Victorian Liberal party could reap $1m in interest from loan that would see John Pesutto repay $10,000 a month
The party's administrative committee will meet next Thursday, to consider loaning Pesutto about $1.5m to cover the balance of the $2.3m in legal costs he owes fellow Liberal MP Moira Deeming after the federal court found he repeatedly defamed her.
The 'request from the member for Hawthorn' – Pesutto – appears at the top of the meeting's agenda but details of the proposed loan have not been circulated to the full 19-member committee amid concerns about potential leaks to the media.
Some members have claimed they have not been provided any information because they are opposed to the loan being granted.
A source with knowledge of the plan, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the deal, said it was drafted by party president Phil Davis, with input from lawyers and accountants.
It would be facilitated through Vapold, the party's investment arm and comes with strict conditions. They include Pesutto offering his superannuation savings as collateral, securing personal guarantors and committing to ongoing fundraising efforts, with all proceeds to go toward repaying the principal of the loan.
He would also be required to commit to a long-term repayment plan, with the loan to initially carry a commercial interest rate of about 6%.
The source said Pesutto intends to pay about $10,000 a month in repayments and that Vapold could make about $1m in interest over the life of the loan.
Calculations show that, without taking into account future fluctuations in commercial interest rates, the total interest on a $1.5m loan with a fixed 6% rate would be about $1.08m, if it were paid over 20 years with monthly instalments of nearly $11,000.
Another source who is close to Pesutto but requested anonymity to speak freely about the terms of the potential loan said it was 'not a get out of jail free card by any means'.
'It is going to be an albatross around his neck going forward personally for years to come,' they said.
'Some would argue he'd be better off declaring bankruptcy but he's committed to continuing to serve the party and avoiding a by election in Hawthorn.'
Vapold's directors have met and backed the proposal, according to the source, although it remains unclear whether that endorsement was made formally.
Corporate documents show Alan Stockdale - the 80-year-old battling to maintain control of the Liberal party's troubled NSW division after claiming women were now 'sufficiently assertive' and the party might need to consider quotas for men – is among Vapold's directors, as is Karyn Sobels, the treasurer of the administrative committee.
Three sources said Vapold was expected to act on the request if the administrative committee gives the plan the green light.
Vapold was contacted for comment.
The details of the loan come as Pesutto's supporters seek to shore up the support of the majority of the committee.
Several administrative committee members who requested anonymity given the nature of negotiations expressed concern the loan not may not be repaid in full, due to the time remaining in Pesutto's career. The former Liberal leader is 54. Some have indicated they would be unwilling to back the proposal unless substantial security was provided.
Others argued the loan could breach party rules and go against the wishes of rank-and-file members, who believe Pesutto should bear the cost alone. They oppose a push for a secret ballot.
Deeming herself expressed 'dismay' at reports the party was considering loaning its own funds to help him, in a letter sent to Pesutto on Sunday, which was also addressed to Davis and the Victorian opposition leader, Brad Battin.
'From the outset, both former president Greg Mirabella and incumbent Philip Davis publicly stated that no party funds would be used in this action and to now expect the party to cover Pesutto's substantial debts goes against the grain of everything we believe as Liberals,' Deeming wrote.
In the letter, she offered to delay payment of $2.3m in legal costs until 2027 on the condition her preselection for the next election be secured, among other demands. That offer was rejected by the party.
In a follow-up email to the committee on Wednesday night, Deeming wrote she was 'sad my latest attempts to settle this matter in the best interests of all parties, including the Liberal party, were not successful'.
'My conscience is clear; I did my very best to try and turn our collective focus away from internal matters,' she said in the email, seen by Guardian Australia.
Battin was peppered with questions about Deeming's offer at a press conference in Shepparton on Thursday but declined to answer, citing 'legal advice'.
'It is a frustrating process,' he said. 'Hopefully we can resolve this … very soon.'
