logo
As bar associations go after courtroom imposters in black & white, concerns about ‘overreach'

As bar associations go after courtroom imposters in black & white, concerns about ‘overreach'

The Print20-07-2025
'No clerk, litigant, or member of the general public is permitted to wear a white shirt and black pants,' the notice stated, declaring the attire 'strictly reserved' for advocates as a symbol of professional identity.
In an effort to clamp down on the worrying trend of touts and fake lawyers misleading and defrauding litigants, the Rohini Court Bar Association (RCBA) issued a notice 15 July, prohibiting non-lawyers from wearing white shirts and black trousers within the court premises.
New Delhi: From Shahdara to Gurugram, court bar associations are imposing attire restrictions after a surge in non-lawyers posing as advocates — triggering fresh debate on freedom, formality, and access to justice.
'A number of touts are falsely representing themselves as official advocates or clerks… These individuals are misleading and defrauding uneducated litigants under false pretence,' the RCBA said.
A month earlier, the Gurgaon Bar Association passed a similar resolution, emphasising that only enrolled advocates or duly authorised law interns are permitted to wear the professional dress code — white shirt and black trousers, salwar suit, or sari—as per Bar Council of India (BCI) norms.
According to the resolution dated 5 June, violators now face a Rs 5,000 penalty, and the rule is strictly enforced inside the district court complex.
In November 2022, the Shahdara Bar Association of Delhi introduced a new dress code for interns—white shirt and blue coat and trousers. This was done keeping in mind the confusion and mix up between advocates and interns as a large number of interns visit the court.
But this order was set aside by the Delhi High Court which said a standard uniform should be mandated across the board as varying dress codes set by different bar associations would create confusion and difficulties for interns. Thus, the uniform prescribed by the Bar Council of Delhi would be followed uniformly across Delhi.
In November 2018, a Delhi High Court judge set aside a similar notice issued by the Rohini Bar Association directing interns not to wear black coats.
Even though there have been debates about change in the formal attire due to the excessive summer heat—discussions about litigant's clothing have been uncommon.
Also Read: Gurugram Bar cracks down on courtroom impersonators with a 'black & white' ban
The colonial legacy
The black-and-white dress code—black coat, white shirt, neckband—was inherited by the Indian legal system from the British colonial tradition.
The tradition of wearing uniforms in courts is centuries-old. In England, judges began wearing wigs around 1650, although robes had already been in use even earlier. After Independence, India did away with the wig but retained black coats and robes as part of courtroom attire.
Under the Advocates Act of 1961, it is compulsory for lawyers in India to wear a black coat or robe along with a white neckband. Wearing a gown is optional, except when appearing before the Supreme Court or high courts.
Over the years, this uniform has become the visual shorthand for a lawyer in India — both inside courtrooms and in popular culture. But that symbolic power is now being undermined.
The crisp black coat and white shirt are more than just fashion. In India, they're a badge of authority. In Bollywood or TV, anyone in black-and-white is instantly assumed to be a powerful lawyer character—think Jolly LLB or Damini.
According to the Bar Council of India 'an advocate shall appear in court only in the dress prescribed and his appearance should always be presentable'.
The Advocates Act, 1961, along with the Bar Council of India Rules, outlines the dress code for advocates in India.
For male advocates , a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (knee-length jacket), black sherwani, and white bands with an advocate's gown. Alternatively, a black open-breast coat, white collar (stiff or soft), and white bands with an advocate's gown. Long trouser —white, black, striped, or grey—or a dhoti.
For female advocates, a black full- or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar (stiff or soft), and white bands with an advocate's gown. Alternatively, sarees or long skirts in white, black, or any mellow or subdued colour without any print or design or flares in white, black, black-striped, or grey.
But the rules, while clear for advocates, are silent on what litigants or the general public can or cannot wear.
Who owns the black & white?
Traditionally, litigants were expected to dress 'formally' in courts, out of respect for the proceedings. But now, some worry these colour restrictions could affect people simply trying to dress appropriately.
The recent curbs raise questions about dress codes being enforced beyond legal professionals.
'While the RCBA's intention to prevent impersonation is understandable, enforcing a prohibition on basic attire—white shirts and black trousers — across all court visitors strays into arbitrary overreach,' Delhi-based advocate Urja Pandey told ThePrint.
Furthermore, these are common everyday wear in India, worn by students, clerks, office workers, and even children, she explained. 'Banning them impinges on ordinary citizens' freedom of expression and right to access justice, especially when they may lack the means for elaborate wardrobe changes.'
'The Bar Council of India's authority under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act empowers it to regulate advocates' dress, not the public's; extending such rules to litigants or clerks risks legal invalidation,' she added.
Supreme Court advocate Shariq Ahmed Abbasi, however, said the Rohini Bar Association notice must be welcomed by the public at large.
This move, he said, is only to 'save litigants from the menace of touts. It was repeatedly brought to the knowledge of the Bar body that several miscreants had falsely represented themselves as lawyers and defrauded the litigants.'
'The step should be seen in the right earnest with the objective of preserving the interests of litigants and as a mark of professional identity and dignity of the legal fraternity,' he told ThePrint.
About alternatives, advocate Pandey explained how the issue of impersonation can be better addressed through 'targeted measures such as mandatory identity cards, better gate security, biometric checks, or visible signage — not blanket attire bans'.
Ved Prakash Sharma, co-chairman of the Bar Council of India since 2019 and a former chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi, also criticised this move. He said a bar association is an association of advocates working at a particular court complex, and they have no right or authority to prescribe a dress code for members of the society.
'They (bar associations) have no legal or moral authority to do that, and (they) are exceeding their jurisdiction and authority by prescribing a dress code or penalising people wearing advocate attire,' he added. 'Even for advocates, the only statutory body—Bar Council of India—will prescribe a dress code.'
He acknowledged the concerns about touts, security and safety as legitimate, but said 'these things are to be taken up with the law enforcement authorities, the police concerned or the district judge or the High Court.' 'And it is their business how to control and regulate the entry of unwarranted people in the court complex.'
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Read: Bangs, lipstick, low neckline—for Indian woman lawyers, merit evaluation steeped in misogyny
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kerala nuns held in Chhattisgarh for alleged religious conversion, bishops' group calls case ‘false'
Kerala nuns held in Chhattisgarh for alleged religious conversion, bishops' group calls case ‘false'

