logo
5 Big Student Loan Updates After A Hugely Consequential Month

5 Big Student Loan Updates After A Hugely Consequential Month

Forbes4 days ago

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to the media after the ... More House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Donald Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. The tax and spending legislation, in what has been called the "big beautiful bill", redirects money to the military and border security and includes cuts to federal student loan forgiveness and repayment programs. (Photo by)
The last several weeks have been hugely consequential for more than 40 million student loan borrowers, with some of the most significant updates in more than a year. And the impacts of these recent events could touch every aspect of student debt from disbursement to loan repayment and student loan forgiveness.
Between court actions, legislation working its way through Congress, and regulatory updates, nearly every single federal student loan borrower may eventually be impacted by these recent changes. And for some borrowers, the consequences could be enormously costly. Here's a breakdown.
The federal student loan repayment system may have never been in as much turmoil as it is today. At least eight million borrowers who had enrolled in the SAVE plan, a Biden administration income-driven repayment program, continue to be stuck in a forbearance due to an ongoing legal challenge over the future of the program. As a result, these borrowers have no payments due and their balances are not accruing interest, but they cannot make progress toward student loan forgiveness. This is true for both income-driven repayment plans, as well as Public Service Loan Forgiveness, or PSLF.
Meanwhile, much of the rest of the IDR application system remains stuck in administrative uncertainty. The Trump administration had essentially shut down the entire IDR application system in February following a new court ruling related to the ongoing SAVE plan legal challenge. That action has had profound downstream effects for borrowers in other IDR plans that have nothing to do with SAVE, including those in IBR, ICR, and the PAYE plan.
After a national teacher's union and student loan borrower legal group filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the IDR system shutdown, the Department of Education resumed application processing in April. But the department revealed in a court filing in May that more than 1.9 million IDR applications remain unprocessed, and less than 80,000 applications were fully adjudicated during the month of April. As a result, hundreds of thousands of borrowers have been unable to change their repayment plan or recalculate their monthly payments – options that the Department of Education is required to offer borrowers under federal law.
According to anecdotal reports, loan servicers are first prioritizing IDR applications submitted by single student loan borrowers with a family size of 1, as they can be faster to process than IDR requests submitted by married borrowers due to additional complexities associated with those applications. But it is unclear if the Department's slow processing pace will accelerate. Another status report is due to be filed in less than two weeks.
The Department of Education also revealed in the same court filing that only a fraction of more than 50,000 PSLF Buyback applications have been processed. Many of these applications have been sitting with the department's PSLF Reconsideration unit for six months or longer.
PSLF Buyback is supposed to give borrowers an opportunity to receive credit toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness for certain past periods of deferment and forbearances, which usually cannot count toward student loan forgiveness under the program. The buyback program allows borrowers, upon approval, to make a lump sum payment equivalent to what they would have paid if they had been making qualifying PSLF payments during the period, provided that they were also working in qualifying public service employment at the time.
Many borrowers who have been stuck in the SAVE plan forbearance, are pursuing PSLF, and are nearing their eligibility threshold for student loan forgiveness have been trying to utilize the PSLF buyback program to qualify for a discharge. But according to last month's court filing, the Department of Education has processed less than 2,000 applications out of more than 50,000 that remain in the queue. Department officials have provided no explanation for the delays, and have not signaled when – or whether – processing will accelerate. Another update is expected in two weeks.
Meanwhile, last month House Republicans narrowly passed sweeping legislation that would fundamentally reshape the federal student loan system. The so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' intended to slash government spending to offset the costs associated with massive tax cuts, would impact nearly every element of federal student aid including disbursement, repayment, and loan forgiveness.
Under the terms of the legislation, the Graduate PLUS and Parent PLUS programs would be phased out or severely limited, which advocates have warned will force millions of families to turn to riskier and costlier private student loans, or forego higher education altogether. The bill would also repeal several popular student loan repayment plans including the SAVE plan, ICR, PAYE, and a newer and more affordable version of IBR. Borrowers who have been enrolled in these plans would be forced to change to a modified version of IBR that could result in much higher payments. One student loan borrower advocacy organization estimated that some borrowers could pay $5,000 or more per year in additional payments as a result. The bill would also create a new IDR plan that may be somewhat more affordable, but would add five to 10 years of additional repayment to a borrower's term before they would qualify for any student loan forgiveness, forcing many borrowers to remain in debt for 30 years or longer.
The bill now heads to the Senate, where it may undergo further changes before the legislation can receive final approval from Congress. It would then be sent to President Trump for his signature.
As Republican lawmakers in Congress take steps to remake the federal student loan system through legislation, Trump administration officials at the Department of Education are making moves to reshape key federal student loan forgiveness and repayment programs through regulatory changes.
Last month, the department moved ahead with negotiated rulemaking, a lengthy process that would result in changes to federal regulations. The department is specifically targeting Public Service Loan Forgiveness in this negotiated rulemaking session. While administration officials have not expressly revealed what, specifically, they want to change about PSLF, most observers expect the department to try to enact regulations implementing President Trump's March executive order to cut off PSLF eligibility for organizations that engage in activities the administration deems to be 'illegal' or 'improper.' Some legal experts have warned that if elements of the order are enacted, it could unlawfully allow the administration to deny student loan forgiveness eligibility for organizations or government entitles that simply oppose the administration's priorities.
The department's negotiated rulemaking process is also targeting the PAYE and ICR plans, two popular IDR plans that allow borrowers to make payments based on their income, with eventual student loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years in repayment. As with PSLF, the department has not confirmed what officials want to change about these programs. But some observers expect the department to try to eliminate student loan forgiveness under these plans, based on a recent court ruling from a federal appeals court that questioned the programs' underlying legal authority. It is unclear what would happen to borrowers who reach the threshold for student loan forgiveness and then have the benefit cut off by the anticipated regulatory updates.
Last month, the Department of Education also resumed collections actions against borrowers in default on their federal student loans. Such actions had been largely suspended for the last several years due to pandemic-era relief programs and associated extensions.
In early May, millions of borrowers began receiving notices that they would be referred to the Treasury Offset program in the coming weeks. Treasury Offset allows the government to garnish the wages of federal employees, offset Social Security benefits, and intercept federal tax refunds. Starting as soon as this month, the Department of Education may initiate administrative wage garnishment proceedings, which would allow the government to seize a portion of wages from defaulted federal student loan borrowers working in non-federal employment.
More than five million defaulted federal student loan borrowers are currently in the department's crosshairs. But that figure could double by the end of the year as hundreds of thousands of additional borrowers fall behind on their monthly payments. The department has said it is engaging in a robust communications campaign to notify borrowers of the coming risks, encourage them to get out of default, enroll in IDR plans, and pursue federal student loan forgiveness programs. But advocacy groups have warned that given the current turmoil facing many of these programs, a significant number of borrowers are going to fall through the cracks. And the financial ramifications could be enormous.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees
No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees

