
As bar associations go after courtroom imposters in black & white, concerns about ‘overreach'
In an effort to clamp down on the worrying trend of touts and fake lawyers misleading and defrauding litigants, the Rohini Court Bar Association (RCBA) issued a notice 15 July, prohibiting non-lawyers from wearing white shirts and black trousers within the court premises.
New Delhi: From Shahdara to Gurugram, court bar associations are imposing attire restrictions after a surge in non-lawyers posing as advocates — triggering fresh debate on freedom, formality, and access to justice.
'A number of touts are falsely representing themselves as official advocates or clerks… These individuals are misleading and defrauding uneducated litigants under false pretence,' the RCBA said.
A month earlier, the Gurgaon Bar Association passed a similar resolution, emphasising that only enrolled advocates or duly authorised law interns are permitted to wear the professional dress code — white shirt and black trousers, salwar suit, or sari—as per Bar Council of India (BCI) norms.
According to the resolution dated 5 June, violators now face a Rs 5,000 penalty, and the rule is strictly enforced inside the district court complex.
In November 2022, the Shahdara Bar Association of Delhi introduced a new dress code for interns—white shirt and blue coat and trousers. This was done keeping in mind the confusion and mix up between advocates and interns as a large number of interns visit the court.
But this order was set aside by the Delhi High Court which said a standard uniform should be mandated across the board as varying dress codes set by different bar associations would create confusion and difficulties for interns. Thus, the uniform prescribed by the Bar Council of Delhi would be followed uniformly across Delhi.
In November 2018, a Delhi High Court judge set aside a similar notice issued by the Rohini Bar Association directing interns not to wear black coats.
Even though there have been debates about change in the formal attire due to the excessive summer heat—discussions about litigant's clothing have been uncommon.
Also Read: Gurugram Bar cracks down on courtroom impersonators with a 'black & white' ban
The colonial legacy
The black-and-white dress code—black coat, white shirt, neckband—was inherited by the Indian legal system from the British colonial tradition.
The tradition of wearing uniforms in courts is centuries-old. In England, judges began wearing wigs around 1650, although robes had already been in use even earlier. After Independence, India did away with the wig but retained black coats and robes as part of courtroom attire.
Under the Advocates Act of 1961, it is compulsory for lawyers in India to wear a black coat or robe along with a white neckband. Wearing a gown is optional, except when appearing before the Supreme Court or high courts.
Over the years, this uniform has become the visual shorthand for a lawyer in India — both inside courtrooms and in popular culture. But that symbolic power is now being undermined.
The crisp black coat and white shirt are more than just fashion. In India, they're a badge of authority. In Bollywood or TV, anyone in black-and-white is instantly assumed to be a powerful lawyer character—think Jolly LLB or Damini.
According to the Bar Council of India 'an advocate shall appear in court only in the dress prescribed and his appearance should always be presentable'.
The Advocates Act, 1961, along with the Bar Council of India Rules, outlines the dress code for advocates in India.
For male advocates , a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (knee-length jacket), black sherwani, and white bands with an advocate's gown. Alternatively, a black open-breast coat, white collar (stiff or soft), and white bands with an advocate's gown. Long trouser —white, black, striped, or grey—or a dhoti.
For female advocates, a black full- or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar (stiff or soft), and white bands with an advocate's gown. Alternatively, sarees or long skirts in white, black, or any mellow or subdued colour without any print or design or flares in white, black, black-striped, or grey.
But the rules, while clear for advocates, are silent on what litigants or the general public can or cannot wear.
Who owns the black & white?
Traditionally, litigants were expected to dress 'formally' in courts, out of respect for the proceedings. But now, some worry these colour restrictions could affect people simply trying to dress appropriately.
The recent curbs raise questions about dress codes being enforced beyond legal professionals.
'While the RCBA's intention to prevent impersonation is understandable, enforcing a prohibition on basic attire—white shirts and black trousers — across all court visitors strays into arbitrary overreach,' Delhi-based advocate Urja Pandey told ThePrint.
Furthermore, these are common everyday wear in India, worn by students, clerks, office workers, and even children, she explained. 'Banning them impinges on ordinary citizens' freedom of expression and right to access justice, especially when they may lack the means for elaborate wardrobe changes.'
