Donald Trump vows to evict homeless from Washington DC ‘immediately'
The White House declined to explain what legal authority Mr Trump would use to evict people from Washington. The Republican president controls only federal land and buildings in the city. Mr Trump is planning to hold a press conference today to 'stop violent crime in Washington DC'. It was not clear whether he would announce more details about his eviction plan then.
Mr Trump's Truth Social post included pictures of tents and DC streets with some rubbish on them. 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before,' he said.
According to the Community Partnership, an organisation working to reduce homelessness in Washington, on any given night there are 3,782 single persons experiencing homelessness in the city of about 700,000 people.
Most homeless people are in emergency shelters or transitional housing. About 800 are considered unsheltered or 'on the street', the organisation said.
A White House official said on Friday that more federal law-enforcement officers were being deployed in the city following a violent attack on a young Trump administration staffer that angered the president.
Alleged crimes investigated by federal agents on Friday night included 'multiple persons carrying a pistol without licence', motorists driving on suspended licences, and dirt-bike riding, according to a White House official yesterday.
The official said 450 federal law enforcement officers were deployed across the city on Saturday.
We have spent the last two years driving down violent crime in this city
The Democratic mayor of Washington DC, Muriel Bowser, yesterday said the capital was 'not experiencing a crime spike'.
'It is true that we had a terrible spike in crime in 2023, but this is not 2023,' Ms Bowser said on MSNBC's The Weekend. 'We have spent the last two years driving down violent crime in this city, driving it down to a 30-year low.'
The city's police department reported that violent crime in the first seven months of 2025 was down by 26pc in Washington compared with last year, while overall crime was down about 7pc.
Ms Bowser said Mr Trump is 'very aware' of the city's work with federal law enforcement after meeting with him several weeks ago in the Oval Office.
The US Congress has control of DC's budget, after the district was established in 1790 with land from neighbouring Virginia and Maryland, but resident voters elect a mayor and city council.
For Mr Trump to take over the city, Congress probably would have to pass a law revoking the law that established local elected leadership, which Mr Trump would have to sign.
Ms Bowser yesterday noted the president's ability to call up the National Guard if he wanted, a tactic the administration used recently in Los Angeles after immigration protests over the objections of local officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
23 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
US denounces Europe in scaled back rights report
US President Donald Trump's administration has scaled back a key US government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries, such as El Salvador, that have been strong partners of the Republican president. Instead, the widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report of the US State Department sounded an alarm on the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, with which the US has clashed on a host of issues. Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appeared to have been largely omitted. The US referred to Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the "Russia-Ukraine war." The report's section on Israel was much shorter than last year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza. More than 61,000 people have been killed in Gaza, the Gaza health ministry says, as a result of Israel's military assault after an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023. The report was delayed for months as Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with "America First" values, said government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The report introduced new categories such as "Life" and "Liberty," and "Security of the Person." "There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses," the 2024 report said about El Salvador. That stood in sharp contrast to the 2023 report that talked about "significant human rights issues" and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions. The US's two-way ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Mr Trump took office, as his administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele. His country is receiving $6 million from the US to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison. Critics said the report was politically driven. "The report demonstrates what happens when political agenda stake priority over the facts," said Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of nongovernment organisation A New Policy. "The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system." State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and was no longer an expansive list of "politically biased demands and assertions." She declined to respond to specific questions about countries and did not say why a list of rights abuses in El Salvador was removed. The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional US promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticised countries selectively, in line with its broader policy towards a particular country. One example is Europe, where Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on its politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in countries such as Romania, Germany, and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration. For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated Human Rights Report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy. This year's report was prepared following a major department revamp that included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which takes the lead in writing the report. In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote an opinion piece saying the bureau had become a platform for "left-wing activists," and vowing that the Trump administration would reorient it to focus on "Western values." In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes. This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former president Jair Bolsonaro, among others. Mr Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges that he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Mr Trump has referred to the case as a "witch hunt" and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods. In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened. It said, "South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country." In last year's report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa. Mr Trump issued an executive order this year calling for the US to resettle Afrikaners. He described them as victims of "violence against racially disfavoured landowners," accusations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government. South Africa dismissed the report's findings, and said it was flawed, inaccurate and disappointing. "It is ironic that a report from a nation that has exited the UN Human Rights Council and therefore no longer sees itself accountable in a multilateral peer review system would seek to produce one-sided fact free reports without any due process or engagement," the government said. On Ireland, the report's executive summary said "There were no significant changes in the human rights situation in Ireland during the year."
