logo
In Cuba, Castro's 'Influencer' Grandson Causes A Stir

In Cuba, Castro's 'Influencer' Grandson Causes A Stir

Cuban influencer Sandro Castro has chosen a very different path to his revolutionary grandfather Fidel, using his name to pursue online fame while occasionally poking fun at the island's dire shortages of food, medicine, power and fuel.
It is a pastime some find entertaining, even fair commentary, but the 33-year-old is coming under increasing scrutiny from those loyal to Cuba's communist project for disrespecting his ancestor's legacy.
For others locked in a daily struggle for survival, the younger Castro's high-flying lifestyle and apparent lack of empathy is offensive on a whole different level.
On his Instagram account, Sandro regales his 127,000 followers with images of him partying, at times with scantily-clad women, often with a beer in hand.
He is sometimes dressed as a monk or a vampire, sporting cat whiskers or the jersey of the Barcelona football club.
From time to time, he mocks the struggles engendered by the country's worst economic crisis in three decades.
"I woke up today with my favorite recipe, chicken with beer... but there is no chicken,' he says in one post while holding up a bottle of the national lager, Cristal.
He also jokes about the power outages that have plagued the island, suggestively addressing a woman with the words: "If I caught you like the UNE (electric company), I'd get you every four hours, Monday to Monday."
The character entertains some, annoys others, but never fails to make a splash.
Castro's followers jokingly refer to him as the "next president," but voices aligned with the communist government are demanding he be silenced.
Loyalist historian and author Ernesto Limia complained on Facebook that Castro "does not respect the memory" of his famous grandfather, who led the revolution that toppled a dictatorship and installed a communist government.
"El Necio," an online influencer, has argued that Sandro Castro "goes against the security of this country" and "against the ideals" of the revolution.
Despite his famous name, some believe Castro may be pushing his luck.
Activists and critics in Cuba are often rounded up for sharing anti-government views, and several are serving sentences for crimes such as "contempt" or disseminating "enemy propaganda."
Manuel Cuesta Morua, a dissident historian who has been detained multiple times for his democratic activism, said the Sandro phenomenon embodied "the distance of the grandchildren's generation from the original revolutionary project."
It also put Castro in stark contrast to the rest of his family, who unlike him enjoy their privileged status "discreetly," he said.
While Fidel Castro was alive, Cubans knew very little about his second wife Dalia Soto del Valle and their five sons -- one of whom is Sandro's father, Alexis Castro Soto del Valle, 63.
The family lived out of the public eye in Punto Cero, an extensive wooded area west of Havana with access controlled by the military.
In 2021, during the Covid-19 pandemic, Sandro came into the spotlight in a leaked video that showed him driving a luxurious Mercedes-Benz.
"We are simple people, but every now and then we have to take out these little toys we have at home," he said in the clip that went viral and sparked public outrage, forcing him to apologize.
Three years later, he caused another stir by celebrating his birthday at a bar he owns in the capital, burning massive neon lights and dancing on tables as the country reeled from the after-effects of a massive blackout. Cuban influencer Sandro Castro, grandson of Fidel, also owns the EFE bar in Havana AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 years after protests in Belarus: Have things changed? – DW – 08/08/2025
5 years after protests in Belarus: Have things changed? – DW – 08/08/2025

