
Horror as decapitated DOLPHIN is found on picturesque beach after 'intentional mutilation'
Last month, a passerby reported finding a dead bottlenose dolphin stranded on the remote, underdeveloped Lea-Hutaff barrier island, situated just north of Wilmington and accessible only by boat.
However, scientists from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington quickly realized that the dolphin's death was not natural, but a criminal act, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Upon their arrival, marine experts described the eight-foot sea animal as having been 'intentionally mutilated' with 'its head removed' - a discovery that prompted authorities to launch an investigation and offer a reward of up to $20,000.
'We are asking the public for any information about who may have been involved,' NOAA Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement said in a statement.
'We are offering a reward of up to $20,000 for information leading to a criminal conviction or the assessment of a civil penalty.'
On April 15, an individual called the Southeast Marine Mammal Stranding Hotline to report a dead, stranded dolphin that had washed ashore on Lea Island, near marker 105.
Scientists with the University of North Carolina at Wilmington - who are part of a national program that coordinates emergency responses to marine mammals - were called to the scene, as they handle cases involving sick, injured, distressed or dead marine life.
At the remote location, the experts encountered a massive, eight-foot dolphin, whose death was clearly the result of foul play.
Based on their findings, officials believe that the bottlenose dolphin's head had been removed between April 16 and April 18, following the initial report.
'This animal was intentionally decapitated, a violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act,' NOAA officials said.
Under the act, it is illegal to harass, harm, kill, feed or collect body parts of protected species - with violations potentially leading to civil or criminal prosecution, fines of up to $100,000 and one year in jail.
During their initial health assessment on the dolphin, university scientists suspected it was carrying Brucella, a bacteria responsible for the infectious bacterial disease, Brucellosis.
The disease primarily affects cattle, swine, goats, sheep and dogs, and can be transmitted to humans through direct contact with infected animals, inhalation of airborne agents or consumption of contaminated animal products, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).
Scientists ultimately conducted a necropsy on the dolphin. However, the complete findings and definitive cause of death are still pending.
After the horrific discovery, officials from the NOAA Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement swiftly issued a $20,000 reward, calling on the public to assist in identifying the individual responsible for the mutilation of the protected sea creature.
The crime is a violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which makes it illegal to harass, harm, kill, feed or collect body parts of protected species, with violations potentially leading to civil or criminal prosecution, fines of up to $100,000 and one year in jail
'The remote location where the dolphin was found adds to the difficulty of investigating this incident and cause of death,' officials explained in the statement.
'We are calling on your help to find those responsible.'
Anyone with information regarding the case is asked to contact the NOAA Enforcement Hotline at (800)-853-1964.
Although tips can be submitted anonymously, those seeking to claim the reward must include their name and contact information.
Last year, the butchered remains of a dolphin were discovered on a New Jersey beach.
In November of 2024, federal authorities were called to the scene in Allenhurst, where they found that the animal's flesh had been 'completely removed with clean cuts from a sharp instrument, leaving only the head, dorsal fin and flukes'.
The dolphin's organs, except for the heart and lungs, had also been removed.
The Marine Mammal Stranding Center quickly released a disturbing image of the mutilated carcass lying on a metal gurney before it was carried away for an investigation.
It was ultimately identified as a common dolphin, which is not listed as a threatened or endangered species.
However, the NOAA still launched an investigation into the death, seeking to find the perpetrator of the crime that carries penalties of substantial fines and up to one year in prison.
The night before the grisly discovery, a common dolphin was reportedly struggling in the surf a block away.
Witnesses said the dolphin managed to make it over the sandbar and swim out to sea. Yet it remains unknown whether the dolphin that was butchered was the same animal seen by the witnesses.
Although the common dolphin is not considered an endangered species, the sea creature is still protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
New details shed light on mystery over why NRL star Brandon Smith was questioned by police as soon as he flew to Queensland
A new report maintains Souths star Brandon Smith was not being questioned over anything he did during a flight when he was pulled aside by police after landing on the Gold Coast with his teammates on Saturday. Smith, 29, was interviewed by police at Coolangatta shortly after arriving on his flight from Sydney. Rabbitohs CEO Blake Solly said Smith was with teammates on Saturday evening at a Broadbeach hotel, but gave no details about what happened during the side's airport arrival. Queensland Police released the following statement on the matter: 'Queensland Police had cause to speak to a 29-year-old male at Coolangatta Airport. 'The male was later released without charge. Police have no further information to provide.' Now News Corp and NRL 360 journalist Phil 'Buzz' Rothfield has shed some light on the incident. 'There's no suggestion of any wrongdoing or that Smith played up on the plane which, when police pull someone aside at an airport, that's normally the case,' Rothfield said on the Big Sports Breakfast radio show on Monday. 'Souths were filing off the plane heading to luggage and Queensland police took Smith aside and spoke to him for a considerable amount of time. 'Souths aren't telling us the reason why, his manager isn't telling us. What I'm told is that there was an issue that has happened in the last 12 months while Brandon Smith was in Queensland and police are looking into it. 'They have been trying to track Brandon for some time. When they couldn't get hold of him, they said they saw he was coming to the Gold Coast and they wanted to chat to him. There's no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the popular star, who played against the Titans on Sunday afternoon. In Australia, offences on aircraft fall under federal jurisdiction because air travel is regulated by Commonwealth laws. The Australian Federal Police handle these matters nationwide.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Man ‘sexually assaulted by another man' on busy train in broad daylight as cops release CCTV in hunt for passenger
COPS have released CCTV images after a man allegedly sexually assaulted another man on a busy train. The British Transport Police (BTP) said the reported attack occurred on the Elizabeth line on Monday, June 16 at around 8am. At the time of the incident, the pair were stood near the train doors on a service between Chadwell Heath and Whitechapel. Cops have now released an image of a man they would like to speak to following the alleged sexual assault. Detectives believe the man may have information that could help with their investigation. Anyone who recognises him is asked to get in touch with police immediately. You can contact the BTP by texting 61016, or by calling 0800 40 50 40 quoting reference 688 of 16 June. Information can also be given anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111. A spokesperson for BTP said: "Do you recognise this man? "Officers investigating a sexual assault on board a train from Chadwell Heath to Whitechapel have released these images in connection. "On Monday 16 June at around 8am a man sexually assaulted another man as they stood near the doors of the train. "Detectives believe the man in the CCTV image may have information that could help with their investigation."


