and the Fund(s) have increased in value to a level near to the Cap, an investor purchasing at that price has little or no ability to achieve gains but remains vulnerable to downside risks. Additionally, the Cap may rise or fall from one outcome period to the next. The Cap, and the Fund(s) position relative to it, should be considered before investing in the Fund(s). The Fund(s) website, provides important Fund information as well information relating to the potential outcomes of an investment in the Fund(s) on a daily basis. The Fund(s) are designed to provide point-to-point exposure to the price return of the reference asset via a basket of Flex Options. As a result, the ETFs are not expected to move directly in line with the reference asset during the interim period. Investors purchasing shares after an outcome period has begun may experience very different results than fund's investment objective. Initial outcome periods are approximately 1-year beginning on the fund's inception date. Following the initial outcome period, each subsequent outcome period will begin on the first day of the month the fund was incepted. After the conclusion of an outcome period, another will begin. FLEX Options Risk — The Fund(s) will utilize FLEX Options issued and guaranteed for settlement by the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC). In the unlikely event that the OCC becomes insolvent or is otherwise unable to meet its settlement obligations, the Fund(s) could suffer significant losses. Additionally, FLEX Options may be less liquid than standard options. In a less liquid market for the FLEX Options, the Fund(s) may have difficulty closing out certain FLEX Options positions at desired times and prices. The values of FLEX Options do not increase or decrease at the same rate as the reference asset and may vary due to factors other than the price of reference asset. Shares are bought and sold at market price, not net asset value (NAV), and are not individually redeemable from the fund. NAV represents the value of each share's portion of the fund's underlying assets and cash at the end of the trading day. Market price returns reflect the midpoint of the bid/ask spread as of the close of trading on the exchange where fund shares are listed. 100% capital protection is over a one-year period before fees and expenses. All caps are pre-determined. Cap Rate — Maximum percentage return an investor can achieve from an investment in the Fund if held over the Outcome Period. Cap Range — Cap ranges are based on the last 15 trading days prior to range announcement, based on market conditions during the sample period, and are subject to change. The actual cap rate may be different based on market events. Protection Level — Amount of protection the Fund is designed to achieve over the Days Remaining. Outcome Period — Number of days in the Outcome Period. The "S&P 500®" is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or its affiliates ("SPDJI"), and has been licensed for use by Calamos Advisors LLC ("Calamos Advisors"). S&P®, S&P 500®, US 500, The 500, iBoxx®, iTraxx® and CDX® are trademarks of S&P Global, Inc. or its affiliates ("S&P"); Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC ("Dow Jones"); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by SPDJI and sublicensed for certain purposes by Calamos Advisors LLC ("Calamos Advisors"). It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Calamos S&P 500® Structured Protection ETFs are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, any of their respective affiliates (collectively, "S&P Dow Jones Indices"). S&P Dow Jones Indices makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, to the owners of the Calamos S&P 500® Structured Protection ETFs or any member of the public regarding the advisability of investing in securities generally or in Calamos S&P 500® Structured Protection ETFs particularly or the ability of the "S&P 500®" to track general market performance. Past performance of an index is not an indication or guarantee of future results. S&P Dow Jones Indices' only relationship to Calamos Advisors LLC ("Calamos Advisors") with respect to the "S&P 500®" is the licensing of the Index and certain trademarks, service marks and/or trade names of S&P Dow Jones Indices and/or its licensors. The "S&P 500®" is determined, composed and calculated by S&P Dow Jones Indices without regard to Calamos Advisors LLC ("Calamos Advisors") or the Calamos S&P 500® Structured Protection ETFs. S&P Dow Jones Indices has no obligation to take the needs of Calamos Advisors LLC ("Calamos Advisors") or the owners of Calamos S&P 500® Structured Protection ETFs into consideration in determining, composing or calculating the "S&P 500®". S&P Dow Jones Indices has no obligation or liability in connection with the administration, marketing or trading of Calamos S&P 500® Structured Protection ETFs. There is no assurance that investment products based on the "S&P 500®" will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC is not an investment adviser, commodity trading advisory, commodity pool operator, broker dealer, fiduciary, promoter" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended), "expert" as enumerated within 15 U.S.C. § 77k(a) or tax advisor. Calamos Financial Services LLC, Distributor © 2025 Calamos Investments LLC. All Rights Reserved. Calamos® and Calamos Investments® are registered trademarks of Calamos Investments LLC. View original content: SOURCE Calamos Investments
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
College grads hit a wall: Tech jobs dry up amid AI boom
Recent graduates are having a harder time landing jobs, with their unemployment rate now above the national average. Yahoo Finance Markets Reporter Josh Schafer joins Market Domination Overtime to explain how a slowdown in tech hiring and rising use of artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping the entry-level job market. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Recent college grads are finding it increasingly difficult to find jobs, and the gap between them and the national average is growing. Joining us now for more is Yahoo Finance market reporter, Josh Schafer. Hey Josh, yes, so we talk a lot about the unemployment rate in America being relatively low. So the unemployment rate that we're looking at on our screen here is in green. It is 4.2%. If you look over time, that is a historically low unemployment rate. But when we zoom into this chart that we're looking at here, we're seeing an interesting trend on who is having a hard time finding a job. So in our white line, we have recent college graduates. Recent college graduates constitute, uh, individuals that are 22 to 27 that just got a degree. Notice the white line typically goes underneath that green line on your screen. So typically it's moving lower. Normally those folks are having an easier time finding a job. But when you zoom in to what's happening right now, you'll see that college graduates are actually having a harder time finding a job than the national average. Two key things to point out with this data. So the folks over at Oxford Economics told me one of the big things we're seeing is AI is definitely playing a little bit of a role here. So AI could be taking in entry-level analyst jobs, entry-level jobs in tech. There's less jobs for these newcomers coming into the job market. Another key piece of this chart in 2022 is when we saw this shift. A lot of college graduates have been going to get a science degrees over the last couple years, right? They've been going into tech. Well, now what's happened since 2022, we've had that year of efficiency from meta and really across tech. There's less jobs in tech now than there used to be. The folks over at indeed told me they've seen a 40% drop in job postings for computer software jobs compared to 2020. So again, there's simply less jobs for people coming into tech right now. So graduates are graduating, they're looking for jobs, they're looking for jobs and they're continuing to not find them as quickly as they used to. So Josh, part of this, it sounds like is, is the jobs that they're targeting, you're saying? Yes, definitely. It's definitely something that we're seeing specifically in tech, and then when you look at how many college graduates are getting a degree in something like information technology, something like computer science. We had sort of skewed because of this big tech boom over the last 20 years, everyone wants to go get into tech, right? Go learn to code now. Well, that's been a shift because some of those jobs are simply being taken, like I said, by AI, or are now being not offered anymore because these companies are trying to slim down. So it's specifically right now seems to be perhaps a tech sector focus. But economists did tell me that this is one reason that the overall unemployment rate is not expected to be falling anytime soon. All right, thank you, Josh. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data