
Structural concerns loom despite macro strength: Jigar Mistry
Nifty 4Q earnings
, they are up like 7-7.5% YoY, but it was almost entirely driven by banks and lending institutions, across the board, especially in the mid and smallcap the earning recovery is absolutely elusive which is a cause of concern for many of them," says
Jigar Mistry
, Co-Founder,
Buoyant Capital
.
The markets are also looking good because, of late, we are just building on to that gains, believe that the worry around the Trump tariff tantrums as well as the slowdown everything is just abating away. Give us some sense what are you pencilling in for the markets and the bigger question is, is this up move sustainable? Share your thoughts.
Jigar Mistry:
It is a dichotomous situation if I am being honest because see, clearly India is a macro darling in an otherwise turbulent world. But frankly earnings recovery is very elusive even as we speak. So, if I pencil in what we are looking at from a macro standpoint, then very clearly the CPI inflation is benign in India. We are around 4-4.5%, that looks fairly okay.
Secondly, with the crude prices coming off and rupee appreciating, you are arguably looking at a trillion INR in saving from the entire economic standpoint that would obviously get dispersed differently. And thirdly, even the CAD, BOP is fairly stable and that gives you an impression that in an otherwise volatile world, turbulent world, India stands out. However, that is not translating fully into how the earnings are panning out.
So, if I look at Nifty 4Q earnings, they are up like 7-7.5% YoY, but it was almost entirely driven by banks and lending institutions, across the board, especially in the mid and smallcap the earning recovery is absolutely elusive which is a cause of concern for many of them.
Secondly, if you look at the retail behaviour, that is also very confounding because on one hand there is more money
Live Events
coming into SIPs, but on the another if you look at the SIP cancellation number, that is at a fairly high number.
And when you look at the Demat account and do the analysis thereof, you find that there has been a direct selling that is going on in the retail accounts and the discontinuation in SIPs are the ones that opened in 2021, 2022. It eventually all boils down to flows and not as much fundamentals. If you look at the rupee appreciation, then that means that FII money has returned back to India since about a month or so.
Domestic liquidity continues to be high and sadly, a lot of that money is again going into sort of all the narrative stocks which is a little bit surprising. So, net-net I would say flows are strong, earnings have to catch up if we want to sustain at the levels that we are at.
While you did speak about the global factors at play and also earnings, but I want to get your broader view on earnings, like about the ongoing Q4 earning season. Are there any early signs of upgrades or downgrades given how the earnings have been so far, any particular sectors that you would like to discuss and help us understand that could see upgrades going forward?
Jigar Mistry:
So, this all sort of began from April to June quarter last year. Now, obviously with the onset of general elections and given the large scale of that exercise, you started seeing a generic slowdown starting from that point and we have almost completed the year with a single-digit growth on the headline indices.
Now the belief system if you look at it like one view of thought is that India pretty much like we saw during COVID, in COVID we did clearly really report a FY20 drop and then in FY21 sort of relay back, very similarly one view of thought is that you should see the current situation in a similar light which is that we do not really see the slowdown in F25 and then do not really talk about the run-up in F26 and we rather look at F24 to F26 and then gauge on which sectors are doing well versus others.
With that standpoint, optically speaking F26 should start seeing some bit of recovery starting next quarter itself because April, May, June last year was a wash out quarter, that is one view of thought.
The other view of thought is that we have actually entered a structural issue which we need to understand.
Unless you start seeing recovery in a lot sectors, it is difficult to believe on where the recovery would come from, that is point one point. Point two, there is some shift even from the policy level in India, so India did phenomenally well to curtail the fiscal deficit from 4.9% to 4.4%, but that has come as by pushing the capex out states, we analysed the past 16 states that went into elections and we have noted that their capex has slowed down to 4.5% negative. Now, centre and state capex and PSU was driving majority of the growth and that might be a little more challenging now.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
Chip in now
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. Trump delaying tariffs on China while targeting India shows our lack of strategic tech and manufacturing The chip war between US and China is back on the table with Washington reportedly working out a deal to take 15% from the sale of Nvidia's and AMD's AI chips to China. This effectively makes US govt a business partner to Nvidia and AMD, and comes after Washington allowed resumption of chip sales to China. The latter had been halted by Trump in April as part of his trade tussle with Beijing. However, he was forced to lift the ban after China retaliated with its own ban on rare earth exports to US. Beijing has now sent notices to Chinese companies discouraging the use of Nvidia chips citing security concerns. Parallelly, however, US and China have decided to extend their tariff truce till Nov. This is in stark contrast to Trump's approach to India, which is now facing the prospect of 50% tariff on its exports to US. The entire episode holds out two key lessons. First, the tech war is here to stay. Whether it's US chip sales to China or China trying to undermine tech manufacturing in India as highlighted by its recent pullout of Chinese engineers from Foxconn's India plants, this is a strategic sector that every country will try to leverage or weaponise. And with the advent of AI, India's expertise in software and coding is no longer that attractive. Therefore, India must not waver in its determination to master bedrock tech like semiconductor manufacturing and design, as well as AI. Countries like Estonia are integrating AI in their education systems. Plus, the recent spat between Elon Musk and OpenAI boss Sam Altman over listing in Apple's App Store shows how fiercely companies are competing over AI tech. India must not lag behind. Second, Trump's targeting India with big tariffs because he feels it doesn't have anything strategic to offer. That's not the case with China given its manufacturing muscle. Similarly, Taiwan's cutting-edge semiconductor industry makes it vital to tech supply chains, and therefore, a prime candidate for tariff exemptions. India too needs to cement a crucial spot in global manufacturing by investing heavily in domestic R&D, technical education and AI. It's work that can't be delayed. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.


Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Bessent Warned on Ethics Compliance, Granted Extension to Divest
(Bloomberg) -- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been granted an extension after failing to fully divest all his assets in compliance with an ethics agreement, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg. The Office of Government Ethics, or OGE, gave Bessent until Dec. 15 to complete the divestiture of assets he identified ahead of his confirmation by the Senate earlier this year. A Treasury spokesperson said the date was mutually agreed upon by Bessent, the office of Treasury ethics and OGE. Bessent said in a statement that those remaining assets represent 4% of his required divestitures and that he is working toward selling them before the end of the year. He said much of the remaining assets are farmland, 'an inherently illiquid asset.' 'Serving President Trump and the American people is the honor of a lifetime,' Bessent said in an emailed statement. 'I gladly divested from more than 90% of the assets I was required to sell before I even assumed office.' 'I am committed to full transparency and disclosure in my personal finances,' he said. Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, was nominated by Trump in November 2024 and confirmed by the Senate on January 28. He disclosed assets worth at least $521 million in his personal financial disclosure, which was made public by OGE ahead of his confirmation hearing. The total value of his portfolio is potentially worth far more, as nominees list the value of their assets within broad ranges that top out at 'over $50,000,000.' The Treasury secretary's failure to fully divest by an earlier deadline in April was cited in a letter sent Monday by OGE to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, signed by the agency's Deputy Director for Compliance Dale Christopher. Christopher subsequently wrote to Crapo again Wednesday, setting out the December timeline and saying that Bessent will continue to recuse himself from matters that could involve the undivested assets. A Treasury spokesperson said Bessent has already divested from 96% of the assets slated to be sold by the end of the year and that more than 90% of the $1 billion in total divestitures were made before January 20. Treasury ethics officials said Bessent's remaining undivested assets 'are illiquid and are not readily marketable,' the second Christopher letter reads, in part. 'They add that excluding the farmlands, the assets also have significant restrictions on who can acquire them.' The letters were first reported by the New York Times. Bessent has made reference in public appearances to the farmland he owns in North Dakota, sometimes referring to himself as a farmer or saying that he listens to farm radio. In addition to the farmland, he has also disclosed stakes in a private equity fund, a privately held sparkling water company and a privately held clinical stage drug development company. --With assistance from Bill Allison. More stories like this are available on


India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Harvard, Trump administration near $500M deal to end funding dispute
Harvard University is close to a deal with the Trump administration that would require the Ivy League school to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and end ongoing investigations, according to a person familiar with the the framework remains under discussion with significant gaps to close, both sides have agreed on the payment amount, and a settlement could be finalised in the coming weeks, the person told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Harvard declined to agreement would conclude a months-long battle testing the limits of federal authority over US universities. What began as a probe into campus antisemitism escalated into a wider feud after the administration cut more than $2.6 billion in research funding, terminated federal contracts, and sought to block Harvard from hosting international students. Harvard filed two lawsuits accusing the administration of illegal retaliation after rejecting demands it said threatened academic freedom. Details of the proposed settlement were first reported by The New York finalised, the $500 million payment would be the largest yet in the administration's efforts to secure financial penalties from elite universities. Columbia University previously agreed to pay $200 million to restore federal funding, while Brown University agreed to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development groups. The destination of Harvard's potential payment has not been determined, the source Trump has pushed to overhaul prestigious universities he calls 'bastions of liberal ideology,' targeting Harvard more than any other. The school, the wealthiest in the US, has an endowment valued at $53 than a dozen Harvard alumni in Congress, all Democrats, warned the university on Aug. 1 that settling could trigger 'rigorous Congressional oversight and enquiry.' They argued that yielding to political demands would set a 'dangerous precedent' for higher education nationwide.- EndsWith inputs from Associated Press Must Watch