&w=3840&q=100)
An uncertain Pakistan: Munir's panic run to US and China shows his anxiety
Very recently, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir was on an official visit to China. During his stay in Beijing, he held meetings with senior Chinese political and military leadership. A military statement emanating from Pakistan claimed that the Chinese military leadership reiterated full confidence in the strength of the bilateral defence partnership, acknowledging Pakistan's pivotal role in promoting 'regional peace'.
General Munir called on Chinese Vice President Han Zheng and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Their discussions focused on the evolving regional and global political canvas, connectivity initiatives under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), and the need for coordinated responses to address shared geopolitical challenges.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Significantly, both sides expressed satisfaction over the depth of bilateral engagement and avowed their shared commitment to sovereign equality, multilateral cooperation, and long-term regional stability. The Pakistan Army statement further claimed that the Chinese leadership lauded the Pakistan Armed Forces as a cornerstone of resilience and a vital contributor to peace in South Asia. This seems far-fetched and looks only like a ceremonial or ritualistic expression.
The military engagement between both sides included comprehensive exchanges on defence and security cooperation, including counter-terrorism collaboration, joint training, defence modernisation, and enhanced institutional linkages. It also claimed that emphasis was placed on improving operational interoperability and strategic coordination to confront hybrid and transnational threats.
On his part, the COAS appreciated China's 'consistent support' and reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to further expanding military-to-military cooperation across all domains. Munir at Beijing reaffirmed Islamabad's deep appreciation for Beijing's consistent support toward its socio-economic development and emphasised the Pakistani military's resolve to strengthen counter-terrorism cooperation with China as part of their shared vision for regional peace and prosperity.
However, reliable sources indicate that the Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir was under severe pressure when China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi raised the issue rather prominently of the safety and security of the Chinese 'personnel, projects, and institutions' in Pakistan. Over the years, several Chinese nationals have been killed in a string of terror attacks in Pakistan. While Munir stressed and claimed that 'brotherhood' between Beijing and Islamabad was time-tested and was 'solid as a rock', he, in the same vein, assured Yi that the Pakistani military would take all necessary steps to ensure the safety of Chinese nationals.
It may be recalled that in October 2024, a suicide car bombing outside Karachi airport had killed two Chinese engineers, and earlier, in the same year in March, a suicide bombing in northern Pakistan had killed five Chinese workers, which had angered the Chinese leadership, who had expressed serious concern over the killings of the Chinese. This had also put at risk the bilateral ties between the two countries, albeit for some time.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Importantly, this was Munir's first visit to China after the hostilities with India in May this year. Islamabad is actively pursuing its military diplomacy to bolster strategic regional partnerships and defence alliances to reposition its defence standing. This was further demonstrated by Munir's visit to the US, as well as his one-on-one lunch with President Donald Trump.
In a separate development related to China, the Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar met with the Chinese Foreign Minister, where both sides reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening bilateral cooperation and promoting regional peace, stability, and development. This shows that Pakistan continues to warm up to China at regular intervals.
Further, in a Pakistan military-related development, Munir on July 26 reaffirmed Pakistan's unwavering resolve to foster a secure, peaceful, and prosperous regional environment through strategic cooperation and defence diplomacy. As a host, he was addressing the Regional Chiefs of Defence Staff Conference in Islamabad, bringing together senior military leaders from the United States, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. The conference seems to represent a major step in strengthening regional security collaboration, strategic dialogue, and military partnerships.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Organised under the theme 'Strengthening Bonds, Securing Peace', the summit aimed to deepen multilateral cooperation in defence, particularly in counter-terrorism, joint training, and knowledge sharing. Participants were engaged in wide-ranging discussions on regional security trends, the changing geopolitical landscape in Central and South Asia, and the urgent need for coordinated responses to transnational threats.
Welcoming the defence delegations, Munir reiterated Pakistan's firm 'commitment' to peace and regional stability. He underscored the importance of enhanced military-to-military cooperation, mutual trust, and continued strategic dialogue to address emerging hybrid 'threats' and ensure collective security.