Scroll.in

time11 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Kerala nuns held in Chhattisgarh for alleged religious conversion, bishops' group calls case ‘false'

Two nuns from Kerala and a man were arrested at the Durg railway station in Chhattisgarh on Saturday for alleged human trafficking and religious conversion, The News Minute reported. The nuns – Preeti Mary and Vandana Francis – are members of the Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate, a congregation under the Syro-Malabar Church in Alappuzha district's Cherthala town and were working at a hospital in Agra, Mathrubhumi reported. The two nuns and the man, identified as Sukhman Mandavi, were accompanying three women from Chhattisgarh's Narayanpur district. Sebastian Poomattam, vicar general of the Raipur Archdiocese, told The News Minute that the nuns were taking the women to Agra where they had been offered jobs of kitchen helpers at a convent. 'They had the consent letters from their parents and were all above 18 years of age,' he added. While at the railway station, a ticket examiner questioned the group on the platform. 'The girls and one man entered the platform where the nuns were waiting,' The News Minute quoted Poomattam as saying. 'The examiner asked about their tickets, and they said the nuns had them.' The vicar general claimed that the examiner informed members of the Hindutva group Bajrang Dal about the situation and that the outfit's members 'arrived in large numbers within minutes'. The police detained the nuns, the man and the three women. The Bajrang Dal vigilantes protested at the police station and demanded the registration of a first information report against the nuns, The News Minute reported. The nuns and Mandavi were remanded to judicial custody till August 8. They were charged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pertaining to human trafficking and sections of Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act. The three women were taken to a government-run shelter home. Unidentified police officers told the Hindustan Times that the nuns were allegedly taking the women to Agra with the promise of 'good facilities and a monthly salary of Rs 8,000 to Rs 10,000'. The police had reached the railway station based on a tip-off from members of the Bajrang Dal, the officers were quoted as having said. 'When questioned, the women said that initially they were told they would be offered jobs within Chhattisgarh, but when they reached Durg, they were told that the nuns had come to take them to Agra,' the newspaper quoted the officers as saying. Commenting on the incident, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of India alleged that a ' false ' case had been filed against the nuns under the influence of Hindutva groups, Onmanorama reported. The bishops' conference sought the intervention of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the matter. Kerala CM seeks PM's intervention Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Sunday also sought Modi's intervention in ensuring justice to the two nuns, PTI reported. In a letter to the prime minister, the chief minister said that Mary and Francis were arrested when they had gone to receive women who were coming to work in their convent. Family members of the two nuns have claimed that they had not been able to communicate with them after they were taken into custody, he added. Vijayan requested the prime minister to intervene in the matter and ensure transparent and fair proceedings, PTI reported. Alappuzha MP KC Venugopal said on Sunday that attacks on minorities had seen 'a rampant increase under BJP-ruled states, be it Chhattisgarh, Odisha or MP [Madhya Pradesh]'. The Congress leader said that he had written to the Union home ministry and Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai demanding strict punishment against the culprits and the urgent need to uphold the Constitution 'so that fundamental rights of minorities are not threatened under their rule'. 'The latest attacks by Bajrang Dal goons on 2 Catholic nuns in Durg, Chhattisgarh point to a tacit support for such hate crimes from the ruling establishment,' Venugopal said on social media. In his letter to the home ministry and the Chhattisgarh chief minister, Venugopal said that it was 'deeply disturbing that self proclaimed vigilantes can instigate communal tension and make baseless accusations of conversion and trafficking without any legal foundation'. He added: 'Despite clear documentation and parental consent, the authorities have chosen to keep the nuns and the man in custody, reportedly under political pressure.'