Pesutto has until 27 June to pay the $2.3m in costs owed to Deeming, or face bankruptcy and disqualification from parliament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week under Australian-first laws
Victorians could soon have a legal right to work from home two days a week, under proposed Australian-first laws to be introduced to parliament by the state Labor government in 2026. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, will use Labor's state conference on Saturday to announce the proposal, which, if passed by parliament, would make the state the first in the country to legislate the right to work remotely. Allan will tell party faithful if a job can reasonably be done from home, employees would have the legal right to do so for at least two days a week. The law would apply to both public and private sector workers, though how it would be enforced and other specifics were not outlined ahead of her speech. In a statement, the premier said that working from home was popular, it saved families money, cut congestion and allowed greater workforce participation, particularly among women with children, carers and people with a disability. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Work from home works for families and it's good for the economy,' Allan said. 'Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit.' The announcement sets the stage for a political fight in the lead-up to the November 2026 state election, given the Coalition opposition has previously signalled plans to return the public service to the office full-time. The shadow treasurer, James Newbury, told the Herald Sun in February that the government 'should be requiring public servants to work from the office' but stopped short of confirming whether the Coalition would enforce a mandate. The issue was also a flashpoint at the recent federal election, with Peter Dutton forced mid-campaign to reverse a policy to restrict work from home arrangements for public servants due to public backlash. Allan's statement said consultation on the legislation would be led by the Department of Premier and Cabinet and would cover the types of businesses and the size of businesses that would be included, as well as the definition of remote work and who was able to do it. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion It stressed the consultation process 'won't determine whether working from home should be a right' as that position had already been decided. Instead, it would focus on 'the appropriate laws to reflect it'. It said 'several legislative options were available'. Allan will be left to rally the room of 600 Victorian Labor delegates, with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, unable to attend as he will be at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory. It will mean the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, will be the most senior party figure at the two-day event and placed in an uncomfortable position as delegates vote on a review of the Aukus submarine deal he has strongly backed. Other urgency resolutions up for debate include a call for the federal government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and impose sanctions on Israel, rejection of the Allan government's proposed protest laws – described as 'anti-democratic and regressive' – and for all 44 public housing tower sites slated for redevelopment to remain in public hands.
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why young Aussies are walking out of high-paying jobs
By Young Australians are less interested in having a long, stressful career as houses become increasingly unaffordable for average-income earners. Australia's median capital city house price is now above $1million, meaning only dual-income couples or individuals on high salaries can buy a home with a backyard. But rather than work harder in a career role to afford a house, Australia's younger workers are less inclined to do stressful corporate jobs, long-term, if there isn't a meaningful reward or a work-life balance, despite there being a cost-of-living crisis. Jin, 23, is graduating at the end of this year from the University of Sydney with a Bachelor of Science majoring in data science and accounting. He will start a full-time graduate role in January next year and is bracing for the occasional weekend shifts as he helps prepare financial reports for big firms during the twice-yearly earnings seasons. But he is aspiring for some work-life balance in his twenties, including some travel. 'I do think a balance is necessary - if we don't have the correct amount of sleep or just the correct amount of breaks to take our minds off things, it's just very hard for us to stay focused,' he told Daily Mail. 'I do want to explore the world outside of Australia. I want to see and experience different cultures.' He is also hoping to work reasonable hours so he has time for family and a social life. 'I think I have a nice balance right now, where I spend my time with my family and my partner,' he said. 'Once or twice a year, I strive to take a one-week holiday or go on a break with my family or my partner.' Jamie MacLennan, the Asia-Pacific managing director of TELUS Health, said younger workers were less inclined to take on stressful roles, despite needing higher pay to cope with the cost of living crisis. 'People are trying to rebalance and balance the work-life component in a world where we're essentially on 24/7,' he said. 'Somewhere along the line, people have got to earn a living, but then the question is - "What's the cost of making that living?" - that's where people are rebalancing. 'You can't quit completely or at scale - there's always going to be an element of people who do that. 'Whether they take the traditional career paths, whether they aspire to those, creates a bigger dislocation.' Mr MacLennan said the mental health effects of Covid on younger people would create succession planning issues for companies in coming years, as fewer of them aspired to be in senior roles. 