
The big shake-up in safe-haven space: Euro steps up, cryptocurrencies move in
The usually sedate world of safe assets is feeling the heat from global trade, geopolitical disruptions, and shifting investor priorities. At the top, gold has held firm. But further down the pecking order, a shake-up is underway.
The US dollar and Treasuries, long seen as the ultimate refuges, are wobbling under the weight of debt worries and political drift. Meanwhile, Europe is quietly strengthening its hand, and the euro, too, may finally be stepping into a more global role. Cryptocurrencies—once considered fringe—are entering the conversation as real, if risky, alternatives.
Read this | Mint Primer: How will Trump's next obsession, a weaker dollar, play out?
The safe-haven hierarchy is being redrawn. Here's how—and why—it matters.
Dollar assets: Trend reversal
The US dollar and Treasury bonds have long been considered safe assets, typically showing weak or negative correlation with other assets during crises. In a classic flight to safety, investors flock to US Treasuries, driving bond prices up, yields down, and strengthening the dollar. But recent economic turmoil has upended this pattern, casting doubt on the dollar's safe-haven status.
Read this | What is India's advantage in the global trade reset amid US's tariff flip-flops?
Between January and May 2025, the US dollar declined roughly 9%, while Treasury yields rose by 25 basis points. Yields on 30-year Treasuries breached the critical 5% threshold following the passage of the US Congress's sweeping 'Big, Beautiful Bill" tax cuts. If the budget is truly pro-growth, as its proponents claim, it should boost the dollar. Conversely, if its expanding deficits spark inflation, as critics argue, higher interest rates would be needed, which should also support the currency. Yet, the dollar weakened regardless, signalling market scepticism about both outcomes and growing concerns over US debt sustainability.
This worry is reflected in a sharp rise in US Credit Default Swap (CDS) spreads in recent months, indicating investors see higher credit risk in US sovereign debt. The increased probability of default relative to other developed economies points to a diminished safe-haven appeal for dollar assets. Contributing factors include Moody's downgrade of US debt from AAA to AA1, a fiscally expansive budget expected to increase national debt, and mounting policy uncertainty.
Euro assets: Going global?
German government bonds, or bunds, have long been Europe's benchmark asset, but never achieved global safe-haven status. One reason is limited supply: outstanding bund stock of 1.9 trillion euro is tiny compared to $28.6 trillion of US treasuries. As a result, the available pool of safe bonds in Europe is not as deep or liquid as in the US (Italian and French government bonds not included, as they are riskier).
But that is set to change in the coming years. Germany has increased fiscal spending limits and approved 1 trillion euro in new debt for infrastructure and defence investment, paving the way for a rapid increase in bund issuance. At the same time, German and US yields have been less correlated since Trump's election, making bunds a better portfolio diversifier and hedging asset than before.
In a recent speech, the president of the European Central Bank identified three links to a complete euro investing ecosystem. These include fiscal spending to stimulate growth and attract capital, supply of safe assets to hedge capital, and widespread use of the euro in international payments.
Read this | As rupee slides, a primer on how to manage an emerging market currency
The last link has been elusive so far: the dollar is far ahead of the euro in global payments. Believing that trade dominance is a key factor in currency use, the EU is actively pursuing new trade alliances.
It is also pushing to develop a digital euro—a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)—to boost digital payments both within and beyond Europe. If successful, this could mark a 'global euro moment," with the common currency emerging as a credible alternative to the dollar ecosystem.
Crypto assets: Mainstreamed
Cryptocurrency assets have entered the mainstream, encouraged by US President Donald Trump, who wants America to be the crypto capital of the world.
Two developments have led to greater acceptance of crypto assets. First, legal clarity on the status of crypto assets has improved. The US is on track to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins (via the GENIUS Act). An executive order has been signed to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve. US retirement funds are now permitted to invest in crypto assets.
Second, institutional adoption has enlarged the investible pool. In particular, the launch of spot crypto ETFs by industry stalwarts such as BlackRock and Fidelity has been a game changer. Fund inflows into crypto exchange-traded products have spiked in recent weeks, driven by investors diversifying from the risks of policy flip-flops and dollar weakness.
High price volatility makes crypto assets inherently risky. Yet, the asset class is being viewed as a hedge or portfolio diversifier, especially during crises of confidence in traditional currency systems. That is because, unlike fiat currencies, its value cannot be debased by quantitative easing or money printing.
Also read | Will America's crypto frenzy end in disaster?
Also, it is non-sovereign, decentralized and safe from sanctions. For investors looking to protect their assets from sovereign actions, crypto assets could be an alternate, safe store of value.