Forbes

time7 minutes ago

  • Forbes

No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees

As demand for master's and doctoral degrees surges, too few programs exist to support the students most often excluded—despite their potential. The United States stands at a crossroads. While innovation, competitiveness, and global leadership increasingly depend on highly educated workers, access to graduate education remains deeply unequal and underfunded. Over 60% of business and government leaders hold graduate degrees—with more than half in business and nearly a third in law. A 2020 report by Brint and colleagues found that 61% of top media figures and 78% of think tank and foundation leaders also held advanced degrees. In many leadership roles, graduate education is no longer a competitive advantage—it's a requirement. Demand is rising. A 2024 report from Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce projects that nearly 1 in 5 jobs will soon require an advanced degree. Among 'good jobs'—those offering middle-class wages of $43,000 or more—1 in 4 will demand graduate credentials. Yet access to graduate education remains deeply inequitable. Madeline Brighouse Glueck finds that parental education still shapes graduate enrollment, especially in high-investment, high-return programs like law, medicine, and PhDs. In medicine alone, over 75% of students come from the top two income quintiles. Even academically qualified first-generation and low-income students are often left behind. While families with financial and social capital can navigate elite admissions and cover soaring costs, others are shut out. The only federally funded graduate pipeline program is the McNair Scholars Program, which supports first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented undergraduates seeking PhDs. This program—and others like Upward Bound—are now at risk of being defunded. As the federal government grows increasingly hostile toward identity-based programs in higher education, the burden of promoting equitable access is falling to the private sector and nonprofit organizations. Yet only a handful of national nonprofits directly focus on this issue: These organizations are doing powerful work—but their combined reach can only serve a fraction of the students who deserve access. To meet the moment, coordinated investments are needed—not just in graduate preparation, but also in affordability, mentorship, and long-term support: Graduate education is not a luxury—it is a national imperative. If we want to lead in science, health, law, and business—and if we believe in opportunity—we must invest in the people who will lead those fields. Let's ensure that talent, not zip code or family background, determines who has a seat at the table. Change can't wait. The time to invest is now. —--------- Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today!

