
Disney's settlement with ‘Mandalorian' actor Gina Carano isn't capitulation. Firing her was
The settlement details have not been made public, but Lucasfilm released a statement praising Carano's on-set professionalism and expressing the hope of 'identifying opportunities to work together with Ms. Carano in the near future.'
I am here to beg everyone to remain calm and avoid using the four Cs: cancel culture (is this the end of it?) and corporate capitulation (is this another example of it?)
No and no.
Cancel culture has long been an amorphous and often recklessly applied term, used to describe a litany of events, including but certainly not limited to male predators losing their jobs, students protesting their school's choice of graduation speakers and outrage over J.K. Rowling's stance on transgender women.
Recently, however, it has taken a far more concrete shape that looks astonishingly like the White House where President Trump continues to literally cancel all manner of things, including U.S. membership in the World Health Organization, the regulatory power of the Environmental Protection Agency and huge portions of Medicaid. Recently, he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after the bureau documented weaker than expected numbers for July and downward revisions for the previous two months.
Corporate capitulation, too, is alive and well, with law firms, universities and media companies falling like dominoes before Trump's lawsuits and threats of defunding. Last year, Trump sued ABC and its parent company Disney for defamation after anchor George Stephanopoulos wrongly stated on air that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping E. Jean Carroll — Trump had been found civilly liable of sexually assaulting and defaming Carroll. Disney settled for $15 million, paid to Trump's presidential foundation and museum.
Even more troubling was Paramount Global's decision to pay a $16-million settlement in what many consider a frivolous lawsuit brought by Trump against '60 Minutes.' After late-night host Stephen Colbert called the move a 'big fat bribe' designed to ensure Paramount's recent acquisition by Skydance, CBS, which is owned by Paramount, announced that 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' was being canceled due to financial considerations.
So while it is tempting to see Disney settling with Carano as a piece of a larger and very worrisome whole, particularly when Elon Musk financed her lawsuit, it was in fact simply the right thing to do.
Carano is a former mixed martial artist turned actor who has been vocal about her support for conservative causes and President Trump. In 2020, she had caught some flack for posting 'beep/bop/boop' as her pronouns in her Twitter bio, which some took as her way of mocking trans people. She denied this, changed her bio and expressed support for the trans community.
There were also posts that criticized masking policies and shutdowns during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as one calling for an investigation into voter fraud after the 2020 election.
But it was a repost on Instagram that cost her her job — in February 2021, she reposted a famously horrific image of a half-naked Jewish woman fleeing from a mob with a moronically simplistic message about divisive politics: 'Most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?'
Landing just a month after then-President Trump sent an armed mob to attack the Capitol in the hopes of overturning an election he refused to believe he had lost, the post, which appeared to compare MAGA supporters in 2021 America with Jews in Nazi Germany, sparked #FireGinaCarano.
And that's exactly what Disney did. Calling her posts 'abhorrent and unacceptable,' Lucasfilm excised her character from 'The Mandalorian' and canceled an upcoming spinoff in which she was to star. Her talent agency, UTA, dropped her and Hasbro canceled a line of toys based on her 'Mandalorian' character.
It was an overreaction that smacked of fear and pandering. I do not agree with the sentiments Carano expressed in her posts, but compared with the blithely toxic abuse regularly used on social media, they are relatively benign, based far more on genuine ignorance — most people are in fact aware of the vicious antisemitism leveraged by the Nazis as well as their institutionalized tactics of fear — than anything else.
Of course, those who attempt to be politically provocative on social media (and reposting a photo of a victimized Jewish woman in such context is the definition of political provocation) cannot then feign shock and dismay when people are provoked, especially at a time when far-right tweets, including the president's, had led to a violent attack against lawmakers. (Hence the irony of Musk's support — the platform he renamed X was in large part built on its ability to harness all manner of just and unjust hashtag campaigns.)
But as my colleague Robin Abcarian noted when Carano filed her lawsuit in 2023, the social media mob's decision that a woman, who was far from a household name, deserved to lose her livelihood, and more important, Lucasfilm's agreement with that decision, was extreme.
