
Meghan Markle reveals 'guilt mentality' about being rich and fear about 'never having enough' money
The Duchess of Sussex made the admission speaking to the billionaire founder of the Spanx fashion brand, Sara Blakely.
Speaking on the final episode of Meghan's Confessions of a Female Founder podcast, Ms Blakely spoke of the joy of female entrepreneurs 'obtaining a lot of financial freedom and money for themselves'.
Meghan admitted she would 'love to adopt' her mindset but claimed that women often felt discouraged from building their own fortunes.
'So many women, especially, we're taught to not even talk about money and there's lots of guilt mentality surrounding having a lot', Meghan said.
'And at the same time there's a scarcity mindset that it's easy to attach to, of like "I'll never have enough".'
Talking about her own businesses, which include her As Ever brand, she said: 'When you only have yourself to answer to I think it's twofold. It can be incredibly liberating or it can be incredibly lonely.'
She added: 'There's a misconception that you need to go to Harvard Business School and have a lot of money and get all the best people behind you [to be successful in business]... So you talk yourself out of it'.
The Duchess of Sussex, 43, was speaking about her business and balancing work with motherhood as the first series of her podcast, published by Lemonada Media, comes to a close
The Duchess of Sussex, 43, was speaking about her business and balancing work with motherhood as the first series of her podcast, published by Lemonada Media, ended.
After her As Ever jam, flower sprinkles, tea and other products sold out, Meghan said she wants to 'step back, gather data from the launch, and figure out exactly what As Ever could be.'
Meghan said for now she is planning to launch a new range of merchandise in early 2026 - and may widen her brand into clothing.
'The category of fashion is something I will explore at a later date, because I do think that's an interesting space for me,' she said.
Her online store sold out in 45 minutes and contained homely items as well as her long-awaited pots of jam.
In the interview, the Duchess also revealed she wouldn't know 'what to call herself' if she had to write a CV.
She said: 'If I had to write a résumé, I don't know what I would call myself.
'I think it speaks to this chapter many of us find ourselves in, where none of us are one note. But I believe all the notes I am playing are part of the same song.'
Meghan added that the 'mom moments' push her to success in the business world, with plans in the future ranging from home goods to fashion.
Revealing her son Archie has begun to lose his teeth, she described becoming the tooth fairy and leaving coins and a little dinosaur underneath his pillow.
She said: 'I had a lot of business meetings the next morning, but I still chose to cuddle with him the rest of the night. Those mom moments energize me to be a better founder, a better employer, a better boss.'
She revealed she may not restock the previous As Ever goods she sold and instead come up with new products such as fashion
Speaking to the Duchess of Sussex on the podcast, the pair shared stories of wearing shoes that pinch and 'cripple' wearers, with Meghan describing how she particularly struggled during her pregnancies.
'I gained 65 pounds with both pregnancies,' the Duchess revealed, continuing: 'And you're in these five-inch pointy-toed stilettos.
'You have the most enormous bump, and your tiny little ankles are bracing themselves in these high heels, but all of my weight was in the front, so you're just going how on earth am I not just tipping, you know faceplanting.
'I was clinging very closely to my husband, I was like please don't let me fall.'
During the conversation with Ms Blakely, Meghan also revealed that Archie, six, and Lilibet, three, who have been mainly kept out of the public eye at their home in Montecito, California, are doing well.
She promised to send Sara family pictures, adding: 'They are so grown.'
The pair also discussed starting businesses in a male dominated world, with Ms Blakely stating: 'There were very few women that I could go to, I really didn't have any.
'I didn't really even have other female founders that were in my network that I could bounce my approach to business.'
