
Could South Park's Trump Attack Cost Paramount? Legal Experts Weigh In
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The animated sitcom South Park made a return to screens this week with a wild satirical portrayal of President Donald Trump, prompting questions about potential legal blowback on the makers.
Following a near two-and-a-half-year hiatus, the premiere episode shows a naked Trump trying to seduce Satan, and came a day after the show's creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone had reached a $1.5 billion streaming deal with Paramount.
South Park has long been known for its political satire, but will this latest episode prompt a legal response from the president, along with a punishing price tag? The views of experts Newsweek spoke to might surprise you.
A Comedy Central Animation Wednesdays billboard featuring South Park is seen during the day above Red Lobster in Times Square July 16, 2024 in New York City.
A Comedy Central Animation Wednesdays billboard featuring South Park is seen during the day above Red Lobster in Times Square July 16, 2024 in New York City.
CraigWhat happened in the South Park Season 27 Premiere?
It was already clear that South Park would be continuing its tradition of tackling topical news while turning up the heat on the unhinged and the absurd.
The trailer for this season, released in April, showed Canada going to war with the U.S, France taking back the Statue of Liberty and a reference to Elon Musk through the character of Randy Marsh, who said, "I'm just going to do some ketamine and f*** around with the government a little."
During the Season 27 premiere, titled Sermon on the 'Mount,' Trump is depicted in bed with Satan, complaining about the size of his penis, and arguing with the Canadian Prime Minister.
The episode also referenced the "Epstein list," the alleged list of clients involved in convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Earlier this month, the Department of Justice and FBI released a memo saying they had found "no incriminating 'client list'" after an "exhaustive review" of government documents related to the case.
This put the president's ties to Epstein under fresh scrutiny, and the Trump administration is under pressure from the president's own supporters to release evidence about Epstein.
This week, The Wall Street Journal reported Trump had been told by Attorney General Pam Bondi in May that his name appeared "multiple times" in the so-called Epstein files. White House communications director Steven Cheung dismissed this allegation as "another fake news story."
Could This Have Legal Implications?
The South Park premiere has caused a stir. But could it have legal implications?
"It's improbable," David S. Korzenik, a media lawyer who has written about and taught media law for decades, told Newsweek during a phone interview. "There's no real possibility of any credible legal peril."
"If there were to be a hypothetical lawsuit against South Park, that would be more just, for show," Korzenik said. He said: "Any lawsuit against South Park for this would be ridiculous."
Korzenik added that "No one is going to look at that and rely on that as being a statement of a fact."
"They're going to understand it to be an insult, joking, attacking, expressing the fears that people have about what could be true or might not be true. And this parody is a highly protected design of American comment."
Dave Heller, Deputy Director Media Law Resource Center told Newsweek via email: "U.S. law is extremely protective of satire and parody, including vicious attacks on public figures."
Heller referenced the 1988 case of Hustler Magazine, Inc. V Falwell, the landmark decision by the Supreme Court, whereby the Court held that parodies of public figures are protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
"Court recognized that mockery of political figures, as a weapon of attack, scorn, and ridicule, is part of American culture as far back as George Washington," Heller said, adding "South Park trades in exactly this tradition. And while it might not be to everyone's taste, it certainly should be understood and protected as such."
Newsweek also spoke with Marjorie Heins, a First Amendment lawyer, founder of the Free Expression Policy Project and author of multiple books about free speech and censorship. "The South Park show is obviously satire, not an assertion of fact, so under the law as it now stands, the satire is fully protected by the First Amendment," she said.
Heins, however, noted that "At some future point, the Supreme Court might change the law to allow the suppression of politically motivated satires such as this."
Newsweek also spoke to Bob Corn-Revere, chief counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "The First Amendment fully protects this kind of satire, particularly when it is directed at a public official," he said. Corn-Revere added that "Trump would have no plausible claim against the creators of South Park or Paramount."
How Has The White House Reacted?
White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Rolling Stone on Thursday morning, "The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end."
"For years they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' [sic] content, but suddenly they are praising the show," Rogers said. "Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows."
"This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history—and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak," Rogers said.
Trump has not personally weighed in on the South Park episode.
What To Know About The Paramount Streaming Deal
The South Park creators' $1.5 billion streaming deal with Paramount came after a monthlong bidding war, per the Los Angeles Times.