Bad publicity is never good for an entertainment property and whether it was explicit in her contract or not, Carano did represent, to a certain extent, 'The Mandalorian,' Lucasfilm and Disney. Unfortunately, the entertainment industry's increasing reliance on social media has created a world in which actors and other creative types are expected to amass millions of followers on platforms that tend to reward the outspoken and outrageous over the thoughtful. Encouraged to reveal themselves 'authentically,' stars can find themselves prodded by fans to comment on current events and excoriated when they refuse or respond in a way that certain followers consider insincere or politically incorrect.
Telling people to stay off social media is not the answer; neither is regulation by hashtag campaign.
While Carano's case is certainly reflective of many perils that face us at the moment, the fact that she reached a settlement, including an apparent promise of more work, is not a sign of further deterioration.
The fear that our cultural landscape is being attacked by political forces that would strangle the notion of free speech and competing ideologies is real and justified. But in this case, the capitulation came not when Disney and Lucasfilm decided to settle with Carano, but when they fired her in the first place.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Washington Post
4 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Doonesbury Comic Strips by Garry Trudeau - August 09, 2025
........Trump on Epstein inquiry: "The whole thing is a bullshit."....Trump on windmills: "They're killing whole thing is a con job."....Trump on Democrats: "Country-hating ARE EXTORTIONISTS!...The Dems are CRAZED LUNATICS!!!"....Trump on Rupert Murdoch and WSJ: "I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third-rate newspaper."....Trump on Josh Hawley: "A second-tier senator."....Scott Galloway: "If Trump brought half the competence, expertise, and elegance to governance as he does to grifting, the country would be in a much better place."....Fox host Megyn Kelly on Stephen Colbert: "He desperately wanted to be Keith Olbermann. And guess what? Keith Olbermann is a failure, and now so are you, Stephen Colbert."....Maureen Callahan on Colbert: "He is such a schoolmarm. He is such a hectoring, humorless lecturer."....Trump on Rep. Jasmine Crockett: "Very low-IQ person."....Laura Ingraham on Crockett: "Having a law degree doesn't mean you're smart."....Trump on Rep. AOC: "She's very low-IQ, and we really don't need low-IQ. Between her and Crockett, we're going to give them both an IQ test and see who comes out best."....Trump on CBS co-host Gayle King: "[Her] career is talent, no ratings, no strength!"....Trump on French President Macron: "What he says doesn't matter."....Memes reposted by Trump: "It's time to indict Obama the traitor!" "Joe Biden's presidency was the biggest scam in U.S. history."....WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on NPR and PBS: "These are not honest news organizations."....Matt Taibbi on NPR: "National Propaganda Radio."....Lev Parnas: "Trump's favorite lie: that he was the victim of a deep state conspiracy."....Pete Buttigieg: "The President sees a bad jobs report, and responds by getting rid of the person in charge of the statistics. This is how America becomes a third-rate country."....Sen. Ron Wyden: "Bottom line, Trump wants to cook the books."....Dan Rather on Trump: "Changes course more often than he changes his socks."....Tina Brown on Andrew Cuomo: "Has the air of a man on his way to a colonoscopy."....White House on South Park depiction of Trump in bed with Satan: "No fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak."....Jason Kander: "You know that scene in an action movie when the bad guy runs through the kitchen of a restaurant and pulls down all the pots and pans behind him to slow down his pursuers? We're in that part of the Trump presidency.".... ........Trump on Epstein inquiry: "The whole thing is a bullshit."....Trump on windmills: "They're killing whole thing is a con job."....Trump on Democrats: "Country-hating ARE EXTORTIONISTS!...The Dems are CRAZED LUNATICS!!!"....Trump on Rupert Murdoch and WSJ: "I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third-rate newspaper."....Trump on Josh Hawley: "A second-tier senator."....Scott Galloway: "If Trump brought half the competence, expertise, and elegance to governance as he does to grifting, the country would be in a much better place."