DW

time2 days ago

  • DW

5 years after protests in Belarus: Have things changed? – DW – 08/08/2025

Five years ago, mass protests rocked Belarus — but the regime clamped down hard. What's changed since then? And could things have turned out differently? No one saw it coming when the largest protests in Belarus' history erupted five years ago — in a country that had already been ruled autocratically by Alexander Lukashenko for more than a quarter of a century. At the time, people took to the streets to protest against the results of the August 9, 2020, presidential election, which was rigged in Lukashenko's favor. They were also angered by the authorities' lack of steps to protect the population against the COVID-19 pandemic and the arrest of the most promising opposition presidential candidates and thousands of citizens. Women organized marches and students took to the streets. Workers, actors, and athletes protested, diplomats were dismissed, and doctors and teachers wrote open letters to voice their dissatisfaction. In turn, the country's security forces responded with a wave of violence. Many people were hurt and even killed, with a steady stream of injured people taken directly from police stations to hospitals. And the Hollywood story of the then housewife Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who entered the race for the Belarusian presidency in place of her then-imprisoned husband Siarhei Tsikhanouski, ended without a happy ending. She was forced into exile in Lithuania. Over the years, Alexander Lukashenko increasingly worked to secure Russia's support. He helped Vladimir Putin in the war against Ukraine, triggered a migration crisis on the border with the European Union, gained power for another five-year term, and still has no intention of stepping down. But could things have turned out differently? The developments in Belarus could not have turned out any differently at the time, says Artyom Shraibman, an expert at the Carnegie Center, a foreign policy think tank. "The West had no leverage at these critical moments to weaken the Lukashenko regime in any way," the Berlin-based political scientist said in an interview with DW. DW columnist Alexander Friedman, who teaches Eastern European history at German universities, points to the global political paradigm, which was different in 2020. "From a European perspective, Belarus was perceived as a zone of Russian interests where extreme caution was required," he said. The situation might have been different if Putin had not supported Lukashenko and had instead taken a neutral position. Five years on, there are no longer even digital traces of the mass protests in Belarus. The media outlets that reported on them at the time are now closed or operate from abroad. Their websites are blocked by the Belarusian authorities. Many people have also deleted their private photos and videos of the events of 2020, fearful that authorities will use them to identify participants in the protests. Articles, reports, archives, and social media posts have also disappeared. At the same time, it is increasingly difficult for the regime in Belarus to hide the enormous scale of the repression. According to the human rights center "Viasna" in Belarus, at least 8,519 people have been prosecuted for political reasons since 2020, and a total of more than 60,000 people have been imprisoned. Among the most prominent prisoners is activist and flutist Maria Kolesnikova, who was sentenced to 11 years in prison. Her relatives have had no contact with her to this day. The same applies to banker and philanthropist Viktor Babaryka, who is serving a 14-year prison sentence. And human rights activist Ales Bialiatski is currently the only Nobel Prize winner in the world who has to work six days a week in a penal colony. "Bialiatski's health is deteriorating; he has problems with his eyesight and his legs," said Leonid Sudalenko, a former political prisoner and Bialiatski's colleague at Viasna, in an interview with DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Even today, Belarusians are still being persecuted in connection with the 2020 protests. Since the beginning of the year, more than 1,700 people have been arrested on administrative, criminal, and politically motivated charges. And those are only the numbers known to human rights activists. The reasons for detention are manifold. Some were photographed during the protests. Others liked "extremist" web content – although in Belarus, all independent media is classified as "extremist", including DW. Some left "incorrect" comments on the web, campaigned for the "wrong" candidate in the 2020 elections, made donations or sent parcels to political prisoners. The list of "extremist" offenses is long. For example, a company that produced jewelry pendants in the shape of a map of Belarus was recently labeled "extremist." In recent months, the regime has released political prisoners in small groups — more than 300 people in total. In June 2025, this included Siarhei Tsikhanouski, blogger and husband of the leader of the Belarusian democratic forces, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. He was released from custody on the day Alexander Lukashenko met with US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Keith Kellogg. The Belarusian regime makes no secret of the fact that it would release political prisoners in exchange for concessions from the West. Lukashenko declared on July 31 that he was prepared to hand over several thousand people. "If you want them, take them! What do you offer in return?" he wrote after talks with the US delegation. Artyom Shraibman believes the West could do more to support people in Belarusian prisons. "It could negotiate more actively for the release of these people and offer Lukashenko concessions in terms of his reputation and diplomacy — phone calls, visits and contacts." In theory, Western countries could go even further, he said, and "consider lifting some sanctions in order to reach a kind of exchange with Lukashenko to end the migration crisis and release political prisoners." But the expert said that such steps would be unlikely to radically change the situation in Belarus. Instead, they could change the prospects of individual victims of this regime. Their fates are largely in the hands of the West. However, since Belarus has not been and is not a priority, there has been no sign of serious willingness to get involved so far.

Fact check: Has Cambodia used border temple as an army base? – DW – 08/07/2025
Fact check: Has Cambodia used border temple as an army base? – DW – 08/07/2025

