
EXCLUSIVE I'm a 16-year-old Scottish Muslim revert and wearing the niqab makes me feel empowered - it's frustrating to keep telling everyone I'm not 'oppressed'
A Scottish teenager who is Muslim, despite coming from a white, atheist family, has revealed how wearing traditional face coverings makes her feel 'really free'.
Olivia, 16, from Aberdeen, who reverted to Islam two years ago, said being covered head-to-toe, with the exception of her eyes, has helped her feel more in charge of how she presents herself to the world.
People who adopt the Islamic faith refer to themselves as reverts, as opposed to converts, because they believe they are returning to the innate faith in Allah they were born with.
The teenager is speaking out in the wake of renewed debate over wearing the burka, after Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said that bosses should be able to stop women from wearing face coverings in the workplace - and that she won't allow them in her constituency surgeries - while Reform MPs have become embroiled in a debate over banning the burka altogether.
Olivia has not gone as far as wearing the burka, which covers the entire face, but does wear the niqab which conceals everything except the eyes and is otherwise covered up head-to-toe - after starting out by just wearing a head scarf or hijab.
She said she has always been interested in religion despite growing up in an atheist family and while her faith journey has largely been positive and enriching, she is frustrated with how often she feels she has to prove to people she's not 'oppressed'.
'I first started just wearing the hijab when I reverted to Islam and over time and I loved how wearing it made me feel,' she told MailOnline. 'It was my own choice, and after that I decided to research the niqab.'
Several countries - including Muslim majority nations such as Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan - have restrictions on wearing face coverings in public buildings and schools, whereas in nations such as Afghanistan, the wearing the burqa is enforced by the Taliban.
While the principle of modesty is laid down in the Quran, what this means in practice remains the subject of debate.
Some who wear the burqa or jiqab say that wearing the garements is an act of and commitment to modesty which helps them feel closer and more devoted to God; in a similar way a Christian nun may conceal their hair or parts of their face.
However, opponents claim it is represents a domineering force in which women are made to wear to 'cover up', as instructed by fathers, brothers and husbands.
Olivia, however, stressed that assuming to know a woman's situation and beliefs just by looking at what she is wearing is 'wrong'.
'People look at it and they have these bad assumptions but if I could get to know someone, I could explain to them that it's not exactly what they think it is,' she added.
'To the people that say they find it oppressive - they're just wrong. They're assuming their views apply to everyone, that everyone that wears the niqab is oppressed.
'To call that oppression is not only wrong, but erases the voices of women like me who wear it proudly and of our own free will.
'I think real oppression is when people try to take that choice away from you, to wear the niqab, or speak over me as if I don't know my own mind. They assume I'm forced into it, but I feel really free when I wear it.'
She said that wished people were 'willing to be more open minded about things', but overall her experience in Aberdeen, which she says has a big Muslim community (some 5.4 per cent of the population identified with the faith in 2022), has been 'positive'.
'It makes you feel less alone,' she continued. 'I do get occasional stares, which I totally understand, I think it's just because people don't really understand it that much.
'But to be honest, I also feel like in some instances I've been more respected after wearing the niqab, people are a lot more respectful when they walk past me.'
She added that one reason she started sharing her experiences with wearing the niqab on TikTok - where she has more than 10,200 followers, was to show people that she's not part of a 'silenced' or oppressed group.
'I want to inspire girls who may be interested in modest clothing,' she added. 'Without preaching or forcing, of course. I just want to show how beautiful it can look.'
'The niqab doesn't restrict me,' she says in one video, set in a scenic forest. 'I still do everything I want to, just with more peace in my heart.'
In another post of herself frolicking in a stunning field, sporting a black and white niqab, she added: 'Sometimes I wonder how people can be intimidated by this.'
In the comments, some have questioned Olivia on her choices, and claimed that humans seek to connect by looking for 'facial cues' - including trolls who have left nasty messages on her page.
But Olivia has pointed out that facial cues aren't something everyone relies on, with others agreeing it's not a guarantee the other person is being honest.
Some also messaged to say that they feel 'warm' and 'safe' around women who dress modestly.
The teenager was 14 when she decided to revert to the Islamic faith, and admits that no one is her family is religious - so it took 'quite some time' for everyone to adjust.