In 2021, Parker and Trey signed a reported $900m deal to extend South Park to Season 30, which should take the show up to 2027. The 26th season featured six episodes, so this season may take a similar format.
Paramount is the parent company of Comedy Central, where South Park airs, as well as CBS. CBS has recently faced significant criticism over its decision to cancel The Late Show With Stephen Colbert.
Paramount has said that the late-night talk show was canceled for financial reasons.
On Thursday, The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved the $8.4 billion merger between Paramount Global and Skydance media. The deal follows Paramount's settlement of a $16 million lawsuit filed by Trump over what he has claimed were deceptive editing practices related to a 60 Minutes interview with then-Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris which aired in October, during the 2024 election.
South Park's season 27 premiere referenced the settlement of the lawsuit and the Late Show cancellation.
The fact that Colbert is a known critic of Trump has sparked new concerns about the administration and its influence over the media.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's DOJ May Release Ghislaine Maxwell Interview: Reports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Justice Department, under Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, is weighing whether to release the transcript of a closed-door interview with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, according to CNN and Fox News. Blanche would reportedly release the transcript at the direction of President Donald Trump, who has ordered the disclosure of "all credible evidence" in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The two-day interview, conducted last week in Tallahassee, reportedly focused on roughly 100 individuals connected to Epstein, with Maxwell's attorney saying she answered "every single question" under limited immunity. The push to make the transcript public comes amid growing pressure from Trump allies and House Republicans to unseal related grand jury materials, though victim advocates warn about privacy concerns and question Blanche's independence because of his prior role as Trump's personal attorney. While Trump has not ruled out a pardon for Maxwell, saying he "hasn't thought about it," critics argue that selectively releasing materials risks appearing as symbolic transparency rather than true accountability. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.


Business Journals
11 minutes ago
- Business Journals
One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Key provisions affecting estate planning, individuals and business owners
After months of debate, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the OBBBA) into law on July 4, 2025. The OBBBA extends provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, expands and/or repeals certain existing incentives, and brings specific new tax provisions – all intended to spur economic growth. Gift and Estate Tax Exemptions The OBBBA retains the increased estate and gift tax exemptions introduced under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. For 2025, the exemption remains at $13.99 million per person, with a scheduled increase to $15 million per individual, or $30 million per married couple, beginning in 2026. This exemption amount is indexed for inflation in future years. The preservation and expansion of the exemption amount provides a lengthened window of opportunity for implementing strategic wealth transfers. Trump Accounts The OBBBA introduces a new type of investment account for minors, coined 'Trump Accounts.' These accounts are taxed similarly to individual retirement accounts, except that contributions are not tax deductible. This means that contributions are made with after-tax dollars, earnings grow tax-deferred and withdrawals in excess of taxpayer contributions are taxed as ordinary income. Account beneficiaries must wait until age 18 to withdraw funds, but there is no age at which withdrawals must begin. Parents can contribute up to $5,000 each year per child and employers can contribute up to $2,500 of that annual limit on behalf of an employee or their dependent. Employer contributions have no impact on the employee's taxable income, but the amount of the contribution, plus any earnings, will be taxed as ordinary income when withdrawn. Each of these limits are indexed for inflation starting in 2028. To the extent an account is not opened for a child born after 2025 but before 2029, the federal government will create and contribute $1,000 to an account for the child's benefit. State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction The OBBBA alters the treatment of state and local tax (SALT) deductions for tax years 2025 through 2029. The SALT deduction cap increases from $10,000 to $40,000 in 2025 and will rise by 1 percent annually through 2029 (reverting back to $10,000 in 2030). Taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeding $500,000 are subject to a phaseout: their deduction is reduced by 30 percent of the amount by which the taxpayer's MAGI exceeds that threshold. However, the deduction cannot fall below $10,000, providing a minimum benefit even for the highest earners. Other Notable Provisions Individual Tax Rates and Standard Deduction: Among the most wide-reaching provisions, the OBBBA permanently extends the reduced individual tax rates introduced under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and adds an additional inflation adjustment to the bottom six tax brackets. It also makes permanent the increased standard deduction, which will stand at $15,750 for single filers, $23,265 for heads of household, and $31,500 for joint filers in 2025, with future indexing. The personal exemption deduction has been permanently eliminated. Child