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Family urge new IOPC probe over restrained man's death
The police watchdog is being urged to conduct another investigation into officers' handling of a man who died hours after being restrained during a mental health Fletcher, 26, died in hospital in Nottingham on 3 July 2022 after a police welfare check escalated into a decision to section investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) - carried out before an inquest into Mr Fletcher's death - found police actions were "reasonable and proportionate". However, Mr Fletcher's family want the IOPC to take further action after an inquest jury in July concluded "gross failings" by Nottinghamshire Police and others involved contributed to his death. Nathaniel Ameyaw, Mr Fletcher's father, said: "It took for a jury to uncover things, uncover failings that the IOPC should have done."Our hope is that they will investigate again and take a thorough look at the police's policies, procedures, what they should have done, what they didn't do - because it wasn't thorough." Mr Fletcher was diagnosed with paranoid personality disorder in 2020 and had struggled with a drug were called to his accommodation, at young people's charity YMCA, to carry out a welfare check on 3 July 2022 following concerns he would harm agreeing to be taken to hospital by the officers, Mr Fletcher suddenly changed his mind, no longer believing they were really was then detained under the Mental Health Fletcher was handcuffed, struck and restrained for about 30 minutes by numerous officers. Eventually an ambulance arrived, and he was taken to the Queen's Medical Centre, where he had been called to the home of Mr Fletcher's mother the day before his death, as he was experiencing another "mental health disturbance".It was discussed then that he should be sectioned and taken to a place of safety - a decision his family under the guidance of a community nurse, Mr Fletcher was taken back to his accommodation with no further condition deteriorated overnight and led to the police welfare check that started the chain of events leading to his death. Investigation report Nottinghamshire Police made a referral to the IOPC on 3 July 2022, and the watchdog said it made a decision to investigate on the same day. The investigation examined police contact with Mr Fletcher on the morning he died, as well as the previous day when they were called to his mother's also considered complaints raised by the family about consideration of his mental health, officers' use of force restraining him and an allegation he was treated differently because he was IOPC's final report was completed in April 2024 and was shared with the coroner and Mr Fletcher's family to assist with the findings were only made public after the inquest had watchdog found "no evidence" of a criminal offence or behaviour that justified disciplinary added there was no evidence supporting the allegation of less favourable treatment of Mr Fletcher. Mr Fletcher's cause of death was recorded as "the physical effects of exertion following a period of restraint, combined with the cocaine and other substances". After a four-week inquest, the jury concluded the level of restraint used by the officers was "appropriate" but found their combined force was "uncontrolled".The jury said there was "ineffective communication" at the scene and a "lack of clear leadership".They added police should have considered the length of time Mr Fletcher was kept in restraints and concluded there was a "gross failure" in training across all agencies involved. The inquest heard how, under a joint policy between police and East Midlands Ambulance Service, officers at the scene should have called for an ambulance. However, an ambulance was not called for until after the initial period of restraint. Police giving evidence at the inquest told the jury they were unaware of the policy. 'Still fighting for answers' Mr Ameyaw said he was comforted by the jury's findings and felt they had seen what had happened "the way [he] saw it".The 49-year-old added: "After my son passed, we had no choice but to put our faith in the IOPC. "They came and met with us as a family. They came to our home and they assured us that they were going to do a thorough investigation. "They were the ones that had access to the body-worn footage, they were the ones that were going to give us the answers." But Mr Ameyaw said: "As a family we are still fighting for answers and it's very difficult." Derrick Campbell, IOPC regional director, said: "We have acknowledged the narrative verdict returned by the inquest jury and respect their findings. "I reiterate my deepest sympathies for Kaine's family and friends for their loss. This is a truly tragic case in which a young man lost his life."Our investigation involved a detailed examination of the evidence, including calls made to police, police incident logs, police radio communication, police officers' body worn video, officers' training records, CCTV, and medical reports. "We also obtained witness accounts from all parties involved, including independent witnesses, police officers, and ambulance staff."Nottinghamshire Police previously said it would reflect on the findings the coroner made and continued to take "all the necessary steps to keep the public and our workforce safe". If you've been affected by the issues in this story, help and support is available via the BBC Action Line.