Afghan goods: FBR slaps 10pc processing fee
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed 10 percent processing fee on wide range of Afghan transit commercial goods, including agricultural equipment, ships' derricks; cranes, steam vapour generating boilers, industrial/laboratory furnaces and ovens, automatic data processing machines and dozens of other goods imported into Afghanistan in transit via Pakistan.
The FBR has expanded the list of items subjected to 10 percent processing fee on Afghan transit commercial items.
The FBR has issued an SRO.816(I)/2025 on Saturday to amend SRO.1380(I)/2023 for imposition of the said processing fee on five major categories of Afghan transit commercial goods.
FBR rolls out new protocols for Afghan cargos
Earlier, 10 percent fee was applicable on five major categories of Afghan transit commercial goods covering confectionaries/chocolates, footwear, machinery (mechanical/electrical), blankets/home textiles and garments imported into Afghanistan in transit via Pakistan.
The FBR had received proposals of the Ministry of Commerce that as Customs duty in Afghanistan is extremely low as compared to Pakistan, and this facility is being misused with the connivance of businessmen from both sides.
It suggested that the FBR should to take the following measures to curb the misuse of Afghan Transit Trade: (i) the requirement of Revolving Insurance Guarantee for all Afghan Transit goods has to be substituted by the FBR with bank guarantee at 100% of the assessed value; and (ii) processing fee at 10% ad valorem shall be imposed on the Afghan Transit goods showing unjustified increase in forward transit cargo Afghanistan's Customs duties on these goods are negligible.
According to the notification issued on Saturday, the federal government has imposed processing fee at the rate of 10% ad valorem on the following Afghan transit Commercial goods imported into Afghanistan in transit via Pakistan: Pulley tackle and hoists other than skip hoists; winches and capstans; jacks; ships' derricks; cranes, including cable cranes; mobile lifting frames, straddle carriers and works trucks fitted with a crane; Fork-lift trucks; other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment; other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery (for example, lifts, escalators, conveyors, teleferics); 0ther moving, grading, levelling, scraping, excavating, tamping, compacting, extracting or boring machinery, for earth, minerals or ores; pile- drivers and pile- extractors; snow-ploughs and snow-blowers; agricultural, horticultural or forestry machinery for soil preparation or cultivation; lawn or sports- ground rollers; harvesting or threshing machinery, including straw or fodder balers; grass or hay mowers; machines for cleaning, sorting or grading eggs, fruit or other agricultural produce, other than machinery of heading 84.37; milking machines and dairy machinery; other agricultural, horticultural, forestry, poultry- keeping or bee-keeping machinery, including germination plant fitted with mechanical or thermal equipment; poultry incubators and brooders; machines for cleaning, sorting or grading seed, grain or dried leguminous vegetables; machinery used in the milling industry or for the working of cereals or dried leguminous vegetables, other than farm- type machinery; machines for extruding, drawing, texturing or cutting man-made textile materials; automatic data processing machines and units thereof; magnetic or optical readers, machines for transcribing data onto data media in coded form and machines for processing such data, not elsewhere specified or included; transmission apparatus for radio- broadcasting or television, whether or not incorporating reception apparatus or sound recording or reproducing apparatus; television cameras, digital cameras and video camera recorders; electrical apparatus for switching or protecting electrical circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical circuits (for example, switches, fuses, lightning arresters, voltage limiters, surge suppressors, plugs and other connectors, junction boxes), for a voltage exceeding 1,000 volts; electrical parts of machinery or apparatus, not specified or included elsewhere and electrical and electronic waste and scrap.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan debt stock reaches all-time high of Rs75trn
