logo
Trump Effect holds sway as Canadians vote

Trump Effect holds sway as Canadians vote

Politico26-04-2025

Three quarters of Canadians dislike President Donald Trump — and Conservatives appear likely to pay a painful price for it in the country's Monday election, according to a POLITICO/Focaldata poll of Canadian voters.
About two in five voters (39 percent) told Focaldata, a U.K. pollster, that Trump was a top concern in the election, second only to cost of living (60 percent).
Since Trump's return to the White House — and Justin Trudeau's exit as Canada's prime minister — the Conservative Party led by populist Pierre Poilievre has watched a 25-point polling lead disintegrate in front of its eyes. Conservatives now trail in most surveys, including the POLITICO/Focaldata poll.
Canada's election has transformed into a test of Trump's political influence beyond the United States. In a backlash against his threats and trade war, about half of Canadians now consider the U.S. as a hostile power, a dramatic turn among moderate and Liberal-leading Canadians.
In a Time magazine interview published Friday,
Trump again reiterated his desire to annex Canada
: 'The only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state.'
Focaldata, which surveyed 2,826 respondents online from April 18 to 23, measured Trump's net favorability at minus 61 among Canadians, 'a deeply negative standing' that the pollster suggests could sway the outcome against the Conservatives.
Liberal Leader Mark Carney has campaigned on the proposition that his experience at the helm of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England makes him best qualified to defend Canada. The poll suggests voters agree that he, not Poilievre, is better suited to managing the nation's relationship with Trump and the United States.
'President Trump and I … we share some experiences,' the newbie politician said after being sworn in as prime minister last month. 'I have been in the private sector. I have worked in the real estate sector. I have done large transactions. I have worked with him during his first presidency at the G20, at the G7.'
With 2 days until Election Day, it remains to be seen whether Carney has closed the deal.
There are signs, though, that polls might be underestimating Conservatives' support. When Focaldata asked voters who they believed their local communities would vote for, Conservatives fared slightly better. James Kanagasooriam, Focaldata's chief research office, says drawing on the 'wisdom of the crowds' proved accurate in Brexit and during both Trump elections.
'The result suggests a Conservative vote lead and a sizeable polling error,' Kanagasooriam told POLITICO in an email. He added that it's a trick to know how much weight to give the finding since it's the only time the firm has deployed the question in Canada.
'While most traditional survey sampling suggests a narrow majority for Carney (including our own), there is an alternative method that paints a very, very different picture,' he said.
Focaldata gives the Liberals the edge in this final weekend of a 37-day campaign.
The firm found 40.5 percent support nationwide for Carney's Liberals. Poilievre's Conservatives trail at 37.5 percent.
Liberals hold a 9-point lead in all-important Ontario — 46 percent to 37. Carney's party also leads in Quebec (38 percent), ahead of the Bloc Québécois (28 percent) and Conservatives (22 percent). Conservatives lead in every province west of Ontario, including by 8 points — 42 percent to 34 — in British Columbia.
Jagmeet Singh's progressive New Democratic Party trails nationally at 10.7 percent. And only 58 percent of its support is rock solid, compared to 71 percent of Conservative voters and 68 percent of Liberals who say their preferences are final.
Helping Carney is that he appears to have persuaded a large chunk of voters that, despite Poilievre's persistent efforts, he is not Justin Trudeau.
A plurality of voters — 46 percent — say the incumbent prime minister 'mostly represents something different from Justin Trudeau's leadership' — and will vote for him, or not, based on his own record. That's a boon for Carney, since Trudeau is underwater with voters, the poll found; nearly three out of five hold unfavorable views of the former prime minister.
Focaldata's survey — with the Liberals polling slightly ahead of Conservatives — is in line with most national polling at this point in the campaign.
A closer look at favorability ratings helps reveal why, with Carney enjoying a net positive 10-point favorability rating but Poilievre net unfavorable by 7 points.
Some of that comes from Carney's popularity among both parties' voters. Liberals like Carney slightly more (86 percent) than Conservatives like Poilievre (84 percent). At the same time, Conservatives dislike Carney less (65 percent) than Liberals dislike Poilievre (74 percent). Combined with other voters' views, that creates the favorability gap in Carney's favor.
Trump, meanwhile, is unpopular with everyone. The poll suggests 3 out of 5 Conservatives have an unfavorable view of the president.
After taking over the Conservative Party in 2022, Poilievre traveled the country to share the message that 'Canada is broken.' Polls showed Canadians widely agreed — until Trump's Oval Office broadsides inspired a surge of patriotism.
Focaldata's survey indicates the Conservative still narrowly leading among the cost-of-living set, but Carney dominates the cross-border file.
Liberals and Conservatives agree that inflation and cost of living are key concerns, but a 52 percent majority of Liberals also said that Trump and Canada's relationship with the U.S. is a top issue, almost double the 27 percent of Conservatives who say the same. (They ranked Trump sixth on their list of top worries.)
Liberals ranked healthcare at their number 3 concern, while Conservatives put it at 4 — just after housing affordability.
The POLITICO/Focaldata poll found that Conservatives are more worried than Liberals about immigration and refugee policy as well as crime and public safety — concerns that are reflected in Poilievre's campaign.
Voters of course back their own parties and candidates when it comes to trusting them to manage most issues, but there are key differences in those numbers that reveal each leader's strengths and weaknesses.
When it comes to managing Trump and the United States, for example, Liberals almost universally say Carney is the better choice. But one in eight Conservatives actually agree that they think Carney and the Liberal Party would do a better job, the survey shows, with an additional one in six Conservatives saying they 'don't know' when asked to pick.
On the flip side, eight percent of Liberals think Poilievre would grow jobs and the economy better than Carney would.
Some Liberals also believe Poilievre would manage immigration and crime better than Carney would. One in eight Liberals said Poilievre is best at managing immigration and refugee policy, while one in five Liberals say the Conservative leader is better at tackling crime.
Nearly half of voters, 45 percent, said Trump's actions have influenced their vote choice 'moderately' or 'a great deal,' with a strong partisan gap.
Liberal voters were far likelier than Conservatives to consider Trump as they picked their party: 53 percent of Liberal voters said Trump's actions have significantly influenced their vote, while only one in four Conservative voters said the same.
The divide extends more broadly to views of the United States. Nearly two-thirds of Liberals (64 percent) say the U.S. is either 'enemy or hostile' or 'generally unfriendly, but not an enemy'. A mere 19 percent see the US as an ally or generally friendly.
Meanwhile, 40 percent of Conservatives say the U.S. is an ally or generally friendly, with 34 percent saying the opposite.
About half of Canadians, 49 percent, now view the U.S. as 'unfriendly' or 'an enemy' — an overall view that is now less favorable even than China, where a years-long diplomatic freeze has chilled relations.
Mickey Djuric contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Revised plan sells 1.2M acres of public lands
Revised plan sells 1.2M acres of public lands

