logo
Debt-laden Italy now better for living standards than Britain

Debt-laden Italy now better for living standards than Britain

Telegraph4 days ago
Britain's living standards fell behind those in Italy for the first time since 2001 in a fresh blow to Rachel Reeves's efforts to boost economic growth and renew the nation's competitiveness.
Slow growth, rising worklessness and high inflation are all damaging Britain, raising fears that the UK is losing its status as a rich nation at the same as Italy shakes off its image as an economic basket case.
Once adjusted for the cost of living, GDP per capita – a critical measure of wellbeing, and a favoured target of Sir Keir Starmer's Government – is now higher in Italy than Britain.
According to the World Bank, Italy's GDP per capita rose to $60,847 (£44,835) last year, overtaking Britain's $60,620.
It comes as unemployment rose to 4.7pc in the UK, spending on benefits balloons and inflation is forecast to hit 4pc – double the Bank of England's target – in the coming months.
Britain's population is also rising rapidly, meaning GDP is stretched over a larger number of people.
By contrast Italy's is shrinking, so even as its economy grows at roughly the same pace as the UK's, GDP per capita is rising more quickly as output is concentrated among fewer people.
It comes despite Italy's Government debt of around 130pc of GDP – far above Britain's debt of around 100pc.
In its manifesto last year, the Labour party promised to 'kickstart economic growth to secure the highest sustained growth in the G7 – with good jobs and productivity growth in every part of the country making everyone, not just a few, better off'.
The Government has since indicated that GDP per head may be a target measure.
But on the World Bank's measure, adjusted for living costs, Britain has fallen from fifth to sixth place among the group of seven major democracies, with only Japan further down the rankings.
'Economic stagnation'
A study from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research earlier this year warned that 'economic stagnation over the past decade is now threatening the UK's position as a place for a high standard of living.'
The think tank found the poorest Britons are now worse off than the lowest-income households in countries, including Lithuania and Slovenia, countries once considered far from rich but which are now increasingly prosperous.
Efforts to reform the British economy have struggled even as Italy has had more success.
Labour's attempts to trim welfare spending and encourage more claimants back to work resulted in a backbench rebellion and a humiliating U-turn.
The Chancellor is expected to refocus her efforts on boosting productivity growth ahead of her Budget in the autumn, as she seeks ways to fill a hole of as much as £50bn in the public finances.
Meloni's Italy 'outperformed' expectations
By contrast economists have hailed Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's reforms.
Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank, said Italy had 'outperformed' expectations.
'Italy has cut welfare entitlements under Meloni, so that people have more incentive to work instead of resting idle,' he said, adding that judicial reforms have also made progress.
Extra subsidies for home renovations also provided a remarkable boost to Italy's economy, as has EU spending under an economic recovery fund known as the Next Generation programme.
The scale of the shift in relative prosperity is significant, both as a sign of Britain's decline and Italy's revival.
Andrew Kenningham, from Capital Economics, said it could be comparable with 'Il sorpasso' – the overtaking – of the late 1980s when Italy's economy became bigger than Britain's.
That was taken as a sign Italy had finally shrugged off its reputation for stagnation – though it regained that status in the years following the eurozone's sovereign debt crisis.
Once again Italy has pushed past Britain, though the UK's GDP remains larger overall.
'It tells us that Italian and British citizens are equally well off in terms of what they can purchase. Average living standards are in principle the same, or in Italy very slightly higher now,' Mr Kenningham said.
Italians also have a higher life expectancy than Britons.
The country has become increasingly attractive to wealthy households from Britain as investors, entrepreneurs and non-doms seek shelter from rising taxes in the UK and instability elsewhere.
'Of all major countries in Europe, politically Italy is by far the most stable. This is unusual – it is not the history of Italy – but compared to politics in the UK, France, Spain and Germany, Italy looks good,' Mr Schmieding said.
'It has a stable, steady government which is not doing as much as it should, but is not doing anything seriously wrong, which is something you cannot say about many other countries.'
Yet for its success, Italy's economy still has its problems.
Paolo Grignani, from Oxford Economics, warned that the cash dished out with the renovation 'superbonus' – which gives homeowners tax credits for renovating their houses – 'led to a fiscal imbalance that will take years for the Italian government to rectify,' while construction has slowed since the scheme ended.
At the same time, Italian wages are not yet back above pre-Covid levels after adjusting for inflation, he said, unlike those in the UK.
A Treasury spokesman said: 'In our Plan for Change, we were clear on the need to put more money into the pockets of working people which is why we protected people's payslips from higher taxes, increased the national minimum wage for three million workers and why we're rolling out free breakfast clubs in every primary school and extending the £3 bus far cap.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rank unfairness of UK today means Starmer's Two Tier Kier nickname has stuck – but here's how he can shed it
Rank unfairness of UK today means Starmer's Two Tier Kier nickname has stuck – but here's how he can shed it

