logo
Asean's new role as middle ground

Asean's new role as middle ground

The Star21 hours ago
Analysts say meetings among top diplomats show the bloc's increasing relevance
KUALA LUMPUR: The slew of unprecedented high-level meetings held between top diplomats at the just concluded Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM) underscores the relevance of Asean as a geopolitical middle ground, say analysts.
They said these meetings, which involved diplomats from global powers, showed that Asean is becoming more credible.
Political analyst Azmi Hasan said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had set the tone of Malaysia's chairmanship of Asean by pledging to raise other international issues aside from matters linked to South-East Asia.
'This means being involved in outside issues such as the conflicts in Gaza, Russia-Ukraine, Iran-Israel and India-Pakistan.
'So, credit should be given to the chairman, who tried to elevate Asean to be respected by other nations,' he said.
Azmi said the joint communique issued at the end of the four-day AMM from July 8 to July 11 showed that Asean wants to exert influence on global issues.
'The side meetings held among these global superpowers on the sidelines of the AMM are very important,' he said.
Among top diplomats present at the AMM were Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Among the important bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the conference was one between Lavrov and Rubio, which concluded after about 50 minutes.
Rubio spoke with Lavrov here on Thursday evening, having already met with the 10-member Asean bloc.
Great power dialogue: Rubio (left) meeting with Wang (right) at the sidelines of the Asean Foreign Ministers Meeting. — AFP
Rubio, who was on his first Asia trip since taking over the State Department, also held a meeting with Wang and described it as 'positive and constructive'.
In the joint communique issued on July 11, Asean foreign ministers said they are strengthening ties with global partners while maintaining their neutral and central role in the region.
Asean also reaffirmed its commitment to an open and inclusive regional order, stressing that the regional group remains a platform for dialogue, not rivalry.
Assoc prof Khoo Ying Hooi of Universiti Malaya International and Strategic Studies Department said Asean has long positioned itself as a neutral and inclusive regional convener.
The AMM this year had underscored that role in an unprecedented way, as many bilateral meetings were held on the sidelines, she said.
'These engagements, especially the Wang Yi-Rubio dialogue, suggest that Asean is increasingly considered a geopolitical middle ground where rivalries can be managed diplomatically.
'That said, we should not romanticise this role too much. Asean's 'centrality' works precisely because it offers a low-stake platform, one that avoids tough commitments or binding rules,' she said.
Khoo said global superpowers are showing up at the AMM because the presence reflects their desire to shape regional norms in their own terms.
'Asean may be hosting the table, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's controlling the menu,' she said.
Khoo said US-China tensions and escalating trade disputes, as well as varying tariff rates announced by the United States, had dominated the headlines during the AMM last week.
'This placed Rubio in a challenging position during his visit, as he sought to reassure South-East Asian partners while Washington's economic policies threatened their interests.
'The regional reaction was mixed; some Asean countries expressed frustration, while others began exploring deeper trade ties with China as a counterweight,' she said.
Khoo said Beijing capitalised on that moment and used the AMM's sidelines to present itself as a more stable partner.
She noted that issues pertaining to Palestine, the South China Sea and Myanmar were also raised.
'But it was the broader structural clash between the US and China through economic tools like tariffs and diplomatic influence that shaped the tone and urgency of this year's AMM discussions,' she added.
Khoo described the AMM as a diplomatic litmus test on managing rivalries and maintaining unity.
'The Asean Summit in October will be pivotal. Timor-Leste is expected to be formally admitted. Malaysia has been signalling a desire for renewal, not a radical overhaul, but a recalibration.
'The 47th Summit presents a potential opportunity for Asean to demonstrate greater confidence and cohesion.
'However, this will largely depend on the willingness of member states to transcend the usual practice of consensus and actively pursue structural reform,' she stated.
Asia West East Centre director and co-founder Abdolreza Alami said Asean has emerged as a trusted platform due to its strategic geographical and economic position at the intersection of the East and West.
'The region sits at the heart of one of the world's most vital geopolitical crossroads – the Indo-Pacific – where the interests of major global players such as China, the US, the European Union and others increasingly converge.
'The growing interest in Asean, evident from the unprecedented number of high-level bilateral and multilateral meetings on the sidelines of the AMM, underscores how the organisation is seen as a valuable venue for diplomacy and strategic dialogue,' he said.
Abdolreza also said the AMM is a clear precursor to a highly significant 47th Asean Summit in October, which will be potentially attended by heads of state from major powers.
This, he said, is symbolically and strategically important, especially at a time when global polarisation is intensifying.
'The challenge for Asean will be to navigate these dynamics carefully, reinforcing its unity and ensuring that it remains a space for cooperation – not competition – between great powers,' he said.
'If managed wisely, Asean could play an increasingly critical role in shaping a stable and inclusive regional order,' added Abdolreza.
The 47th Asean Summit will be held in Kuala Lumpur from Oct 26 to 28.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alumni seminar held in Mauritania to mark 60th anniversary of diplomatic ties with China
Alumni seminar held in Mauritania to mark 60th anniversary of diplomatic ties with China

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

Alumni seminar held in Mauritania to mark 60th anniversary of diplomatic ties with China