'The Bar Council of India's authority under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act empowers it to regulate advocates' dress, not the public's; extending such rules to litigants or clerks risks legal invalidation,' she added.
Supreme Court advocate Shariq Ahmed Abbasi, however, said the Rohini Bar Association notice must be welcomed by the public at large.
This move, he said, is only to 'save litigants from the menace of touts. It was repeatedly brought to the knowledge of the Bar body that several miscreants had falsely represented themselves as lawyers and defrauded the litigants.'
'The step should be seen in the right earnest with the objective of preserving the interests of litigants and as a mark of professional identity and dignity of the legal fraternity,' he told ThePrint.
About alternatives, advocate Pandey explained how the issue of impersonation can be better addressed through 'targeted measures such as mandatory identity cards, better gate security, biometric checks, or visible signage — not blanket attire bans'.
Ved Prakash Sharma, co-chairman of the Bar Council of India since 2019 and a former chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi, also criticised this move. He said a bar association is an association of advocates working at a particular court complex, and they have no right or authority to prescribe a dress code for members of the society.
'They (bar associations) have no legal or moral authority to do that, and (they) are exceeding their jurisdiction and authority by prescribing a dress code or penalising people wearing advocate attire,' he added. 'Even for advocates, the only statutory body—Bar Council of India—will prescribe a dress code.'
He acknowledged the concerns about touts, security and safety as legitimate, but said 'these things are to be taken up with the law enforcement authorities, the police concerned or the district judge or the High Court.' 'And it is their business how to control and regulate the entry of unwarranted people in the court complex.'
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Read: Bangs, lipstick, low neckline—for Indian woman lawyers, merit evaluation steeped in misogyny
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
66 Maoists carrying cash bounty of Rs 2.31cr surrender in Chhattisgarh
RAIPUR: As many as 66 Maoists, including 49 top rank cadres carrying a cumulative bounty of Rs 2.31crore, on Thursday surrendered before police and paramilitary officials across five districts of Chhattisgarh's Bastar division. There were four women Maoists among those who surrendered. About 1,570 Maoists have renounced violence and surrendered in the past 18 months. Most of the top-ranking Maoists who surrendered were from Bijapur district. These cadres include state zonal committee member (SZCM) Ramanna Irpa, carrying cash bounty of Rs 25 lakh. He surrendered along with 24 others. They carried a total bounty of Rs 1.15 crore. "Maoists, with a bounty of Rs 2.31crore, have surrendered in Bastar division under the 'Poona Margham' (rehabilitation and social integration) campaign," Bastar range IGP P Sundarraj said. Ramanna alias Jagdish alias Vikesh, a 37-year-old SZCM from Bijapur, was considered the "nerve centre" of Maoist operations in the Red Corridor linking Malkangiri in Odisha, Sukma, and Bijapur in Chhattisgarh. He was active since 2002 and commanded company number 8. Ramanna oversaw jungle warfare training, arms procurement, and coordinated major attacks on security forces across Odisha and Chhattisgarh and was involved in at least 40 incidents of violence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo "I joined the Maoist organisation inspired by the 'Jal-Jungle-Jameen' campaign. But, in the past 25 years, promises that the organisations made were never met and no development done. It's a hollow ideology," Ramanna told mediapersons in Bijapur. "This transformation is not a coincidence, but a clear testament to the widespread acceptance of our govt's surrender and rehabilitation policy and welfare-oriented initiatives. Programmes like the Niyad Nellanar Yojana have laid a strong foundation of trust in tribal-dominated regions," Chhattisgarh CM Vishnu Deo Sai said. In Dantewada district, 15 Maoists surrendered, including five carrying a total reward of Rs 17lakh. Budhram alias Lalu - a DVCM -- and his wife Kamli alias Moti Potavi, an area committee member, topped the list, with bounties of Rs 8lakh and Rs 5lakh, respectively. The duo was associated with the movement for over two decades. Another major surrender unfolded in Kanker district with 13 Maoists, carrying a combined bounty of Rs 62lakh. The most high-profile among them was Manglu alias Rupesh alias Arun Komra, a military company number one commander, wanted for a series of deadly ambushes between 2006 and 2024. He carried a bounty of Rs 10lakh.