Describing her time in boardrooms surrounded by men, she jokingly added: 'I'm like Jane Goodall but instead of observing chimpanzees in their natural habitat I get to observe men in their natural habitat. They totally forget I'm there.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
MTG cashed in on ICE contractor's big win but Trump goes after ‘disgusting degenerate' Nancy Pelosi over stocks
Donald Trump's decision to wade into the debate over a congressional stock-trading ban could end up making things awkward for some of his closest allies in the House and Senate. While stock trades by members of Congress and their families have long been controversial, the sustained push for new restrictions on lawmakers is new. Supported by members of both parties, the effort to push back against an image of corruption and decadence in the chamber is growing in popularity particularly among younger members. But the prospect of making it to the president's desk with legislation that would ban congressional stock trading has now caused Trump to weigh in. The issue was glaring as he went on a late-night rant on Truth Social Saturday night against Democratic former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — after reports about one of his own MAGA faithful, Marjorie Taylor Greene cashing in on a stock deal tied to an ICE contractor. 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all INSIDE iNFORMATION! Is anybody looking into this??? She is a disgusting degenerate, who Impeached me twice, on NO GROUNDS, and LOST! How are you feeling now, Nancy???' he raged in his posting. Pelosi's office hadn't responded publicly as of Sunday morning. Taylor Greene has drawn criticism after she purchased stock in Peter Thiel-owned Palantir in April, three days before the company won an ICE contract. The company's stock has since surged. That's not even the first time this year Greene, who maintains that all of her trades are managed without her input by a financial adviser, has been called out by stock-trading watchdogs for highly-lucrative trading activity. 'After many successful years of running my own business, I ran for Congress to bring that mindset to Washington. Now that I'm proudly serving the people of Northwest Georgia, I have signed a fiduciary agreement to allow my financial advisor to control my investments,' Greene told the fact-checker site Snopes in May. 'All of my investments are reported with full transparency. I refuse to hide my stock trades in a blind trust like many others do,' she added. 'I learned about my Palantir trades when I saw it in the media.' The California Democrat Pelosi, once her party's leader in the House of Representatives, is one of a few senior members of the chamber who has come out publicly against restrictions on congressional stock trading. 'We're a free market economy,' Pelosi said in 2021. 'They should be able to participate in that.' But her stance shifted over time and earlier in 2025 she came out in favor of legislation that would restrict such activity. The HONEST Act, a bill sponsored by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, advanced through a Senate committee in late July. 'While I appreciate the creativity of my Republican colleagues in drafting legislative acronyms, I welcome any serious effort to raise ethical standards in public service. The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well. I strongly support this legislation and look forward to voting for it on the Floor of the House.' Pelosi supports the bill, despite it previously bearing her name: Hawley originally dubbed it the the 'PELOSI Act', a reference to the trading activity primarily conducted by Pelosi's husband Paul. She is one of the wealthier members of Congress; her family controls more than $127m in publicly-traded assets watched by stock-trading analysts. Its advancement drew opposition from Trump, which Hawley characterized in a rare public shot at his own colleagues as the result of Republican senators supposedly having called up the president and lied to him about what was in the bill. 'I wonder why Hawley would pass a Bill that Nancy Pelosi is in absolute love with — He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in late July. Hawley responded, telling reporters: 'He said, senators, I don't know who, had called and told him yesterday afternoon that the bill had been changed at the last minute and would force him to sell all of his assets, sell Mar-a-Lago, sell his properties. So, I said, 'Well, that's just false. I mean, it explicitly exempts you and all your assets.'' The senator's response referred to a provision stuck in aimed explicitly at winning Trump over. The ban affects future presidents and vice presidents, but not Trump or his no. 2, JD Vance. It's unclear whether Hawley will succeed in winning over the president, but the ban at least has the potential to make it through both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support. Members of Congress on key committees are often scrutinized for their trading activity as in some cases lawmakers are privy to information that is not yet public or widely known, but could still affect markets. Some members of Congress were caught up in a scandal over such activity in 2020, at the onset of the Covid pandemic, when they triggered selloffs of their own stock shares ahead of a market collapse. One former North Carolina senator, a Republican, sold more than $1 million in stock one week before the market crashed.