NCLA Asks Sixth Circuit to Revive Suit Over Dept. of Education's Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause
NCLA Asks Sixth Circuit to Revive Suit Over Dept. of Education's Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NCLA Asks Sixth Circuit to Revive Suit Over Dept. of Education's Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause

Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. U.S. Department of Education; Sec'y of Education Linda McMahon, in her official capacity; and James Bergeron, Chief Operating Officer of Federal Student Aid, in his official capacity Washington, DC, June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed an opening brief today asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to reverse a district court's dismissal, for lack of standing, of our Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. Dept. of Education lawsuit against the Department's unlawfully forgiving 35 months of interest on student loans. Without any statutory authority, the Department extended Congress's original six-month interest forgiveness and payment suspension for nearly three more years, cancelling debt in violation of the Constitution's Appropriations Clause at a cost of at least $175 billion to taxpayers, harming the Mackinac Center in the process. This scheme injures public-service employers like Mackinac by reducing the financial incentives for (potential) employees to participate in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. The Sixth Circuit should decide Mackinac does have standing and require the district court to hear the case on the merits against the Department's unlawful policy. Established by Congress, the PSLF program allows employees to have their student-loan debt forgiven after ten years of work with one or more public-service employers. When the Department excused debtors from paying interest on their loans, it decreased—dollar for dollar—the wage subsidy the program promised to public-service employers like the Mackinac Center, making it more expensive for them to keep compensating their PSLF employees at the same level. The economic harm caused by the Department's unlawfully excusing student-loan debtors from honoring their obligations is enough, on its own, to require the government to answer for its actions in court. But in addition to that, the Department's lawless decisions also skewed the labor market in a way that frustrates the congressionally-designed PSLF program, increases the cost for the Mackinac Center to compete for college-educated employees, and costs taxpayers billions. The Department caused these injuries, and now the Court of Appeals should make sure it must answer for them. NCLA released the following statements: 'Governmental agencies cannot blithely ignore the law without expecting to answer for the harm their unlawful actions cause organizations like the Mackinac Center. We trust the Court of Appeals will make that clear to the Department of Education.'— Daniel Kelly, Senior Litigation Counsel, NCLA 'The Department of Education under Secretary McMahon should settle this case. What possible reason does it have to keep defending the lawless regime instituted by former Secretary Miguel Cardona and Richard Cordray to forgive student-loan debt—or in this case interest on that debt—without authority from Congress?'— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA For more information visit the case page here. ABOUT NCLA NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA's public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans' fundamental rights. ### CONTACT: Joe Martyak New Civil Liberties Alliance 703-403-1111 in to access your portfolio

Proud Boys Leaders Sue U.S. Over Jan. 6 Prosecutions
Proud Boys Leaders Sue U.S. Over Jan. 6 Prosecutions

Wall Street Journal

time14 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Proud Boys Leaders Sue U.S. Over Jan. 6 Prosecutions

Five members of the Proud Boys, once convicted of masterminding the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol, are accusing the federal government and FBI employees of violating their rights in connection with their prosecutions in a new lawsuit. Top leaders of the far-right group were either pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Trump earlier this year. On Friday, they filed a lawsuit in a Florida federal court claiming that the FBI agents and prosecutors were motivated by personal animus against them and their beliefs. The suit seeks $100 million in punitive damages.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store