Tory ex-ministers defend record after PM demands ‘answers' over Afghan data leak
Ex-veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the former Conservative administration's actions in relation to Kabul but said it was 'absurd' to accuse him of failing grasp the scale of crisis.
Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' relating to the previous government's handling of Afghanistan (Andrew Matthews/PA)
'I know who is covering their tracks, and who has the courage to be honest,' he said. 'I would caution those who might attempt to rewrite history.'
Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of an £850 million scheme set up after the leak, which was kept secret as the result of a superinjunction imposed in 2023 which was only lifted on Tuesday.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir insisted there would be scrutiny, which the Conservatives should welcome.
'Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen,' he told MPs.
Former prime minister Liz Truss, who was foreign secretary at the time of the breach in February 2022, but a backbencher when the superinjunction was sought, said she was 'shocked' by the 'cover-up'.
Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen Sir Keir Starmer, Prime Minister
She said the revelations pointed to a 'huge betrayal of public trust' and 'those responsible in both governments and the bureaucracy need to be held to account'.
Mr Mercer said: 'I've spilt my own blood fighting for a better Afghanistan, lost friends, fought to get operators out of the country and away from the Taliban, and visited hundreds of resettled families and hotels in the UK under direct commission from the previous prime minister after the schemes were dangerously failing.
'Others were with me in this process and we have all the receipts.'
Shadow justice secretary Mr Jenrick said he had 'strongly opposed plans the plans to bring over 24,000 Afghan nationals' during 'internal government discussions in the short period before my resignation' in December 2023.
'I first learned of the data leak and plan to resettle people after the superinjunction was in place,' he said. 'Parliamentary privilege is not unlimited; I was bound by the Official Secrets Act.'
Mr Jenrick said the secret scheme had been 'a complete disaster' and that the previous government 'made serious mistakes' but that 'thousands more (Afghan people) have come since Labour came to power.'
'Contrary to what some have suggested, the Afghan individuals I helped came on the Arap (Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy) scheme and had nothing to do with the subsequent ARR scheme caused by the data leak,' he added.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has said the 'episode' raises 'significant constitutional issues'.
Earlier on Wednesday, Downing Street declined to say what questions former ministers should face but said Sir Keir was 'angry' about the breach.
Sir Keir's press secretary said: 'The Prime Minister is angry at such a terrible breach that had such grave consequences being allowed to happen.
'Which is why it's clear that there are questions that need to be answered by Conservative ministers who, in their own words, have talked about the ineptitude of the Conservative government at the time.'
She also pointed to comments from Mr Mercer, who described the handling of the breach as 'farcical' and 'the most hapless display of incompetence by successive ministers and officials that I saw in my time in government'.
The Commons Defence Committee will be setting out plans for an inquiry straight after the parliamentary recess in September.
Chair, @TanDhesi has responded to the Secretary of State's statement on Afghanistan.
— Defence Committee (@CommonsDefence) July 16, 2025
Committee chairman Tan Dhesi said: 'These shocking events now deserve proper, thorough parliamentary scrutiny to ensure that lessons are learned.
'I have consulted my cross-party colleagues on the Defence Committee and we all agree that this is work we intend to lead.'
Tory former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace said he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction and insisted it was 'not a cover-up' but was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk.
A dataset of 18,714 who applied for Arap was released in February 2022 by a defence official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems.
The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the blunder when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak.
Then defence secretary Sir Ben said he had applied for a four-month standard injunction shortly before leaving office but, on September 1 2023, when Grant Shapps took the role, the government was given a superinjunction.
Former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace (Ben Birchall/PA)
Sir Ben said he did now know why the superinjunction was granted 'but nevertheless, I think the point here is I took a decision that the most important priority was to protect those people who could have been or were exposed by this data leak in Afghanistan, living amongst the Taliban who had no regard for their safety, or indeed potentially could torture them or murder them', he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
He also defended his actions in an article in the Daily Telegraph newspaper.
'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. It was not, as some are childishly trying to claim, a cover-up,' he said.
The leak led to the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024.
The scheme is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million.
A total of about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme.
The key facts on the Afghan Resettlement data incident that took place in 2022, and the action we are taking to support those impacted.
Defence Minister @LukePollard explains 👇 pic.twitter.com/DY3SbBSmgp
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) July 16, 2025
The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked.
Defence Secretary John Healey said he was not going to 'lead a witch hunt after a defence official'.