The author is an independent writer in economics and finance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
LOS ANGELES — The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
‘KILL the BILL': Elon Musk yet again explodes over Donald Trump's tax bill
lon Musk yet again launched a scathing attack on President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill on Wednesday (June 4), urging Americans to pressure their lawmakers to "kill" it. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk wrote on X, formerly Twitter. In a previous post, Musk called for a complete rewrite of the bill: 'A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS.' 'This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!' In a post on June 4, Musk accused Republican House members of betraying fiscal conservatism and blamed the bill for expanding the national deficit. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' he posted. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote in a previous post. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' Elon Musk also on May 28 voiced strong criticism of the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' warning that it could worsen the federal deficit and undermine cost-cutting efforts led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). In an interview with CBS, Musk said he was 'disappointed' by the tax and spending bill, which narrowly passed the House and is now pending a Senate vote. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful. But I don't know if it could be both,' Musk remarked in a preview clip posted online. He added, 'It increases the budget deficit and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' Despite Musk's sharp rebuke, President Trump remains firmly behind the legislation. 'Passing THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL is a Historic Opportunity to turn our Country around,' Trump said in a social media post earlier. He's pushing for the Senate to pass the measure before July 4. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt brushed off Musk's comments. 'The President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill and he's sticking to it,' she told reporters. The proposed bill, which has cleared the House and is now being debated in the Senate, includes major rollbacks to Biden-era subsidies for electric vehicles and clean energy — programs that benefit Tesla. It also slashes safety-net spending, while adding an estimated $2.5 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. Musk's vocal opposition comes just days after he ended his four-month stint leading DOGE, a Trump administration initiative to reduce federal spending. His brief tenure was marked by controversy and reportedly coincided with a dip in Tesla EV sales. On May 29, Musk officially confirmed his departure on X: 'As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending.' Trump hosted a farewell at the White House on May 30, publicly thanking Musk: 'He's done a fantastic job,' Trump said at a joint press conference. The tech billionaire, once seen as a key Trump ally, appears to be distancing himself from politics. Speaking at the Qatar Economic Forum on May 20, Musk said he planned to reduce his political spending. 'I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' he said.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Trump tax bill to add $2.42 trn to US deficit: Congressional Budget Office
The House-passed version of President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill would add $2.42 trillion to US budget deficits over the next decade, according to a new estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO's calculation, released Wednesday in its so-called scoring of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' reflects a $3.67 trillion decrease in expected revenues and a $1.25 trillion decline in spending over the decade through 2034, relative to baseline projections. Prospects for an even more dire US fiscal trajectory threaten to stoke concerns about the bill among GOP fiscal hawks. Trump ally Elon Musk on Tuesday blasted the package as a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' House Republicans narrowly passed the bill last month, and it now faces opposition in the Senate, where multiple lawmakers have expressed varying demands for changes. Trump is expected to meet with Senate Finance Committee Republicans Wednesday to discuss the bill. Trump administration officials have repeatedly dismissed CBO projections as inaccurate, saying they fail to account for the uplift to economic growth that the tax cuts, along with tariff hikes and deregulation, will provide. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last month, 'I'm not worried about the US debt dynamics,' because a swelling GDP will ease the burden. He also predicted 'north of 3%' growth by this time next year. Timing for passage The CBO's $2.42 trillion deficit-increase estimate doesn't incorporate any so-called dynamic effects from changes in economic growth or other indicators resulting from the new tax and spending measures. Bessent has called on lawmakers to pass the bill, which includes an increase in the statutory debt limit, by mid-July. The Treasury has been using special accounting maneuvers to keep within the debt ceiling since the start of the year, and has warned it could exhaust its capacity in August. Fiscal conservatives have demanded the measure do more for deficit reduction. But other GOP members have demanded that temporary tax cuts in the bill be made permanent — which would further dampen revenues. The CBO score will also be reviewed by the Senate's rules-keeper who could determine whether provisions comply with the chamber's requirements. The bill encompasses much of Trump's economic agenda. It would make permanent his 2017 income-tax cuts, and provide new benefits promised on the campaign trail — including eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay through 2028. It also raises the cap on the federal deduction for state and local taxes to $40,000 from $10,000. The bill has various federal spending cuts, including to clean-energy credits, and features new work requirements for Medicaid beneficiaries and new guidelines for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Some of those cuts also face opposition among Senate Republicans. Wednesday's CBO release indicated that measures in the existing bill could leave 10.9 million people without health insurance in 2034. That includes 1.4 million without verified citizenship, nationality or satisfactory immigration status who would no longer be covered in state-only funded programs.