KARACHI: The federal government's total debt stock surged by over Rs 6 trillion during the first ten months of this fiscal year (FY25) due to massive borrowing to finance the budget deficit. According to a statistic released by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Wednesday, the central government's total debt, comprising domestic and external liabilities, rose by 9 percent during July-April of FY25. Overall, the stock reached an all-time high level of Rs 74.936 trillion by the end of April 2025 compared to Rs 68.914 trillion as of June 2024, depicting an increase of Rs 6.022 trillion. The major growth in debt stocks was attributed to domestic borrowings, which rose by 11.37 percent or Rs 5.363 trillion to reach Rs 52.523 trillion in April 2025 up from Rs 47.16 trillion in June 2024. The domestic debt comprised long-term loans worth Rs 44.132 trillion and short-term borrowings amounting to Rs 8.328 trillion. Pakistan govt's debt stock soars to Rs73.6trn by March-end External debt, in rupee terms, saw an increase of Rs 659 billion during the first ten months of FY25, reaching Rs 22.413 trillion by the end of April 2025 compared to Rs 21.754 trillion in June 2024. The SBP reported that the Weighted Average Customer Exchange Rate of the US dollar was Rs 278.3668 in June 2024 and Rs 280.9739 in April 2025. The federal government's debt showed a notable increase of Rs 1.248 trillion in April 2025 due to massive borrowing to finance the budget deficit. On a month-on-month (MoM) basis, the federal government's debt stock rose by 2 percent from Rs 73.688 trillion in March 2025 to Rs 74.936 trillion in April 2025. Analysts noted that the tax collection by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is 26 percent higher during the first eleven (July-May) months of this fiscal year compared to previous year; however, cumulatively FBR has failed to achieve the target. The shortfall in revenue collection has compelled the federal government to borrow from domestic and external resources. FBR had missed its revenue collection target by some one trillion rupees in the first eleven months of this fiscal year due to lower imports and slowing economic growth. The FBR has collected some Rs10.233 trillion between July-May of FY25 as against the budgetary target of Rs11.241 trillion for the same period. The SBP has already emphasised the need for a sharp acceleration in tax revenue growth to meet the annual targets. Achieving the primary balance target remains a significant challenge for the government. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Cashless economy at crossroads
Listen to article As Pakistan's informal economy swells to $140 billion, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif faces a choice between incentivising people by offering lower taxes to encourage digital payments or imposing higher costs on cash transactions for government payments and utility bills. An expert committee on the cashless economy, made up of public and private sector representatives, recently submitted recommendations to the PM. Their approach centres around a "carrot and stick" policy. If the PM chooses incentives, he will have to lower sales tax and petroleum levies. But if he opts for penalties, people will pay more when making payments to the government or buying fuel and other utilities. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is set to announce the new budget on June 10. It will be clarified whether the government will focus on incentivising digital payments or punishing cash use. Previous punishment policies targeting non-filers with higher taxes have failed to deliver results. "It is up to the government whether to incentivise digital payments or punish cash users," said a committee member in background talks. The committee offered four key recommendations, presenting both options to the government. The first calls for mandating acceptance of digital payments by empowering district authorities to enforce the use of the RAAST QR code — an instant payment method — at all retail outlets. Local authorities should ensure the presence of RAAST QR codes and penalise merchants for inactivity. The committee expects that within a year, one million active RAAST QR codes could be operational if enforced effectively. "The solution lies with QR codes, not credit cards," said a committee member. "There are only 2 million credit cards and 50,000 card readers, but Pakistan has five million retail outlets." Merchants charge 1.5% fees on credit card payments, but only 1% on RAAST payments, the member added. The committee estimated that the informal economy makes up 35% of the economy, translating to $140 billion today. The government must choose to incentivise or punish, but past experience shows punishments don't work. One major recommendation is to reduce the sales tax on digital payments from 18% to 5%, along with a three-year tax audit break for digital transactions. The committee also proposed eliminating customs duties on digital payment-related equipment. They believe these incentives could double digital transactions within six months. When the committee approached the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) about tax cuts, the FBR said the International Monetary Fund (IMF) would oppose it. However, the IMF told the committee it had no objection and threw the ball back in FBR's court. On the punishment side, the committee suggested making cash payments more expensive. They recommended imposing a surcharge on over-the-counter government payments, capping cash-on-delivery payments, and removing sales tax incentives on cash-on-delivery. One punitive proposal is to increase petrol prices by 1% or Rs3 per litre for cash payments. With 12,000 petrol stations nationwide and 70% of customers on motorcycles, this