logo
How Indiana's U.S. representatives voted on the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

How Indiana's U.S. representatives voted on the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Hoosiers in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 3 voted along party lines for the final approval of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," with Indiana's seven Republicans voting in favor of the bill and the two Democrats voting against.The bill now goes to the president's desk for his signature ahead of the Fourth of July.
The massive budget reconciliation bill, which narrowly passed the U.S. Senate on July 1, passed the House on a vote of 218-214. It is likely to impact Hoosiers through tax cuts and spending cuts to federally supported programs, such as Medicaid. Thousands of Indiana residents could lose access to the public health insurance program for low-income Americans, as well as SNAP benefits.
But the bill also makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts from the first Trump term, which were due to expire at the end of this year and would have resulted in a $1,900 average tax increase for Hoosiers in 2026. The bill goes further on other tax cuts, eliminating clean energy tax credits and instituting a short-term tax break on tips and overtime wages.
More: From taxes to Medicaid, 4 ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' could impact Hoosiers
Indiana representatives' votes remained unchanged from their initial votes on the bill when it left the House in late May, despite skepticism some Republican members expressed over changes in the Senate that are expected to increase the national debt.
U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz threatened to withhold her vote on a procedural step to advance the bill but later voted with Republicans to allow the bill to proceed.
U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman posted on X July 1 that changes made in the Senate include "unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit." In the post Stutzman said he was "willing to work through the 4th" to improve the bill but voted for its passage on July 3.
"This bill was not perfect, but it gives all Americans a fresh start by curbing the last 4 years of disaster under Joe Biden," Stutzman said in a July 3 post following the passage of the bill.
U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, a Democrat representing Northwest Indiana, said in a post on X he voted against the measure because it creates uncertainty for Hoosiers.
"I opposed this measure because I cannot in good conscience leave people behind," Mrvan said. "The Republican Majority made a decision to prioritize their elite donors and corporations, and now our seniors, veterans, hard-working Americans, women, children and those yet to be born will pay with increased costs and possibly their lives."
The House vote follows a Senate vote earlier this week where Vice President J.D. Vance cast a tie-breaking vote to advance the bill on a 51-50 vote. Both U.S. Sens. Todd Young and Jim Banks voted in favor of the bill.
Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about Trump's tax bill
USA TODAY contributed to this story.
Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at brittany.carloni@indystar.com and government accountability reporter Hayleigh Colombo at hcolombo@indystar.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Costa Ricans sanctioned in U.S. drive targeting drug trafficking
4 Costa Ricans sanctioned in U.S. drive targeting drug trafficking

UPI

time15 minutes ago

  • UPI

4 Costa Ricans sanctioned in U.S. drive targeting drug trafficking

Aug. 19 (UPI) -- The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned four Costa Rican men and two entities for allegedly trafficking narcotics to the United States and money laundering as part of an effort to disrupt criminal cartels that have turned the Central American nation into a global cocaine hub. The sanctions, issued Monday against Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez, Edwin Danney Lopez Vega, Alejandro Antonio James Wilson and Alejandro Arias Monge under a Biden-era executive order, followed a joint investigation involving the Drug Enforcement Agency in the United States and Costa Rica and Costa Rican authorities. Gamboa and Lopez are in prison awaiting extradition to the United States after Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves Robles enacted a constitutional amendment in May permitting the extradition of Costa Rican nationals accused of drug trafficking and terrorism. Authorities allege former vice-minister for public security Gamboa was a major drug trafficker in Costa Rica, facilitating the shipment of cocaine worth tens of millions of dollars from Colombia through Costa Rica to the United States and Europe. Gamboa allegedly abused his position to gather intel about ongoing counternarcotics investigations and sold it to those being targeted. Lopez was allegedly an associate of Gamboa who helped him launder drug money and was the only known source of supply for Arias, Costa Rica's most wanted fugitive. Aria is accused of drug trafficking, robberies, and homicides throughout the country's eastern Limon province, with a $500,000 State Department bounty for information leading to his arrest or conviction. Gamboa and Lopez face 10 years to life imprisonment in a federal jail if convicted. The Treasury alleges James was engaged in drug trafficking and, working with Gamboa, paid off corrupt police and port officials in order to smuggle Colombian cocaine to the United States and Europe via Costa Rica's Moin container terminal. Also sanctioned were a front company owned by Gamboa and Limon Black Star Football Club, allegedly used by Gamboa to launder money. Treasury said that as a key cocaine transshipment hub, Costa Rica had become an "increasingly significant waypoint" for criminal groups trafficking cocaine into the United States, where cocaine was responsible for 22,000 overdose deaths in the 12 months to October. "Drug cartels are poisoning Americans and making our communities more dangerous by trafficking cocaine, often laced with fentanyl, into the United States," said Treasury Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley. "The sanctions target key drug smugglers involved in transporting drugs into the United States. Treasury, in close coordination with U.S. law enforcement and our Costa Rican partners, will continue to use all available tools to disrupt narcotrafficking organizations that threaten the safety of Americans." Costa Rica was seeing rising rates of organized crime-fueled violence resulting from gangs vying for control of drug trafficking routes and turf, with 2024 was the second-most violent year on record, Treasury said, with 2025 on track for similarly grim statistics. Much of the violence is centered on the eastern Limon region, which recorded the highest homicide rate in the country in 2024, rising dramatically in the six years since the Moin port opened, as criminal groups battle for control of the terminal in order to smuggle cocaine out of the country aboard departing container ships. The sanctions freeze all wholly or majority-owned U.S. property and interests in property of individuals and businesses, or those held or controlled by Americans, which must be reported to the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control. Financial institutions or any person are also banned from granting any financial assistance or providing or receiving funds, goods, or services from the four men or the two entities, while foreign financial institutions that process any significant transaction on their behalf run the risk of OFAC secondary sanctions.