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Halle Berry's ex-husband David Justice lays bare details of their failed marriage… and what could've 'saved' it
Halle Berry 's ex-husband David Justice got candid about his failed marriage to the Oscar winner - and revealed what could have salvaged the relationship. The 58-year-old Monster's Ball actress previously tied the knot with the former MLB player in 1993, but the pair divorced just four years later. David opened up about the topic on Thursday's episode of the All The Smoke podcast and said while they initially were in a 'honeymoon state' after saying 'I do,' he began to question if she was 'the woman I want to have kids with.' The sports star explained that he only had 'one relationship before' marrying Halle. 'My knowledge and my understanding, my wisdom around relationships just wasn't vast.' David, 59, explained that he had been 'looking at my mom and I'm a Midwest guy. So, in my mind, I'm thinking a wife at that time should cook, clean, [be] traditional, you know? 'Then I'm thinking, "Okay, if we have kids, is this the woman I want to have kids with and build a family with?"' Daily Mail has reached out to Halle's reps for comment. David opened up about the topic on Thursday's episode of the All The Smoke podcast and said while they initially were in a 'honeymoon state' after saying 'I do,' he began to question if she was 'the woman I want to have kids with'; Halle seen in May in Cannes David added, 'At that time, as a young guy - she don't cook, don't clean, don't really seem like motherly, and then we start having issues.' He recalled the Hollywood actress asking him to marry her after only five months of dating. The baseball pro revealed that he had accepted the proposal 'because I couldn't say no' and admitted he wasn't sure 'if my heart was really into it.' 'But I didn't want to make her feel bad and say no, you know, or [if] I was just in the moment.' Months into their marriage, the former couple's differences came to light and their careers resulted in them spending a lot time away from each other. 'We spent a lot of time apart because she was doing movies in this country, that country,' David said, before sharing what he felt could have possibly kept their marriage together. 'And we honestly probably could have made it if I knew about therapy. If we knew about therapy, we probably could have made it.' Halle and David began dating in 1992 after she first saw him competing during an MTV celebrity baseball game. She later gave the sports player her phone number through a reporter that they both knew. The former couple tied the knot on New Year's Day in 1993 amid their whirlwind romance, but separated in 1996. The following year, their divorce was finalized. Halle later admitted to Parade in 2007 that she had suffered from depression following the split which led her to a suicide attempt. 'My sense of worth was so low,' the actress told the outlet, per Today. 'I had to reprogram myself to see the good in me. 'Because someone didn't love me didn't mean I was unlovable. I promised myself I would never be a coward again.' The Catwoman star later married Eric Benet in 2001 but the former couple divorced in 2005. She also tied the knot with Olivier Martinez in 2013 but their divorce was finalized in 2016. Halle is mom to daughter Nahla, 17, whom she welcomed with ex Gabriel Aubry and also shares son Maceo-Robert, 11, with Olivier. David has also since moved on following his separation from Halle and married Rebecca Villalobos in 2001. The couple share three children together. Earlier this year in February, Halle hit back at comments saying that she 'can't keep a man.' While appearing on The Drew Barrymore Show, the topic of dating was brought up and the actress said, 'I mean, it's hard out here. It's hard in these streets.' Halle continued, 'I've heard people say, "Something must be wrong with Halle Berry, she can't keep a man." Who's to say I want to keep a man? 'I don't want to keep the wrong man. Like, I'm not crazy, right? So when you find that you make a mistake - we all make mistakes.' She added, 'We have a right to say, "Oh God, this was a mistake. Let me start again." We have the right to do that.' The Never Let Go actress has since been romantically linked to Van Hunt - whom she was confirmed to be dating in 2020. A few months earlier in June, Van revealed that he has already popped the big question to the Hollywood star during an interview with Today. 'I put out the proposal, and it's still on hold as you can see. It's just out there floating. You know, maybe you can encourage her,' he said. But Halle - who had also joined in on the interview - expressed, 'I think we will get married just because, out of the people I've been married to, this is the person I should have married. 'And I feel like I should, we should get married, but it's not because we feel like we have to. I think it's something that we would like to do, just because we want that expression.'