could be a significant deterrent. The committee believes the punishment policy could cut cash circulation by 2% of GDP, about Rs2.6 trillion. It also suggested that all government paymentssuch as those to Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) beneficiaries or contractorsshould be made digitally. This would require mandatory installation of RAAST QR codes at all government payment points within six months and creating digital wallets for every government disbursement, starting with BISP. If successful, this could add 20 million new bank accounts within 18 months, the committee said. The government introduced the non-filer category in 2013 to broaden the tax base. However, over 12 years, it has become a tool to extract higher taxes rather than expand the base. Utility bills are also being used to collect taxes, hurting sectors like telecommunications. The telecom industry demands exemption from withholding tax deductions, similar to the banking sector. Telecom companies face deductions on thousands of transactions, such as electricity bills for cell towers. This raises compliance costs and administrative burdens. Verifying tax claims on these bills is also difficult for authorities, adding to the operational load. The industry argues withholding tax on telecom services should not be treated as a minimum tax, which applies even during loss-making years. Current harsh recovery measures disrupt business and undermine taxpayer confidence. CMOs pay advance or withholding tax on hundreds of thousands of transactions, including electricity bills and imports. Maintaining documents and handling audits demand significant effort and cause verification issues. They want the 4% withholding tax on telecom services to be adjustable rather than a minimum tax. The shift from adjustable income tax to minimum tax has effectively turned income tax from direct to indirect, the industry said. The sector also demands removal of the 10% advance income tax on auctions or renewals of telecom licenses. This advance tax raises business costs and capital expenses, hindering 4G/5G expansion and rural coverage. Further, the telecom sector wants the 75% advance tax on non-filers abolished, along with measures like SIM blocking, which have not produced meaningful results. Operators would need costly and time-consuming billing system upgrades to manage two tax rates. Since telecom services are essential, SIM blocking could deprive people of basic access. In April 2024, mobile operators were ordered to block SIM cards of over 500,000 non-filers. The Finance Act 2024 increased the advance income tax rate for non-filers to 75%. Additionally, non-compliance carries penalties of Rs50 million for the first offence and Rs100 million for subsequent violations. These punishments have failed, with the FBR shifting responsibility onto others. The withholding tax under Section 236 rose from 10% to 15% in the 2021 supplementary Finance Act. It applies only to tax filers, yet most telecom consumers are non-filers. The industry wants this rate reduced to 12.5% in the next budget.
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Textile bodies demand continuation of original EFS
KARACHI: The Value-Added Textile Associations Forum, representing various apparel and textile bodies, jointly held a press conference on Wednesday, demanding the continuation of the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) in its original form as introduced in 2021, without any amendments made in the Federal Budget 2024-2025. The presser held at PHMA House with leaders of different textile associations strongly opposing the imposition of Sales Tax at the import stage under the scheme, warning it would undermine the purpose of facilitating exporters. The forum called on the Government of Pakistan to continue the scheme under section 880(1)(b) of SRO 957(I)/2021, which allows local input goods liable to sales tax to be supplied against zero-rated invoices. This provision, they said, ensures liquidity, competitiveness, and formalization across the export-oriented industry value chain. 'EFS is inevitable and a lifeline for enhancing national exports,' the associations declared in a unified voice. They urged the reinstatement of local procurement under the scheme to support the entire textile value chain, enabling a level playing field and a win-win for all stakeholders. Export Facilitation Scheme be retained in FY26 budget They explained that the scheme was launched in 2021 after wide consultation with stakeholders to simplify and streamline export procedures. EFS merged all previous schemes into one, reduced documentation requirements, and introduced a single-window digital system through WeBOC and Pakistan Single Window (PSW). The fully automated system includes real-time audits and helps regulate compliance costs. According to the forum, since its inception, the EFS has played a crucial role in easing liquidity pressures and supporting exporters' competitiveness. The press conference was addressed by leaders including Jawed Bilwani (Chief Coordinator, Value-Added