logo
Trump administration guts program for families struggling to pay utility bills

Trump administration guts program for families struggling to pay utility bills

Yahoo28-04-2025
The state's ability to provide energy assistance could be reduced even more in 2026, as the Trump administration has signaled it could end the program next year. (Getty Images)
As high summer temperatures start to creep across the state, about $1.4 million in federal funding meant to help low-income Nevadans pay utility bills is in limbo after the Trump administration fired every employee responsible for administering the funds.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated the entire staff that allocates funds for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) as part of a broad effort by the White House to dramatically downsize the federal government.
Federal funding for LIHEAP is approved by Congress and funneled through state programs which use the money to pay energy providers directly in order to help low-income families avoid shutoffs.
Consumer advocates warn that the layoffs could threaten or delay nearly $400 million in utility assistance funding that had not yet been distributed to states by the time the federal program was gutted.
Nevada was awarded about $15 million in LIHEAP funding this year, but about $1.4 million of that funding is now in limbo after the program was essentially shuttered in early April.
According to the Nevada Division of Welfare and Supportive Services — which administers the state's LIHEAP funding —Nevada has not received the remaining 10% of its allocated funding as of Thursday.
Earlier this month, Nevada Sen. Jacky Rosen and several other Democratic senators sent a letter to HHS urging the agency to disburse all of the LIHEAP funds that Congress has appropriated.
'By terminating all 23 employees tasked with overseeing LIHEAP, it is now unclear how these funds will be administered. In our view, that is unacceptable,' reads the letter. 'Failure to disburse these funds constitutes an illegal impoundment of bipartisan, congressionally appropriated funds and will put the health and well-being of some of the most vulnerable people in America at risk.'
HHS did not respond to a request for comment on the fate of Nevada's remaining funding.
Nevada's Energy Assistance Program received more than half its funding from LIHEAP last year, making it a vital source of utility assistance funding for the state.
Last year, Nevada's Energy Assistance Program paid out more than $31 million in benefits to help more than 17,000 households in the state keep their power on. A portion of those funds were also used to help low-income households pay for upgrades that improve energy efficiency and lower power bills in the long term.
Still, as temperatures rise there is a growing demand for utility assistance funding in the state. Nearly 32,000 Nevadans had their power disconnected by NV Energy for nonpayment in 2024, according to data from the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada.
In southern Nevada, where temperatures reached 100 degrees or higher for 64 consecutive days in 2024, air conditioning is a life-saving necessity.
Extreme heat exposure is a serious health hazard. It can cause heat rash, cramps, heat exhaustion, or heat stroke, which can be fatal or have lifelong consequences. Older people, people with disabilities, pregnant people, and children are at increased risk of adverse health impacts from heat.
Without the remaining 10% of Nevada's LIHEAP funding, the state won't be able to provide financial assistance to as many households struggling to pay their energy bills.
The state's ability to provide energy assistance could be reduced even more in 2026, as the Trump administration has signaled it could end the program next year. A leaked draft budget request document from the HHS proposes allocating zero funding for the LIHEAP program in 2026, according to reporting by the Hill.
The U.S. Constitution puts Congress, not the president, in charge of federal spending, but the Trump administration has been challenging congressional power of the purse, with little pushback from Republicans in control of the legislative branch.
The administration's termination of LIHEAP programs and staff is raising alarms for consumer advocates.
Keriann Conroy, a research associate with the Energy and Policy Institute, a utility watchdog organization, said any reduction in LIHEAP funding could be especially devastating for Nevada.
'It's the main source of energy assistance funding that exists both nationwide and in the state of Nevada,' Conroy said.
'This is absolutely a program people depend on. I think you'll see the most vulnerable people being disconnected and being put in life threatening circumstances,' Conroy said. 'Since most Nevadans are already struggling to pay their utility bills you'd see that extend to a larger group of people.'
Reno and Las Vegas are the two fastest-warming cities in the country, according to climate scientists at Climate Central. Heat played a role in the deaths of 527 people last year in Southern Nevada alone, according to the Southern Nevada Health District.
Yet, Nevada's customer protections against utility companies disconnecting consumers during extreme weather are limited.
Nevada is one of 19 states that does not require utilities to publicly disclose the number of customers they disconnect to utility regulators, leaving little transparency to understand the full extent of disconnections. However, Nevada lawmakers are currently considering a bill that would require utilities to report disconnections by month and zip code.
Nevada also does not have a blanket moratorium on utility disconnections during months of extreme weather, like many other states do, including neighboring Arizona.
'If LIHEAP assistance disappears, it will add insult to injury in a state with limited consumer protections. Nevada's customer protections against utility companies disconnecting consumers during extreme weather are limited,' Conroy said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes
US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on the International Criminal Court for pursuing investigations into U.S. and Israeli officials for alleged war crimes. The State Department on Wednesday announced new sanctions on four ICC officials, including two judges and two prosecutors, who it said had been instrumental in efforts to prosecute Americans and Israelis. As a result of the sanctions, any assets the targets hold in U.S. jurisdictions are frozen. The sanctions are just the latest in a series of steps the administration has taken against The Hague-based court, the world's first international war crimes tribunal. The U.S. has already imposed penalties on the ICC's former chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who stepped aside in May pending an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, and four other tribunal judges. In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had taken action against ICC judges Kimberly Proust of Canada and Nicolas Guillou of France and prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal. 'These individuals are foreign persons who directly engaged in efforts by the International Criminal Court to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation,' Rubio said. He added that the administration would continue 'to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions.' In a separate statement, the State Department said Prost was hit for ruling to authorize an ICC investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan, which was later dropped. Guillou was sanctioned for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant related to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Khan and Niang were penalized for continuing Karim Khan's investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, according to the statement. Wednesday's move carries on a history of Trump administration actions against the ICC, of which the U.S. is not a member, dating back to his first term in office. During Trump's first term, the U.S. hit the ICC with sanctions, but those were rescinded by President Joe Biden's administration in early 2021.

Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis
Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis

New York Post

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis

The Democratic Party is bleeding registered voters, suffering a 4.5 million swing against it that could take years to recover from, according to a new report. Between the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, Democrats lost about 2.1 million voters across the 30 states that track registration by political party, according to a New York Times analysis of data gathered by the L2 tracking firm. Over the same period, the Republican Party gained 2.4 million registered voters. Officially, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans nationwide, but that number is incomplete because blue states like California and New York allow voters to register by party — as does the District of Columbia — while reliably red states like Texas, Missouri and Ohio do not. Most alarmingly for Democrats, the decline is nationwide, with the US seeing more new voters registering with the GOP in 2024 for the first time in six years. Democrats also saw their registered voter advantage dwindle in four 2024 battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — all of which President Trump carried this past Nov. 5. Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters in the 30 states that track registration by political party. AP Michael Pruser, who tracks voter registration closely as the director of data science for Decision Desk HQ, warned that the numbers not only help explain Trump's victory last year — in which he became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years — but also forecast significant headwinds for Democrats in next year's midterm elections as well as the 2028 presidential vote. 'I don't want to say, 'The death cycle of the Democratic Party,'' Pruser told the Times, 'but there seems to be no end to this.' 'There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year,' he added. In North Carolina, Democrats lost 115,523 voters between the 2020 and 2024 election, with Republicans gaining more than 140,000 members and erasing the Dems' registration advantage, according to the L2 data. More new voters registered to be Republican than Democrat last year, the first time since 2018. Michael Nagle Democrats suffered similar losses in Arizona and Pennsylvania, while in Nevada — a state whose politics were long dominated by the Las Vegas-based Culinary Workers Union — the share of registered Democrats suffered the second-steepest plunge of those states measured between 2020 and 2024. (Only deep-red West Virginia saw more precipitous losses.). Even Democratic bastions like New York and California were not safe from voter erosion, with Dems losing 305,922 registered voters in the Empire State in between the two elections. In California, Democrats lost 680,556 voters between 2020 and 2024. All in all, Democrats went from enjoying an advantage of nearly 11 percentage points over Republicans in registered voter numbers in 2020 to just over six percentage points across the 30 states and DC in 2024, the Times found. Experts believe that the fall of new Democratic registrations can be linked to the growing number of voters choosing to be independents or unaffiliated, a trend that is sapping both parties' rolls. In 2018, more than one-third (34%) of new voter registrations nationwide were Democrats, while registered Republicans made up just 20% of new voters. As of last year, however, Republicans had erased that gap, with party supporters making up 29% of new voters, while Democrats made up 26% of new voters.

Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown
Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown

Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday railed against what he called 'stupid white hippies' who were protesting the federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital and argued they did not represent the citizens of Washington, D.C. Miller, Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Union Station on Wednesday, where National Guard troops have been stationed outside for days in a show of force near the transportation hub. 'We are not going to let the communists destroy a great American city, let alone the nation's capital,' Miller told the crowd near Shake Shack inside Union Station. 'And let's just also address another thing. All these demonstrators you've seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they're not part of the city and never have been. And by the way, most of the citizens who live in Washington, D.C., are Black.' 'So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old,' he added. 'And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C.' The Trump administration earlier this month began surging federal law enforcement across parts of the district to crack down on what the White House said was an unacceptable level of crime, despite statistics showing violent crime has declined in the city. Last week, Trump took federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed hundreds of National Guard troops across the city to further the crack down on crime. The White House has said officers across the district have made more than 550 arrests since the surge in federal resources began on Aug. 7. But local residents have largely expressed disapproval with the aggressive moves from the federal government. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 D.C. residents published Wednesday found 65 percent do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Roughly 80 percent of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store