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The most suspect stock trades by politicians revealed including the Republican who can't STOP flipping shares
Members of Congress aren't technically allowed to use insider knowledge to trade stocks while in office, but a couple of well-timed trades have raised eyebrows among eagle-eyed critics. Momentum to ban members of Congress from trading stocks is swelling even as lawmakers make major profits from the turbulent stock market. Right now, existing law allows legislators sitting on military committees buy defense stocks while financial regulators can snap up crypto and bank shares. Though trading on inside information is forbidden, there's little enforcement - and the practice appears rampant on Capitol Hill. Senate proposals would bar even the president and vice president from trading, but wealthy lawmakers claim restrictions would strip incentives and force unfair divestment of their holdings. Others complain they can't survive on their $174,000 salaries alone, fueling a trading bonanza that's generating handsome profits just as ban proposals gain steam. Here the Daily Mail highlights the top most suspect stock trades of the year: Rep. Rob Bresnahan, R-Pa., a 34-year-old freshman legislator has been one of the most scrutinized traders. He was the former CEO of Kuharchik Construction, Bresnahan's family company, where he is credited with expanding the family business. The Pennsylvania Republican campaigned on banning members from trading, but he has reported more transactions than practically every other lawmaker. 'Bresnahan has filed more stock trades than almost any other member of Congress since entering office this year,' Quiver Quantitative's co-founder Christopher Kardatzke told the Daily Mail. Since being sworn in this January and August 8, the Republican has made at least 617 trades, according to federal disclosures data compiled by Quiver Quantitative. The Republican has repeatedly claimed his financial advisors manager his trades, but when pressed recently by a local radio station on why he doesn't instruct them to halt the transactions he deflected. 'And then do what with it?' the lawmaker told WVIA. 'Just leave it all in the accounts and just leave it there and lose money and go broke?' Bresnahan introduced a bill earlier this year to ban members and their spouses from stock trading, even as he's continued to make transactions. According to federal data retrieved by Quiver Quantitative, Bresnahan has traded a total volume of over $7 million since January. He has sold $4 million in stock and purchased $3 million in the past eight months Right before Trump's signature domestic agenda the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' passed Congress, Bresnahan reported sale in Centene, a healthcare company that later lost over half of its share price because of Medicaid cuts contained within the legislation. Democratic attack ads have shredded him for voting for the cuts. 'Honestly I found out about it in real time but the key takeaway is I follow the STOCK Act and I follow the rules,' Bresnahan said when pressed on the stock sale by WNEP. Bresnahan has been widely criticized for being hypocritical about his stock trading. He's claimed his advisors are forbidden from trading in companies held by foreign adversaries, however his disclosures show that he has bought and sold shares in Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce company. Bresnahan has also indicated he will put his money in a blind trust, where it is managed by someone else and he has no clue about the individual transactions. But setting up such an account takes time, he has claimed. 'The whole process has been excruciating,' he told the Washington Examiner recently. Nearly 170 of the Pennsylvanian's trades occurred just after Trump's early April tariff announcement, dubbed 'Liberation Day' by the White House. In one instance in February, the lawmaker even disclosed a day trade, showing the purchase and sale of Palantir stock on the same day. 'Even if the portfolio is managed by a financial advisor, as Bresnahan has claimed, we're left to wonder why an advisor is day-trading Palantir stock in a U.S. Congressman's account,' Kardatzke said. Firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has also gained attention for trading the same stock around the same time - a transaction that has netted her thousands. The Georgia Republican made a flurry of stock purchases around the exact time that Trump instructed the nation that it was 'a great time to get rich, richer than ever before,' on Truth Social. After the market dipped around Liberation Day, Green heeded the president's warning and loaded up on discounted stocks. She purchased tech stock Impinj on April 4, which has since rocketed up over 100 percent in the last few months. And after buying Palantir on April 8, the Georgia Republican has doubled her investment, locking in a return over 115 percent. The tech company provides AI solutions and software to the federal government, including the Pentagon and more recently the Department of Homeland Security. Greene currently sits on the House Homeland Security Committee, the congressional panel that approves funding for DHS and ICE. She also claims her portfolio is managed by a financial advisor. 'Prior to this year, we had only seen one member of Congress ever buy Palantir stock. In the first two months of 2025, we saw six different members buy in,' Kardatzke noted. 'Maybe they all share the same financial advisor. The stock is up 148 percent so far this year.' Legislation to ban trading among members has even received backing from former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who has become notorious for scoring winning trades during her decades in Congress. When she led Congress in 2021 she famously brushed off questions about implementing a stock trading ban for members, citing 'a free market economy.' Though her disclosures show that these trades are done by her husband, Paul Pelosi, it does raise questions as to how he can so frequently beat the market, and by such massive margins. 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' her spokesperson told the Daily Mail. Between 2023 and early July 2025, over 70 percent of Pelosi's trades were profitable, according to Capitol Trades. The Bay Area couple has also reported call options on AI-focused companies like Nvidia, Alphabet and others. 'I think it's a little bit sketchy just because of how high-risk high-reward option contracts are,' Christopher Josephs, co-founder of Autopilot, a congressional investing app, told the Daily Mail. 'No average everyday person trading does that.' The 85-year-old Democrat got defensive recently when asked by CNN's Jake Tapper to respond to Trump's attacks on her trading practices. 'Why do you have to read that?' Pelosi interrupted when Tapper began asking about members' trading.