Washington Post columnist trashes colleagues, says editor robbed him of his humanity in memoir: report
Jonathan Capehart wrote he was sent into an "eye-popping rage" that caused him to quit the Washington Post editorial board and fire off a frantic email to HR over a sentence in an editorial concerning Georgia's "Election Integrity Act of 2021," according to a review written by Chronicles Magazine's Mark Judge, who obtained an early copy of the book.
Former President Joe Biden had called the Peach State's voting law, which placed restrictions on mail-in voting and gave state officials more control over how elections were run, "Jim Crow 2.0". Major corporate backlash hit the state after the bill's passage, including the MLB pulling the 2021 All-Star game from the state, and the Biden administration launched a lawsuit against the state.
Trump Applauds Jeff Bezos' Changes At Washington Post In Rare Media Praise
In his memoir, "Yet Here I Am: Lessons from a Black Man's Search for Home," Capehart recalls meeting where the Election Integrity Act was discussed with the Washington Post's editorial board that particularly unnerved him, and ultimately led to his quitting the board altogether.
"How could it be voter suppression if all these people are coming out to vote?" Washington Post editorial board member Karen Tumulty had allegedly asked.
Read On The Fox News App
Capehart, who is also an MSNBC host and PBS contributor, wrote that the meeting had so "disturbed" him that he penned an email to everyone present. When the editorial board wrote that Georgia's voter turnout "remained high despite hyperbolic warnings by President Biden and other Democrats that updated voting rules amounted to Jim Crow 2.0," in a 2022 editorial. Capehart wrote that he was sent into an "eye popping rage." The journalist wrote that his anger at the line was so piqued that it ultimately led to him quitting the editorial board in 2023.
Msnbc Host Fights Back Tears During Jan. 6 Segment: 'I'm Going To Try To Get Through This'
"I was sitting at my desk in the den of my apartment when I read the editorial in the print edition on December 8. A fine, perfectly reasonable piece … Reasonable until I hit the third sentence of the fifth paragraph. I was a tornado of emotions, eye-popping rage, and disbelief. I couldn't stay."
Capehart wrote that he emailed his resignation from the editorial board to Washington Post staff and reported his frustrations surrounding the editorial to HR. Capehart is still an opinion writer for the paper. The memoir details a subsequent, contentious, meeting he had with Tumulty in which she apologized for "misunderstandings" between them, but defended the use of the word "hyperbolic" to describe Biden's criticisms of the law.
"I do think use of the word 'hyperbolic' is defensible… I have a rule: No one should be called a Nazi unless they were an actual Nazi,' she told me. 'So for President Biden to call the Georgia voter law 'Jim Crow 2.0,' well that's an insult to people who lived through Jim Crow,'" Tumulty allegedly said.
Capehart wrote that he felt he was being "punked" by his colleague, and said she "robbed me of my humanity." He wrote that he sat gripping his chair as Tumulty made her remarks, and claimed that she had made a racial situation "worse."
"She either couldn't or wouldn't see that I was Black, that I came to the conversation with knowledge and history she could never have, that my worldview, albeit it different from hers, was equally valid," Capehart wrote.
Reviewer Mark Judge described Capehart's behavior as a "hissy fit" in his review, and said Tumulty's only crime was treating him "like an adult."
"You don't go to HR because you disagree with an editorial, grow up," Judge told Fox News Digital.
Tumulty told Fox News Digital she had not seen Capehart's book. Capehart did not respond to a request for comment. The Washington Post did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request to comment.Original article source: Washington Post columnist trashes colleagues, says editor robbed him of his humanity in memoir: report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump declares 100% computer chip tariff unless firms build in the US
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he would impose a 100% tariff on computer chips, only sparing companies that commit to 'building' on US soil. The threat raises the prospect of higher prices for essential products dependent on the processors, and it will squeeze US tech firms, often reliant on Asia for chips. It also comes more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his most onerous tariffs. The president announced the tariff alongside Apple CEO Tim Cook on Wednesday, who said his firm would invest an additional $100 billion in domestic manufacturing. That comes on top of a previous commitment made in February, bringing the total to $600bn. The pledge follows similar announcements from companies such as TSMC and Nvidia, who have promised to spend more in the US. Big Tech has already made collective commitments to invest about $1.5 trillion in the country since Trump moved back into the White House in January. Now the question is whether the deal brokered between Cook and Trump will be enough to insulate the millions of iPhones made in China and India from the tariffs that the administration has already imposed and reduce the pressure on the company to raise prices on the new models expected to be unveiled next month. Wall Street seems to think so. After Apple's stock price gained 5% in Wednesday regular trading sessions, the shares rose by more than 2% in extended trading after Trump made his exemption announcement. Related Trump cranks up India tariffs to 50% in an attempt to pressure Russia Despite tough talk, most Canadian, Mexican goods dodge new Trump tariffs The shares of AI chipmaker Nvidia, which has also recently made big commitments to the US, rose marginally in extended trading to add to the $1 trillion gain in market value the Silicon Valley company has made since the start of Trump's second administration. Demand for computer chips has been climbing worldwide, with sales increasing 19.6% in the year-ended in June, according to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics organisation. Trump's tariff threats mark a significant break from existing plans to revive computer chip production in the US that were drawn up during the administration of President Joe Biden. Since taking over from Biden, Trump has been deploying tariffs to incentivise more domestic production. Essentially, the president is betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs will force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up consumer prices. By contrast, the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that Biden signed into law in 2022 provided more than $5bn to support new computer chip plants, fund research, and train workers for the industry. The mix of funding support, tax credits and other financial incentives were meant to draw in private investment, a strategy that Trump has vocally opposed. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Ups Duties on India to 50%, Citing Russian Oil Purchases