....Fox host Megyn Kelly on Stephen Colbert: "He desperately wanted to be Keith Olbermann. And guess what? Keith Olbermann is a failure, and now so are you, Stephen Colbert."....Maureen Callahan on Colbert: "He is such a schoolmarm. He is such a hectoring, humorless lecturer."....Trump on Rep. Jasmine Crockett: "Very low-IQ person."....Laura Ingraham on Crockett: "Having a law degree doesn't mean you're smart."....Trump on Rep. AOC: "She's very low-IQ, and we really don't need low-IQ. Between her and Crockett, we're going to give them both an IQ test and see who comes out best."....Trump on CBS co-host Gayle King: "[Her] career is talent, no ratings, no strength!"....Trump on French President Macron: "What he says doesn't matter."....Memes reposted by Trump: "It's time to indict Obama the traitor!" "Joe Biden's presidency was the biggest scam in U.S. history."....WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on NPR and PBS: "These are not honest news organizations."....Matt Taibbi on NPR: "National Propaganda Radio."....Lev Parnas: "Trump's favorite lie: that he was the victim of a deep state conspiracy."....Pete Buttigieg: "The President sees a bad jobs report, and responds by getting rid of the person in charge of the statistics. This is how America becomes a third-rate country."....Sen. Ron Wyden: "Bottom line, Trump wants to cook the books."....Dan Rather on Trump: "Changes course more often than he changes his socks."....Tina Brown on Andrew Cuomo: "Has the air of a man on his way to a colonoscopy."....White House on South Park depiction of Trump in bed with Satan: "No fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak."....Jason Kander: "You know that scene in an action movie when the bad guy runs through the kitchen of a restaurant and pulls down all the pots and pans behind him to slow down his pursuers? We're in that part of the Trump presidency.".... ........Trump on Epstein inquiry: "The whole thing is a bullshit."....Trump on windmills: "They're killing whole thing is a con job."....Trump on Democrats: "Country-hating ARE EXTORTIONISTS!...The Dems are CRAZED LUNATICS!!!"....Trump on Rupert Murdoch and WSJ: "I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third-rate newspaper."....Trump on Josh Hawley: "A second-tier senator."....Scott Galloway: "If Trump brought half the competence, expertise, and elegance to governance as he does to grifting, the country would be in a much better place."....Fox host Megyn Kelly on Stephen Colbert: "He desperately wanted to be Keith Olbermann. And guess what? Keith Olbermann is a failure, and now so are you, Stephen Colbert."....Maureen Callahan on Colbert: "He is such a schoolmarm. He is such a hectoring, humorless lecturer."....Trump on Rep. Jasmine Crockett: "Very low-IQ person."....Laura Ingraham on Crockett: "Having a law degree doesn't mean you're smart."....Trump on Rep. AOC: "She's very low-IQ, and we really don't need low-IQ. Between her and Crockett, we're going to give them both an IQ test and see who comes out best."....Trump on CBS co-host Gayle King: "[Her] career is talent, no ratings, no strength!"....Trump on French President Macron: "What he says doesn't matter."....Memes reposted by Trump: "It's time to indict Obama the traitor!" "Joe Biden's presidency was the biggest scam in U.S. history."....WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on NPR and PBS: "These are not honest news organizations."....Matt Taibbi on NPR: "National Propaganda Radio."....Lev Parnas: "Trump's favorite lie: that he was the victim of a deep state conspiracy."....Pete Buttigieg: "The President sees a bad jobs report, and responds by getting rid of the person in charge of the statistics. This is how America becomes a third-rate country."....Sen. Ron Wyden: "Bottom line, Trump wants to cook the books."....Dan Rather on Trump: "Changes course more often than he changes his socks."....Tina Brown on Andrew Cuomo: "Has the air of a man on his way to a colonoscopy."....White House on South Park depiction of Trump in bed with Satan: "No fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak."....Jason Kander: "You know that scene in an action movie when the bad guy runs through the kitchen of a restaurant and pulls down all the pots and pans behind him to slow down his pursuers? We're in that part of the Trump presidency."....


