logo
‘It means death': Afghan women's rights activists face deportation from Pakistan

‘It means death': Afghan women's rights activists face deportation from Pakistan

The Guardian30-03-2025

More than 50 prominent female Afghan women's rights activists sheltering in Pakistan are facing deportation home, where they fear they will be imprisoned or killed under Taliban rule.
Under a draconian policy, the Pakistan government has pledged to deport millions of Afghan nationals, after relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan severely deteriorated and attacks by militants in the border areas surged.
Pakistan government ministers have accused Afghans of being 'terrorists' and 'traitors' who are fuelling crime and militancy in the country.
Pakistan began deportations of Afghan refugees in September 2023. According to a recent report by Amnesty International, so far at least 844,499 Afghan nationals have been forcibly deported back to Afghanistan where they are at 'real risk of persecution by the Taliban'.
Among those facing the threat of returning to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan are 60 female activists and human rights defenders, who fled persecution after they spoke out for women's rights and education or attended protests. Many have been forced into hiding in recent weeks, as police have been going door-to-door in the cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi, arbitrarily arresting any Afghans and allegedly demanding huge bribes.
Humaira Alim worked as a women's rights and education activist in Afghanistan for seven years before the Taliban came back to power in 2021. After women were deprived of the right to work and then attend university under the group's strict Islamic rule, she was among a group of women who defied the Taliban and helped organise protests on the streets.
But after facing 'dire warnings' and then direct threats to her life from the Taliban for her activism when pregnant with her first child, Alim said she had 'no choice' but to flee over the border to Pakistan in December 2022.
She has stayed in Islamabad ever since, living with her two young children on a visa that has been given monthly. Alim described her situation as an 'awful nightmare', as all Afghan nationals – even those who had lived in Pakistan for decades – were now facing routine persecution and harassment from the police. She and her children were recently forced to hide on the roof of their home as officers came looking for them.
'If they send me back to Afghanistan, it only means death,' she said. 'The Taliban have records on me and my activism. There is no place for women like me. They only arrest and torture us. I can't go back there with my children.'
Alim said she knew dozens of other Afghan women like her, who had worked as activists, lawyers and human rights defenders and faced harassment or torture at the hands of the Taliban, who were now in hiding in Pakistan.
Liliana Harrington, senior campaigner for Avaaz, an organisation that has been advocating for the women, said: 'Deporting these people to the Taliban is a death sentence. Pakistan would not only abandon these brave people to their oppressors but also abandon its proud legacy of protecting vulnerable Afghans.'
The Pakistan government has given all undocumented Afghan nationals a deadline of 31 March to leave the country, otherwise they will be arrested. Alim said she and other female activists were just asking for more time, to find a third country who might be able to offer them asylum. Currently, they are waiting to see if they get an offer from Brazil or if other countries will offer them a safe haven.
The widespread expulsion drew condemnation from Isabelle Lassee, Amnesty's deputy regional director for south Asia. 'The Pakistani authorities are violating the rights of Afghan refugees with impunity, subjecting them to arbitrary decisions that are shrouded in secrecy, totally lacking transparency and accountability,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran executes Mojahed Kourkouri over 2022 anti-government protests
Iran executes Mojahed Kourkouri over 2022 anti-government protests