'We haven't recovered from Covid - our brains have been rewired. There continues to be a mental health crisis - crisis is not an overstated term in Australian society and it's most acute in that younger generation coming through,' he said. 'People have that sense of missing out - they're in a situation where they can't afford to get what they want or they can't afford to live in the environment that they want.' Stress is now a deal breaker for staff, with recruitment agency Randstad revealing 60 per cent of workers would rather have less stress than more pay. Unbearable demands had seen 40 per cent of workers switch to a lower-paid role. Amelia O'Carrigan, Randstad's director of public sector and business support, said employers couldn't ask staff to work five days in the office without incentives. 'It's not a complete pull back on flexibility and expect that workers will agree to that. In fact, to completely say - "You need to be back into the office five days" I would say would be a risky strategy,' she said. 'As job confidence starts to return, you'd be at risk of employees looking elsewhere.' The Randstad survey of 5,250 workers in Australia, Germany , Italy , Japan , Poland , the UK and the United States found stress to be a major issue. Financial concerns are the biggest driver of personal stress in Australia, with 44 per cent nominating it as a problem, a survey of 1,000 people by TELUS Health found. Unaffordable housing was also cited as a driver, with 18 per cent nominating their housing or living situation as a source of personal stress. While many young people are reconsidering taking on stressful roles, Jin said he would be willing to make sacrifices to one day establish a data-oriented start-up for small businesses, that could use AI to audit their finances in real time. 'If I were to want to live comfortably, or think about having a better life, I would try to branch off into a different industry,' he said. 'If the corporate ladder doesn't work, I'll try my hand with something I like within data science, because I sacrificed it away for stability - I'll try to think about doing a start-up project on the side. 'Earning more money comes with more responsibilities so naturally you come with more stress - probably personally, I think I have pretty good stress management.' 'My goal, before I hit 30, I'll try to get a car that I like, I like sports cars, I want to work towards that. We need goals in life or what are we working for? If we're just working for a living - it's not hard, it would just be very boring.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers
Drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation for taking out a car loan after a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court, experts have warned. Industry analysts also said on Friday that banks will 'breathe a sigh of relief' after the Supreme Court ruled they are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. Nevertheless, the financial watchdog has said it is still considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who potentially receive compensation. Lawyers have also indicated that some consumers should still consider pursuing their claims over 'unfair' treatment. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, went to the UK's highest court to challenge a Court of Appeal ruling which found 'secret' commission payments paid by buyers to car dealers in agreements before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent were unlawful. The ruling last year found three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, should receive compensation. But in a decision on Friday, justices at the UK's highest court overturned the Court of Appeal, though some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Lawyers for the lenders told the Supreme Court at a three-day hearing in April the decision was an 'egregious error', while the Financial Conduct Authority intervened in the case and claimed the ruling 'goes too far'. However, the judges upheld a claim brought by one driver under the CCA that his relationship with the finance company had been 'unfair', awarding him the commission amount of £1,650.95 plus interest. Lizzy Comley, chief operating officer of consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, said the ruling still reinforces the right of many consumers to pursue claims. She said: 'This landmark ruling is positive news for the millions of people who have lost money due to the car finance mis-selling. 'The court confirmed that for years, consumers have potentially been unfairly overcharged on car finance agreements, and this ruling reinforces their right to pursue justice and recover the compensation they deserve.' However, others have said that the ruling will make it harder for most claims. Nicola Pangbourne, partner at Kennedys law firm, said: 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation. There's now quite a few hurdles they've got to get through.' Industry experts have suggested the ruling will be broadly seen as a success for lenders, who had been preparing for significant compensation payments. Caroline Wayman, global head of financial Services at PA Consulting, said: 'Lenders will breathe a sigh of relief at the ruling, but it should still be a wake-up call for firms to scrutinise any large, undisclosed commissions in their business. 'Firms should ask themselves whether it still feels justifiable or could be considered unfair, particularly if they haven't disclosed commercial ties to the broker and it won't be enough to expect customers to have read and understood the fine print.' On Friday, a spokesperson for the Financial Conduct Authority said after the ruling that it would confirm whether it will consult on any such scheme by 8am on Monday. They said: 'We want to bring greater certainty for consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible.'
