Santander giving away free £500 to customers in prize draw
Each month, one lucky customer will win a European getaway for two people, with flights, accommodation, airport transfers, an experience to the value of £500 and £500 spending money included.
Banking is changing, and so must we.
We're pleased to announce that we've acquired @TSB from Banco Sabadell, subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals.
This move will provide us with the scale needed to accelerate our transformation and become the best bank for all our… pic.twitter.com/zjZDiqQ2rg — Santander UK (@santanderuk) July 1, 2025
Monthly destinations include Dubrovnik in July, before Santorini in August, Lisbon in Portugal in September, Paris in France in October, before Stockholm and Prague round off the year in November and December, respectively.
The prize draw is open to all personal Santander Mastercard debit or credit cardholders. To enter, customers just need to opt in via the Mastercard Priceless page.
This will be made available to customers through multiple channels, including emails, the online banking website, the mobile app and social media.
Recommended reading:
Once enrolled, every qualifying purchase in the UK earns one entry into the draw, with purchases made abroad earning two entries - no minimum spend required.
Gerry Davies, Payments Commercial Director, Santander UK, said in a statement issued this week: 'Summer has well and truly begun and to celebrate, we're thrilled to be offering customers multiple chances to win their next trip for free - from July until the end of the year.
"Customers can spend abroad without having to worry about additional fees with our Edge current accounts and credit card offering fee-free spending on holidays.'
The promotion runs from 1 July to 31 December 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation
The Sweden international, who is reported to have asked Newcastle executives to explore a move away from St James' Park, has been heavily linked with Liverpool. His former club Sociedad confirmed on Thursday he was 'working with his trainers' at the club's Zubieta facility. Newcastle have been approached for comment. The player did not travel with the rest of the Newcastle squad earlier this month for their pre-season tour of Asia amid speculation over his future, with the club saying at the time he was absent due to a minor thigh injury. The decision to train at his old club rather than his current one will heighten speculation that Isak sees his future away from Newcastle. No offer has been submitted by Liverpool as yet to Newcastle, who would almost certainly be looking for a British record transfer fee for the player. Should Newcastle price Isak out of a move or simply refuse to listen to offers, one option Isak and his representatives might consider would be to unilaterally terminate his contract with three years remaining. A European Court of Justice ruling in favour of former Chelsea midfielder Lassana Diarra last year means players can now terminate their deals 'without unnecessary fears', according to the lawyer who led Diarra's case. The ruling appears to have given players greater leeway to terminate a contract without just cause. The court found some of FIFA's transfer rules were contrary to European law because they restricted freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. Jean-Louis Dupont, who led Diarra's challenge and who was also at the centre of the landmark Bosman case which granted players free agency at the end of their contracts, believes last year's ruling lifts the threat of significant sanctions for players who choose to terminate their deals. Dupont, speaking in general rather than specifically about Isak's case, told the PA news agency: 'In its Diarra judgement, the court ruled that players have a right to termination without just cause and that it is for the ex-employer to establish the existence and the quantum of damages, knowing that losing the opportunity to transfer the player is NOT a damage. 'According to the court, such termination cannot entail disciplinary sanctions (when effected in between seasons). 'FIFA has, imperfectly, amended its rules to abide by the court ruling. But the bottom line is that players have the right to terminate without unnecessary fears.' Asked whether he thought players would now be free from the threat of sporting sanctions such as a ban for terminating their deals, Dupont added: 'Yes. If not, the right to terminate, as granted by the court, would just be theoretical. But, apparently, FIFA is still resisting on this point.' Following the ECJ ruling, FIFA opened a global dialogue on its transfer rules and issued amended, interim rules just before Christmas last year. The world players' union FIFPRO immediately pushed back on the amendments, saying they did not 'provide legal certainty' to players. FIFPRO issued guidance to players in May stating that following the ruling, a player's transfer fee or transfer value could no longer be used in the calculation of any compensation due to the club where the player had been contracted, and advised that the compensation paid should be 'limited to the residual value of the contract, with a possible further reduction or increase on the basis of the national law'. A presumption that a player's new club had induced the termination of contract was removed in the amended rules issued by FIFA last December. Now, a player's old club must prove the new club induced the player to break contract.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Trump's tariffs: both a political and an economic threat