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gurgaon's buzzing ‘Bengali Market' empties out
Gurgaon: The narrow lanes of Bengali Market near South City, once bustling with life and commerce, now echo with an eerie silence. In less than a week, an estimated 4,000 residents — many who had called this place a home for decades — have vanished, leaving behind their livelihoods and dreams. The exodus began after cops in plainclothes detained some 25 men in a sudden raid to identify Bangladeshi immigrants and Rohingya living illegally here. What followed was a wave of fear and uncertainty that emptied this vibrant settlement — home to drivers, maids, fish sellers, and cooks mainly from West Bengal. You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon "We are people who work to eat. What will we do back home? We can't do farming. It will be very difficult for us to go back and start a life again," said Mohammed Zulfiqar Ali, a driver who has lived in the NCR city for 25 years. His story mirrors that of thousands of others who built their lives here, with children enrolled in local schools and steady jobs supporting their families. Residents alleged that police conducted arbitrary detentions without any proper verification. "They don't ask for IDs. They just pick us up and start beating," said Beauty, a resident for 14 years. She alleged that her teenaged nephew was so severely beaten up that "he cannot even walk". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Ultimate Trick to Finding 5-Star Hotels for $50/Night? Liseer Read More Undo He has since gone back to Bengal. Over the past few days, nearly 250 people have been detained across the city, with four community centres converted into holding facilities in Badshapur, Sector 10A, Sector 40, and Manesar. "When they asked us to show IDs, we did so. But they just said, 'Brother, just sit in the car and we'll go'," said Mohammed Zulfiqar Ali. While some were released from the detention centres in 5-6 hours, others returned home after a day. But those detained alleged torture and humiliation. "His whole skin peeled off," a resident claimed about a neighbour. The fear, Zulfiqar claimed, was so profound that he deleted video evidence of the beatings from his phone, fearing further repercussions. The sudden displacement has created a financial crisis for many. With monthly rents in the city between Rs 3,000 and Rs 7,000, and no savings or employment prospects in their villages back home, families face an uncertain future. "We can feed our children in our villages, but we cannot build their future," said a woman, referring to limited educational opportunities in rural areas. "We don't have anything at home. We earn here, eat, and just pass our days, educating our children a little," she added. While some, like Abhi Rahman, a tea shop owner for nine years, plan to return "when things are settled", most see no immediate hope of coming back. The holding centres currently house hundreds of people, mainly ragpickers employed by sanitation contractors, as authorities verify their documentation.


Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Scared to leave Bengal… but no jobs here': Workers plan to return to Mumbai despite deportation ordeal
They were picked up in Mumbai last month on suspicion of being illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and pushed into the neighbouring country. They were later brought to their native West Bengal following intervention from the state government, but they plan to return to Mumbai despite the ordeal. The reason is simple — they see a much better chance of making ends meet and providing for their families while working in the city. 'There is nothing for us here (in Bengal), no job. For years, we have worked outside, where the pay is almost double. Yes, I am scared to leave Bengal — I still remember the time when we had to sleep under the open sky in Bangladesh after we were pushed out of the country — but when I look at my children, I am more scared. How will I provide for them? I am planning to return (to Mumbai), come what may,' said Mehbub Sheikh (36) from Bhagabangola in Bengal's Murshidabad district, who worked as a construction worker in Mumbai. Apart from Mehbub, Nazimuddin Mondol, Minarul Sheikh, Shamim Khan, Mostafa Kamal Sheikh, Fazar Mondol and his wife Taslima, were detained in Mumbai in June on suspicion of being Bangladeshis who illegally moved to India. On June 14, at around 3 am, they were pushed into Bangladesh, where they spent two nights, before they were brought back to India to their home state of West Bengal. The ordeal has upended the lives of these seven individuals, some of whom still have small businesses to run or contracts to fulfil back in Mumbai. One of them, Minarul Sheikh, has already returned to the city. The others are busy trying to get their documents, such as Aadhaar cards and PAN cards, issued before going back. Their existing documents, they claimed, had been seized by authorities (including their cellphones) . TMC Rajya Sabha MP Samirul Islam, chairman of the West Bengal government's Migrant Labour Welfare Board, said: 'I had spoken to them and told them that we will arrange for a job for them in Bengal. But they are free citizens who have the right to work anywhere in India.' Mehbub Sheikh explained the simple economics that draw them back to Mumbai despite the experience of having been branded illegal immigrants by authorities there. 