Korean War Veterans Day marked with ceremony at Burnaby memorial
More than 100 people gathered at the Korean War memorial in Burnaby's Central Park Saturday morning to mark the 72nd anniversary of the armistice that ended the conflict.
The wreath-laying ceremony also marked the 12th annual Korean War Veterans Day, which was designated a day of remembrance via an act of Parliament in 2013.
MPs, MLAs, local politicians, active-duty members of the Canadian Forces, veterans, police, firefighters and community members all turned out for Saturday's ceremony at the Ambassador of Peace Korean War Memorial.
In addition to the wreath-laying, attendees at Saturday's event took in Korean choir and drum performances.
'We just want to commemorate and honour the Korean War veterans,' said Michael Chang, president of the Western Canada chapter of the Korean Veterans Association.
Among the United Nations forces, Canada sent the third-most troops of any nation, with more than 26,000 deployed, nearly a third of the country's military at the time.
'They sent 30 per cent of all forces to Korea,' Chang said. 'In 1950, I think nobody even knew where Korea was.'
While Saturday was the 72nd anniversary of the armistice, this year is the 75th since the war began.
Veterans of the conflict are now typically in their 90s, if they're still alive, said Chang.
'That means, you know, a lot of them, sadly, pass away every year,' he said. 'So, every year has kind of a special meaning for the veterans.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
8 minutes ago
- CTV News
Is Canada's parents and grandparents sponsorship program working? Here's what families and an expert think
Maria Torres has been waiting 10 years to sponsor her elderly mother to live in Canada. Maria Torres has been waiting 10 years for a chance to sponsor her widowed mother from Colombia as a permanent resident so she can finally live in Canada with her family. Over the next few weeks starting Monday, thousands of people in Canada are set to receive invitations for applications to sponsor their parents and grandparents under the federal government's reunification program. Torres, a pharmacy assistant who lives with her husband and eight-year-old daughter in Ottawa, is anxiously waiting to find out if she is among those who will be randomly chosen to apply. Torres said she filled out an interest-to-sponsor form – the first step before anyone can be invited to apply – for the 2020 intake. The government is only sending emailed invitations to potential sponsors from that pool, with the goal of accepting 10,000 complete applications from 17,860 invitations. 'It's like when you buy the lottery, you just hope that you win it, but if you don't, well, buy it again and wait,' Torres said in a video interview with 'You're heartbroken and you have to live with this sadness and disappointment.' Torres said her 71-year-old mother visits for limited periods through a tourist visa. 'She's here, she's happy, she's with her granddaughter, with her daughter, and then she has to go back to Colombia alone because she doesn't have any more children,' Torres said. 'And for us it's really hard, and not just because she's leaving, but we don't know if we are going to be able to see her again.' Torres was among those who expressed their concerns with the program in response to a callout to readers. Some said it could be too late for reunification if families continue to wait years just to get a chance to be part of the pool. Many said the process has been frustrating and disheartening. Backlog While Torres may be lucky just to be a potential sponsor, some believe the process needs to improve. 'I think people want at a minimum the opportunity to be chosen, and there's been no opportunity for anybody who wasn't able to put their name in the pool in 2020, and so that's hugely unfair,' Tamara Mosher-Kuczer, founder of Lighthouse Immigration Law in Ottawa and a member of the Canadian Immigration Lawyers Association, said in a video interview with Harpreet Singh, a digital marketing consultant from Langley, B.C., who came to Canada from the U.K. in 2018, can relate to these frustrations as he hopes to sponsor his 59-year-old mother. Singh, who is now a Canadian citizen, hopes to launch a petition, with the support of an MP, that would call on the federal government to open the interest-to-sponsor form to those outside the 2020 pool. 