‘Revenge of 1971': Hafiz Saeed's outfit claims credit for Shiekh Hasina's ouster from Bangladesh
The statements were made by JuD leaders Saifullah Kasuri and Muzammil Hashmi, who is listed as a UN-designated terrorist, during their impassioned speeches earlier this week, according to news agency PTI.
'I was four years old when Pakistan was dismembered in 1971. The then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi had declared that she'd drowned the two-nation theory in Khaleej (Bay of Bengal). On May 10, l … we have taken the revenge of 1971,' Kasuri said while addressing supporters in Allahabad, located in Rahim Yar Khan, about 400 km from Lahore.
Kasuri's reference was to the 1971 Liberation War in which Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) gained independence following Pakistan's surrender in Dhaka to the combined forces of Indian soldiers and Bangladeshi freedom fighters.
JuD member 'cut into pieces' during Indian strikes on May 7
During his speech, Saifullah Kasuri admitted that one of his associates, Mudassar, was killed and dismembered in the Indian airstrike on Muridke — the headquarters of JuD and LeT — carried out on May 7.
The strike was part of Operation Sindoor, carried out in retaliation against the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, which left 26 people dead.
'I was not allowed to attend his funeral. On the day of his funeral, I cried a lot,' Kasuri said, although he did not specify who had barred him from being present at the burial.
In contrast, high-ranking members of the military, police, and civilian administration of Punjab province reportedly attended the funeral of Mudassar and two other JuD members, with media coverage capturing the event.
Kasuri added, 'I was in my constituency meeting with the people when the Pahalgam incident took place. India made me the mastermind of this attack. India made my city, Kasur, popular in the world.'
He further stated, 'We are preparing the next generation for jihad...We are not afraid of dying.'
Meanwhile, speaking at an event in Gujranwala, about 80 km from Lahore, Muzammil Hashmi claimed, while addressing Indian leadership, 'We defeated you in Bangladesh last year...'
Hasina fled India last year
Hashmi's remarks referred to the ouster of Sheikh Hasina on August 5, which came after large-scale student-led anti-government protests.
Following her removal, Hasina fled to India, and three days later, Muhammad Yunus assumed charge as the Chief Adviser of the interim government.
Diplomatic relations between Pakistan and Bangladesh reportedly improved after Hasina's departure.
Reacting to the provocative speeches made by JuD leaders, Pakistan's former diplomat Hussain Haqqani said, 'The rhetoric of Jihadi extremists at their public rallies makes it difficult for the rest of the world to believe official assertions that Pakistan is no longer sponsoring or tolerating them.'
Meanwhile, Mohammad Tajul Islam, chief prosecutor of Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal, recently shared details about the events leading to Hasina's resignation. In a report published on Wednesday by Prothom Alo, a local media outlet in Bangladesh, he stated that military officials had asked Hasina to step down to prevent further bloodshed. She initially refused and is reported to have said, 'You shoot me and bury me here, in Ganabhaban.'
Eventually, she fled Dhaka after being persuaded by her son.
(With PTI inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
CM Stalin writes to PM Modi; seeks urgent relief as US tariffs threaten TN exports, jobs
The Tamil Nadu government has raised an alarm over the severe implications of the United States' 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports, warning that the proposed escalation to 50 per cent could devastate the state's manufacturing sector and cost millions of jobs. In a detailed letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin highlighted that Tamil Nadu's dependence on the US market is higher as compared to other Indian states. While 20 per cent of India's total goods exports worth $433.6 billion in 2024-25 went to the US, Tamil Nadu sent 31 per cent of its $52.1 billion exports there. This heavy reliance, the Chief Minister warned, makes Tamil Nadu particularly vulnerable to tariff shocks. The most affected sectors include textiles, apparels, machinery, auto components, gems and jewellery, leather, footwear, marine products, and chemicals. All of these are labour-intensive industries where any decline in exports would swiftly translate into mass layoffs. The textile industry, which accounts for 28 per cent of India's exports in the sector and employs nearly 75 lakh people in the state, faces an especially grave threat. Officials estimate that as many as 30 lakh jobs are at immediate risk if tariffs are doubled to 50 per cent. To cushion the blow, CM Stalin urged the Centre to take urgent corrective measures. These include rectifying the GST inverted duty structure for the man-made fiber value chain by bringing it under a uniform 5 per cent GST slab, exempting import duty on all varieties of cotton, and providing collateral-free loans of up to 30 per cent under the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) with a 5 per cent interest subvention and a two-year moratorium on repayment. Further demands include enhancing RoDTEP (Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products) benefits to 5 per cent and extending pre and post-shipment credit facilities to all textile exports, including yarn. Industry consultations revealed similar challenges in other sectors as well. To provide relief, CM Stalin requested the Union Government to launch a special interest subvention scheme for exporters hit by tariffs, accelerate Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to offset market risks, and announce a financial relief package similar to the COVID-era moratorium on principal repayments. The letter also drew parallels with Brazil, which recently introduced tax deferrals and credits to support its exporters. Warning of an unprecedented crisis threatening Tamil Nadu's manufacturing sector, CM Stalin called for urgent intervention from PM Modi in consultation with ministries and industry stakeholders. He assured the Centre of Tamil Nadu's full cooperation in implementing national-level measures to safeguard livelihoods and preserve the competitiveness of Indian exports.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Analysing the entry of foreign higher education institutions in India