DW

time3 days ago

  • DW

Fact check: Has Cambodia used border temple as an army base? – DW – 08/07/2025

After a ceasefire with Thailand was agreed at the end of July, the Cambodian army has been accused on social media of using an ancient temple in the Emerald Triangle as a military base. DW Fact Check takes a look. In the region known as the Emerald Triangle, the border area where Laos, Cambodia and Thailand meet, the long-standing border dispute between the latter two has flared up again. At the heart of the century-old conflict are contested border lines and competing claims to several temple sites. Thailand and Cambodia share a border over 800 kilometers (500 miles) long, the placement of which is partly a remnant of colonial times. Several temples in this border region are highly valued and claimed by both countries, spurring disputes since the 20th century. The conflict escalated significantly in 2008 when Cambodia nominated the 1,000-year-old Hindu temple Preah Vihear/Phra Viharn to become a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The move was contested by Thailand and triggered violent clashes. Most recently, on July 24, fighting erupted again in the region and resulted in over 30 deaths to date and more than 200,000 people displaced. A ceasefire has been in effect since July 28, though there have been reports of ceasefire violations. Following the heightened tensions and media attention, recent posts on social media have accused Cambodia of using ancient temples for military purposes. DW Fact Check investigates one viral claim. Claim: "Everyone, please spread the news. Cambodia is using ancient sites as military bases, building bunkers, violating international conventions, and breaching UNESCO principles!!!!!", a user claimed on X on July 31. The post is accompanied by two photographs and a text making a similar claim. It has more than 1 million views and is one of multiple similar posts shared on X, like this one, and on other platforms like Facebook, Instagram or YouTube. The text accompanying the two photographs reads "Sacred Heritage Site Turned into Military Base – A Clear Violation of International Conventions". It also includes the hashtag "Prasat Ta Kwai", which is the name of a temple in the border region. But what exactly do the photographs show? DW Fact Check: Unproven A Google reverse image search reveals that the images had already been published online months ago, like here on Facebook in April 2025. It also shows that posts with the images came up again and went viral two days after the ceasefire agreement. We found similar images of the temple and its name: Prasat Ta Krabay/Prasat Ta Khwai. With this information were able to geolocate the temple: A search on Google Street View allowed us to replicate the angle from where the images were taken almost exactly, as the following screenshots show. While we could not fully determine the context of the earlier images, we could confirm that the photographs in the claim show Prasat Ta Krabay/Prasat Ta Khwai. However, they do not depict the current situation. The images from Google Street View, which are dated November 2013, do show military personnel at the temple site. One of them seems to wear a patch on his right arm with the Cambodian national flag on it. Next to the Prasat Preah Vihear/Prasat Phra Viharn, another ancient temple called the Ta Muan Thom is also at the center of the unrest. According to , these ancient sites have witnessed repeated military clashessince they are in contested territories, and both nations maintain military forces close by to guard them. Pavin Chachavalpongpun, professor at Kyoto University's Centre for Southeast Asian Studies and co-author of (2013), confirmed to DW that ancient temples have been used for military purposes in the Thai-Cambodian conflict, especially in the Emerald Triangle region. Chachavalpongpun writes: "Many of these Khmer temples, such as Prasat Ta Krabey and Prasat Ta Muan Thom, are situated atop the high ridges of the Dangrek Mountains, a natural border. This elevated position offers a clear vantage point, making them valuable for observation and defense." The symbolic significance of these sites for national identity and heritage is also an important reason for stationing troops there. Through this, Chachavalpongpun explains, "each country asserts its sovereignty over the disputed territory, effectively transforming a cultural landmark into a militarized frontier and a flashpoint for conflict." There have been numerous reports and photographic evidence (like here and here) of Thai and Cambodian forces building bunkers in the Preah Vihear site and other temples. "This construction is a direct consequence of using these cultural sites as military positions, as it provides shelter and a strategic advantage for the occupying forces," said Chachavalpongpun. However, DW has found no concrete proof of whether Prasat Ta Krabay/Prasat Ta Khwai has been used as a full military base or bunker in recent days. Doing this could damage these culturally important places. Whereas Preah Vihear was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2008, Prasat Ta Krabay/Prasat Ta Khwai is not. Still, international humanitarian law protects cultural property and prohibits its use for military purposes. Chachavalpongpun writes: "By using a temple as a military base, a country not only exposes a protected cultural site to the risk of damage from armed conflict but also risks losing its protected status. In the case of a UNESCO World Heritage Site like Prasat Preah Vihear, such military use is a direct violation of the principles under which it was listed." The 1972 UNESCO World Heritage convention aims to protect natural and cultural heritage of "outstanding universal value." The transformation of such sites into militarized zones clearly contravenes this.

Trump's 'Dividend' Promise For Americans Leaves Open Questions
Trump's 'Dividend' Promise For Americans Leaves Open Questions

Int'l Business Times

time3 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump's 'Dividend' Promise For Americans Leaves Open Questions

If Donald Trump is to be believed, millions of Americans could receive a financial slice of the fortunes generated by the US president's sweeping tariffs. But the eyebrow-raising suggestion from a leader with a flair for creating headlines is largely opaque -- with key questions left open about how the giveaway would be funded. Trump himself has acknowledged the difficulty in splashing cash at a time when the United States faces crushing debt. "We have so much money coming in, we are thinking about a little rebate," Trump said last month, "but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt." He has since referred to the so-called rebate as a "dividend," and said it could be for "people that would be middle income people and lower income people." His idea has, naturally, roused interest. Republican Senator Josh Hawley introduced a bill in July that would see $600 checks sent to each adult and dependent child in American families. Trump has a track record in dishing out money -- or at least taking the credit for it. During the Covid pandemic, he insisted that his name be put on government checks distributed to tens of millions of Americans as financial support. Trump's latest plan raises a key question: How will it be financed? The United States faces a national deficit that worsened from October to June compared to the same period a year earlier. That was despite a rise in revenue generated by tariffs that Trump has slapped on dozens of US trading partners. Handing out cash to Americans would add to the deficit and increase the country's debt, which was at more than $36.8 trillion by early August. Trump, when explaining his dividend idea, has claimed the United States is raking in trillions of dollars from other countries thanks to his protectionist agenda. The Republican has also cited large investments promised by Japan and the European Union -- deals that coincided with agreements on US tariffs. But foreign leaders paint a different picture. Japan, for example, has stated that its $550 billion pledge will largely be in the form of loans and guarantees -- certainly not just hard cash. And Trump's claims about the revenue generated by tariffs can also be misleading. The president claims -- wrongly -- that tariffs are paid by foreign countries to the US government. Yet, in reality, it is importers in the United States that are on the hook. Most economists note that American consumers therefore end up paying more as businesses, facing rising costs, raise prices on their products.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store