BBC News

time11 hours ago

  • BBC News

Iran executes Mojahed Kourkouri over 2022 anti-government protests

A man has been executed in Iran, three years after he was arrested during the nationwide anti-government protests in 2022, the judiciary Kourkouri, also known as Abbas Kourkouri, was sentenced to death after being convicted of armed attacks and membership of a "rebellion group", according to the judiciary's Mizan news agency. He was accused of killing of seven people, including nine-year-old Kian Pirfalak, during protests in the city of Izeh. Kian's family said he was killed by security forces, but authorities maintained that a "rioter" shot him. Amnesty International said Kourkouri was subjected to torture and that his trial was "grossly unfair". Kourkouri is the 11th person known to have been executed in relation to the protests, which were sparked by the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman who was detained by morality police in Tehran in September 2022 for allegedly wearing her hijab "improperly".Hundreds of people were killed and thousands detained in a violent crackdown by security forces, which portrayed the protests as "riots".Kourkouri was accused of opening fire on a car carrying Kian Pirfalak and his family in Izeh, in the south-western province of Khuzestan, at the height of the unrest that authorities blamed "terrorist agents" for Kian's killing, and later arrested Kourkouri during an armed raid the following month, during which Kourkouri was shot and injured in the knee, human rights groups family has repeatedly said it does not think Kourkouri was involved in the boy's Kian's funeral, the boy's mother was overheard in a video telling mourners: "Hear it from me myself on how the shooting happened, so they can't say it was by terrorists, because they're lying." "Plainclothes forces shot my child. That is it," Zeynab Molaei that the day, she appeared to recant the remarks in a state TV interview, warning that they should "not be misused". She looked visibly distressed, prompting many on social media to warn that she might have been judiciary's announcement that Kourkouri had been executed sparked condemnation among human rights International said Kourkouri's trial was unfair because he had been denied access to an independently chosen lawyer and his confessions, which were broadcast on Iranian state media, had been added that following his arrest, Kourkouri was held in solitary confinement and repeatedly subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including severe was initially sentenced in April 2023, but a judicial review of his case was filed to the Supreme Court in January 2024, Amnesty said. His conviction was later upheld and his sentence was sent for implementation later that year, it director of the Oslo-based Iran Human Rights group, Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, said Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Iran's other leaders "must be held accountable for the extrajudicial killing" of Kourkouri, "as well as for the murders of Kian Pirfalak and thousands of other innocent people"."The international community must break its silence in the face of this tsunami of executions carried out by the Islamic Republic," he human rights group Hengaw said at least 582 prisoners, including 19 political, religious, and security inmates, had been executed in Iranian prisons so far this last person to be executed in connection with the 2022 protests was Reza Rasaei in August last 34-year-old was sentenced to death in 2023 after what Amnesty called a "grossly unfair" trial that relied on forced confessions, which they said were "obtained under torture and other ill-treatment, including beatings, electric shocks, suffocation and sexual violence".Iranian authorities accused him of having a part in the death of a member of Iran's Revolutionary Guards during the protests - a charge Rasaei was executed in secret and his family was not given prior warning, Amnesty said.

The Troubles: Supreme Court to hear Paul Thompson inquest disclosure challenge
The Troubles: Supreme Court to hear Paul Thompson inquest disclosure challenge

BBC News

time16 hours ago

  • BBC News

The Troubles: Supreme Court to hear Paul Thompson inquest disclosure challenge

The Supreme Court will hear a case later which campaigners believe has implications for state secrecy around several killings during the Northern Ireland case has been brought by the Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary is appealing a decision in which a coroner intended to release some intelligence information about the loyalist murder of Paul "Topper" Thompson in 25-year-old was travelling in a taxi which was fired upon by the Ulster Freedom Fighters (UFF) at Springfield Park in west Belfast. His family believes the case involves state Louisa Fee had planned to disclose a "gist", or summary, of intelligence at his inquest in March 2024, but Benn's predecessor, Chris Heaton-Harris, began a legal challenge which will now culminate in a two-day hearing in will be delivered at a future point. 'Critical questions' Amnesty International, Relatives for Justice and the Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) are supporting Mr Thompson's said the case raised "critical questions" about the government's Neither Confirm Nor Deny policy, which is used "to prevent the disclosure of information on national security grounds".CAJ director Daniel Holder said: "This case has wide implications for numerous bereaved families and the rule of law."National security cannot surely be invoked to conceal state wrongdoing or the involvement of state agents in killings or other human rights violations."Mr Thompson's inquest was one of several halted under the last government's Legacy has pledged to reinstate inquests under a replacement act was passed by the Conservative government in September 2023 despite opposition from Labour, all Northern Ireland parties, several victims' groups and the Irish created a new legacy body known ICRIR to take over all Troubles-era cases from 1 May 2024, including those on the desk of the Police Service of Northern act shuts down all historical act's most controversial element, the offer of conditional immunity to suspects, has been disapplied following legal action by bereaved families.

