Idaho murder suspect's lawyers demand trial postponement over 'prejudicial' TV special
Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger, who has been accused of killing four University of Idaho students, are asking that his trial be delayed.
The court filing cites that a recent NBC "Dateline" special has caused prejudice towards Kohberger and that they now need additional time to prepare.
The defense also believes that moving forward would infringe on Kohberger's constitutional rights.
Judge Says Gag Order 'Likely' Violated In Bryan Kohberger's Idaho Murder Case
"Motion to Continue due to the substantial amount of trial investigation and preparation still outstanding, as well as recent and forthcoming publicity that is highly prejudicial to the defense," the filing said. "Any conviction and sentence resulting from a capital trial beginning in August 2025 will be unconstitutionally imposed and, therefore, vulnerable to reversal on direct or collateral review."
New information about the murders was presented during the May 9 NBC "Dateline" program, which included surveillance footage from a nearby house. The surveillance video showed a car similar to Kohberger's that was in the area of the King Road house several times just before the four students were killed.
Read On The Fox News App
Idaho Student Murders: Bryan Kohberger's Family Could Be Asked To Testify Against Him, Court Docs Reveal
The episode also suggested that some of the information aired was nonpublic. According to the documents, the material was obtained from sources close to the investigation.
Kohberger's attorneys also brought up concerns regarding an upcoming book on the case. They claim in the filing that the book's promotional blurb implies the information leaked to the Dateline crew was not the only incident.
"A continuance is necessary to fully investigate the leaks and to mitigate the prejudicial effects of such inflammatory pretrial publicity occurring so close to the current trial date," it stated.
Forensic expert and Jacksonville State University Professor Joseph Scott Morgan told Fox News Digital there's a risk that the TV episode on Kohberger will taint the jury pool.
"I think the first place you have to look is the tainting of the pool, of the jury pool," Morgan said. "Progressively, it becomes more and more difficult because people form opinions, they put things out there that are not true, and you still have yet to pick a jury. And it's not like you're going to Manhattan. You're talking about Ada County, Idaho. You have a limited pool of potential jurors there."Original article source: Idaho murder suspect's lawyers demand trial postponement over 'prejudicial' TV special
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why the deadly Apple Store crash trial has been delayed yet again
In a case one judge said "has grown whiskers," the trial of Bradley Rein, the man accused of killing one person and injuring 22 others when his SUV crashed into the Hingham Apple Store, has been yet again delayed. The trial is now set for May 23, 2026. Rein, 54, of Hingham, faces charges – including second-degree murder – in the death of Kevin Bradley, 65, of New Jersey, as well as 18 counts of aggravated assault and battery and motor vehicle homicide by reckless operation. Authorities say Rein's 2019 Toyota 4Runner accelerated to 60 mph in five seconds before plowing through the glass storefront of the Derby Street Shops Apple Store on Nov. 21, 2022, only stopping when it hit a back wall. The trial was initially scheduled for December 2025, then moved to March, and now again to May. The delays stem from ongoing legal battles over evidence requested by the defense, which argues the crash may have resulted from a vehicle malfunction, not driver error. Defense attorney Joan Fund says an expert has found discrepancies between the SUV's electronic data recorder and Rein's statements, suggesting the car may not have responded properly to braking. Fund is seeking multiple years of Toyota documentation on similar unintended acceleration issues and has already obtained related records from Herb Chambers Toyota of Quincy. 'Without this information, which I submit to the court is exculpatory, the defense cannot present its case,' she said. Exculpatory refers to evidence that can clear someone from guilt. Prosecutors object to the request, calling it speculative and overly broad. Plymouth County Assistant District Attorney David Cutshall said Rein never claimed the vehicle malfunctioned. 'In every version, he accepted responsibility,' Cutshall said, referencing Rein's earlier explanations that he either pressed the gas instead of the brake or that his foot got caught between the pedals. Plymouth County Superior Court Judge Mark Gildea previously denied defense motions to suppress Rein's police statements and phone data, ruling that Rein was not misled and had voluntarily waived his rights. The judge presiding over the May 27 hearing, Gregg Pasquale, acknowledged the complexity of the case and allowed time for Toyota to respond to the request, which could include objecting to it or seeking to quash it entirely. A compliance hearing is scheduled for June 16 to allow both sides to review any materials produced, give Toyota the chance to respond and address next steps. Since his release on $100,000 bail, Rein has violated probation multiple times. He served 60 days in jail in 2023 for letting his GPS ankle monitor battery die, was later found intoxicated at home and missed required check-ins and testing in 2024. The court has since added a continuous alcohol-monitoring device and warned further violations could result in bail revocation. This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: Second-degree murder trial delayed to May 2026 in Hingham Apple Store crash.
