
India joins BRICS statement expressing ‘grave concern' over strikes against Iran
India has joined the BRICS grouping to 'express grave concern' over the 'military strikes against Iran' since June 13 and has called it a 'violation of international law and UN Charter. PM Narendra Modi is expected to travel to Rio de Janeiro for the BRICS summit on July 5-6.
Iran expressed 'gratitude' to India's 'freedom-loving' citizens, political parties, institutions and others who stood by Tehran in the face of military attacks on it by Israel and the US.
This comes 10 days after India had distanced itself from a statement issued by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) which condemned the military strikes carried out by Israel.
A joint statement by BRICS said, 'We express grave concern over the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East.'
It also said, 'In the face of rising tensions with unpredictable consequences for international peace and security, as well as for the world economy, we underscore the urgent need to break the cycle of violence and restore peace. We call on all parties to engage through existing channels of dialogue and diplomacy, with a view to de-escalating the situation and resolving their differences through peaceful means.'
'We express serious concern over any attacks against peaceful nuclear installations that are carried out in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm. In this context, we reiterate our support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at addressing regional challenges,' it said, alluding to the strikes by US and Israel on nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz.
It said that civilian lives must be protected, and civilian infrastructure must be safeguarded, in full compliance with international humanitarian law. 'We extend our sincere condolences to the families of the victims and express our solidarity with civilians affected,' it said.
'Guided by the principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter, BRICS remains committed to promoting international peace and security and to fostering diplomacy and peaceful dialogue as the only sustainable path toward long-term stability in the region. In this regard, we also reaffirm the necessity of establishing a zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, in line with relevant international resolutions. We call upon the international community to support and facilitate dialogue processes, uphold international law, and contribute constructively to peaceful settlements of disputes for the benefit of all humanity,' it said, adding that BRICS countries will remain seized of the matter.
In a statement, the Iranian embassy in Delhi said it appreciates the 'genuine and invaluable support' to those siding with Tehran.
The Iranian embassy extended 'heartfelt gratitude' to all 'freedom-loving' people of India –including political parties, members of Parliament, non-governmental organisations, religious and spiritual leaders, university professors, members of the media, social activists, and all individuals and institutions who stood firmly and vocally with Iran.
The embassy said messages of solidarity, support, public statements, and active participation in peace-oriented gatherings when the Iranian people were under military assault, were a source of 'deep encouragement'.
'The steadfastness of the Iranian people in the face of this blatant aggression was not merely a defence of their homeland and national dignity, but a symbol of resistance against the grave violations of the United Nations Charter, humanitarian principles, and the foundational norms of international law,' it said.
The solidarity of nations with the people of Iran is not simply a political stance — it is an affirmation of the universal values of justice, legality, and global peace, it said.
'The Islamic Republic of Iran has consistently emphasized the need to uphold the principles of international law and to resist expansionist and aggressive policies.
'We firmly believe that the unity and solidarity of nations serve as a powerful bulwark against war, violence, and injustice,' the embassy said.
On June 14, SCO, currently chaired by China, called Israel's 'aggressive actions against civilian targets (in Iran), including energy and transport infrastructure, which have resulted in civilian casualties, a gross violation of international law and the United Nations Charter'.
In a statement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said: 'India did not participate in the discussions on the above-mentioned SCO statement… India's own position on the matter had been articulated by us on June 13, 2025, and remains the same. We urge that channels of dialogue and diplomacy be utilised to work towards de-escalation and it is essential that the international community undertake endeavours in that direction.' It said that India's 'overall position' was communicated to other SCO members.
In its statement, the SCO had expressed 'serious concern over the escalating tensions in the Middle East and strongly condemn(ed) the military strikes carried out by Israel on the territory of Iran.'
'They (actions) constitute an infringement on Iran's sovereignty, cause damage to regional and international security, and pose serious risks to global peace and stability,' the SCO statement had said.
Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Putin to skip BRICS summit in Brazil over ICC arrest warrant
Russian President Vladimir Putin will not attend the upcoming BRICS summit in Brazil, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed on Wednesday, citing an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) over alleged war crimes in Ukraine. 'This is related to certain difficulties in the context of the ICC's demands,' Ushakov said, according to Reuters. 'In that context, the Brazilian government could not take a clear position that would allow our president to participate in this meeting.' The summit, scheduled for July 6–7 in Rio de Janeiro, will see Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov represent Russia in person. Putin is expected to join the proceedings via video link. The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Putin in March 2023, accusing him of illegally deporting hundreds of Ukrainian children following Russia's 2022 invasion. While the Kremlin has dismissed the allegations and called the warrant null and void, the legal risks remain for Putin when visiting ICC member states like Brazil. As a signatory to the Rome Statute, Brazil is obliged to detain any individual wanted by the ICC who enters its territory. This is not the first time Putin has opted out of international summits due to the ICC warrant. He skipped the 2023 BRICS summit in South Africa under similar circumstances and sent Lavrov instead. He also missed the G20 summit in Brazil in November 2024, reported The Kyiv Independent. In a rare exception, Putin visited Mongolia in September 2024 — despite its ICC membership. Media reports suggest Chinese President Xi Jinping may also skip the BRICS summit this year. (With inputs from Reuters, The Kyiv Independent, The Moscow Times)


Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rajnath Singh refuses to sign SCO statement as cross-border terrorism concerns remain unaddressed
Jun 26, 2025 12:18 PM IST Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday has reportedly refused to sign the joint statement of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). As per reports, the defence minister refused to dot India's name on the document due to its failure to address India's concern regarding cross-border terrorism. India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh attends the Defense Ministers' Meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Members States in Qingdao (AP) At the SCO Summit, India raised its concerns regarding cross-border terrorism, citing the Pahalgam attack and conflict with Pakistan. However, as per PTI, Rajnath Singh refused to endorse the joint statement as it not did explicitly address India's concerns. Citing sources close to the matter, PTI reported that India's refusal comes due to no clear-cut approach to combat terrorism, including cross-border terror attacks. With Singh's refusal, the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting concluded with no joint statement from the participants. The meeting was held from June 25 to 26 in Qingdao, China. Defence leaders from member states such as India, China, Russia, and other Central Asian nations came together to discuss issues related to regional and international peace and security.

The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Donald Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday (June 26, 2025) as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday (June 24, 2025) and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Mr. Trump decides to strike Iran again. Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorised the attacks. Iran-Israel conflict LIVE updates 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said on Tuesday (June 24, 2025) that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday (June 27, 2025). CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday (June 26, 2025). Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Mr. Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Mr. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorised to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday (June 25, 2025), Ms. Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Ms. Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Mr. Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. Most Republicans have staunchly defended Mr. Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Mr. Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for US involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Mr. Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Mr. Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear programme'.