logo
Too harsh, too vague

Too harsh, too vague

Time of Indiaa day ago
Uttarakhand is following in big brother UP's footsteps as its state cabinet approves what can be fairly described as draconian amendments in anti-conversion law via the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill 2025. Aside from harsher punishment (minimum prison sentence of seven years, fine up to ₹10L) and expanding its scope (property seized), the law is even more problematic thanks to loosely worded conditions defining the offence. For instance, inducement/allurement has been expanded to include 'glorifying one religion against another'. It bans 'social media applications aimed at building online communities of people who share interests and activities or are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others…' for the purposes of the law. Whatever does this mean?
The law in a 2022 amendment had already imported terms of the most stringent of laws – anti-terror legislation UAPA. So, 'illegal conversion' is a cognisable nonbailable offence, police already need no warrant to arrest, suspicion will suffice, and the burden of proof is on the accused. New amendments increase jail-term to life of 14 years. Similar to UP's law, if convicted of illegal conversion of minors or SC/ST, jail-term may be 20 years or remainder of life. Mass conversion is defined as 'when the religion of two or more persons is converted'. CM Dhami justifies the amendments because allegedly a 'demographic change' is being wrought in the state through 'illegal/forced conversion'. For the record, Uttarakhand population is 83% Hindu, about 14% Muslim, a smattering of Christians and others.
The long arm of the law has stretched into what is legislative and executive overreach. The legislation is to be amended to allow local govt to confiscate property belonging to the accused if there is not evidence, but mere suspicion of 'foreign funds' being involved. DMs can order seizure of any property they have 'reason to believe' is related to alleged conversion. And this can be done '…regardless, whether a court has taken cognisance of such offence.' This, when the burden of proof is already on the accused. There is disquiet in the state about harsh measures being exploited by officials for witch-hunts. A law where anyone can be arrested on mere suspicion of 'intent', where the accused's property can be seized, which places the onus of proving the charges wrong on the accused is at the least a poorly designed legislation. It demands a thorough review, or reversal.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email
This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Want to Know if EC is Still an Independent Body, Elections Free and Fair': Kanimozhi
'Want to Know if EC is Still an Independent Body, Elections Free and Fair': Kanimozhi

The Wire

time4 minutes ago

  • The Wire

'Want to Know if EC is Still an Independent Body, Elections Free and Fair': Kanimozhi

New Delhi: While the opposition has continued its protests demanding a discussion on the special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar in parliament, the monsoon session is coming to a close with no end in sight to the stalemate between the opposition and government. The opposition's call for a discussion on the SIR has not been heeded to by the government, which has last week pushed ahead with legislative business and passed crucial Bills, including the new income tax Bills, and two Bills relating to sports governance: the National Sports Governance Bill and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill. In an interview with The Wire, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) parliamentary party leader and Lok Sabha MP Kanimozhi said that the BJP-led Union government believes in 'pushing ahead' with bills and questioned why elected representatives could not discuss the electoral process in parliament. 'The government is not prepared to listen to us. I don't understand if the elected representatives of the people of this country cannot discuss the electoral process, then who else has the authority?' said Kanimozhi. While the government has said that the Election Commission is an independent constitutional body which cannot be discussed in parliament, Kanimozhi said that there is a need to know whether elections are still free and fair. 'I really want to know if the Election Commission is still an independent body. If it is, we don't have any problems. We want to know whether it is still an independent body and if elections are free and fair. That is why we need a discussion,' she said. With Tamil Nadu slated to go to the polls next year, the BJP is looking to make inroads in the southern state through cultural outreach efforts including Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple visit in July, highlighting the history of the Chola Kings and tying up with the AIADMK for the assembly elections. 'Tamil people are not blind to what the BJP is trying to do' The outreach comes amid the ongoing tussle between the Union government and the DMK government in the state over the implementation of the three language policy and NEP in the state. Meanwhile an archaeologist who had earlier overseen the excavation of an ancient civilisation in Tamil Nadu's Keezhadi, has been asked by the archaeological survey of India (ASI) to resubmit his report in a move. Tamil Nadu politicians have described the development as a bid by the the BJP-led centre to try to suppress information about the ancient Tamil civilisation that had flourished on the banks of the Vaigai river. 'Tamil people are not blind to what the BJP is trying to do. We understand that you don't care about our culture. You don't care about our language. You try to suppress us. You try to suppress the greatness of our culture. And before every election if you suddenly discover the Cholas or Rajendra Chola. It is not that the people will get fooled by that,' said Kanimozhi.