'The idea behind it is good,' Singh said about the program in a video interview with 'It's just that it needs to be overhauled, so everybody gets a fair and equal chance.' While critics say the process is taking an emotional toll on families, the federal government says it is dealing with the backlog from the 2020 submissions. 'Given the number of submissions remaining in the 2020 pool, IRCC (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada) will continue to draw from that pool, giving those potential sponsors, who have been waiting for years, the opportunity to apply,' spokesperson Mary Rose Sabater wrote in an email to IRCC couldn't immediately say how many submissions remain from that year. Asked when the government would open submissions to people outside of the 2020 pool, Sabater said the federal government 'cannot comment on policy decisions on future intakes,' noting that it would communicate any news publicly. The federal government recommends that, for now, people consider the super visa program , which allows parents or grandparents to visit Canada for five years at a time, with the option to extend their visit for up to two years without leaving the country. When asked about concerns that the process is unfair, Remi Lariviere, another IRCC spokesperson, wrote in a separate email to that 'the government is committed to reuniting as many families as possible.' While the demand 'significantly exceeds' admissions targets, Lariviere said, the government's top priorities include both attracting top talent and ensuring sustainable levels of immigration. Who qualifies as a sponsor? Sponsors must be a Canadian citizen, permanent resident or person registered in the country as an Indian, according to the federal government. They must be at least 18 years old and living in Canada at the time they apply to sponsor their biological or adopted parents or grandparents. Additionally, sponsors must provide proof they have enough income to support the individuals they are sponsoring, as well as themselves and their own families, and ensure the people they're sponsoring won't need social assistance. 'Part of our family is missing' Rohan Chandna, who arrived in Saskatoon from India in 2018 as a permanent resident, said he and his wife have 'well-established jobs' and can easily support his parents in Canada. But he said he didn't apply in the 2020 pool because he didn't meet the income requirement then. At the time, he was new to the country. Instead, he said his parents, both in their 70s, will come to Canada this September on a super visa. 'It's unfortunate because we are in a very good position to manage to support them here, whether it's medically, house-wise, financially, whatever they need, ' Chandna, an IT project manager who has two daughters aged 10 and four, said in a video interview with 'Since we have come here, we are feeling that part of our family is missing.' Chandna wept as he described how difficult it was not to have his parents around while his eldest daughter spent about three years undergoing treatment for leukemia. 'We had no support at the time, like it was just me and my wife juggling work,' he said. 'Desperately waiting' Soodeh Farokhi, the CEO of an AI startup, said she planned to apply to sponsor her parents, both from Iran, after 2020 but wasn't aware that the government wouldn't accept interest-to-sponsor submissions outside of that pool. She has been 'desperately waiting' ever since. 'I know that even if we are in the pool, it might take many years to bring our parents, but still the hope and that fairness means a lot to me,' Farokhi, who became a Canadian citizen in 2022, said in a video interview with Farokhi's parents spent some time in Canada years ago on visitor visas to help care for her two children when they were born. Now with all the instability in Iran, Farokhi said it's unlikely she'll be able to visit her parents in the country. 'The emotional toll on my parents not seeing their grandchildren is very high,' said Farokhi. 'My mom is actually suffering from depression being far from her grandchildren.' Farokhi said she is not asking for special treatment and just wants the chance for more families to be considered as part of the pool. 'I'm a working mom and entrepreneur,' she said. 'I have a very busy life both professionally and personally and having my parents beside me means a lot.'