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Betting site bans individual over heckling incident with Olympic champion sprinter Gabby Thomas
A sports bettor who heckled Olympic champion sprinter Gabby Thomas during a Grand Slam Track event in Philadelphia over the weekend has been banned by the betting site FanDuel Sportsbook. In a statement sent to The Associated Press on Wednesday, FanDuel wrote it 'condemns in the strongest terms abusive behavior directed towards athletes. Threatening or harassing athletes is unacceptable and has no place in sports. This customer is no longer able to wager with FanDuel.' Last weekend, Thomas finished fourth in a 100-meter race won by Melissa Jefferson-Wooden. The bettor wrote in a post on social media that he 'made Gabby lose by heckling her. And it made my parlay win.' He posted a picture of his parlay that had Jefferson-Wooden winning the 100. Thomas, the 200-meter champion at the Paris Games last summer, explained the heckling incident on X. She wrote: 'This grown man followed me around the track as I took pictures and signed autographs for fans (mostly children) shouting personal insults – anybody who enables him online is gross.' Grand Slam Track, a track league launched by Hall of Fame sprinter Michael Johnson this spring, wrote in a statement it was 'conducting a full investigation into the reprehensible behavior captured on video. 'We are working to identify the individual involved and will take appropriate action as necessary. We will implement additional safeguards to help prevent incidents like this in the future. Let us be clear, despicable behavior like this will not be tolerated.' ESPN first reported the bettor had been banned by FanDuel. The Grand Slam Track season wraps up with the fourth and final meet in Los Angeles on June 28-29. The Thomas incident is the latest in a string of stalking and abuse of female athletes. Frida Karlsson, a Swedish cross-country skiing world champion, recently brought her experience with stalking into public view when she went through a trial. A man in his 60s was given a suspended sentence and ordered to pay 40,000 kronor ($4,100) in damages after being convicted of stalking Karlsson for a year and four months, according to Swedish news agency TT. The man, according to the indictment, called Karlsson 207 times, left her voicemails and text messages and approached her, including outside her apartment. In February, police in the United Arab Emirates detained a man who caused British tennis player Emma Raducanu distress by exhibiting ' fixated behavior ' toward her at a tennis tournament. Raducanu had been approached by the man at the Dubai Championships where he left her a note, took her photograph and engaged in behavior that caused her distress, according to the government of Dubai's media office.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.
In the few months since Donald Trump returned to the presidency, he has issued so many executive orders and pronouncements on domestic and foreign policy that he may have overwhelmed our intellectual and emotional energy to fully appreciate their impact. Whether or not you approve of the direction he wants to take the country, he took office after being duly elected. Many of his initiatives are within his authority. Generally speaking, Trump has the right to indulge his ideological obsessions and advance policies that benefit the economic class that 'brung him to the dance.' But, what of those executive orders that exceed the limited authority proscribed for the presidency — powers meant to be shared with other branches of government, or those that defy Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution? Say goodbye to democracy — and our freedoms — if we ignore James Madison's warning in the Federalist Papers No. 47 that "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." On Jan. 20, 2025, Trump took the Presidential Oath of Office to 'faithfully execute the Office of President' and 'preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Yet just three months later, when asked if he agreed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that every person in the United States is entitled to due process, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he's not so sure. 'I don't know. I'm not a lawyer.' The Constitution states that 'no person' shall be 'deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.' It says 'person,' not 'citizen.' Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court has held that everyone in this country have certain basic rights. When Welker reminded the president of this constitutionally guaranteed right, Trump complained that this only slows him down: 'I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it.' This helps explain why democracy requires an independent judiciary — to check the actions of the executive (from local police to presidents) to ensure that government allegations of wrongdoing are accurate and mistakes are not made. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the recent high-profile example, is Salvadoran, married to an American citizen with three American-born children who has lived in U.S. since 2011. He was granted protected status by an immigration judge in 2019. Nevertheless he was detained by ICE in March and deported to El Salvador without a hearing. The Trump administration originally acknowledged that he was mistakenly deported, and a federal judge ordered that he be returned to the U.S. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld this directive. As of this writing the Trump administration has done nothing to facilitate his return. The President even quipped that he could do so, but he will not. The government now asserts that Abrego Garcia's deportation wasn't a mistake, claiming he is a member of the Salvadoran gang MS-13, but declines to provide evidence supporting the claim. As if to emphasize contempt for constitutional rights, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller recently said that the Trump administration was considering suspending Habeas Corpus to block an immigrant's right to challenge their detention before being deported. There are other examples of presidential defiance of the law, such as the illegal impoundment of congressionally authorized appropriations and constitutional freedoms. So, it is time to insert the 'I' word (impeachment) into civic conversations. I am not naïve: impeachment is neither imminent nor likely — for now. The disgrace of this period, as future historians will note, is that whether the President has intimidated Congress into silence or they applaud his overly expansive use of power, the legislative branch has abandoned its oversight responsibility. For now, Congress is content to look the other way. Nevertheless, we must begin to insert 'impeachable offenses' into civic conversations. If we don't, we will be complicit in accepting that the aberrant behavior of this President is the new normal for the evaluation of future presidents. Howard L. Simon served as executive director of the ACLU of Florida from 1997-2018. He resides in Gainesville and is president of Clean Okeechobee Waters Foundation, Inc. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Talk of impeachment hasn't come up. How long can that last? | Opinion