India's higher education sector has grown remarkably, boasting 1,168 registered universities and 45,473 colleges serving millions of students. Despite this expansive network, the government's move to allow foreign universities to establish campuses in India raises some concerns. Studying abroad Each year, eight to 10 lakh Indian students choose to pursue higher education abroad, even as over 4.33 crore students enroll in institutions within India. However, the decision to study overseas isn't driven by academic quality alone. Many of those who can afford the high costs often see international education as a worthwhile investment. What they're really seeking is not just a degree but the experience of living in a new culture, building global networks, and gaining professional exposure, which cannot be replicated by foreign campuses located within India. Career prospects also play a significant role. Many students believe they stand a better chance of securing high-paying jobs in developed economies after graduation. In fact, education often becomes a stepping stone toward long-term goals like permanent residency in or citizenship of countries such as the U.S., U.K., Canada, or Australia, which attract students with their stronger economies, higher salaries, and robust career opportunities. While foreign universities operating in India may offer excellent academic programmes, they could fall short of delivering these broader, more aspirational benefits. Challenges The idea of global institutions setting up campuses in India may sound progressive or even visionary, but it comes with several serious concerns that deserve closer examination. A pressing issue is the potential financial drain without corresponding benefits to the local education ecosystem. Foreign universities will likely repatriate profits to their home countries instead of reinvesting in India. In contrast, domestic institutions typically use their earnings for faculty development, fund research, and upgrade infrastructure. This means foreign campuses could create a steady outflow of resources that benefits their countries of origin more than India's education sector. Another major concern is the limited alignment of these campuses with the real aspirations of Indian students. Indian students seek overseas education for immigration benefits, international job markets, and cultural exposure. Without these incentives, their appeal remains limited. There's also the risk of competitive displacement. India already boasts an extensive higher education network. Bringing in established global institutions could marginalise smaller or less-known Indian universities. The brand power of foreign universities might attract the best students and faculty, leaving local institutions to struggle for relevance and resources. Cost is another major factor. Global universities tend to operate on a high-cost model, charging tuition fees far above what most Indian institutions ask for. If they follow a similar pricing strategy here, access will likely be limited to affluent students, creating an elitist and exclusionary education system. Such a model goes against the broader national goal of inclusive and equitable education for all. Further, the long-term benefits of foreign campuses remain unproven. India already enables international education collaborations through IITs, IIMs, and other premier institutions. The effectiveness of standalone foreign campuses in significantly improving education standards remains uncertain, making the policy a risky experiment. Alternatives Given these concerns, India would do well to consider alternative strategies that enhance its higher education sector while maintaining economic and academic autonomy. A more sustainable approach would begin with strengthening Indian universities themselves. This means increasing funding, expanding research opportunities, and investing in faculty development so that domestic institutions can offer globally competitive education without depending on foreign players. Another promising strategy involves encouraging global collaborations within Indian campuses. Joint research projects, faculty exchange programmes, and integrated curricula can bring international standards and perspectives into Indian classrooms without leading to large-scale financial outflows. Technology also offers an effective and affordable pathway to global exposure. Virtual exchange programmes, international webinars, and global faculty lectures could offer students exposure to world-class education at lower costs, making international learning more accessible. Finally, if the objective is to facilitate global education, increasing scholarships for Indian students seeking international opportunities would be a more effective and targeted approach. The focus should be on strengthening Indian institutions, fostering international collaborations, and expanding global exposure more effectively. For now, this policy seems like a miscalculated opportunity rather than a strategic advancement for India's higher education ecosystem. (Views expressed are personal) P. John J. Kennedy is former Professor and Dean, Christ University, Bengaluru. S.P. Mishra is Founder, India Career Centre, Hyderabad.
Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
How markets may react to Trump-Putin talks and Modi's GST tax reform on Monday?