Mass grave row: K'taka govt backs Dharmasthala, will take action against those who misled, says Minister Hebbalkar
Mass grave row: K'taka govt backs Dharmasthala, will take action against those who misled, says Minister Hebbalkar

Hans India

time34 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Mass grave row: K'taka govt backs Dharmasthala, will take action against those who misled, says Minister Hebbalkar

In the wake of the politics and controversy surrounding the issue, the Karnataka government on Saturday reiterated that it stands firmly with the Dharmasthala pilgrimage centre and assured that action will be taken against those who misled the government in this regard. Speaking to the media in Udupi on Saturday, Women and Child Welfare Minister Laxmi Hebbalkar said, 'Our government stands with Dharmasthala. The unknown complainant is narrating hundreds of fictitious stories. We will not spare those who misled the government.' 'Dharmasthala is a sacred place. Attempts are being made to defame it. Despite the excavation of burial sites one after another, nothing substantial has been found. The government will always stand with Dharmasthala,' she added. 'A bundle of lies was propagated on social media about the temple town. Later, the BJP picked up the allegations and is now shedding crocodile tears. The matter was discussed at both national and international levels. Those who indulged in defaming Dharmasthala will be punished,' Hebbalkar stated. 'The investigation by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) is progressing. Many have been levelling accusations and attacking the government. To put an end to speculations and allegations, Home Minister G. Parameshwara constituted the SIT. The issue was raked up deliberately, and it should end now,' she said. 'Let the BJP make claims on hundreds of issues. The party is behind the unknown complainant and the masked man. The SIT has been formed to put an end to all the drama surrounding this matter. I am a devotee of Lord Manjunatha. I have unflinching faith in the sacred Dharmasthala pilgrimage centre. I fully endorse the statement of Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar,' Hebbalkar added. 'The government is committed and concerned. Dharmasthala is a place where 'Dharma' is upheld. Let all actions that bring disrepute to Dharmasthala come to an end,' she stated. She also urged that justice should be delivered in the Sowjanya murder case and in other cases reported from Dharmasthala. Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar stated on Friday that action will be initiated against those who indulged in carrying out propaganda against the Hindu pilgrimage centre Dharmasthala in the alleged mass grave case. 'The government is considering taking action against those who have lied and spread misinformation in connection with the Dharmasthala case,' he had announced. Dy CM Shivakumar said, 'This is not a matter for or against Dharmasthala. All procedures must be carried out lawfully. I have observed Dharmasthala very closely. I have faith and confidence in the devotion, reverence, and practices there. I believe that in the coming days, the investigation will reveal the conspiracy that took place. Regarding this matter, our Home Minister G. Parameshwara will present the facts before the state by responding in the Assembly.' Meanwhile, the Karnataka BJP unit launched the 'Dharmasthala Chalo' campaign on Saturday morning to counter the alleged conspiracy surrounding the mass grave case. The campaign was flagged off at the Nelamangala toll on the outskirts of Bengaluru. In a major development, on July 11, the unidentified complainant in the case, who is a lower caste Hindu, had claimed that he was forced to bury several bodies of women and girls who were raped and murdered in Dharmasthala village. He appeared before a court in Karnataka's Mangaluru district and recorded his statement. The man gave his statement before Principal Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate. The development has sparked a major controversy. He requested that the police exhume the bodies in his presence. Even as 17 burial sites were excavated, the authorities could not find any strong evidence. Retired Supreme Court judges and activists demanded a SIT probe monitored by the Supreme Court or the High Court into the shocking case, allegedly involving many women, girls and destitute men. While the state government has followed the rule of law and allowed a probe into the alleged mass murders, the Opposition BJP has accused it of giving in to anti-Hindu forces and demanded an interim report from the Home Minister.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store