Analysing the conference, it could be safely interpreted that Munir, with his political and military ambitions, possibly wants to forge an alliance with the Islamic countries' military leadership in the name of regional peace. He could also be meaning to signal India, his sworn adversary, about his 'deepening military cooperation' with the CIS countries. Munir should know that India already enjoys an excellent relationship with these countries that have participated in the conference, and no amount of signalling is likely to work towards his military designs.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Having stepped up its diplomatic outreach, especially post Operation Sindoor, the Pakistan Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on July 25. Earlier, the Deputy Prime Minister arrived in Washington, DC, on July 24 on the second leg of his eight-day visit to the US. He had arrived in New York on July 21 to attend 'high-level signature events' of Pakistan's United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Presidency, including a conference on Palestine. Discussions were also held on promoting bilateral trade and economic relations and cooperation in important sectors, including investment, agriculture, technology [and] minerals. Counter-terrorism and regional peace were also discussed. Foreign Minister Dar acknowledged the efforts of President Donald Trump and the US leadership in promoting global peace, adding that their role and efforts regarding the recent Pakistan-India tension were 'commendable'.
Meanwhile, at the US State Department, Marco Rubio expressed appreciation for Pakistan's continued willingness to play a constructive role in mediating conversations with Iran and its commitment to preserving regional stability. The two also discussed prospects for deepening bilateral counter-terrorism cooperation, including countering Islamic State—Khorasan (Isis—K), and the upcoming US-Pakistan Counter-Terrorism Dialogue in Islamabad scheduled in August this year. Rubio underscored the importance of expanding mutually beneficial bilateral trade and exploring prospects for enhancing collaboration in the critical minerals and mining sectors. Dar was also scheduled to speak at the US think tank, the Atlantic Council, sharing Pakistan's perspective on regional and global issues as well as the future of Pakistan-US relations. Dar's visit comes ahead of Pakistan holding the presidency of the UN Security Council this month.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Judging by the Pakistan Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister's US trip and earlier Munir's recent China visit, both much hyped, it is clear that Pakistan is making desperate efforts to keep China and the US in good humour and on the right side by a delicate balancing act, as both the US and China are at loggerheads, but the US needs Pakistan as a strategic ally. [It may be recapitulated that Munir was in the US, including a meeting with Trump, just ahead of the US military strikes at the Iran nuclear sites using the Pakistani skies.]
Such US overtures to Pakistan could possibly be cosmetic, more tactical, and not really substantial or meaningful. Only time will tell about their 'relationship' and its tenacity.
The writer is a retired IPS officer, adviser NatStrat, Bangladesh watcher and a security analyst. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
5 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump Tariffs: India Must Stand Firm Against Unreasonable Demands
The recent announcement by the United States to impose a 25% tariff - along with a further 25% penalty for buying oil from Russia, making a total of 50% - on Indian exports is not merely a trade manoeuvre. It is a moment of reckoning for India's economic diplomacy. While some may interpret this move as a bargaining tactic in the midst of ongoing negotiations, we must not underestimate its potential impact. If implemented in full, these measures could severely damage our export economy and undermine the very foundation of our strategic partnership with the United States. Let us be clear: the American market is significant. Our exports to the US alone amount to nearly $90 billion. A dramatic drop in access could cost us up to half a percentage point of GDP - a blow we cannot afford in a fragile global economic climate. But while the stakes are high, so too must be our resolve. Be Prepared To Walk Away India is not a supplicant at the global table. We are a proud and self-respecting nation with legitimate interests and our own red lines. Our negotiators must be empowered to seek the best possible deal, but they must also be prepared to walk away if the terms are unreasonable. We cannot - and will not - sacrifice the livelihoods of 700 million Indians dependent on agriculture simply to appease foreign demands. A responsible partner nation would understand that, especially if it is a democracy driven by its own influential constituencies. For some reason, US President Donald Trump chooses not to understand, and says he doesn't care. His disparaging remarks about the "dead" Indian economy are the equivalent of a schoolyard bully telling a smaller child that "your mother is ugly". It is meant to demean and belittle, not to be taken literally. But we must take the US President seriously. Mr Trump's negotiating tactics may be idiosyncratic, but there is still a negotiation going on. The United States must understand that trade is a two-way street. Our average tariff on American goods stands at a modest 17%. Some items have already come down further. If US manufacturers find the Indian market challenging, they must look inward at their pricing and competitiveness. After all, consumers everywhere buy what they can afford, and India is no exception. The Hypocrisy Moreover, the notion that India should be penalised for its energy trade with Russia is