Man convicted of killing woman abducted from insurance office to be executed in Florida's 10th execution of the year
Man convicted of killing woman abducted from insurance office to be executed in Florida's 10th execution of the year

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Man convicted of killing woman abducted from insurance office to be executed in Florida's 10th execution of the year

A man convicted of abducting a woman from a Florida Panhandle insurance office and killing her is scheduled to be executed Tuesday evening. Kayle Bates, 67, is set to receive a lethal injection at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison near Starke under a death warrant signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. It would be Florida's 10th death sentence carried out in 2025, further extending the state record for a single year. Two more executions are planned within the next month. Advertisement 3 Kayle Bates, 67, is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison in Starke, under a death warrant signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis. AP Since the US Supreme Court restored the death penalty in 1976, the highest previous annual total of Florida executions was eight in 2014. Florida has executed more people than any other state this year, while Texas and South Carolina are tied for second place with four each. Advertisement Bates was convicted of first-degree murder, kidnapping, armed robbery and attempted sexual battery in the June 14, 1982, killing of Janet White in Bay County in the Florida Panhandle. Bates abducted White from the insurance office where she worked, took her into some woods behind the building, attempted to rape her, stabbed her to death and tore a diamond ring from one of her fingers, according to court documents. Attorneys for Bates have filed appeals with the Florida Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court, as well as a federal lawsuit claiming DeSantis' process for signing death warrants was discriminatory. 3 Bates was found guilty of murdering Janet White in Bay County on June 14, 1982, along with charges of kidnapping, armed robbery, and attempted sexual battery. Family Handout Advertisement The federal lawsuit was dismissed last Tuesday, with the judge finding problems with the lawsuit's statistical analysis. The court ruled that even if the numbers were correct, they wouldn't necessarily prove discrimination. On the same day, the Florida Supreme Court denied Bates' pending claims, including arguments that evidence of organic brain damage had been inadequately considered during his second penalty phase. The court ruled that Bates has had three decades to raise these claims. A US Supreme Court decision is still pending on Bates' final appeal. 3 It would be Florida's 10th death sentence carried out in 2025, further extending the state record for a single year. AP Advertisement A total of 28 men have died by court-ordered execution so far this year in the US, and at least 10 other people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. Curtis Windom, 59, is set to become the 11th person executed in Florida on Aug. 28. He was convicted of killing three people in the Orlando area in 1992. David Pittman, 63, would be the 12th person executed in Florida if his death sentence is carried out as scheduled Sept. 17. He was found guilty of fatally stabbing his estranged wife's sister and parents at their Polk County home before setting it on fire in 1990. Florida executions are carried out using a three-drug lethal injection: a sedative, a paralytic and a drug that stops the heart, according to the state Department of Corrections.

The UK will no longer require Apple to create backdoor access to users' data
The UK will no longer require Apple to create backdoor access to users' data

Engadget

time16 minutes ago

  • Engadget

The UK will no longer require Apple to create backdoor access to users' data

UK officials will no longer compel Apple to create backdoor access to its users' data, according to US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. She wrote on X that she, President Trump and Vice President Vance worked closely with their "partners in the UK" over the past months. "As a result," she continued, "the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties." As The New York Times notes, the UK government issued the secret order earlier this year after amending the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016. The law gives the UK government the right to compel companies to turn over data to law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Reports about the mandate started to come out in February, however, and Apple pretty much confirmed it when it disabled iCloud's Advanced Data Protection feature in the UK. ADP gives users the power to to add optional end-to-end encryption to a variety of iCloud data, which means the information can't be accessed by authorities unless they have the user's device in their hands. "As we have said many times before, we have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will," Apple said at the time. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers asked Gabbard to take measures to prevent what they called "a foreign cyberattack waged through political means" after the information about the mandate went public. Meanwhile, Apple filed a complained with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), which "investigates complaints about the alleged conduct of public bodies in relation to members of the public," to get the order reversed. The company has yet to issue an official statement about the reversal of the UK mandate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store