'My younger siblings love it,' she explained. 'They always play with the fabric of my clothes, it's really cute. For my parents and the people around me, it took them quite some time to accept my choice.
'It wasn't easy. It's not easy for anyone to be honest, especially women in the UK.'
She admitted they did question her choice at the start - which she 'does understand' - but have since been accepting of her choices.
Olivia said however they are now supportive and 'do their best', especially when it comes to day to day differences, such as her not always being able to eat everything others can.
'My mum is really supportive of my choices,' she added. 'She didn't really question the niqab!'
'I do really want to emphasise that it's not the case that all of us are pressured into it,' she added. 'It's my own decision.
'I'm a revert and every step of my journey has come from deep reflection and not at all from outside pressure from anyone.
'I just think it's important to stress that Muslim women are empowered to make these decisions for ourselves.
I wasn't pressured into it, in fact I feel like I was pressuring people to accept that I want to do this, that it's my decision.
'I didn't really have much support, but I think that's what makes it more meaningful and it was a choice made out of love.'
Olivia's sentiment is one that is felt by many Muslim women who choose to wear the facial covering.
Writing in a Medium post, blogger and podcaster Samar Asamoah - who runs the podcast The Niqabi Diaries - admitted she struggled with stigmas herself.
'I had noticed and was pretty tired of seeing little to no representation of sisters who wear the niqab. To make it worse most of the time a niqabi was seen it was in a negative light. To show Islamic extremism, to show how Islam oppresses women or when talking about niqab bans,' she penned in 2022.
'In the Muslim community I had experienced many kinds of stigma against niqabi sisters before I myself started wearing it and then after wearing it myself.'
Another writer, Noshin Bokht, writing for The Muslim Vibe, shared her own experiences with the niqab in 2017.
'My father was oblivious to the fact that I was even considering wearing the niqab, until the day I actually started wearing it. I am not married, and my brothers are both significantly younger than me, so no man in my life could've influenced my decision,' she wrote.
'However, those who are forced to wear niqab by the males in their lives have been greatly wronged and are indeed oppressed. Those who force it upon women are not following any religion, only their own malicious desires.
'The preferment to wear the niqab is an extraordinarily intimate one, and it is a means for that individual to enhance their relationship with God.
'It is my reminder that I am a Muslim woman, honoured by the Almighty, with a much more preeminent purpose. It does not serve the purpose of helping men to keep their sexual desires in check, that responsibly falls on the man alone, regardless of my choice of attire. This liability is ordained by Allah, Himself.'
She also stressed that 'it is time the world puts an end to defining women by their clothing, especially niqabi women and reforming such inaccurate outlooks'.
Both the niqab and burqa have continued to face scrutiny in legislation all over the world.
Earlier this month, Reform UK MPs called for a ban on burqas in Britain - but there was confusion as officials insisted prohibiting the garment is not the party's policy.
Sarah Pochin, who won last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election for Reform, threw her support behind a ban during Prime Minister's Questions.
As she quizzed Sir Keir Starmer in the House of Commons, Ms Pochin asked the PM if he would support outlawing the burqa, which is worn by some Muslim women.
'Given the PM's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he in the interests of public safety follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others and ban the burqa?,' she said.
Ms Pochin's question triggered disquiet in the Commons and cries of 'shame' from other MPs.
Sir Keir did not answer Ms Pochin's question but instead took the opportunity to attack Reform's economic plans - as set out by party leader Nigel Farage last week.
After PMQs, Lee Anderson, one of Ms Pochin's fellow Reform MPs, also gave his public backing to a burqa ban.
Yet, despite two out of the five Reform MPs supporting a ban, a party spokesman said it was 'not party policy' - although they added it was an issue that 'needs a national debate'.
At the 2010 general election, Mr Farage stood for UKIP - his former party - on a manifesto that called for a ban on both the burqa and niqab.
But he later disowned UKIP's 2010 manifesto as 'drivel' when he returned as the party's leader after the contest.
In his reply to Ms Pochin in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told the recently-elected MP: 'Can I welcome her to her place, but I'm not going to follow her down that line.