'This is much bigger than the mistake of an individual,' he told the BBC.
The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments.
Kemi Badenoch has apologised on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak.
'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there … and we are sorry for that,' she told LBC.
Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024.
However, an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
25 minutes ago
- ITV News
Starmer under pressure to recognise Palestinian state as "unspeakable" crisis in Gaza worsens
Words by ITV News Producer, Kieran Carter ITV News understands a group of MPs will on Friday publish a letter calling on the Prime Minister Keir Starmer to immediately recognise Palestine as a state. The letter, organised by MP and International Development Select Committee chair Sarah Champion, is reported to have been signed by a large group of cross-party MPs and comes as pressure builds on the PM to move more quickly on Palestinian recognition. Recognising growing calls from across parliament and the wider public, on Thursday the prime minister published his strongest words yet on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In a statement he wrote: "The suffering and starvation unfolding in Gaza is unspeakable and indefensible. "While the situation has been grave for some time, it has reached new depths and continues to worsen. We are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe." Starmer announced his intention to hold an "emergency call" with both France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Friedrich Merz on Friday to discuss what steps they can take to "stop the killing... get the people food" and "build a lasting peace." He continued: "We all agree on the pressing need for Israel to change course and allow the aid that is desperately needed to enter Gaza without delay." The PM stopped short of an immediate recognition of a Palestinian state, repeating his previously stated belief this should come after a lasting ceasefire was reached. He wrote: "We are clear that statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people. A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis." Starmer's call with France and Germany comes a day after Emmanuel Macron announced France will recognise Palestine as a state, amid growing global anger over people starving in Gaza. Pressure has also come from those within the prime minister's own party. Earlier this month nearly 60 MPs wrote to the Foreign Secretary David Lammy, urging the government to act decisively to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and reocgnise Palestine as a state. The Labour group of MPs, Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East (LFPME) have long called for Palestine's recognition, asking the government to join the 145 other countries around the world - including Ireland, Spain and Norway - which already do recognise Palestine. They write: "The right to self-determination and statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people and cannot be prevented or vetoed by any neighbour. It is a right to be realised, not a gift to be given." LFPME also point to Labour's manifesto commitment to Palestinian recognition as part of a two-state solution. The letter sent earlier this month was followed by the publication of a report by the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, led by MP Emily Thornberry, into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The report included several recommendations to the government, including that the UK should immediately recognise the state of Palestine alongside France, "while there is still a state to recognise." It continues: "The Government cannot continue to wait for the perfect time because experience shows that there will never be a perfect time, and in hindsight it is possible to see times when it should have occurred." Outside of Labour's own MPs, opposition parties have also called for the immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. The Liberal Democrat Leader Sir Ed Davey, who has spoken out passionately against Israel's actions in Gaza said: "The UK should be leading on this, not falling behind." The Green party have also backed the calls for recognition with Co-Leader, Carla Denyer describing it as the "bare minimum" the UK could do. She added: "The UK government must join France in recognsing the state of Palestine – as well as enacting a full arms embargo, widespread sanctions, a ban on the import of settlement goods, and funding for evidence collection for prosecutions. "Time and time again our leaders have called the situation 'intolerable' and yet continue to tolerate it – we must see real action to end the genocide.' ITV News understands all four green MPs have signed the letter calling for Palestine's recognitino as a state.