Abergavenny mosque site vandalised by racist graffiti
Abergavenny mosque site vandalised by racist graffiti

South Wales Argus

timea day ago

  • South Wales Argus

Abergavenny mosque site vandalised by racist graffiti

Plans to turn a former Gwent library into a mosque have been met with support when the Argus went to canvas opinion, but some, including local Senedd member Laura-Anne Jones, have questioned the plan. The old Abergavenny library on Baker Street has been unused since 2015 after the library was relocated to the Town Hall. In May, Monmouthshire council agreed to grant a 30-year lease to the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association who plan to use the building as a mosque. This would be the county's first mosque. The former Abergavenny library which could be a mosque covered in racist graffiti (Image: NQ) Sadly overnight (June 10) the site was the target of racist graffiti. Written in Arabic the word 'masjid' meaning mosque appeared next to the word 'no.' Also graffitied were crosses symbolic of the Christian faith. When the Argus spoke to locals in Abergavenny, they were upset and angered by the vandalism. Francis Buxton 83 and Caroline Lewis 81 next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 83-year-old local Francis Buxton is a Christian. When asked about the painted crosses Francis said the following. 'I deplore the fact there's a cross there as if it's supporting this protest and I do hope there can be some statement from the local Christian churches, to say we stand alongside the Muslims and support them in having a regular prayer place.' 32-year-old Jenny McConnel next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) Reacting to the graffiti 32-year-old Jenny McConnel said: 'I just feel really upset and it's basically on my doorstep that people would oppose a peaceful place for people to worship it's just really upsetting.' 24-year-old Ebony Metcalf next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 24-year-old Ebony Metcalf is new to Abergavenny. She said: 'I only moved here in November, and I thought it was a lovely community and all this sudden hatred it's just disgusting. 'Vandalising a building. I don't understand it it's hateful for no reason.' 62-year-old Hayley Ward shared her thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) When asked about the idea of the mosque taking over the former library, 62-year-old Hayley Ward said: 'Well, it is different, but I think it's important to encourage and allow all sorts of diversity it's important we are all equal I think it's only fair and right that there should be access to all sorts of cultures in Abergavenny.' Catherine Evans 67 and Anne Jenkins 90 shared their thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 67-year-old Catherine Evans 67 and mother 90-year-old Anne Jenkins also supported the idea of a new religious site. Catherine said: 'I think it's great I think we should be inclusive it's somewhere for the Islamic community to be able to worship instead of having to travel long distances. 'I think we should be embracing multiculturalism. That's what it's about isn't it?' Catherine commented why some people may be against the mosque. 'In this world people have got different opinions and some people are more right wing than left wing.' Joshua Jones 35 and Stephen Hopkins 54 shared their thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 35-year-old Joshua Jones 54-year-old Stephen Hopkins were also in favour of a new mosque. Stephen said: 'It's brilliant I haven't heard of it but it's good.' 'Another religious site is good it's a good idea.' Joshua added: 'I think it's great to have that in the community. 'I think everyone has the right to practise their religion. What they believe in is up to them.' 43-year-old Dylan Roberts shared his thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 43-year-old Dylan Roberts had the following to say: 'I've got no issue with it I think its fine people need a place to worship. 'I think there's a lot of sentiment in the country a lot of it aimed by Muslims and I think a lot of scepticism comes from that.' 65-year-old Sue Holden shared her thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 65-year-old Sue Holden said: 'It's good the building isn't standing derelict and that it's in use and there is a need for a Mosque.' 31-year-old Jordie Le Bowen shared his thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny (Image: NQ) 31-year-old Jordie Le Bowen said: 'Wonderful, it's more inclusive in terms of libraries going there's a hell of a lot of online resources going. 'So, we don't have to worry about that being an issue in my opinion.' The plan was given approval by Monmouthshire Council last week but the decision was called in, meaning further discussion will take place. A meeting is due to take place on Wednesday, June 11, to discuss the plans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store