'But now she is here and safely in her place, perhaps she could tell her new party leader [Mr Farage] that his latest plan to bet £80billion of unfunded tax cuts, with no idea how he's going to pay for it, is Liz Truss all over again.
'Although considering I think (Ms Pochin) was a Conservative member when Liz Truss was leader, she probably won't.'
Sir Keir's response drew criticism from Tory former foreign secretary James Cleverly, who posted on social media afterwards: 'After failing to answer any of Kemi's (Badenoch) questions, he basically said to Sarah Pochin that he didn't like her question, so "wasn't going to engage with it".
'Refusing to answer MPs' questions isn't an option as a government minister.'
Mr Anderson later shared a social media video of Ms Pochin speaking at PMQs, adding: 'Ban the burqa? Yes we should. No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public.'
Tory MP Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said he did not support a ban on burqas in Britain.
'Fundamentally I do believe in freedom and I believe that people should have the choice to to wear whatever they want,' he told GB News.
'I wouldn't like to tell you what to wear. But I do also think it's important to make sure that women are not in any way coerced into doing something that they don't want to do.
'So I think it is very important to make sure that women are not being coerced and are able to make their own free choices.'
Then-French president Nicolas Sarkozy introduced a ban on burqas in France in 2010.
Anyone found wearing the covering in a public space can face a fine of 150 euros (£125). It has since been unsuccessfully challenged in the European courts.
Belgium brought in a similar ban a year later, and other countries including Denmark and Austria have got similar laws.
Switzerland was the latest European country to introduce a prohibition, which started on January 1 this year.
Last year, it was also announced that women in Kyrgyzstan - a Muslim-majority country - will be fined for wearing a full-body niqab under a new plan that is supported by the country's official Muslim governing body.
The authority said the garments could hide 'attackers in disguise' and are 'alien to our society'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
38 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
SNP warned not to ‘squander' £9.1bn boost after Chancellor Rachel Reeves unleashed £300bn UK-wide splurge
LABOUR challenged the SNP not to 'squander' a £9.1billion boost to Holyrood's coffers after the Chancellor turned on the taps at her spending review. Rachel Reeves unveiled a £300billion UK-wide splurge in a bid to appease voters after her party's rocky first year in power. 2 Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar labelled the extra money as 'game-changing' 2 Finance Secretary Shona Robison claimed that if Ms Reeves was being fair, she'd have sent an extra £1bn a year to Holyrood Announcing her long-term spending plans for the years from 2026, she confirmed major investment in defence and nuclear power plus a three per cent above-inflation increase to NHS spending down south. Ms Reeves admitted 'too many people in too many parts of our country' were yet to feel the benefits of the 'change' they voted for when Labour swept back into power last July. The knock-on effect of the Chancellor's funding pledges means a massive cash boost for the Scottish Government to spend as it sees fit. Nats ministers will get an average annual boost of £2.4billion on day-to-day spending and £400million for major projects in the years to 2029. That's on top of the £4billion-plus yearly bonus delivered last October from the first Budget of Sir Keir Starmer's government. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar labelled the extra money as 'game-changing'. He said: 'These plans will bring billions of pounds of investment to Scotland — on top of the record Budget settlement. 'But the massive increase in funds must not be squandered by the SNP government, which has a track record of waste and failure.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said voters would face a clear choice at next May's Holyrood election. He said: 'It's either a third decade of the SNP, who've squandered their opportunity over the last 18 years and squandered the £4.9billion extra the UK Government gave earlier. Top 5 takeaways from Spending review 'Or a government that's committed to investing in public services and infrastructure, renewing Scotland and working with a UK Labour government to deliver jobs right across the country.' But experts warned the extra cash could be swallowed by Scottish Government pledges such as pay hikes for public sector workers and higher devolved benefits. FUEL AID HOPE NATS' Finance Secretary indicated the SNP might dish out more cash to pensioners after Labour's winter fuel payment U-turn. But Shona Robison refused to commit to passing on all of an estimated extra £120million from Westminster to struggling Scots OAPs. Labour has now said older people down south with an income below £35,000 will receive the handouts, following an outcry when they were axed. Experts reckon the extra funds now due to Holyrood will be enough to cover £100 payments Nats have already pledged to pensioners. Asked if the payments could be increased, Ms Robison said: 