NOUAKCHOTT, July 13 (Xinhua) -- The Association of Mauritanian Alumni of Chinese Universities has held a celebratory seminar to mark the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Mauritania and China. The seminar was held on Saturday in Nouakchott, the capital of Mauritania, under the theme "Mauritania-China Relations and Prospects for Joint Cooperation." It brought together intellectuals and political figures, who highlighted the history and evolution of bilateral ties as well as prospects for future cooperation. Yarbane Kharrachi, president of the association, said Mauritania-China relations have been rooted in mutual respect, solidarity, and non-interference in internal affairs. He noted that the relationship has since expanded into various fields, directly impacting Mauritania's development trajectory. Kharrachi added that the 60th anniversary offers a valuable opportunity to strengthen bilateral cooperation in support of inclusive and sustainable development. He also conveyed the association's hope for increased Chinese investment in Mauritania's key sectors to help create jobs and drive economic growth. For his part, Chinese Ambassador to Mauritania Tang Zhongdong expressed his delight at attending the event, underlining the resilience and strength of bilateral relations despite global changes. Tang noted that the past six decades have seen fruitful cooperation between the two countries across multiple sectors. He called for building a China-Mauritania community with a shared future and turning bilateral relations into a model of mutually beneficial cooperation.

Philippines, US and Japan push to advance trilateral economic ties
Philippines, US and Japan push to advance trilateral economic ties

The Star

time4 hours ago

  • The Star

Philippines, US and Japan push to advance trilateral economic ties

MANILA (Bernama-PNA): The Philippines, the United States, and Japan are focused on developing their trilateral economic partnership to complement their growing security ties, the US State Department has announced. According to the Philippine News Agency (PNA), the foreign ministers of the three states - Secretary Ma. Theresa Lazaro, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi - discussed the plan and the need to unlock more private sector investments in their flagship Luzon Economic Corridor. They met on the sidelines of the ASEAN-related foreign ministers' meeting in Malaysia on Thursday (July 10), the statement said. The State Department said Rubio highlighted Manila's wealth in critical minerals and stressed the need to diversify critical mineral supply chains. The officials proposed advancing trilateral cooperation in the Philippines on cyber security, energy (including civil nuclear energy), and investments in reliable and secure telecommunications networks. They concluded with an agreement to hold sectoral trilateral discussions at the senior officials' level in the coming months to advance their shared desire for peace and security in the region. In the same meeting, the officials reaffirmed their interest in advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific and agreed to coordinate cooperation on maritime security, including through Maritime Cooperative Activities, trilateral military exercises, and capacity building and assistance for the Philippine Coast Guard and other Philippine maritime authorities. -- Bernama-PNA

Patriots limit 'Trump doctrine'
Patriots limit 'Trump doctrine'

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Patriots limit 'Trump doctrine'

AS some 20 Iranian ballistic missiles headed for the United States air base at Al Udeid in Qatar last month following US strikes against Iran, the only US personnel at the almost entirely evacuated base were some 40 air defence personnel manning a Patriot missile battery flown in a few weeks earlier. According to a press briefing by US chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Daniel Caine, a few days later, together with another Patriot detachment from the Qatari military also present at the base, the US team fired more of the defence missiles than in any previous engagement since the system was first deployed in the first Gulf War in 1991. "They crushed it," he said, noting that damage to the base was minimal with no casualties. On the surface, officials from the Trump administration have painted last month's US strikes against Iran as an unusually decisive use of US power, talking of a new "Trump doctrine" in which military force is used with much clearer aims than under previous presidents. They argue it has "restored American deterrence", sending a clear signal to other potential foes, including Moscow and Beijing. The administration had also presented its 52-day bombing campaign against Houthi militants in Yemen as being similarly successful in restoring freedom of navigation there — only for the Houthis to restart attacks on shipping in recent days. All of that comes amid growing divisions within the administration over the future use of US military force. On that front, recent events in the Gulf have had consequences in Washington and beyond. According to reports last week, the US has barely 25 per cent of the Patriot missile stockpile the Pentagon believes it needs. Consumption of those missiles in the Middle East and Ukraine has made growing those stocks impossible despite heightened production. Last week, that prompted a Pentagon edict stopping shipment of several weapons types to Ukraine, including Patriot, long-range HIMARS strike rockets and artillery shells, described at the time as a deliberate decision to help rebuild US stocks. That decision, however, has since been reversed by President Donald Trump amid reports it had never received White House authorisation in the first place. "We have to," Trump told a press conference in Washington. "They have to be able to defend themselves." The US president has become increasingly critical of his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in recent days, accusing him of being uninterested in Trump's efforts to mediate a peace deal as Russian forces have launched the largest drone strikes of the war against Ukraine. That will likely worry the powerful group within the current administration known as "the restrainers", keen to rein in the multi-decade US tendency to make open-ended defence commitments. On one side are several top US commanders who argue Ukraine should be supported as its defeat could embolden Moscow and Beijing to launch future attacks. On the other are individuals, including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon No. 3 civilian official Elbridge Colby, who have argued publicly that too much support to Ukraine helps China by driving down already limited US weapons stocks. Ironically, the restrainers — including Vice-President JD Vance, among the most publicly committed US officials to reducing America's overseas military footprint — had been among the most supportive of Trump's actions on Iran. "Number one: you articulate a clear American interest ... in this case, that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. "Number two, you try to aggressively diplomatically solve that problem. "Number three, when you can't solve it diplomatically, you use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it becomes a protracted conflict," Vance told an Ohio fundraising dinner last month. Another even more significant challenge is that the threats the US now most needs to deter — a potential Chinese attack on Taiwan, or a Russian assault into Eastern Europe — are likely impossible to counter through a single US strike. Instead, Trump or his successors would likely face a choice between either unleashing a massive open-ended US conventional military campaign — at the very least an air, drone and missile offensive against advancing Russian or Chinese forces — or abandoning Taiwan and eastern European allies to their fate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store