Trump-Putin talks Live Events PM Modi announces GST rate cuts Trump-Putin meeting impact on stock markets GST impact on stock markets (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The understanding reached between the US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Ukraine is expected to buoy markets when trading resumes on Monday. Adding to the optimism, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day announcement of major Goods and Services Tax (GST) reforms this Diwali could further boost investor sentiment, opine Trump and Putin did not reach a deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine, Putin claimed he and Trump had reached an 'understanding'.The close to three-hour meeting between the two heads in Alaska has not resulted in a ceasefire between the warring nations (Russia-Ukraine) but Trump called it a "very good meeting" though he said that there's no deal until there is a deal."We had a very good meeting today, and I think a lot of points were negotiated on behalf of Ukraine', he said. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' and stated that he plans to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on the other hand warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.'.On the domestic front, PM Modi's announced rate cuts to be rolled out by Diwali in the GST 2.0. Speaking from the Red Fort on Independence Day, Modi said GST rates will be lowered on everyday-use goods as part of reforms to the eight-year-old tax Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, PTI later reported that the government envisages two slabs — standard and merit — plus special rates for select items, replacing the current four brackets of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28%, with luxury and sin goods attracting an additional Bathini, Director-Equity Strategy at WealthMills Securities said that the meeting between Trump and Putin is a positive development and a progress from the earlier logjam and global stock markets will take it well even without specific outcomes. These are complex problems and cannot be resolved in one meeting. The agreement to meet again with calm markets," Bathini Gupta, Director at Ya Wealth Global Research, echoes a similar sentiment further highlighting Trump's statement that he would hold off imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil. This is a progress, Gupta said, adding that he did not mention India, which is another major buyer of Russian crude and has been slapped with a total 50% tariff along with penalty for the imports from Agrawal, Head - Retail Fundamental Desk at SBI Securities called no negative development as a positive trigger for the market. "Trump's statement that "he will not have to think of retaliatory tariffs on countries buying Russian oil right now but may have to 'in two or three weeks" now offers at least a temporary relief to countries like India". It seems that an additional tariff of 25% on India beginning August 27 for importing crude oil from Russia, will be on a backburner, he Jefferies' global head of equity strategy, Christopher Wood, said the Trump administration's imposing a 50% tariff on Indian imports is not a reason to sell Indian equities. Instead, it's a reason to buy them since "it is only a matter of time before Trump backs off the stance, which is not in America's interest.""It is worth noting that the track record makes it clear that it pays to stand up to Donald," said Wood in his latest 'Greed & Fear' of SBI Securities said that India's plan to move to 2 slab GST structure (5% and 18%) coupled with 1 more slab of 40% for sin products augurs well for consumption. "Few categories like large TV, AC, cement, automobiles, etc are likely to get cheaper, as they are shifted from 28% category to 18%. Moreover, reduction in GST rates on insurance products also will ease burden on consumers. Cheaper cement prices can have a multiplier effect on various sectors like real estate, roads/highways/infra as cost of production is likely to reduce and the same can be passed on to the consumer," he the markets will take the news positively, its implementation should be swift, otherwise the festive season sale could get postponed in anticipation of the reduced prices, thereby impacting the demand in the short and Bathini also lauded the announcement saying that any relaxation from GST in this festival season will boost consumption and help in the overall growth of the economy. They said that the consumption theme like FMCG, autos could now be in equities snapped a six week losing streak ending with weekly gains of over 1%.Market expert Santosh Meena said that Indian markets could react over GST and the "productive" Trump-Putin meeting when they resume trading on Head of Research at Swastika Investmart decodes the Nifty chart highlighting formation of a strong base at the 24,350 level, which he said is a bullish engulfing candlestick pattern on the weekly chart. "The immediate resistance lies at the 20 and 50-day moving averages (DMAs) clustered around 24,700-24,800. A decisive break above this level could trigger a short-covering rally towards 24,950, 25,080, and 25,225. Immediate support is at the 100-DMA of 24,575, with the crucial support level remaining at 24,350," Meena Anand James, Chief Market Strategist at Geojit Investments expects more downside from here. "Directional moving indicators are still in favour of more downsides with 24,000 and 23,560 as potential downside supports attracting prices lower," he said."That said, the last week saw several attempts to push higher, giving us reversal hopes. Apparently none of those moves managed to successfully close above the 24670-720 band, the near term congestion resistance, they did manage to bring parabolic sar under the price, lending a positive bias. More importantly, the broader market has shown even better signs of resilience having had the highest number of Nifty 500 constituents closing above 10 day SMA, since 24th July. Incidentally, the Nifty had tumbled from the 25,200 region on that day. This would be the objective we would be aiming, should we clear above 24,720 on Monday," James said.