'There's other things we need to fund as well which is why we're looking at the options. We'll deliver the best deal for pensioners.' Nats ministers are already set to spend £2billion more on welfare by the end of the decade than they receive from Westminster. But SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison claimed that if Ms Reeves was being fair, she'd have sent an extra £1billion a year to Holyrood. She said: 'This review is business as usual from the UK Government, which is yet again treating Scotland as an afterthought and failing to provide the funding we need. 'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we'd have £1.1billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than a billion pounds.' But despite the extra cash, an expert warned SNP policy decisions mean tax rises or spending cuts may be needed to balance Scotland's books by 2027/28. David Phillips, associate director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the winner of next year's election 'will face tough choices' due to increased NHS, benefits, and public sector pay costs. Earlier, Ms Reeves told the Commons her plans were the start of Labour's project to 'renew Britain'. She vowed to back the Acorn carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire. But official documents raised questions about how the scheme, to store gas emissions under the North Sea, would be funded. NUCLEAR SWIPE AT FM & CO RACHEL Reeves slammed the SNP's opposition to arms factories and nuclear power as she confirmed defence spending hikes. The Chancellor announced an £11billion boost for the armed forces plus a £600million increase for security and intelligence agencies. She also confirmed a £250million redevelopment of the Faslane base on the Clyde, where new nuclear submarines will be stationed. It means defence spending will be upped to 2.6 per cent of GDP by April 2027. Ms Reeves blasted Nats' opposition to nuclear weapons and munitions. She said: 'Investment in Scotland, jobs in Scotland, defence for the United Kingdom, opposed by the Scottish National Party, delivered by this Labour Government.' Sir Keir Starmer previously set out the UK Government's Strategic Defence Review in a speech in Glasgow last week. Nats and Labour clashed as the No10 chief claimed Nats' goal of scrapping Trident nuclear missiles would make Scotland less safe. Sir Keir said: 'Imagine the effect that would have on the safety and security of the UK and of Scotland.' They concluded: 'A final investment decision will be taken later.' Scottish Tory finance spokesman Craig Hoy warned UK taxes will probably have to rise at the Budget this autumn. He said: 'This spend-now-tax-later statement will offer no comfort to those betrayed by the first year of a disastrous Labour Government. 'Taxes remain sky-high and the Chancellor will almost certainly have to hike them further to pay for her spending plans, breaking yet another of her promises.' Mr Hoy added: 'Scots are saddled with two failing, high-tax, left-wing governments — one at Westminster and the other at Holyrood.'


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BBC is showing Bargain Hunt and Homes Under the Hammer repeats instead of Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter's doubles match... again
The BBC has been criticised for showing two-year-old repeats of Bargain Hunt and Homes Under the Hammer instead of Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter 's doubles match at Queen's. The British tennis pair played their quarter-final of the Queen's Club Championships earlier today, but the footage was not even available on the BBC website for the majority of the match. It comes after the corporation also failed to broadcast the British duo's opening round win against Wu Fang-hsien and Jiang Xinyu on Monday. When their latest match began at noon today, BBC One had opted to show a two-year-old episodes of Homes Under The Hammer and Bargain Hunt, The Telegraph reported. Meanwhile BBC Two was showing Politics Live, providing reaction to the Government's spending review. Coverage for Raducanu and Boulkter's match eventually became available on the iPlayer deep into the second set. With just enough time for viewers to see the British pair lose in straight sets 6-2, 7-5. On Monday, the BBC had showed live coverage of British number 3 Sonay Kartal's win in the singles against Daria Kasatkina instead of the British pair's first round match. Kartal's match was also available on iPlayer with highlights of another match involving Brazilian player Beatriz Haddad Maia as she defeated Czech player Petra Kvitova. The Lawn Tennis Association, which hosts Queen's in Eastbourne, could not move the game to the main arena due to contractual obligations made with the Women's Tennis Association. The WTA mandates that four single matches are played on Centre Court each day, meaning there is no room for doubles matches to be played despite interest in the British pair. Their opening match was only featured briefly as part of the coverage on BBC Two before it returned to coverage of Kartal's match. The BBC previously told The Telegraph after the first round match: 'Our TV coverage at Queens covers one court with one feed and we were broadcasting GB's [Great Britain] Sonay Kartal's Centre Court singles match on BBC Two. 'We provided regular updates on Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter's doubles match on BBC Two and the BBC Sport website where fans can enjoy all the stories that define this historic tournament.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Equalities watchdog tells trans activists personal attacks ‘have to stop'