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jeremy Corbyn backs Birmingham bin strikes at 'megapicket'
Large crowds of people have joined a second "megapicket" in Birmingham to show their support for the city's striking bin workers. Among them was former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn who spoke at a gathering on Pershore Street earlier, attended by members of different unions who had travelled across the country to show solidarity with their Unite workers in the city have been on all-out strike since March in a row over pay, linked in part to proposals to change some job roles. Corbyn told the BBC workers "should not be faced with a wage cut".Birmingham City Council has said it has "negotiated in good faith" during the long-running dispute but Unite had "rejected all offers". At the "megapicket", some supporters of the workers described them as the "heroes of the pandemic" who had kept the city moving during the crisis. Corbyn, addressing the gathering, criticised the Labour-led city council and said the bin workers were "not the ones who wasted money on the Commonwealth Games, they're not the ones who buried their heads in the sand for many, many years instead of looking at the finances of the city."They're the ones who have tried to keep the city clean and keep the city operating." A key feature of the dispute is the council's decision to remove the Waste Recycling and Collection Officer (WRCO) role from the union claims about 170 affected workers face losing up to £8,000 a year as a result, although the council disputes the told the gathering that those on strike should be able to return to work with their wages intact. The "megapicket" was again organised by Strike Map, a group of trade union activists who have created a digital map to demonstrate where industrial action is taking place picket comprised of three gatherings in the city on Friday and formed a group of thousands, Strike Map said. The other locations included the city's Atlas and Perry Barr depots. In May, hundreds of union workers travelled on coaches from areas including Bristol and Leeds to support striking refuse workers at the Lifford Lane depot in Kings Norton, told the BBC it was up to the city council to "do an arrangement with central government" in order to protect the wages and conditions of staff. John Cotton, leader of the Labour-run council, said earlier this month: "Throughout this process the council has sought to be reasonable and flexible, but we have reached the absolute limit of what we can offer."He said the authority needed to create a better waste service as "an efficient, improved service is a crucial part of our need to become financially sustainable and is what the people of Birmingham need." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'Jeremy Corbyn's new party could be called Palestine Inaction - it has a certain ring to it'
Does Jeremy Corbyn want his new party to punish Labour, highlight injustice, or break new ground? Fleet Street Fox suggests some names to cover all the bases It's a difficult thing, picking a name for a political party. Labour arose from the trade union movement, which arose from the Chartists, and you can probably draw a line all the way back to the Peasants' Revolt. Yet its current membership, political leaders and voters have soft, white hands that have never laboured at much more than picking their noses. The Conservatives, if their name is accurate, want to keep things the same as they've always been. Only they've just presided over Brexit, the biggest constitutional, social and economic upheaval since the Dissolution of the Monasteries. The Greens would be better known as the Rainbow Flag Warriors, the Liberal Democrats should really call themselves Combined Watersports and have done with it, and Reform UK is, well, more like Nigel Enterprises Ltd. Thanks to Jeremy Corbyn this is all about to get much harder, because he wants us ALL to have a go at naming the party he's setting up after finally splitting from Labour, which of course split from him some time ago. The obvious one, is therefore, Splitty McSplitface, in honour of the Great British Public's penchant for ridiculing the whole idea of voting for names of things which already ought to know what they're called. We could go with Peace, Love, & Understanding, but with his back catalogue of internal party rows it'd have the sketchwriters cackling with glee. Better, perhaps, to go with something less likely to highlight one's own failings, and points the finger instead at others. Calling the new party Keir Starmer's Not Very Good At This, Is He, would thoroughly tickle the nation's toes every time they issued a press release. If, on the other hand, Jezza really wants to cause the government a headache, he could opt for Palestine Inaction - having just declared its near-namesake a terror group, it would highlight the tectonic slowness of the official response to the horrors of Gaza, and at the same time make Home Secretary Yvette Cooper spit staples. It's certainly got a ring to it. If that's just a little too terrorist-y, there's always highlighting the authoritarian decision to outlaw environmentalists for the terrible crime of sitting down in inconvenient places. Must Stop Oil, Action on Sofas, Greenpolice: they're are all there for the taking. If he really wants to clean up British politics and lead a Left-wing insurgency, he could try calling it Reformed Reform UK. Although it's possible that the Electoral Commission will throw it out for being too similar to another party, and it'd have to be tweaked to Deformed UK. That probably wouldn't sell so well at the ballot box. Perhaps Jeremy has no interest in attacking other parties, and still has his head in the allotment. In which case, a name like Courgettes Have Feelings Too could be on the shortlist, along with Potato Justice and Co-Operative Jam Making. There is no substitute for making sure your party is of the now, ahead of the zeitgeist and with its finger on the pulse of what people really want. In which case, for broad media coverage and general public approval, the best name might well be Publish The Epstein Files, Ya Big Pervert. But let's be honest - the entire point of this party is not to win general elections, which Jeremy has twice proven is beyond him, nor to appeal to a broad church of otherwise-disaffected Britons. Because if he was capable of that, he wouldn't have lost. The only reason that he and fellow purgatory-adjacent MP Zarah Sultana have set up a new party is to cause problems for Labour, to split the vote, unbalance a centrist leadership, and give themselves a home they won't be evicted from for their host of unwelcome views, friends, and habits. And so there is only one possible name that will suit. One name, one vision: to piss off Keir. Which is why, Britain, when you are asked to come up with a title for the new iteration of Corbynmania, you must baptise it 'New Labour Ego Trip'. For nothing else comes close.