Tax Credit (CTC): The CTC receives a modest expansion, with the non-refundable portion increasing to $2,200 for 2025 and the refundable portion of $1,400 made permanent, both of which are indexed for inflation. Income phaseouts remain at $200,000 for individuals and $400,000 for joint filers. Charitable Contribution Deduction: For charitable giving, the OBBBA permanently allows non-itemizers to deduct up to $1,000 for individual filers or $2,000 for joint filers beginning in 2026. For itemizers, the OBBBA adds a 0.5 percent floor on charitable contributions, meaning the charitable contribution deduction is allowed only if, and to the extent that, aggregate contributions exceed 0.5 percent of adjusted gross income. Gambling Losses: Starting in 2026, gambling losses will be deductible only up to 90 percent of winnings, a measure expected to significantly impact those in the gambling industry. Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction: The OBBBA makes the 20 percent QBI deduction permanent. Phase-in income limits are increased to $75,000 for individual filers and $150,000 for joint filers. The OBBBA also introduces an inflation-adjusted $400 minimum deduction for taxpayers who have at least $1,000 of QBI from one or more active trades or businesses, broadening the benefit's reach. Section 179 Expensing: This provision remains favorable for business owners, with the OBBBA maintaining the maximum expensing limit of $2.5 million and increasing the phaseout threshold to $4 million, both of which are indexed for inflation. Interest Deduction (Section 163(j)): The OBBBA reinstates the use of EBITDA, rather than EBIT, to calculate interest deductibility starting in 2025, restoring greater deductibility for leveraged businesses. Qualified Property: Finally, the OBBBA permanently reinstates 100 percent bonus depreciation for qualified property acquired and placed in service on or after January 19, 2025. Conclusion Although many of the OBBBA's provisions are characterized as permanent, future political shifts could change the landscape. Individuals are well advised to consider leveraging today's high estate and gift tax exemptions, review wealth transfer strategies and reassess income tax planning in light of the changes. For questions or a discussion on how the OBBBA affects your estate and income tax planning, readers are encouraged to contact Reinhart attorney Josh LeNoble or another member of Reinhart's Trusts and Estates Practice. To learn more about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, click here. Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren is a full-service, business-oriented law firm with offices in Milwaukee, Madison, Waukesha and Wausau, Wisconsin; Chicago and Rockford, Illinois; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Denver, Colorado; and Phoenix, Arizona. With more than 200 lawyers, the firm serves clients throughout the United States and internationally with a combination of legal advice, industry understanding and superior client service. Josh LeNoble is an attorney in Reinhart's Trusts and Estates Practice, where he focuses on estate plans for high-net-worth individuals and families, providing customized tax and estate planning solutions. By creating detailed yet flexible estate plans, he enables clients to better respond to future family changes, economic conditions and changes in tax laws.


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says GOP ‘entitled' to five more House seats in Texas
President Trump argued that Republicans are 'entitled' to pick up five additional House seats in Texas as state GOP officials try to advance a new congressional district map ahead of the midterms next year. Trump said during an interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' Tuesday that other Democratic states like California, Illinois and Massachusetts are already significantly gerrymandered, giving Republicans much less representation in Congress than the percentage of the vote that he won there during the 2024 election. 'We should have many more seats in California. It's all gerrymandered,' he said. 'And we have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.' Trump's comments come as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), following a push from the president, and state Republicans are seeking to redraw the state's congressional map mid-way through the decade. If passed, it could eliminate five currently Democratic-held seats and allow the GOP to pick them up next year. Abbott called a special legislative session to approve the map, but Texas state House Democrats left the state on Sunday ahead of the session to deny the body quorum and prevent it from being able to conduct business. They traveled to three Democratic states — Illinois, New York and Massachusetts. Trump noted that no Republicans currently represent any part of Massachusetts in the House, despite him receiving more than a third of its votes in November, and only a few serve in the House in Illinois despite him receiving a higher percentage of votes there as well. 'You notice they go to Illinois for safety, but that's all gerrymandered,' the president said. Texas state law penalizes state lawmakers with a $500 fine per day if they intentionally avoid attending a session to deny quorum. Abbott also ordered their arrests and directed the Texas Rangers to investigate the Democrats over possible bribery related to donations they've received to cover the fines. But the state lawmakers vowed to continue with their efforts, arguing it's necessary to fight back against what they view as a 'blatant racism.' In response to the moves from Texas and other possible Republican-led states, Democratic-led states like California and New York have pledged to advance with their own redistricting plans to add more Democratic seats to their congressional delegations.