The equalities watchdog has told trans activists that personal attacks on her and her staff have 'got to stop'. Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), appeared emotional as she revealed to MPs that she had to cancel one meeting after police warned of a ' serious risk ' of violence. She said that while feminist campaigners had acted in a 'dignified and respectful' manner, trans rights activists had made it harder for her staff to come to work in safety. 'Personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation' 'The level of agitation that they can cause in terms of personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation, where our family members are affected – our intimate family members have to think about how they're going about to their place of work – has got to stop,' she said. 'I didn't come into public life to bleat on about myself and feel sorry for myself… I have chosen not to walk away, I have chosen to deliver in the public interest as has done every member of my board. 'And they don't need to do this, they do it because of a desire for public service, as do my senior staff.' The watchdog also repeated that companies and organisations should be using EHRC guidance on access to single-sex spaces, rather than those of groups such as Stonewall. Baroness Falkner also said guidance would be issued on how to 'respectfully' question transgender people about their biological sex. Women's rights activists who do not believe in gender ideology, the idea that sex is a spectrum and that people can change their gender identity, have had to run the gauntlet of intimidating protests from the trans rights movement for years. After the Supreme Court ruled in April that the word 'sex' in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, trans rights activists took to the streets, with one carrying a placard showing an illustration of a gallows alongside a slogan suggesting ' the only good Terf (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) ' is a hanged one. In 2022, a group called Pissed Off Trannies left more than 60 bottles of urine outside the EHRC offices and poured some of the contents into the revolving doors. The EHRC has come in for greater criticism from trans rights activists after they published guidance confirming that organisations can bar trans people from toilets and changing rooms meant for the opposite sex. 'Serious risk of violence' Appearing before the Commons women and equalities select committee, Lady Falkner spoke of the effect such violent threats had on her and her organisation. 'Sorry, I'm trying not to be emotional about this because it goes to the heart of what public service is about, and I've been involved in public service for 21 years now,' she said. 'The personal attacks – and I refer to personal attacks as well as the attacks on my staff, because we have a duty of care to our staff and we must ensure that our staff are able to work in a respectable, safe place of work. 'We were due to go to Glasgow for our regular annual board meeting in Scotland, and we were unable to go because the police hadn't been informed and there was serious risk of violence from messages that were seen. 'What bothers me more than my own personal security is that my staff should be able to come to their place of work in safety, and that has been somewhat lacking in the last several years.' Lady Falkner said those on the gender-critical side of the debate, 'who felt disadvantaged or felt the law was not supporting them, did so in a dignified, respectful manner, frequently using the last resort of a tribunal or a court to pursue justice for themselves or their loved ones'. Talking about trans rights activists, she said: 'Here we have a group that I appreciate is vulnerable, but I don't think it is fair because women and girls are vulnerable as well. 'I don't think it is fair to have a balancing act of 'who is more vulnerable'. Victimhood is not the way I approach things. 'The level of agitation that they can cause in terms of personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation, where our family members are affected – our intimate family members have to think about how they're going about to their place of work – has got to stop.' Lady Falkner was then prevented from continuing to talk about the attacks the EHRC has faced by Sarah Owen, Labour MP and the committee chair. She then bizarrely asked her to clarify that she was not opposed to the right to protest. 'Overly hostile' Last night, Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said she was 'shocked' by the 'overly hostile' questioning of some of the members of the committee. 'It was particularly shocking that when Lady Falkner talked about the pressures on EHRC staff of the protests and personal attacks, the chair of the committee, Sarah Owen MP, cut her off,' she said. 'The Supreme Court provided complete legal clarity on the meaning of 'sex' in the Equality Act. Today's proceedings suggest that some MPs simply refuse to accept that.'