both perplexing and hypocritical. China buys far more oil and gas from Russia - not to mention trading a whole host of other items -- than we do, but they have been given a 90-day negotiating window, while we have only 21 days. From August 27, in other words, Indian goods in the US will be subject to a 50% tariff while Chinese goods come in at 30%. What does that say about Mr Trump's priorities? What happened to the "strategic relationship" with India, and the US' geopolitical rivalry with China? What's more, the European Union buys oil and gas from Russia too - again, more than India does - and this has not been a factor in the US-EU trade talks. For that matter, the United States itself imports about $2 billion worth of fertilizers a year from Russia, pays over $1.4 billion annually for uranium hexafluoride and another $1.8 billion for palladium (needed for catalytic converters) from Russia. US trade with Russia in the first five months of this year alone (January-May 2025) stands at $2.4 billion - at which rate, in a twelve-month period, one can safely assume the US will pump nearly $6 billion into Russian coffers this year. How can Mr Trump argue that India's money is "fuelling Russia's war machine in Ukraine", but his American dollars are not? Strategic Ambiguity Isn't A Virtue The US also continues to engage with Pakistan in energy exploration, the quest for rare earth minerals, and now cryptocurrency - despite Pakistan's well-documented history of incubating terrorism and harbouring, as well as deploying, terrorists. If Washington believes there is oil to be found in Pakistan, I wish them luck. But let us not pretend that strategic ambiguity is a virtue when it is selectively applied. India values its relationship with the United States. We share democratic values, strategic interests, and a history of cooperation. Four million Americans trace their descent to our land. But friendship must be built on mutual respect, not unilateral demands. Reasonable conversation among partners is essential. We cannot accept a framework where one side dictates terms and the other is expected to comply without question. We Have Options Fortunately, India is not without options. We have concluded a trade deal with the United Kingdom, are negotiating with the European Union, and are exploring partnerships with other nations. If the American market becomes untenable, we will diversify. That is the strength of India - we are not wholly dependent on any single export destination. In this moment, we must rally behind our negotiators. They carry the weight of our national interest, and they must be given both the courage and the clarity to defend it. Flexibility is a virtue, but it has its limits. India must not buckle under pressure. We must walk into these negotiations with open minds - but also with open eyes. If a fair deal is possible, let us embrace it. If not, let us walk away with our dignity intact. There will always be other horizons to explore. (Shashi Tharoor is an author, former diplomat, and Member of Parliament from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, since 2009) Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
How China, its media reacted to India-US tariff row: ‘Dragon and elephant dancing together'
The old saying "दुश्मन का दुश्मन दोस्त होता है [the enemy of my enemy is my friend]" seems to make sense when looking at India, China, and the US today. With both India and China sharing concerns about the US, they may seem closer than before. Recently, US President Donald Trump doubled the US tariffs on imported Indian goods to 50 per cent, penalising India for buying oil from Russia. China, another big purchaser of Russian oil, faces over 50 per cent tariffs (including reciprocal tariffs, fentanyl trade-related tariffs, and other levies). Trump's salvo, which started with China as the target, is now on course to "single" out India over Russian purchases. This has prompted speculation that New Delhi may now shift its approach towards China. Many even believe that China has softened its stance towards India. Until now, India's ties with the US were seen through China prism. But is this really the case? Is India finding an "unlikely ally" in China? Several opinion pieces and the tone of Chinese media can offer some insight into this aspect. Here we dissect what Chinese media is saying about the US's additional 25% tariff on India. Apart from the tariff threats, what has grabbed attention in India, China, and the US is Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's expected visit to China — the "first in seven years" if reports hold true. The news has sparked debate about whether "the US is now pushing India into the arms of China." Back in April-- when Trump had first announced reciprocal tariffs, the Washington Post had reported: 'India edges closer to China, hedging against Trump's unpredictability.' In a March article, think tank Modern Diplomacy analysed the India-US-China ties, claiming that 'Trump is not the reason for the reconciliation between China and India, but he has become a cheerleader for their renewed friendship.' Meanwhile, US magazine The Diplomat recently commented on the India-China ties, saying, 'The trend in the past decade has seen the two neighbours [India and China] embracing each other and then falling out... the time has come again for them to explore yet another round of engagement.' A report in China's state media, Global Times, noted that "some Western media outlets have interpreted Modi's visit as an attempt to 'hedge against' the US." It, however, contended that "such a view is rather one-sided." Several Chinese media articles highlighted "long-standing friendly exchanges" — and not long-standing disputes — between India and China. One article even tried to explain the "deepening cooperation" between India and China through the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting and potential PM Modi's presence with a Hindu proverb that says, "Help your brother's boat across, and your own will reach the shore." The author of the opinion piece welcomed PM Modi to China "with genuine intentions to improve bilateral ties and pragmatic cooperation plans, and to jointly usher in a new chapter of 'the dragon and the elephant dancing together.' A Global Times report on August 7 cited an analyst as saying that India's illusion that the US would treat it with exceptional favour was shattered. "Now, it seems this illusion has been shattered. India comes to realise that the two nations are not in the equal partnership India had previously imagined," Xie Chao, an assistant professor of Indian studies at Tsinghua University, was quoted as saying. Another report by the Chinese media outlet focused on "reviving China-Russia-India trilateral cooperation [RIC]". It "must transcend symbolism," the report read. It argued that "for all three [nations], it represents a strategic opportunity to unite against external sanctions pressure, reaffirm foreign policy autonomy and advance a multipolar order." The report noted that the "key" to restarting RIC lies with India, presenting both the primary challenge and opportunity." The Chinese foreign ministry criticised Trump's tariffs against India, saying, 'China's opposition to the abuse of tariffs is consistent and clear.' Meanwhile, China's Ambassador to India Xu Feihong took potshot at the US. "Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile," he said in a post on X. India and China have often engaged in long-standing disputes over border, and Beijing's presence in the Indian Ocean region (IOR). The India-China ties hit a low in 2020 after the standoff between Indian and Chinese troops along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Ladakh's Galwan Valley. However, reports about PM Modi's visit to China for the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meet are seen as a sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the US rise. It also sparked hopes of reconciliation and improved bilateral ties. However, neither Indian nor Chinese officials confirmed PM Modi's visit. Since June this year, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar have visited China, exhibiting diplomatic engagement rarely seen in recent years.
NDTV
21 minutes ago
- NDTV
Nike, Adidas Pass Trump Tariff Costs To US Customers
US President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs on imports from more than 90 countries came into effect on Thursday. It shook global supply chains and led to price hikes from some of the world's biggest brands, including Nike, Adidas, and Mattel. The tariffs, which apply to goods entering the US from key trading partners like Vietnam, Indonesia, China, and Mexico, are already feeding into inflationary pressures at home. The US consumer price index rose 2.7% in June, up from 2.4% in May, AP reported. Economists warn that the new trade measures could further accelerate costs for American households. Adidas Hikes Prices Adidas was one of the first global retailers to sound the alarm. The German sportswear giant confirmed in July that it will raise prices for US customers to offset an expected $218 million in additional costs triggered by the tariffs in the second half of 2025. The company's largest sourcing partner, Vietnam, now faces a 20% tariff, while Indonesia, which accounts for 19% of Adidas' manufacturing, is subject to a 19% tariff. "We feel the volatility and uncertainty in the world does not make this prudent," said CEO Bjorn Gulden, adding that Q2 results were already negatively impacted by the tariffs to the tune of "double-digit euro millions". He added that while existing products may retain their current prices, new launches will be priced higher in the US. Nike Shifts Sourcing Adidas rival Nike had similar concerns. The company expects to absorb as much as $1 billion in additional costs due to the tariffs and has already implemented price hikes in the US, adding $5-$10 to many of its sneaker models. Chief Financial Officer Matthew Friend said China, now subject to a 30% tariff, still accounts for around 16% of Nike's US imports. Nike plans to reduce that figure to a "high single-digit percentage" by May 2026, shifting production to less-exposed countries like Vietnam and Indonesia. "We will optimise our sourcing mix and allocate production differently across countries to mitigate the new cost headwind into the United States," Friend said. He added that Nike was reviewing internal cost reductions to manage the financial impact. Consumer Goods Take A Hit Beyond sportswear, other major companies are also preparing to raise prices. Mattel, the US toy giant and maker of Barbie, announced it will increase prices due to the rising cost of Chinese imports. Retailers like Walmart, Shein, Temu, and automakers, including Ford, Volvo, and Subaru, are also warning of cost pass-throughs to US consumers. Prices of goods made with imported parts are set to rise as the new US tariffs drive up production costs. Items like electronics, apparel, and toys, which are heavily reliant on foreign components, will be among the hardest hit. Analysts warn this could add nearly 1.8% to consumer prices, costing households an estimated $2,400 annually. Stricter customs checks are also expected to cause border delays, especially as the US ends the duty-free status of small parcels under $800 starting August 29, Reuters reported. This will slow shipments, raise costs for businesses, and delay deliveries for consumers. Countries hit with the highest tariffs include India (50%), Brazil (50%), China (30%), Canada (35%), and Switzerland (39%). India's tariff, due to take effect on August 27, was explicitly tied to its ongoing purchases of Russian oil, with Mr Trump threatening further action if those imports continue.