New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Is Turning Us Into a Doddering Industrial Giant
The American economy seems to be slowing. Although the unemployment rate remains low, the jobs report released this month showed that the U.S. labor market has essentially been stalled since President Trump foisted 'Liberation Day' on us in April. Yes, it's true, the artificial intelligence sector remains white-hot, but once you look beyond it, the weather is chillier — the manufacturing sector may be shrinking, home building is slowing and most employment growth is happening in just one industry: health care. Perhaps this slowdown will soon reverse. But nearly seven months into his presidency, it's now clear that Mr. Trump and his officials' tax and trade policy — and their hatred for next-generation energy technologies — is distorting and, increasingly, robbing the economy of its complexity. And if he keeps at it, Mr. Trump will demote America into a deindustrialized power that relies on technology developed elsewhere and doesn't know how to sell much more than crypto, soybeans and petroleum products. You can see this, first, because Mr. Trump and his officials are waging a war on electricity infrastructure. This campaign is primarily driven by their opposition to the solar and wind farms that they associate with their foils, the Democrats. Even as electricity has clearly become more important to the economy — and even as the country's biggest technology firms strive to secure any spare electron for their new metropolis-size data centers — Mr. Trump and his team have begun a regulatory coup to smother new power development. That war began, of course, with Mr. Trump's signature domestic policy law, which pinched off long-running tax credits for wind and solar energy. But it does not stop there. In the past few weeks, the Trump administration has started an all-out war on renewable energy. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has weaponized his department's permitting process to slow down wind, solar and battery projects nationwide — every step of every federal permit for renewable energy must now pass under the eye of some political appointee. Another recent order has suggested that the federal government may essentially ban wind and solar farms from public land. A separate Transportation Department policy could even restrict companies' ability to build private wind farms on private land. At the same time, Chris Wright, the energy secretary, has killed federal financing for the Grain Belt Express transmission project, an electricity megaproject that was set to zip 5,000 megawatts of power across the Great Plains. Although the power line was fully permitted and approved, it had grown unpopular with some Missouri farmers, and thus with the Republican senator Josh Hawley. In other moods and moments, Mr. Wright has said that the country must build more power lines, not fewer. But in stranding the project, Mr. Wright has endangered a cheap new power supply and damaged the government's credibility. As long as he governs, executives cannot trust the Energy Department to keep its promises. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Russia and Ukraine hold fast to their demands ahead of a planned Putin-Trump summit
The threats, pressure and ultimatums have come and gone, but Russian President Vladimir Putin has maintained Moscow's uncompromising demands in the war in Ukraine, raising fears he could use a planned summit with U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska to coerce Kyiv into accepting an unfavorable deal. The maximalist demands reflect Putin's determination to reach the goals he set when he launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Putin sees a possible meeting with Trump as a chance to negotiate a broad deal that would not only cement Russia's territorial gains but also keep Ukraine from joining NATO and hosting any Western troops, allowing Moscow to gradually pull the country back into its orbit. The Kremlin leader believes time is on his side as the exhausted and outgunned Ukrainian forces are struggling to stem Russian advances in many sectors of the over 1,000-kilometer (over 600-mile) front line while swarms of Russian missiles and drones batter Ukrainian cities. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also has stood firm in his positions, agreeing to a ceasefire proposed by Trump while reaffirming the country's refusal to abandon seeking NATO membership and rejecting acknowledgment of Russia's annexation of any of its regions. A look at Russian and Ukrainian visions of a peace deal and how a Putin-Trump summit could evolve: In a memorandum presented at talks in Istanbul in June, Russia offered Ukraine two options for establishing a 30-day ceasefire. One demanded Ukraine withdraw its forces from Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — the four regions Moscow illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured. As an alternate condition for a ceasefire, Russia made a 'package proposal' for Ukraine to halt mobilization efforts, freeze Western arms deliveries and ban any third-country forces on its soil. Moscow also suggested Ukraine end martial law and hold elections, after which the countries could sign a comprehensive peace treaty. Once there's a truce, Moscow wants a deal to include the 'international legal recognition' of its annexations of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and the four regions in 2022. Russia says a