School guard held for sexual harassment of two boys
The police said that the 53-year-old security guard had cornered the two boys aged 15 and 17 in the kitchen of the school canteen after school hours and "sexually harassed" the boys, according to a complaint lodged at Arnala Coastal police, Virar, on Saturday by a senior office-bearer of the school-cum-junior college.
The complaint mentions that the crime took place sometime in the third week of June, in the evening.
The cops traced the security guard and arrested him under charges of sexual harassment and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and produced him in court, which has sent him to police custody.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
HC warns of severe action for cybercrimes targeting children
Underscoring the seriousness of cyber offences targeting children, the Delhi High Court has said that such crimes will attract severe consequences, reflecting the grave psychological impact on victims. While upholding the conviction of a man in a cyber-bullying case involving a minor, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, in a judgement delivered on July 28, stated that digital abuse, though often faceless and silent, can be as mentally scarring as physical violence. The court was hearing an appeal in a 2016 case registered following a complaint lodged by the mother of a 14-year-old girl, a Class IX student, who became the target of a cyber assault. According to the prosecution, the victim received a morphed nude image with her face superimposed on another person's body, accompanied by a threatening message warning that the obscene content would be posted on Facebook unless she complied with the sender's demands. 'The present case reflects a textbook example of cyber-bullying, where an adolescent girl, who was pursuing her studies, became a victim of a targeted assault upon her privacy and dignity,' said Justice Sharma. 'Such conduct, in the virtual world, has very real and devastating consequences in the real world,' the judge said. The High Court said the psychological impact on a minor is difficult to quantify in words in a judgment. A trial court convicted the accused under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and the Information Technology Act. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years. The High Court found no grounds to interfere with the conviction, noting that the plea for leniency on behalf of the man 'stands on a fragile footing'. 'It is important not only to detect and punish such crimes effectively but also to affirmatively uphold a child's right to safety, dignity, and mental well-being in such cases,' it added.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Rape FIR under POCSO can't be quashed on ground of compromise: Punjab and Haryana HC
Chandigarh, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that an FIR under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for a minor's rape cannot be quashed on the ground of a compromise even if the victim subsequently married the accused and had children. Rape FIR under POCSO can't be quashed on ground of compromise: Punjab and Haryana HC The court held that such compromises are unenforceable in law, being illegal and also contrary to public policy. At the time of the registration of FIR in 2013, the victim was a 13-year-old girl and her father had then alleged that she was enticed away by the accused. The accused allegedly raped the girl in Gurugram and was declared a proclaimed offender after being on the run for nine years before being arrested in 2023. The FIR was registered in August 2013 under the provisions of the IPC and POCSO Act in a police station in Gurugram. The accused approached the high court and sought the quashing of the FIR as he married the survivor and they had four children. However, the court dismissed his plea. "In fact, the competence of minors to consent is inherently ambiguous, even in circumstances where such consent appears to be given freely," the bench of Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri observed. The court, in its July 29 order, also observed that the rationale behind fixing the age of marriage and consent for sexual activity to a fixed statutory minimum is based upon the recognition that minors lack the requisite mental maturity and psychological competence to give informed consent to sexual acts. "This position emanates from a protectionist objective, whereby the law operates on the presumption that minors lack the capacity to fully apprehend or appreciate the nature, implications and potential consequences of indulging in sexual activities," the court held. The petition had been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of an FIR registered in August, 2013, under Sections 363, 366-A and 34 IPC , registered in a police station in Gurugram on the basis of compromise with the victim and the complainant. The present petition had been filed by the accused for quashing of the FIR based on a compromise which was stated to have been entered into by the brother of the petitioner with the respondents who are the complainant and the victim. "....The law provides ex-ante protection to minors by criminalising sexual activities involving persons below eighteen years of age, who by virtue of their age are deemed to be legally incapable of giving informed consent. "In this way, the POCSO Act has adopted the 'brightline rule' which is based upon the principle that minors do not possess the legal or developmental capacity to give informed consent in matters of sexual activity, and reflects a clear and consistent legislative intent to create an unambiguous zone of protection for minors from sexual exploitation...," the court said. The court observed that the allegations pertain to the offence of rape committed upon a minor girl, attracting the provisions of the POSCO Act, FIR and its consequential proceedings cannot be quashed based upon compromise. It was held that the offences under the POCSO Act are statutory crimes against society and marriage, with the victim, especially where she is a minor, cannot absolve the accused of criminal liability and normalising such compromise undermines the deterrent effect of the POCSO Act and sends a regressive message that child sexual abuse can be legitimised via subsequent marriage and erodes public confidence in child protection laws. According to the reply filed by the State, after the FIR was registered, the petitioner was later apprehended from Bihar along with the minor-victim who was recovered from the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner was granted the concession of regular bail during the course of trial but he misused the concession of bail and thereafter, he was declared a proclaimed person on December 19, 2014. He was again apprehended by the police on December 21, 2023 in Amritsar after a long gap of nine years. This was after he was declared a proclaimed person by the trial court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel said the matter has been amicably settled between the parties with the intervention of the "respectables" and it has been stated in the "compromise" that the FIR was lodged on the basis of some misunderstanding and the trial is still pending. He submitted that considering the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the present FIR may be quashed based on compromise. He further submitted that the victim had left her house on her own free will and got married with the petitioner and thereafter, four children were born out of the said wedlock and the victim has otherwise also attained the age of majority. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, whereby the petitioner and respondent victim have already got married to each other and four children were born out of the wedlock, it will be just and proper in case the FIR is quashed based on compromise to prevent miscarriage of justice, the counsel had submitted. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Woman kingpin linked to kidnap of city minor
Nagpur: The name of the city's trafficking kingpin, a woman, has surfaced in the Rajasthan minor kidnapping case. The gang sold a minor, now rescued, for Rs2.50 lakh for marriage to a youth in Rajasthan, who is now accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Pocso), along with others. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He is yet to be arrested. Roma Patil, now in custody, is believed to have partnered with Jamna Lal and another elusive mastermind, to traffic a substantial number of teenagers to states like Rajasthan, Haryana, Gujarat, and remote Madhya Pradesh, where women are purchased for marriages due to a skewed sex ratio. Jamna Lal, a native of Rajasthan, is in custody but hospitalised. Senior inspector Harish Borade of Wathoda police station said that the gang has been charged under Pocso, as the rescued minor was medically confirmed to have been raped by the man she was supposed to marry. Police said that Roma, Jamna Lal, and their accomplices lured teenagers with a promise to pay Rs10,000 to accompany them to Rajasthan and other states, perpetrate a drama of getting married, and later escape back to Nagpur on the pretext of seeing family. The rescued minor was also promised a similar amount for pretending to be a bride. Police records reveal Roma's name as a recurring figure in trafficking cases, marking her a central player in a sprawling network. Beyond Nagpur, authorities suspect the gang's operations extend to Bhandara and Gondia, where young girls from impoverished backgrounds are easy targets. The latest case involves a minor abducted from Nagpur, promised money, and trafficked to Rajasthan. The girl's ordeal ended after police, acting on a tip-off, rescued her and arrested key suspects, including Patil and Lal. Investigators believe the gang exploited economic desperation, targeting families in rural Maharashtra. "The accused used cash as bait, knowing these girls come from areas with limited opportunities," said a senior officer.