The Sun

time8 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Rank unfairness of UK today means Starmer's Two Tier Kier nickname has stuck – but here's how he can shed it

FOR those enraged at growing evidence of 'two-tier' Britain, the acquittal of Ricky Jones last week was just the latest depressing example. Here was a Labour councillor being cleared of encouraging violent disorder despite calling for far-right protesters to have their throats slit. 3 3 Reform and the Tories seized on the case as yet another blinding display of courtroom double standards. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp wasted no time laying the travesty squarely at the feet of Sir Keir Starmer. In a tweet viewed more than two million times, he said 'as far as I can see, this Labour Government seems to be quite happy with two-tier justice'. Cue howls of anger from online liberals, who breathlessly crowed that not only was he disrespecting the decision of a jury, he was unfairly meting out blame to ministers. 'You ought to know this has nothing to do with them', retorted the arch-Conservative wet Dominic Grieve. 'That is the hallmark of a rabble rouser.' Rank unfairness But people are roused. In fact, they are bloody furious about what they perceive to be rampant 'two-tierism'. The refrain thundered into the political lexicon like a bullet train in the tinderbox aftermath of last year's Southport riots. In that sticky, angry summer, there was a feeling the clunking fist of the British state was being disproportionately brought down upon a certain kind of protester. For a public that routinely watches paedophiles walk free, the case of Lucy Connolly ­— slung in the slammer for a disgraceful but quite clearly stupid tweet — became a lightning rod. Even now, her 31-month jail sentence is the yardstick held up against some of the more mind-boggling outcomes from our judiciary. 'Two-tier' justice savaged by Kemi Badenoch who blasts 'extraordinary' decision to spare Huw Edwards You can argue the toss over how much blame ministers should shoulder for policing and court decisions. We have an independent judiciary but it is of course Parliament that makes our laws and ministers who make the political weather. Rightly or wrongly, Starmer is the man at the sharp end of the criticism. And much more dangerously for him, allegations of two-tier standards have now stretched well beyond the orbit of crime and seeped into every cranny of public life. It has become a byword for the rank unfairness voters see in modern day Britain. Charges of two-tierism are so common I'd eat my notebook if it is not the 2025 Oxford word of the year. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look Of all the unfortunate nicknames bestowed upon our Prime Minister, none has stuck quite so solidly as Two Tier Keir. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look. Ordinary British families struggling to pay the rent watch in fury as undocumented illegal migrants waltz into hotels for free bed and board. Law-abiding citizens paying full whack for council services and leisure activities read revelations in The Sun about small-boat migrants getting discounts. Millions of workers setting their alarm clocks for crack of dawn see an ever-growing number of their countrymen and women signing on for welfare with zero requirements to look for work. Taxpayers squeezed more than ever wonder where the improvement in public services is to show for it. Passengers paying hefty Tube fares rattle with rage as guards turn a blind eye to entitled oiks bumping the barriers. And just last week, we saw Birmingham council tear down St George flags from lamp-posts while turning a blind eye to Palestinian ones. Two-tierism is more than just a buzzword — it captures the mood of a nation fed up with a system they increasingly feel is not on their side. The PM's political enemies are alive to just how damaging the Two Tier Keir narrative has become. Consider how just last year those who brandished allegations of two-tierism were dismissed as cranks and nutjobs, whereas now these are mainstream complaints. Even when Starmer was shoving Netflix show Adolescence down our throats, but neglected to watch a documentary about grooming gangs, he was accused of 'two-tier telly'. How does Sir Keir neutralise these attacks and restore the faith of a nation that loves rules and loathes unfairness? Winning the trust of voters always starts by showing them you get it. Starmer will never himself use the T-word — a refrain adopted mainly by the political Right. And it is unlikely this former lawyer will start openly criticising his old profession, although it is a good first step that he has pledged new legislation to stop dinghy-chasing lawyers weaponising European human-rights laws. Kick up backside Expect him to start wrapping himself up in the language of 'fairness' over the next few months, though, as he tries to show he does in fact get it. He tweeted yesterday: 'I will do what it takes to uphold the law and ensure fairness for the British people. 'If someone doesn't have the right to be in this country, we won't allow them to stay.' Which is all well and good, but the rhetoric has to be matched by results. Whitehall departments have been given a kick up the backside to deliver positive stories about this Government to sell. At a recent summer bash, No10 chiefs told Cabinet aides that the Health, Treasury and Environment departments had churned out the most 'top of the grid' stories — a pointed reminder to slackers to up their game. Stopping the boats, closing hotels, driving living standards, going after genuine criminals and getting more people into work — voters don't ask the world of their politicians, they just want the basics done right so they can get on in life. Sir Keir needs to restore that uniquely British sense of fairness — or it could all end in tiers. NEVER wrestle with a pig – you both get dirty but the pig likes it. I fear Sir Keir Starmer's latest mud-slinging campaign against Nigel Farage could see him end up on the wrong end of that old political slogan. 3 New Labour attack ads claim the Reform leader 'wants to make it easier to share revenge porn online' and would 'put women and girls at risk'. Another one attempts to portray him as best mates with social media misogynist Andrew Tate. It all comes shortly after ministers lampooned Farage, right, as 'on the side' of modern day Jimmy Saviles. Politics can be a dirty business and sometimes it pays dividends to go below the belt. But if the gloves are off, the PM should not be surprised if he now gets hit back twice as hard. And Reform are hardly the sort who will pull their punches. I suspect the real reason Labour has ratcheted up the criticism is that nothing else is sticking to Teflon Nige, or knocking him off his perch atop the polls. A No10 insider recently told me their attempts to undermine the costs of Farage's policies were futile. They said: 'We are so far out from a general election that nobody cares about whether the sums add up. It's all vibes.'