peace treaty should have Ukraine declare its neutral status between Russia and the West, abandon its bid to join NATO, limit the size of its armed forces and recognize Russian as an official language on par with Ukrainian -– conditions reflecting Putin's earliest goals. It also demands Ukraine ban the 'glorification and propaganda of Nazism and neo-Nazism' and dissolve nationalist groups. Since the war began, Putin has falsely alleged that neo-Nazi groups were shaping Ukrainian politics under Zelenskyy, who is Jewish. They were fiercely dismissed by Kyiv and its Western allies. In Russia's view, a comprehensive peace treaty should see both countries lift all sanctions and restrictions, abandon any claims to compensation for wartime damage, resume trade and communications, and reestablish diplomatic ties. Asked Thursday whether Moscow has signaled any willingness to compromise to make a meeting with Trump possible, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov responded that there haven't been any shifts in the Russian position. Ukraine's position The memorandum that Ukraine presented to Moscow in Istanbul emphasized the need for a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire to set stage for peace negotiations. It reaffirmed Ukraine's consistent rejection of Russian demands for neutral status as an attack on its sovereignty, declaring it is free to choose its alliances and adding that its NATO membership will depend on consensus with the alliance. It emphasized Kyiv's rejection of any restrictions on the size and other parameters of its armed forces, as well as curbs on the presence of foreign troops on its soil. Ukraine's memorandum also opposed recognizing any Russian territorial gains, while describing the current line of contact as a starting point in negotiations. The document noted the need for international security guarantees to ensure the implementation of peace agreements and prevent further aggression. Kyiv's peace proposal also demanded the return of all deported and illegally displaced children and a total prisoner exchange. It held the door open to gradual lifting of some of the sanctions against Russia if it abides by the agreement. Trump's positions Trump has often spoken admiringly of Putin and even echoed his talking points on the war. He had a harsh confrontation with Zelenskyy in the Oval Office on Feb. 28, but later warmed his tone. As Putin resisted a ceasefire and continued his aerial bombardments, Trump showed exasperation with the Kremlin leader, threatening Moscow with new sanctions. Although Trump expressed disappointment with Putin, his agreement to meet him without Zelenskyy at the table raised worries in Ukraine and its European allies, who fear it could allow the Russian to get Trump on his side and strong-arm Ukraine into concessions. Trump said without giving details that 'there'll be some swapping of territories, to the betterment of both' Russia and Ukraine as part of any peace deal that he will discuss with Putin when they meet Friday. Putin repeatedly warned Ukraine will face tougher conditions for peace if it doesn't accept Moscow's demands as Russian troops forge into other regions to build what he described as a 'buffer zone.' Some observers suggested Russia could trade those recent gains for the territories of the four annexed by Moscow still under Ukrainian control. 'That is potentially a situation that gives Putin a tremendous amount of leeway as long as he can use that leverage to force the Ukrainians into a deal that they may not like and to sideline the Europeans effectively,' Sam Greene of King's College London said. 'The question is, will Trump sign up to that and will he actually have the leverage to force the Ukrainians and the Europeans to accept it?' Putin could accept a temporary truce to win Trump's sympathy as he seeks to achieve broader goals, Greene said. 'He could accept a ceasefire so long as it's one that leaves him in control, in which there's no real deterrence against renewed aggression somewhere down the line,' he said. 'He understands that his only route to getting there runs via Trump." In a possible indication he thinks a ceasefire or peace deal could be close, Putin called the leaders of China, India, South Africa and several ex-Soviet nations in an apparent effort to inform these allies about prospective agreements. Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Center argued Putin wouldn't budge on his goals. 'However these conditions are worded, they amount to the same demand: Ukraine stops resisting, the West halts arms supplies, and Kyiv accepts Russia's terms, which effectively amount to a de facto capitulation,' she posted on X. 'The Russian side can frame this in a dozen different ways, creating the impression that Moscow is open to concessions and serious negotiation. It has been doing so for some time, but the core position remains unchanged: Russia wants Kyiv to surrender.' She predicted Putin might agree to meet Zelenskyy but noted the Kremlin leader would only accept such a meeting 'if there is a prearranged agenda and predetermined outcomes, which remains difficult to imagine.' 'The likely scenario is that this peace effort will fail once again,' she said. 'This would be a negative outcome for Ukraine, but it would not deliver Ukraine to Putin on a plate either, at least not in the way he wants it. The conflict, alternating between open warfare and periods of simmering tension, appears likely to persist for the foreseeable future.'