Analyst Warning for Intel: Nvidia, AMD and other customers don't want to use Intel's manufacturing services because…
Major chip companies including Nvidia and AMD are reluctant to use
Intel
's manufacturing services because they compete directly with Intel's chip-design business, creating a fundamental conflict of interest that threatens the struggling chipmaker's turnaround efforts.
Gus Richard, a Northland Capital Markets analyst quoted by the Wall Street Journal, said Intel "can create a design environment that works for Intel, but it's hard if not impossible for anybody else to use." The warning highlights how Intel's unified structure prevents its factories from competing effectively with contract manufacturers like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and Samsung.
Intel's manufacturing operation also lacks the customer-service culture that has made TSMC successful with contract clients, according to the WSJ analysis. The company has struggled to adapt its factories, originally built exclusively for Intel chips, to serve external customers' diverse needs.
Breakup pressure mounts as losses spiral
The customer acquisition problems have contributed to massive financial losses at Intel's chip factories, which posted a $2.32 billion operating loss in Q1 2025 following $13.4 billion in losses last year. CEO Lip-Bu Tan faces mounting pressure to break up the company as its unified structure appears increasingly unsustainable.
Separating Intel's chip-design operations from its manufacturing facilities could solve the critical business problems that have plagued turnaround efforts under former CEO Pat Gelsinger, who was ousted in December after three unsuccessful years, the WSJ reported.
Intel's stock has plummeted 65% over five years while rivals AMD more than doubled and Nvidia surged 16 times in value, reflecting investor frustration with the 56-year-old semiconductor giant's struggles.
Federal support provides limited relief
Intel began preparing for potential separation in September by establishing its factories as a separate subsidiary with independent directors.
CFO David Zinsner
told the WSJ in January that the company was exploring strategic investments from financial partners and customers.
Despite maintaining nearly $9 billion in cash, manufacturing assets valued at over $100 billion, and receiving $7.865 billion in federal
CHIPS Act funding
, reaching the billions in new revenue needed to make the manufacturing arm profitable remains uncertain.
Intel hopes the unit will break even by 2027, having secured customers including Microsoft and Amazon's cloud division, though these represent smaller clients compared to major chip designers.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
19 hours ago
- India Today
AI engineer Varun Gupta, an IIT grad, gets probation and $34,000 fine for leaking Intel secrets to Microsoft
An ex-Intel engineer who stole 'thousands of files' from his former employer has escaped prison but won't escape the headlines. Varun Gupta, who left the chip giant in early 2020 to join Microsoft, has been handed two years' probation and a fine of $34,472 (around Rs 30,21,510) for lifting confidential documents, data that prosecutors say helped him secure his new role and gave Microsoft an edge in high-stakes negotiations with to Oregon Live, Gupta spent his final days at Intel quietly copying sensitive information from company systems. Among the material he walked away with was a PowerPoint presentation that outlined Intel's pricing strategies for a major client, the kind of playbook most rivals could only dream of report highlighted that Gupta had worked at Intel for a decade, serving as a product marketing engineer, before leaving in January 2020. Just days later, he was in the ranks at Microsoft. Court documents revealed that the files he took were 'instrumental' both to landing his new post and in later discussions between the two tech titans. Assistant US Attorney William Narus, who prosecuted the case, argued that Gupta's behaviour was deliberate and repeated. He urged the judge to impose eight months in federal prison, stressing that Gupta had 'purposefully and repetitively accessed secret documents' in order to bolster his defence painted a different picture. Gupta's lawyer, David Angeli, admitted the theft was a 'serious error in judgment' but insisted his client had already paid a heavy price. Gupta has lost the kind of senior industry roles he once held, and he previously settled a civil lawsuit with Intel to the tune of $40, Angeli argued, was punishment the end, US District Judge Amy Baggio settled somewhere in the middle. While refusing to send Gupta to prison, she did not let him off lightly. The $34,472 fine wasn't plucked out of thin air, it was calculated to reflect the cost of the eight months of federal imprisonment that prosecutors had pushed explained that this unusual figure underscored the seriousness of Gupta's misconduct, signalling that the court did not see it as a 'one-off indiscretion.' But she also noted that Gupta's reputation had already been dragged through the mud, which she considered punishment in its own the case now behind him, Gupta is turning his back on the world of semiconductors. Having paid his fine in full, he has relocated with his family to France, where life looks very different. Instead of battling over chips and contracts, he's swapping servers for say Gupta is currently studying vineyard management and plans to reinvent himself in the wine industry. His ambition? To become a technical director in viticulture.- EndsMust Watch
Mint
20 hours ago
- Mint
Politics beats the market in Trump's pay-for-play chip scheme
The Trump administration's recent reversal of export restrictions on certain Nvidia and AMD's AI chips to China marks a major shift in U.S. policy and has raised legal concerns. But the deeper risks are political and economic—and warrant scrutiny. His administration decided in July to re-allow Nvidia and AMD to sell their H20 and MI308 chips to China—conditional on a 15% revenue remittance to the U.S. government. Export controls on AI chips were initially implemented by the Biden administration in 2022 to curb China's access to advanced processors critical for artificial intelligence and supercomputing, citing national security concerns. But Nvidia's H20 chip was specifically designed for the Chinese market. Even though it is reportedly incapable of training large AI models, the H20 chip is effective for inference tasks—allowing AI systems to respond to queries based on pre-trained data. Chinese engineers have leveraged the H20 chips for applications using open-source models such as DeepSeek and Alibaba's Qwen, which are increasingly popular in China's AI ecosystem. Trump continued these controls—until recently. Critics, such as Rep. Don Bacon (R., Neb.) and Liza Tobin, who served as China director at the National Security Council under the first Trump and Biden administrations, have argued that the sale of these chips, even under revenue-sharing constraints, undermines the strategic intent of the original export controls. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.) likened it to gambling with national security. The Trump administration's reversal appears motivated by revenue generation. Bernstein Research estimates that Nvidia could sell approximately 1.5 million H20 chips in China in 2025, generating $23 billion in revenue; a 15% cut would yield more than $3 billion for the U.S. government. It aligns with Trump's broader strategy of using tariffs and trade deals to bolster government income. However, this revenue-centric approach raises concerns about the erosion of principled policymaking. The arrangement resembles a 'pay-to-play" scheme, where export licenses are granted in exchange for financial contributions. Legal scholars argue that this violates the Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits taxes or duties on exports. Moreover, the Export Controls Reform Act of 2018—signed by Trump himself—explicitly forbids charging exporters for licenses. The deal with Nvidia and AMD may also reflect a broader diplomatic calculus. China dominates the global supply chain for rare earth materials, which are essential for military technologies like guided missiles, fighter jets, and radar systems. These materials are also used in manufacturing key components for smartphones and electric vehicles—including batteries, touch screens, and camera lenses. The U.S. is investing in domestic mining and processing of rare earth minerals, such as at the Mountain Pass mine in California, which is the only rare-earth mining and processing facility in the U.S. But it remains heavily reliant on Chinese exports. By easing chip restrictions, the Trump administration may be signaling goodwill in hopes of securing a stable supply of rare earths. This strategic compromise, however, risks emboldening China. If Beijing perceives U.S. export controls as negotiable or monetizable, it may be less inclined to make concessions in other areas of trade or security. The precedent set by this deal could weaken the credibility of future U.S. restrictions, making it harder to enforce technology bans or secure allied cooperation. And then there are the corporate interests. The role of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in shaping this policy shift cannot be overlooked. Huang reportedly argued that restricting Nvidia's access to the Chinese market would inadvertently benefit domestic Chinese competitors like Huawei. He emphasized that China's AI development is deeply intertwined with Nvidia's chips and software ecosystem, suggesting that continued engagement would allow the U.S. to retain some influence over China's technological trajectory. Nvidia also maintains a research center in Shanghai. While Huang's argument has merit, it reveals the tension between corporate interests and national security. Nvidia's dependence on the Chinese market and talent pool may compromise its ability to align with U.S. strategic interests. Investors may view all of this as a slippery slope, in which political considerations begin overriding free-market principles, potentially undermining confidence in U.S. financial markets. Ultimately, the reversal of export restrictions on Nvidia and AMD's AI chips to China reflects a transactional approach to national security—one that prioritizes revenue over resilience. About the author: Christopher Tang is a distinguished professor at the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron's newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors. Submit feedback and commentary pitches to ideas@
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Ex-Intel engineer sentenced and fined $34,472 for stealing trade secrets and sharing with Microsoft; Judge says: Used those materials during negotiations ...
Representative image A former Intel engineer who illegally shared the company's trade secrets with his new employer, Microsoft, has been sentenced to two years of probation and ordered to pay a fine of over $34,000, a report has said. The sentence was handed down last week to Varun Gupta, who worked as a product marketing engineer for Intel for nearly a decade. He was fired from his senior position at Microsoft after his actions came to light. According to Assistant US Attorney William Narus, Gupta copied thousands of confidential files from his Intel computer onto a portable hard drive before leaving the company in 2020, as per a report in Oregon Live. He then 'repeatedly accessed those documents' and used them to represent Microsoft in contract negotiations with his former employer, specifically on a deal related to computer processors, the report added. 'Not only did the defendant take proprietary materials with him, he also used those materials during negotiations against his prior employer,' Narus said in a sentencing memo. One of the documents shared was a PowerPoint presentation outlining Intel's pricing strategy with another major customer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo What the sentencing memo on the former Intel engineer said In a sentencing memo, Narus argued for an eight-month prison term, emphasising the need to deter such behavior in an industry with high employee turnover. 'Not only did the defendant take proprietary materials with him, he also used those materials during negotiations against his prior employer,' Narus wrote. Gupta's defense attorney, David Angeli, countered that Gupta had already suffered a significant and lasting punishment. Angeli noted that his client had already lost the high-level position he worked years to achieve, settled a civil lawsuit with Intel for $40,000, and experienced a permanently damaged reputation that effectively ended his career in the tech sector. In a prepared statement to the court, Gupta apologised to both Intel and Microsoft, as well as the government, for the resources spent 'because of my bad decision.' He spoke of his daily struggle with questions about his future and his "legacy" as he works to rebuild his life in a new country. After leaving the tech industry, Gupta relocated his family to France and is now studying vineyard management, with aspirations of working in the wine industry. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Review: Changing The Game AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
