
Emergency funds: How much is enough in 2025?
It might sound like a luxury, but it's one of the best tools for surviving in a world where price rises are outpacing wage growth and jobs are less secure.
Even in 2025, with easy access to credit such as buy-now-pay-later and support from Work and Income and the community, having your own emergency fund still makes financial sense.
All sorts of curveballs can derail us. Think: accident, ill health, business failure, and relationship breakdown, to name a few.
The magic number of how much to save in an emergency fund is three to six months of living expenses. That might seem like a pipe dream for some. However, people who focus on the goal find a way to get there.
There's a common myth: 'I can't afford to save'.
In truth, it's the opposite; we can't afford not to.
Get started with a few powerful personal finance tricks.
The first is to track spending to free up money for savings. Set up small, achievable goals, such as the first $40 by the end of this month.
Automate savings at the beginning of the month. Where possible, look for additional income such as a small side hustle.
Get quick wins on the board. If you replace eggs on toast or leftovers instead of, say, $25 on takeaways, chuck the $15-plus into your emergency fund. Deleting UberEats can free up considerable cash.
Any amount, even $5 or $10 a week, is worth adding to the fund.
Start by saving just enough to cover one week of expenses. That alone gives you breathing room to pay a single unexpected bill or to help out whānau in a true emergency.
But remember, the fund is for emergencies, not for everyday spending. So keep the money in a separate savings account that isn't linked to your Eftpos or debit card.
If you're serious about building an emergency fund, beware of mistaking everyday spending for emergencies. That's confusing needs and wants.
An emergency fund is not another Eftpos account to dip into. Nor is it for planned expenses such as holidays.
It's meant to be a financial buffer.
This is the time to scrutinise every dollar and ask honestly: is it a need or a want?
A great place to start is the supermarket, where lateral thinking can reduce the bill considerably. Not everything on supermarket shelves is a need.
I told a friend who was in the process of transitioning to a single income how I work on $3 per plate for protein as a rule, thanks to the Love Food Hate Waste campaign. It works. The concept left her a bit speechless.
Also be aware that some personalities lurch from one crisis to the next. If that sounds familiar, then consider getting third party help.
A good place to start is a budgeting centre or Citizens Advice Bureau, which can refer you to more specialised assistance if you need it. Sometimes the issue sits in our psychological make-up, not our budgeting skills.
An emergency fund works best tied into a bigger financial plan.
Sorted.org.nz's Goal Planner and Budget Planner can be helpful. Everyone's brain works differently, and for some people, a budgeting app such as PocketSmith or Westpac's CashNav app might work better. For others, a simple spreadsheet is the answer.
I gave Gemini, Google's AI engine, some realistic figures of what someone might earn and spend on rent each month in New Zealand, and asked it to create a personal financial plan. I couldn't fault anything it said.
I then asked Gemini to put its recommendations into a spreadsheet. It didn't give me a spreadsheet, but it did go into great depth explaining how to set one up, including all the formulas and the exact cells to copy them into.
Finally, think of your emergency fund as an act of self-care and empowerment.
Start small. Stay consistent. Your future self will thank you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
31-05-2025
- NZ Herald
Emergency funds: How much is enough in 2025?