Important cases listed for hearing in Delhi High Court on Monday
Important cases listed for hearing in Delhi High Court on Monday

News18

time34 minutes ago

  • News18

Important cases listed for hearing in Delhi High Court on Monday

Agency: PTI Last Updated: Important matter listed for hearing in the Delhi High Court on Monday, July 28: * Pleas against Centre's decision clearing film 'Udaipur Files' for release. PTI SKV UK MNK MNK (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

'Death to Trump': EasyJet flight to Scotland diverted after man yells 'Death to US, Allahu Akbar'
'Death to Trump': EasyJet flight to Scotland diverted after man yells 'Death to US, Allahu Akbar'

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

'Death to Trump': EasyJet flight to Scotland diverted after man yells 'Death to US, Allahu Akbar'

A passenger on board EasyJet flight to Scotland claimed there was a bomb on the plane as he shouted 'death to America' and 'death to Trump.' read more A man sparked panic on an easyJet flight from Luton to Glasgow by falsely claiming he had a bomb onboard. An EasyJet flight from Luton, England, to Scotland had to be diverted on Sunday (July 27) after a passenger claimed there was a bomb on the plane and also shouted 'Death to Trump (US President)'. A video, which gained traction on social media but could not be independently verified, allegedly captures the man standing in the plane's aisle, shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (an Arabic phrase meaning 'God is great'), along with 'death to America' and 'death to Trump.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 🚨 'I'm going to bomb the plane, Death to America, Death to Trump - Allahu Akbar' Recorded earlier today aboard a Domestic internal flight EasyJet over The UK Legacy Media aren't showing you this ‼️ — Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) July 27, 2025 The footage shows fellow passengers restraining him by tackling him to the floor. He is also heard yelling, 'Stop the plane. Find the bomb on the plane,' while other passengers appear visibly shocked and scared. This caused panic among the passengers, forcing the pilot to land the plane at the nearest airport. The 41-year-old man was later arrested. In a similar incident earlier this month, a 21-year-old Indian-origin man, Ishaan Sharma, was arrested in Miami for allegedly attacking passengers on a Frontier Airlines flight. Sharma reportedly displayed erratic behaviour, including mocking laughter and making threatening remarks such as, ''you punt, mortal man, if you challenge me, it will result in your death.' Upon landing in Miami, he was charged with battery. Southwest Airlines flight experiences tense moment In a separate incident, a Southwest Airlines flight experienced a tense moment when the pilot informed passengers that their Boeing 737 had narrowly avoided a collision with another plane before safely landing in Las Vegas. The incident occurred on July 25, during Southwest Flight 1496, which departed from Hollywood Burbank Airport just before noon. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to a flight tracking website, the jet plummeted hundreds of feet in just over 30 seconds. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reported that the crew was responding to an onboard alert about a nearby aircraft. The FAA is currently investigating the incident. Southwest Airlines explained that the crew reacted to two alerts, prompting the pilot to first climb and then descend. The airline noted that the flight proceeded to Las Vegas, 'where it landed uneventfully.' Southwest is collaborating with the FAA 'to further understand the circumstances' of the event.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store