Donald Trump's 1 August tariffs deadline did what it was always intended to do. It kept the markets and the nations guessing amid last-minute uncertainty. It attempted to reassert the global heft of the United States economy to take on and master all comers. And it placed President Trump at the centre of the media story, where he always insists on being. In the event, there were some last-minute agreements struck this week, few of them fair or rational in trade terms, most of them motivated by the desire to generate some commercial order. Some conflicts are still in the balance. There were 11th-hour court challenges too, disputing the president's very right to play the trade war game in this way. Even now, no one, probably including Mr Trump himself, knows whether this is his administration's last word on US tariffs. Almost certainly not. That's because Mr Trump's love of tariffs is always more about the assertion of political clout rather than economic power. Mr Trump's antipathy towards the European Union drives one example. The pact agreed by Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend underlines that the EU's aspirations as a global economic superpower exceed its actual clout. The EU could not prevent Mr Trump making European goods 15% more expensive if they sell on US markets. Nor could it stop Mr Trump getting EU tariffs on US goods withdrawn. Equally eloquent about the global balance of economic power is that Mr Trump has not been able to force China to bend the knee in the manner of the EU. China has responded aggressively to Trump's tariff threats, retaliating with tariffs of its own and blocking the sale of commodities, including rare-earth minerals, that the US most covets. Unsurprisingly, this standoff has not produced one of Mr Trump's so-called deals. Friday's deadline has been reset for later in the month. It would be no surprise if it was eventually pushed back further. Mr Trump is not imposing tariffs on the rest of the world in order to promote global trade or even to boost the US economy. He is doing it, in part, because Congress has delegated this power to him, allowing the president to impose or waive tariffs at will. He uses this power for many purposes. These include raising government income without congressional oversight and also, because tariffs are regressive, shifting the tax burden away from the very rich, like Mr Trump himself, on to the middle and working class. But economics also comes way down the field in the list of reasons why Mr Trump is wielding the tariff weapon internationally. US talks with Brazil – with which the US runs a trade surplus, not a deficit – have been hijacked by Mr Trump's grievance over the prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro for trying to overturn his 2022 election defeat. Talks with India are deadlocked because Mr Trump wants to penalise Delhi for buying energy and weapons from Russia. Those with Canada have been hit by Mr Trump's objections to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestine. The ultimate test of the policy, however, will indeed be economic. For now, financial markets appear to have decided that Mr Trump's tariffs are manageable. If tariffs now raise the cost of goods on US high streets, slowing growth and feeding inflation, as they may, the wider market response could change quickly. In that event, the mood among American voters might even shift too. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
UK air traffic chief rejects calls to step down after radar system failure causes travel chaos
More than 150 flights were cancelled with others delayed or diverted NOT DEPARTING UK air traffic chief rejects calls to step down after radar system failure causes travel chaos THE head of air traffic control in Britain has ignored calls to quit as the latest flights meltdown continued to cause travel misery yesterday. Thousands of passengers were still battling to get home or dealing with journeys disrupted by Wednesday's radar system failure. 6 Martin Rolfe, the head of air traffic control in Britain, has ignored calls to quit Credit: Alamy 6 Wednesday's radar system failure caused more than 150 flights to be cancelled with others delayed or diverted Credit: Peter Macdiarmid - Commissioned by The Sun 6 Thousands of passengers are still battling to get home or dealing with journeys disrupted Credit: Doug Seeburg More than 150 flights were cancelled and others delayed or diverted by the glitch, with the knock-on effects still causing problems yesterday. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander summoned Martin Rolfe, the head of National Air Traffic Services, for talks — but he did not step down. Airline bosses, led by Ryanair, had called for him to go after they had to rip-up timetables. A similar 2023 failure cost carriers £100million — and they said lessons had not been learned. Ms Alexander said of the latest drama: 'This was an isolated event and there is no evidence of malign activity. 'I know that any disruption is frustrating for passengers. "Flights are now resumed and I am grateful to airlines who are working hard to get people to where they need to be.' She advised passengers to continue to check with airlines before travelling. Monica Clare, 68, from Brentford, West London, will miss a friend's wedding because her Aer Lingus flight from Heathrow to Shannon in Ireland was cancelled yesterday. The retired maintenance manager said: 'I'm absolutely numb. 'I'm so upset. I'm heartbroken. It's disgraceful. "It's absolutely unbelievable in this day and age that something that went down for 20 minutes has caused havoc like that all over the country. 'I'm so upset, I'm so angry. Brits face DAYS of travel chaos after all flights grounded at UK airports - as tech glitch 'mystery' grows "I've spoken to my friend who's getting married. They're devastated.' The Sun revealed cockpit crews were sent an urgent warning of the pending travel misery by controllers, who told them of an 'ATC radar failure'. The disruption was the second to have happened as a result of a technical fault at Nats' hub in Swanwick, Hants, in two years. Most of the disruption came at Heathrow, where 84 departures and 71 arrivals were cancelled, while some inbound flights had to be diverted to European cities. BA flights were still being cancelled yesterday owing to aircraft and crew being out of position, contributing to 16 more cancellations at Heathrow. Asked if Mr Rolfe should quit, Business Minister Gareth Thomas said: 'Clearly, an incident happened two years ago and measures were taken then. "It looks like those measures weren't enough but we need to get to the bottom of what exactly happened.' HEATHROW could handle 276,000 more flights a year and welcome budget airline easyJet for the first time under a £49billion 6 Monica Clare will miss a friend's wedding because of the disruption Credit: PA 6 Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander summoned Martin Rolfe for talks Credit: Alamy