Corbyn was wrong to ‘capitulate' over anti-Semitism, says Sultana
Corbyn was wrong to ‘capitulate' over anti-Semitism, says Sultana

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Corbyn was wrong to ‘capitulate' over anti-Semitism, says Sultana

Jeremy Corbyn 'capitulated' over anti-Semitism as Labour leader, the co-founder of his new political party has claimed. Zarah Sultana, who launched a new hard-Left movement with Mr Corbyn last month, said he was wrong to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism. The definition includes the examples of holding Jews responsible for the actions of Israel and comparing its policy to that of the Nazis. On Sunday night, the Board of Deputies of British Jews accused Ms Sultana of a 'grave insult' to the Jewish community and questioned her 'wider commitment' to anti-racism. Labour initially refused to accept the IHRA wording under Mr Corbyn, whose five-year leadership of the party was repeatedly dogged by complaints of anti-Semitism. Following a backlash, it eventually incorporated all 11 examples in the IHRA definition in 2018, including a line warning against claiming the existence of Israel as a state was a 'racist endeavour'. In an interview with The New Left Review, Ms Sultana was asked how Mr Corbyn's time in charge of Labour from 2015 to 2020 should be adapted for the present day. She replied: 'I think we're in a very different political moment. We have to build on the strengths of Corbynism – its energy, mass appeal and bold policy platform – and we also have to recognise its limitations. 'It capitulated to the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, which famously equates it with anti-Zionism and which even its lead author Kenneth Stern has now publicly criticised.' Andrew Gilbert, the vice-president of the Board of Deputies, said: 'The IHRA definition has been adopted by the government and public institutions in this country and around the world, and is supported by the overwhelming majority of British Jews as it is clear and measured in defining anti-Semitism. 'Calling the recognition of the IHRA definition of antisemitism a 'capitulation' is a grave insult. Labour's real betrayal under Corbyn was unlawfully harassing and discriminating against Jews. 'Those who seek to delegitimise and mis-define the IHRA definition in this way prove themselves to be no friend to the Jewish community and also all into question their wider commitment to anti-racism, the wellbeing of the Jewish community and social cohesion.' A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism added: 'If Jews do not have the right to define the hatred that targets them, then who does? Does Zarah Sultana think that it should be herself?' Alex Hearn, the director of Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'Zarah Sultana has fundamentally misrepresented the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. It is unsurprising that she opposes it, given her history. 'There should be no place in a mainstream political party for the likes of Ms Sultana, and it is surprising that the Labour Party tolerated her for so long. 'Hopefully she will remain on the fringes of politics for the remainder of her career, which is where her extremist views belong.' In the same interview, Ms Sultana referred to Israel as a 'genocidal apartheid state' and said Sir Keir Starmer should have stopped arms sales to the country long ago. A Labour source said: 'The electorate has twice made their view clear about a Jeremy Corbyn-led party. 