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Revised plan sells 1.2M acres of public lands

The Big Story A revised plan from Senate Republicans would sell off as much as 1.2 million acres of publicly owned lands, according to legislative text obtained by The Hill. © Jason Goode The updated text would require the sales of between 0.25 and 0.5 percent of the 245 million acres currently owned by the Bureau of Land Management, or between 612,500 and 1.225 million acres. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), is spearheading the plan, which would be included in the GOP's megabill to advance much of President Trump's agenda. Lee has said he would revise his original plan, which would have sold off between 2.2 million and 3.3 million acres, after the Senate parliamentarian ruled it could not go inside the party's budget package. Lee's office did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. The text obtained by The Hill only pertains to Bureau of Land Management lands, complying with Lee's promise to ax provisions in his original bill that would have also included National Forests. The updated version also makes further changes: It specifies that land that is sold must be used 'solely for the development of housing or to address any infrastructure and amenities to support local needs associated with housing. It also requires land sold to be within 5 miles of the 'the border of a population center.' Read more at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Schumer taken to hospital for dehydration amid DC heat wave Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) was taken to a Washington-area hospital Wednesday after becoming lightheaded at the Senate gym during the morning. Judge blocks Trump from withholding EV charger infrastructure funds A federal judge on Tuesday issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from withholding funds for electric vehicle charger infrastructure from 14 states. 'Alligator Alcatraz': What to know about Florida Everglades migrant detention site The nearly 40-square-mile site was first developed in the late 1960s with plans to become a major hub, but the project fizzled because of environmental concerns, leaving just a single strip that has been used as a training site and for rare general aviation needs. What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: Shell in Early Talks to Acquire Rival BP (The Wall Street Journal) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Questions around success of Iran strikes spark fears on Capitol Hill Questions swirling around the success of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites are raising fears on Capitol Hill that more could be coming. Read more Trump calls for firing of CNN reporter over Iran nuclear damage report President Trump on Wednesday called for the firing of CNN correspondent Natasha Bertrand, who reported on air an internal U.S. intelligence assessment that found Saturday's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites set back Tehran's nuclear program by only a few months. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal
NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal

The Hill

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hill

NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal

The Big Story NATO leaders on Wednesday agreed to a major defense spending increase while leaving room for some alliance countries to not hit the new spending goals thanks to very particular wording. © AP 'Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations,' the 32 leaders of the alliance said in a statement that pointedly did not specify 'all allies' had committed to doing so. President Trump since his first term has pressured NATO countries to commit more of their annual GDP to military spending as the United States looks to shift its attention from security priorities in Europe to the Indo-Pacific and Middle East. NATO's biggest-spending member, Washington, since early this year has insisted alliance countries must up their defense dollars from the 2 percent goal set in 2014 to the ambitious 5 percent. But the goal seemed to be a stretch given that nine of the 32 NATO member countries have yet to reach the earlier 2 percent goal. With vague diplomatic language, however, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has claimed he delivered on Trump's spending demands. 'For too long, one ally, the United States, carried too much of the burden of that commitment. And that changes today,' Rutte said at the end of a meeting of NATO leaders Wednesday. To hit the 5 percent goal — which countries have until 2035 to reach — allies agreed to split the spending among different buckets to easier reach targets: A review of spending is set for 2029 to monitor progress and reassess Russia's security threat, given its ongoing war in Ukraine and overt threats to alliance members should they interfere in the conflict. But several countries have made clear they will not be meeting the new targets as they are pressed by economic challenges — issues that could be made worse by Trump's global tariffs. Among the most vocal of those countries is Spain, which before the NATO summit officially announced that it cannot meet the 'unreasonable' goal by 2035. 'Not all allies are bound to the 5 percent target,' according to a statement from the Spanish government ahead of the summit. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Unpacking the conflicting assessments on Iran strikes As the dust settles on Iranian sites hit by U.S. bombs and missiles over the weekend, there's growing tension over how much the military operation set back Tehran's nuclear program. The Trump administration is blasting assessments from U.S. intelligence agencies about the damage inflicted by strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, while apparently endorsing an Israeli assessment. And Director of … Questions around success of Iran strikes spark fears on Capitol Hill Questions swirling around the success of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites are raising fears on Capitol Hill that more could be coming. President Trump is insisting Saturday's strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities were an unqualified success, 'obliterating' Tehran's nuclear capabilities and setting back the program for years. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, amplified that assertion Wednesday, … 50 percent say US strikes on Iran make Americans less safe: Survey Half of registered voters say they think U.S. military strikes on Iran's nuclear program would make Americans less safe, according to a new Quinnipiac University survey conducted in the days after President Trump bombed the Middle Eastern country. The poll, released Wednesday, phrases the question as a hypothetical, asking respondents whether 'U.S. military strikes targeting Iran's nuclear program would make Americans … Mother of Naval Station Norfolk sailor killed seeks Navy accountability WASHINGTON, D.C. (WAVY) — The mother of a sailor who disappeared from Naval Station Norfolk and was found dead in a Norfolk neighborhood is in Washington D.C. Wednesday demanding transparency and accountability from the U.S. Navy. Angelina Resendiz was initially reported missing May 29 and was last seen in her barracks at Naval Station Norfolk around 10 a.m., according to the Navy. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service confirmed … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: Trump knocks down barriers around personal data, raising alarm The Trump administration is shattering norms around the handling of Americans' personal — and sometimes private — information, dismantling barriers around data in the name of government efficiency and rooting out fraud. Privacy experts say the moves bring the country closer to a surveillance … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Trump calls for firing of CNN reporter over Iran nuclear damage report President Trump on Wednesday called for the firing of CNN correspondent Natasha Bertrand, who reported on air an internal U.S. intelligence assessment … Read more Winners and losers from the New York City mayoral primary New York State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani stunned the country on Tuesday with his victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who conceded overnight … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-ed related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store