Irish Independent
39 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Russians try to take more Ukrainian land with sudden advance before Putin meets Donald Trump
In one of the most extensive incursions so far this year, Russian troops advanced near the coal-mining town of Dobropillia, part of Putin's campaign to take full control of Ukraine's Donetsk region. Ukraine's military dispatched reserve troops, saying they were in difficult combat against Russian soldiers. Mr Trump has said any peace deal would involve 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both' Russia and Ukraine, which has up to now depended on the US as its main arms supplier. But because all the areas being contested lie within Ukraine, president Volodymyr Zelensky and his EU allies fear that he will face pressure to give up far more than Russia does. Mr Trump's administration tempered expectations yesterday for major progress toward a ceasefire, calling his meeting on Friday with Putin in Alaska a 'listening exercise'. Mr Zelensky and most of his European counterparts have said a lasting peace cannot be secured without Ukraine at the negotiating table, and a deal must comply with international law, Ukraine's sovereignty and its territorial integrity. This breakthrough is like a gift to Putin and Trump during the negotiations They will hold a virtual meeting with Mr Trump today to underscore those concerns before the Putin summit, the first US-Russia summit since 2021. 'An imitated rather than genuine peace will not hold for long and will only encourage Russia to seize even more territory,' Mr Zelensky said in a statement yesterday. Mr Zelensky said Russia must agree to a ceasefire before territorial issues are discussed. He would reject any Russian proposal that Ukraine pull its troops from the eastern Donbas region and cede its defensive lines. Asked why Mr Zelensky was not joining the US and Russian leaders at the Alaska summit, a White House spokeswoman said that the bilateral meeting had been proposed by Putin, and that Mr Trump accepted to get a 'better understanding' of how to end the war. 'Only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present, and so this is for the president to go and to get a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. 'You need both countries to agree to a deal.' Mr Trump is open to a trilateral meeting with Putin and Mr Zelensky later, Ms Leavitt said. Ukraine faces a shortage of soldiers after Russia invaded more than three years ago, easing the path for the latest Russian advances. 'This breakthrough is like a gift to Putin and Trump during the negotiations,' said Sergei Markov, a former Kremlin adviser, suggesting it could increase pressure on Ukraine to yield territory under any deal.
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Why is Putin being rewarded for illegal invasion of Ukraine?
Yet neither Europe, nor Ukraine, will be involved in the conversation, though the future of both will be on the table. That Europe is locked out, despite the stakes involved, is troubling, but not surprising. The temperature in Anchorage this week may be 20C, but the leaders of Germany, France, Italy and the UK have long known they have been getting the cold shoulder. Mr Trump sees more gains in keeping Russia close than in maintaining bonds built up over 80 years since the end of World War II. European allies have been pressing for a ceasefire freezing the current front line as a first step ahead of talks on a more enduring settlement. But Washington had other plans. Moscow insisted Ukraine must cede its entire eastern Donbas area as well as Crimea, illegally annexed in 2014, as a ceasefire condition. This week, EU leaders issued a somewhat forlorn statement saying: 'The people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future.' It added that the principles of 'territorial integrity' must be respected and 'international borders must not be changed by force'. But Mr Trump has already made clear that he expects territories will be 'swapped'. The nervousness surrounding Friday's meeting is understandable, especially in countries bordering Russia. So far, Putin has been offered everything without conceding anything. An illegal invasion has been rewarded. Permitting Putin to take all he wants puts Ukraine and the whole continent at risk An International Criminal Court warrant was issued for Putin on March 17, 2023, following an investigation of crimes against humanity and genocide, yet he is to be welcomed in the US. It ought to be remembered that most of Europe's borders were drawn in the blood of war. Since the Yalta conference in 1945 (involving the US, UK and Russia), when a post-war peace rooted a collective security order and a plan to give self-determination to the liberated peoples of Europe was put in place, some kind of stability prevailed. Whatever comes out of Friday's meeting, without cast-iron commitments from the Russian leader, Europe and Ukraine have everything to fear. Mr Trump's ambition to end the war is laudable, but permitting Putin to take all he wants puts Ukraine and the whole continent at risk. There is acceptance that concessions will have to be made by Kyiv, but that must involve discussing, not dictating, terms. Dissecting a sovereign country against its will would be a disastrous outcome. Nato chief Mark Rutte has said territory would 'have to be on the table', along with security guarantees for Ukraine, but how do you rate a pact with someone who does not recognise international law? Any deal that Moscow could flip on a whim after securing Mr Trump's embrace might put a dent in American credibility. But it could undermine the security of both Europe and Ukraine.