'Keir Starmer's Labour Party rightly tore anti-Semitism out at its roots. Corbyn almost led the Party to extinction. We're not going back.' Sir Keir faced a backlash over his refusal to call for an immediate ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war, which broke out after Hamas killed around 1,200 Israelis on Oct 7 2023. Labour has shed significant amounts of support among Muslim and Left-wing voters at every election since the start of the conflict. Launching their party last month with the temporary name of 'Your Party', Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana made clear pro-Palestinian activism would be a central part of its policy platform. They said: 'We believe in the radical idea that all human life has equal value. That is why we defend the right to protest for Palestine. 'That is why we demand an end to all arms sales to Israel. And that is why we will carry on campaigning for the only path to peace: a free and independent Palestine.' Ms Sultana's remarks came as she also claimed her and Mr Corbyn's new party was currently too much of a 'boys' club'. She is currently the only female MP out of the six independents who will eventually represent the new party in the Commons. Alongside Mr Corbyn, the others are Adnan Hussain, Ayoub Khan, Iqbal Mohamed, Shockat Adam, all of whom were elected on a pro-Gaza ticket at the general election last year. Ms Sultana insisted that the new organisation 'can't just be led by MPs', adding: 'Right now there are six of us MPs in the Independent Alliance, five of whom are men. 'This shouldn't be what our party looks like going forward, so the committee that's organising the conference should be gender balanced as well as racially and regionally diverse, all with an equal stake and voting rights. Anything less would be a boys' club.' Later in the interview, Ms Sultana expressed her hope that her new party would represent 'a politics of fun and joy'. 'One of the best parts of Corbynism was the rallies and the music and the performances,' she said. 'We need to get that back.'

Private equity group Advent to acquire U-Blox for $1.3 billion
Private equity group Advent to acquire U-Blox for $1.3 billion

Reuters

time8 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Private equity group Advent to acquire U-Blox for $1.3 billion

Aug 17 (Reuters) - Private equity group Advent International said on Sunday it has agreed to take over Switzerland's U-Blox Holding (UBXN.S), opens new tab in a cash offer worth some 1.05 billion Swiss francs ($1.30 billion). Advent said its public tender offer for U-Blox's shares would be carried out by its indirect subsidiary ZI Zenith. The 135 Swiss francs per share offer represents a 53% premium to the undisturbed volume-weighted average share price of the last six months, Advent said in a statement with U-Blox. The tender offer is subject to terms and conditions, and regulatory approvals customary for such transactions, and is expected to be settled within the next six months, it added. U-Blox, a maker of microchips and software for car navigation, said on Friday it was in talks with Advent. The Swiss technology group, which went public in 2007, said last week it cut its first-half loss before interest and tax to 7.7 million francs from a loss of 28 million a year earlier. Earlier this year, the firm sold a unit making cellular modules for wireless communication to focus on navigation and positioning technology used in cars, robots and farm equipment. ($1 = 0.8063 Swiss francs)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store