'It is not hard to get Rs 1,200-1,400 per day in Mumbai with a little bit of extra work. There, you also get months of work continuously. Here, it is just Rs 500 (a day) in my village and Rs 700 in Kolkata. That, too, you don't get work consistently. I have a setup in Mumbai. I owe people about Rs 1 lakh, which I had taken to pay advances to other labourers who work with me,' said Mehbub. 'I have two children who take private tuition. How will I pay for it?' he asked. Minarul Sheikh (30) from Beldanga in Murshidabad, who is already back in Mumbai, has debts to pay and a business to run, his family said. 'A week after he was brought back from Bangladesh, he left for Delhi. Now, he is in Mumbai. He told us that he owes money to a lot of people. He has been in the business of hair cutting, and for years, worked in Mumbai and Delhi. His business cannot be done sitting at home,' said Monijul Sheikh, Minarul's elder brother, who works as a mason in Assam. Mostafa Kamal Sheikh (53), who ran a jhalmuri stand in Mumbai, has a similar story. He says he has been working in the city since 1999 and lived in a rented room at Nalasopara before he was detained and pushed into Bangladesh. 'I have a regular business of selling jhalmuri there, and regular clients. I have given a Rs 16,000 deposit for the room that I rent (for Rs 4,000 a month). Everything is there, and only for festivals do I return home,' Mostafa Kamal said. 'After they took my cell phone and documents, I got a new SIM card from here and also renewed my Aadhaar card. I will apply for a police clearance certificate and when I get it, I will leave the next day,' he said. Another one of the seven, 29-year-old Shamim Khan, said he would also go back to Mumbai as soon as he gets his documents renewed. 'I have a wife and a child to take care of. I have an aged mother to take care of. On July 25, my mother will undergo gallbladder stone surgery. There is a cost involved. There isn't much work here, and the pay is low. In Mumbai, I made Rs 30,000 monthly,' he explained. 'The local MLA and panchayat members came to meet me after I was brought back from Bangladesh. But they will not give me a job, will they? So, I will go back after I get my documents renewed,' Shamim, from Hariharpara in Murshidabad, said. Tahajul Mondol's son Fazar (21) and daughter-in-law Taslima (19) had also been pushed into Bangladesh. He said he would also go to Mumbai now, along with the younger couple. 'They are construction workers and I am a plumber. To bring my son and his wife back home (after they were pushed into Bangladesh), I had to go to Mekhliganj (from where police handed the couple over to their family). The trip cost Rs 24,000, and I had to take out a loan. They had gone to Mumbai to work just five months ago. I have been working in Karnataka for the last three years,' said Tahajul, adding, 'We cannot stay here as there is no proper job.' Nazimuddin Mondol from Hariharpara in Murshidabad said he has to collect payments from several people for work done in Mumbai. 'I worked as a mason and was a labour contractor. People in Mumbai owe me Rs 3-4 lakh in payments. I cannot afford to lose that, so I will go back,' he said. 'In accordance with their skill and the quality of life they are living, there is not sufficient scope or jobs here in Bengal. It is natural that simple monetary economics will rule over fear of persecution,' said Arnab Pal, convener of Parijayi Sramik Aikya Manch. Ravik Bhattacharya is the Chief of Bureau of The Indian Express, Kolkata. Over 20 years of experience in the media industry and covered politics, crime, major incidents and issues, apart from investigative stories in West Bengal, Odisha, Assam and Andaman Nicobar islands. Ravik won the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award in 2007 for political reporting. Ravik holds a bachelor degree with English Hons from Scottish Church College under Calcutta University and a PG diploma in mass communication from Jadavpur University. Ravik started his career with The Asian Age and then moved to The Statesman, The Telegraph and Hindustan Times. ... Read More