It might sound like a luxury, but it's one of the best tools for surviving in a world where price rises are outpacing wage growth and jobs are less secure. Even in 2025, with easy access to credit such as buy-now-pay-later and support from Work and Income and the community, having your own emergency fund still makes financial sense. All sorts of curveballs can derail us. Think: accident, ill health, business failure, and relationship breakdown, to name a few. The magic number of how much to save in an emergency fund is three to six months of living expenses. That might seem like a pipe dream for some. However, people who focus on the goal find a way to get there. There's a common myth: 'I can't afford to save'. In truth, it's the opposite; we can't afford not to. Get started with a few powerful personal finance tricks. The first is to track spending to free up money for savings. Set up small, achievable goals, such as the first $40 by the end of this month. Automate savings at the beginning of the month. Where possible, look for additional income such as a small side hustle. Get quick wins on the board. If you replace eggs on toast or leftovers instead of, say, $25 on takeaways, chuck the $15-plus into your emergency fund. Deleting UberEats can free up considerable cash. Any amount, even $5 or $10 a week, is worth adding to the fund. Start by saving just enough to cover one week of expenses. That alone gives you breathing room to pay a single unexpected bill or to help out whānau in a true emergency. But remember, the fund is for emergencies, not for everyday spending. So keep the money in a separate savings account that isn't linked to your Eftpos or debit card. If you're serious about building an emergency fund, beware of mistaking everyday spending for emergencies. That's confusing needs and wants. An emergency fund is not another Eftpos account to dip into. Nor is it for planned expenses such as holidays. It's meant to be a financial buffer. This is the time to scrutinise every dollar and ask honestly: is it a need or a want? A great place to start is the supermarket, where lateral thinking can reduce the bill considerably. Not everything on supermarket shelves is a need. I told a friend who was in the process of transitioning to a single income how I work on $3 per plate for protein as a rule, thanks to the Love Food Hate Waste campaign. It works. The concept left her a bit speechless. Also be aware that some personalities lurch from one crisis to the next. If that sounds familiar, then consider getting third party help. A good place to start is a budgeting centre or Citizens Advice Bureau, which can refer you to more specialised assistance if you need it. Sometimes the issue sits in our psychological make-up, not our budgeting skills. An emergency fund works best tied into a bigger financial plan. Goal Planner and Budget Planner can be helpful. Everyone's brain works differently, and for some people, a budgeting app such as PocketSmith or Westpac's CashNav app might work better. For others, a simple spreadsheet is the answer. I gave Gemini, Google's AI engine, some realistic figures of what someone might earn and spend on rent each month in New Zealand, and asked it to create a personal financial plan. I couldn't fault anything it said. I then asked Gemini to put its recommendations into a spreadsheet. It didn't give me a spreadsheet, but it did go into great depth explaining how to set one up, including all the formulas and the exact cells to copy them into. Finally, think of your emergency fund as an act of self-care and empowerment. Start small. Stay consistent. Your future self will thank you.


Scoop
25-05-2025
- Scoop
Payments NZ Forcing The World's Most Aggressive Removal Of EFTPOS Terminals, Says EDANZ
Press Release – EDANZ Payments NZ is demanding that 19,000 EFTPOS terminals be scrapped by 30 April 2026despite these same PCI PTS v4.x devices being certified and secure for use in all countries including Australia for example until 31 December 2033, a full 6.5 years longer. Payments New Zealand is enforcing the most extreme and aggressive removal of EFTPOS terminals anywhere in the world, according to the EFTPOS Dealers Association of New Zealand (EDANZ). The association is calling out Payments NZ for pushing end-of-life (sunset) dates 5 to 7 years earlier than any comparable jurisdictions globally – including the PCI Security Standards Committee the world wide governing body, plus Australia, the United States, and all G7 nations. 'Perfectly Secure Devices Are Being Thrown Out' Payments NZ is demanding that 19,000 EFTPOS terminals be scrapped by 30 April 2026—despite these same PCI PTS v4.x devices being certified and secure for use in all countries including Australia for example until 31 December 2033, a full 6.5 years longer. COST to Business – Over $14 Million And it's not an isolated event. Between 2023 and mid-2024, 60,000 v3.x devices were forced into early retirement here in New Zealand. Globally, those exact devices are still approved for use in other countries right now and until 2030. COST to Business – Over $45 Million Looking ahead, another bombshell looms. In 2029, Payments NZ has planned the forced sunset of 90,000 v5.x EFTPOS terminals—60,000 of which were only just installed as part of the previous device purge. These same v5.x models are still being sold in New Zealand as compliant, and will remain in use overseas until 2036. COST to Business – Over $70 Million 'No Other Country in the World is Doing This' – EDANZ EDANZ has, after extensive research, found no other international regulatory body enforcing this level of premature terminal retirement. Identical EFTPOS models are still approved in all G7 countries and Australia for 5 to 7 years longer than in New Zealand. 'This policy is not just aggressive—it's reckless,' says Steve Batey, Chairman of EDANZ. 'It's wasteful, anti-business and completely misaligned with global best practices.' Outdated Rules and No Oversight EDANZ also claim Payments NZ are using 12-year-old guidelines (as per their own admission) that has not been updated in line with global security improvements. As a company owned by New Zealand's eight major banks, Payments NZ functions like a quasi-regulator/governing body but EDANZ believe they operate without the appropriate government oversight in this area. 'They are not even following their own rules,' Batey says. 'These guidelines are outdated, unfit for purpose, and massively out of step with the rest of the world.' This Policy is Costing Everyone – and these costs will land with Consumers These repeated, premature replacement cycles from 2023 through to 2029 and beyond will impose enormous, compounding capital costs on industry, which are ultimately passed down to small businesses and consumers. EDANZ argues that a common-sense, globally aligned approach is needed where devices are replaced as per world-wide guidelines. Replacement via organic churn, with wear and tear, business closure, or demand for new features, also Non Deployment dates that stop older terminal being recycled – That should be enough say EDANZ. 'This is not only bad economics—it's an environmental disaster,' Batey adds, pointing to the increasing volume of EFTPOS devices being sent to landfill as e-waste, many of them still perfectly functional. EDANZ Calls for Immediate Government Intervention EDANZ has submitted a formal complaint to Payments NZ and filed evidence with Government Ministers Scott Simpson (Minister of Commerce) and David Seymour (Minister of Regulation), urging immediate action. The association is demanding that the Commerce Commission, the Reserve Bank, and other government departments be granted formal oversight of Payments NZ moving forward. 'The banks cannot be allowed to make self-serving decisions that burden the rest of New Zealand,' Batey states. 'The current system is broken. This needs fixing—now.'