National Post
8 minutes ago
- National Post
Trump's Golden Dome missile-defence push on Canada leaves Ottawa with few good options
Washington, D.C. — U.S. President Donald Trump wants a Golden Dome of missile defence over the United States, and if you're thinking this sounds familiar, you'd be right. Back in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, aka Star Wars, also aimed to develop a space-based and layered defence system to knock out any incoming strikes. Article content It didn't work out. Article content Article content Article content The space-based part proved elusive, but technology has now advanced enough to make more of it feasible, at least in theory. Trump envisions a system that includes space-based weaponry that can take out missiles — ballistic and hypersonic — and he wants Canada to help pay for building this defensive wall over North America. Article content Article content 'I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation, but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State,' the president posted on social in May. Since then, the quoted price has gone up to US$71 billion. Article content Ottawa has acknowledged that discussions with the U.S. are underway, but they're happening against a backdrop of strained U.S.-Canada relations over defence spending and a trade war. With pressure on Prime Minister Mark Carney to cool Washington's belligerence, the Golden Dome's feasibility as a technology may matter less than the symbolism of Canada's willingness to collaborate with the White House. And none of the options for Canada, whether it's spending tens of billions of dollars to buy into a risky initiative or spurning a testy and vindictive president, are painless. Article content Article content Article content Article content U.S. missile defense currently includes the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) in Alaska and California, which is designed to intercept ICBMs in space and has a 55 per cent test success rate. The Patriot system defends battlefield and critical sites against shorter-range missiles closer to their targets, and the mobile THAAD system (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) provides regional defence against various missile threats, also closer to their targets. The naval Aegis system, meanwhile, offers effective naval-based missile interception – and the Patriot, THAAD and Aegis all generally outperform GMD. Article content Golden Dome aims to integrate all of the above — the ground and sea-based technologies — while adding a new space-based layer of satellites equipped with sensors and interceptors to detect incoming threats and take them out at various stages of their trajectories. Article content This would improve U.S. missile defence beyond just dealing with potential ballistic missiles coming from rogue nations such as North Korea or Iran, said Patrycja Bazylczyk, a research associate with the Missile Defense Project at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies CSIS.
National Post
38 minutes ago
- National Post
Barry Appleton: Canada submits to China's algorithmic colonialism
On Nov. 6, 2024, Canada ordered TikTok's local offices expelled but left its influence engine untouched. The result? Fewer Canadian jobs, no new oversight, and continued foreign control over our digital public square. It makes about as much sense as banning foreign diplomats while allowing their propaganda broadcasts to continue uninterrupted. Article content Canada's shutdown order, issued after a national security review, eliminates TikTok's 350 Canadian employees and halts cultural sponsorships worth millions. Yet the algorithm that shapes what Canadians see, share, and believe remains entirely in Chinese hands. We have managed to achieve the worst of both worlds: less accountability with zero additional protection. Article content Article content Article content This backwards approach reveals how Canada thinks about digital threats with analog tools. We are treating algorithmic sovereignty like a traditional corporate takeover — kick out the foreign company, problem solved. But in the attention economy, corporate presence matters far less than code control. The algorithm is the empire, not the office lease. Article content Article content Contrast this with the United States, which pursued forced divestiture — demanding that ByteDance sell TikTok to American owners or face a complete ban. While controversial, this approach at least recognized that ownership matters for algorithmic control. The U.S. understood that keeping the platform while changing its governance structure could address security concerns without eliminating the service entirely. Article content Why didn't Canada consider forced divestiture? The option deserves serious examination. Unlike our current approach, divestiture could have preserved Canadian jobs, maintained cultural sponsorships, and potentially brought algorithmic decision-making under friendlier jurisdiction. Instead of corporate whack-a-mole, we could have pursued structural change. Article content While Canada plays these games, serious digital powers are asserting algorithmic control. The European Union mandates transparency reports for recommendation systems, requires platforms to offer non-profiling feeds, and conducts algorithmic audits through its European Centre for Algorithmic Transparency. Even authoritarian China requires tech companies to file algorithmic parameters with regulators. Article content Article content Canada? We disbanded the company but kept the black box. Article content The irony runs deeper. TikTok's Steve de Eyre argues that eliminating Canadian operations removes 'the accountability of having a TikTok entity within Canada's legal jurisdiction.' He is right. We now have algorithmic colonialism — where our information flow is governed by foreign logic systems we cannot audit or influence — without even the pretense of local oversight. Article content This approach stems from fundamental confusion about how digital sovereignty works. Traditional sovereignty meant controlling territory and physical infrastructure. Digital sovereignty means controlling the logic systems that govern information flow. When algorithms decide what news Canadians see during elections, or when TikTok's system shapes teenage mental health through curated feeds, corporate nationality becomes secondary to algorithmic accountability.