Apparel & Textile Associations Forum), Muhammad Babar Khan (Central Chairman, Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers & Exporters Association), Ijaz Khokhar (Former Chairman, Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers & Exporters Association), Rafiq Godil (Former Chairman, Pakistan Knitwear & Sweater Exporters Association), Farooq Rahman Dittu (Pakistan Cotton Fashion Apparel Exporters Association), Ather Bari (Chairman, Towel Manufacturers Association), Irfan Merchant (Chairman, Denim Manufacturers & Exporters Association), Khurram Mukhtar (Former Chairman, Pakistan Textile Exporters Association), Hamid Arshad Zahur (Chairman, Pakistan Tanners Association), and other representatives from major exporting cities including Karachi, Lahore, Faisalabad, and Sialkot. Jawed Bilwani stressed that EFS has been critical in supporting not only textiles but other export sectors as well. He pointed out that all associations, including APTMA, initially welcomed EFS. In an Inter-Ministerial Committee chaired by Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal, APTMA representatives agreed that the scheme should continue in its original form. However, APTMA later parted ways and demanded the imposition of Sales Tax at the import stage under EFS—a move that Value-Added Associations rejected strongly. He warned that imposing Sales Tax at the import stage would defeat the very objective of EFS, causing severe liquidity issues and harming exporters' competitiveness. Bilwani also revealed that APTMA, in the same committee meeting, admitted their yarn quality—produced from contaminated local cotton—is not on par with imported yarn. He stated that even the top 100 textile exporters, including composite units under APTMA, support the continuation of EFS in its original form with local procurement allowed on zero-rated invoices. He added that the upcoming federal budget should also include the reinstatement of Regionally Competitive Energy Tariffs and Final Tax Regime (FTR) to ensure financial viability and export growth. Speaking at the press conference, PHMA Central Chairman Muhammad Babar Khan rejected APTMA's 'misleading' demand to impose Sales Tax at the import stage under EFS. He said that spinning is only a sub-sector of the textile industry, while the value-added sector remains committed to supporting the entire value chain. He urged the Government to create policies that benefit all textile sub-sectors equally, from garments to spinning and ginning. Babar Khan highlighted that rising manufacturing costs have hurt all textile sectors. The apparel and garment sector contributes the highest value addition, up to 70 percent, and needs EFS to remain unchanged to stay competitive. He questioned why APTMA, after supporting EFS from 2021 to February 2025, has suddenly changed its stance. He urged APTMA to drop their unjustified demand for Sales Tax at import-stage and return to supporting the reinstatement of local procurement in the scheme. Babar Khan recalled the key strengths of EFS: a strategic and fully automated system built with input from all textile associations to reduce compliance burdens and simplify export operations. The scheme offers end-to-end traceability and operates in a fully digital environment through WeBOC and PSW. The association leaders agreed that countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam also rely heavily on imported raw materials to manufacture export garments. Their governments offer facilitation schemes similar to EFS, making it crucial for Pakistan to maintain parity. They stated that collecting Sales Tax from exports only to refund it later serves no real purpose and often leads to long refund delays, further straining exporters' liquidity. They emphasized that EFS should remain unchanged and that the FBR should focus on expanding the tax base instead of burdening existing exporters. Exporters' Sales Tax refunds have already been delayed for months, and adding more taxes will only increase their hardships. The associations repeated their firm demand to continue EFS in its original form as of 2021—before the 2024-2025 Federal Budget—with local procurement allowed under section 880(1)(b) of SRO 957(I)/2021, which permits local input goods subject to Sales Tax to be supplied against zero-rated invoices. This, they said, is necessary to ensure liquidity, competitiveness, and formalization of the export value chain. The continuation of EFS in its original form has also been recommended by the Inter-Ministerial Committee chaired by the Federal Planning Minister, under the Prime Minister's direction. Other PHMA representatives present at the event included Former Chairmen Chaudhry Salamat Ali, Farrukh Iqbal, Kashif Zia, Sr. Vice Chairman Hazir Khan (Faisalabad), Former Chairman Shahzad Azam Khan and Zonal Chairman Abdul Hameed (Lahore), Tariq Bhatti and Khawaja Musharraf (Sialkot), PRGMEA Northern Zone Representatives Sohail Afzal and Ayazuddin, and numerous top exporters from Karachi, Lahore, Faisalabad, and Sialkot. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