Scoop
25-05-2025
- Scoop
Payments NZ Forcing The World's Most Aggressive Removal Of EFTPOS Terminals, Says EDANZ
Payments New Zealand is enforcing the most extreme and aggressive removal of EFTPOS terminals anywhere in the world, according to the EFTPOS Dealers Association of New Zealand (EDANZ). The association is calling out Payments NZ for pushing end-of-life (sunset) dates 5 to 7 years earlier than any comparable jurisdictions globally - including the PCI Security Standards Committee the world wide governing body, plus Australia, the United States, and all G7 nations. "Perfectly Secure Devices Are Being Thrown Out" Payments NZ is demanding that 19,000 EFTPOS terminals be scrapped by 30 April 2026—despite these same PCI PTS v4.x devices being certified and secure for use in all countries including Australia for example until 31 December 2033, a full 6.5 years longer. COST to Business – Over $14 Million And it's not an isolated event. Between 2023 and mid-2024, 60,000 v3.x devices were forced into early retirement here in New Zealand. Globally, those exact devices are still approved for use in other countries right now and until 2030. COST to Business – Over $45 Million Looking ahead, another bombshell looms. In 2029, Payments NZ has planned the forced sunset of 90,000 v5.x EFTPOS terminals—60,000 of which were only just installed as part of the previous device purge. These same v5.x models are still being sold in New Zealand as compliant, and will remain in use overseas until 2036. COST to Business – Over $70 Million 'No Other Country in the World is Doing This' – EDANZ EDANZ has, after extensive research, found no other international regulatory body enforcing this level of premature terminal retirement. Identical EFTPOS models are still approved in all G7 countries and Australia for 5 to 7 years longer than in New Zealand. "This policy is not just aggressive—it's reckless," says Steve Batey, Chairman of EDANZ. "It's wasteful, anti-business and completely misaligned with global best practices." Outdated Rules and No Oversight EDANZ also claim Payments NZ are using 12-year-old guidelines (as per their own admission) that has not been updated in line with global security improvements. As a company owned by New Zealand's eight major banks, Payments NZ functions like a quasi-regulator/governing body but EDANZ believe they operate without the appropriate government oversight in this area. 'They are not even following their own rules,' Batey says. 'These guidelines are outdated, unfit for purpose, and massively out of step with the rest of the world.' This Policy is Costing Everyone – and these costs will land with Consumers These repeated, premature replacement cycles from 2023 through to 2029 and beyond will impose enormous, compounding capital costs on industry, which are ultimately passed down to small businesses and consumers. EDANZ argues that a common-sense, globally aligned approach is needed where devices are replaced as per world-wide guidelines. Replacement via organic churn, with wear and tear, business closure, or demand for new features, also Non Deployment dates that stop older terminal being recycled – That should be enough say EDANZ. "This is not only bad economics—it's an environmental disaster," Batey adds, pointing to the increasing volume of EFTPOS devices being sent to landfill as e-waste, many of them still perfectly functional. EDANZ Calls for Immediate Government Intervention EDANZ has submitted a formal complaint to Payments NZ and filed evidence with Government Ministers Scott Simpson (Minister of Commerce) and David Seymour (Minister of Regulation), urging immediate action. The association is demanding that the Commerce Commission, the Reserve Bank, and other government departments be granted formal oversight of Payments NZ moving forward. 'The banks cannot be allowed to make self-serving decisions that burden the rest of New Zealand,' Batey states. 'The current system is broken. This needs fixing—now.'