Citing its continued purchasing of Russian oil exports, President Donald Trump has made good on his threat to levy additional duties on India, bringing the country's overall tariff rate to 50 percent. The White House on Wednesday released an executive order that pointed to the 'unusual and extraordinary threat' that Russia poses to the United States as a result of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. 'I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to impose an additional ad valorem duty on imports of articles of India, which is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil,' Trump wrote. More from Sourcing Journal Trump Threatens EU With 35% Tariffs if Trade Bloc Forgoes $600B US Investment 76% of UK Retailers Probing New Export Markets Due to Tariff Turbulence EU Delays Duties on US, While India and China Negotiations are Snarled by Russia Conflict The new ad valorem rate of 25 percent will be stacked upon existing duties, including the 25 percent to be levied upon the country's exports on Thursday under Trump's worldwide 'reciprocal' tariffs. The tariffs announced Wednesday will go into effect in 21 days. Goods that have already been loaded onto vessels bound for the U.S. before that date that arrive before Sept. 17 will not be subject to the new duties. Trump cited Biden-era directive from 2022 as justification for the action. Executive Order 14066 declared a state of emergency and imposed trade and financial sanctions on Russia for its aggression against Ukraine and the inherent threat posed to U.S. interests. Trump extended the executive order for one year in April. About 18 percent of India's exports are bound for the U.S., representing 2 percent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Global investment bank UBS estimated that $8 billion worth of exports will be impacted greatly by the duty hike, including apparel, textiles, chemicals and jewelry. U.S. trade with India has been on an upswing in recent years, with data from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) showing bilateral trade amounted to $212.3 billion in 2024, up 8.3 percent ($16.3 billion) from the year prior. Total goods trade amounted to $128.9 billion in 2024, with India's exports to the U.S. accounting for $87.3 billion (up 4.5 percent from 2023). America's goods trade deficit with India increased by 5.9 percent last year, reaching $45.8 billion. There are certain sectors that will likely be saved from the burn of new tariffs, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and derived electronic products, like those manufactured by Apple in large volumes at its India-based production campuses. The country faces 50-percent duties on steel and aluminum through a separate, global executive order impacting all export markets. India's Ministry of Foreign Affairs wasted no time in responding to the president's announcement, with an official spokesperson writing, 'The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India.' 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the U.S. should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest,' the statement said. 'We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.' As tensions with the U.S. heat up again, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is reportedly planning an Aug. 31 sojourn to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping for the first visit in seven years. Modi will attend a summit hosted by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit, a 24-year-old international and economic security organization founded by Russia and China, along with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. India and Pakistan joined as full-time members in 2017. India and China's relationship appears to be growing cozier despite a longstanding territory dispute over their shared border in the Ladakh region near the Himalayas. A major confrontation took place in June 2020, and a clash occurred again in December 2022. The two nations have taken steps toward compromise in recent years as their economies become ever more intertwined. China is India's second largest trading partner, accounting for $127.7 billion in bilateral trade last year. Both are founding members of the BRICS Alliance, which includes Russia and Brazil—two countries that have recently been at the center of the Trump administration's crosshairs. Just hours after targeting India for its trade relationship with Russia, the president announced that his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, 'just had a highly productive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.' 'Great progress was made! Afterwards, I updated some of our European Allies. Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come,' Trump Truthed. Sign in to access your portfolio
NBC News
6 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump administration to scale back annual human rights reports
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is scaling back the State Department 's annual Human Rights Report and placing a new focus on restrictions on freedom of expression by U.S. allies as well as adversaries. The reports, which are widely anticipated and read around the world, have been composed by U.S. diplomats under congressional mandate for almost 50 years as a measure of countries' adherence to internationally recognized human rights. The report for last year, which normally would have been released in the spring, has already been delayed by months. 'The 2024 Human Rights Report has been restructured in a way that removes redundancies, increases report readability and is more responsive to the legislative mandates that underpin the report,' a senior State Department official said Wednesday in a briefing to reporters. 'We call out certain abuses that we think deserve highlighting, but just because we focus on one instance does not mean that we are not aware of other instances of human rights abuses,' the official added, noting that all 198 countries and territories were listed in the reports. The delay follows dramatic cuts to the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, including the elimination of almost every office as part of the mass reorganization of the agency earlier this year. The official dismissed concerns about staffing shortages and said the draft version that had been received from the Biden administration prioritized things 'the American people rejected,' noting that 'the process of revising and ensuring that the report is readable and is factually based took several months.' The official said the report is still being finalized but would be transmitted to Congress 'in the near future.' When the 2024 report is released it will reflect the values of this administration, the official said, including concerns about a global threat to freedom of expression. 'Governments around the world continue to use censorship, arbitrary or unlawful surveillance and restrictive laws against disfavored voices, often on political and religious grounds,' the official said. The official cited Vice President JD Vance's controversial speech to the Munich Security Conference in February, during which he accused European Union leaders of suppressing free speech, particularly that of far-right groups. 'We are committed to having frank conversations with our allies, our partners and also our adversaries, to promote freedom of expression around the world,' the official said. The report will also focus on the right to life, 'the most cherished fundamental human right of all,' the official said. 'When governments are using means to hurt life, to destroy life, whether that be through war, whether that be through transnational repression, whether that be through extrajudicial killings, those are issues that we're going to raise.' The official declined to directly address whether the report would address other human rights concerns such as government corruption and restrictions on participation in the political process, the denial of freedom of movement or peaceful assembly and access to free and fair elections.
