
Aiming a blow at narcos, Colombia pays farmers to uproot coca
Among the beneficiaries are Alirio Caicedo and his son Nicolas, who a decade ago planted an expanse of coca as they staked their future on the continued patronage of criminal gangs.
Today, they are uprooting the crops and hoping for the best.
The Caicedos and some 4,000 other Colombian families have entered into a pact with the government to replace their coca with alternative crops such as cocoa and coffee.
It is part of a $14.4 million project to reduce supply of a product blamed for untold misery in a country where armed groups force rural communities to grow coca and raze forests for its cultivation.
The project seeks to eradicate coca production on 45,000 hectares in three of Colombia's most conflict-riddled regions, including the southwestern Micay Canyon where the Caicedos ply their trade in the Argelia municipality.
For farmers it is a risk.
They cannot be sure that their new plantations coffee in the Caicedos' case will succeed, or that guerrillas and other groups whose income depend on cocaine sales will leave them in peace.
"When one is planting a coca plant, there is hope that in time... there will be a harvest and there will be some income," Nicolas Caicedo, 44, told AFP while he and his dad, 77, shoveled and tugged at the remaining coca shrubs on their property.
"Uprooting the plants means that... there will be no more harvests in other words, no more money," from coca at least.
With coca, the Caicedos said they were guaranteed an income of about $800 per month.
They have received an initial payment of about $300 under the project to grow coffee, with more to come.
But another farmer, who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity, said he doubted the project could work in areas such as Argelia where illegal groups outnumber the state in terms of fighters and guns.
"No armed group that lives off is going to want a farmer to stop growing coca and switch to coffee," he said.
Gustavo Petro, Colombia's first-ever leftist president, took office in 2022 with the goal of extricating his country from the US-led "war on drugs" blamed for double-victimization of rural Colombians already living under the yoke of violent criminal groups.
On his watch, cocaine production in Colombia the world's biggest exporter of the drug reached record levels as demand continues to grow in Europe and the United States the principal consumer.
Several previous attempts to get Colombian coca producers to change crops have failed as armed groups caused havoc and government payments and other assistance eventually dried up.
For Gloria Miranda, head of Colombia's illegal crop substitution program, told AFP would be naive to think this new program will end drug trafficking "as long as there is a market of 20 million consumers and it remains illegal."
In his stated quest for "total peace," Petro has sought to negotiate with a variety of armed groups, meaning fewer military operations and the abandonment of forced coca eradication.
But talks have mostly broken down, and the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House in January has ramped up pressure on Bogota.
The Trump administration is reviewing Colombia's certification as an ally in the fight against drugs a move that could restrict millions of dollars in military aid.
With high stakes for its crop replacement gamble, observers fear the government may be taken advantage of.
Some farmers may "try to deceive" by taking the money while continuing to grow coca, Argelia government secretary Pablo Daza told AFP.
Without adequate monitoring, "the chances are quite high that we are wasting money," added Emilio Archila, who oversaw a similar, failed, project under former President Ivan Duque.
Miranda assures there will be "meticulous" satellite monitoring, and anyone found not to be complying will be expelled from the program.
Used not only for cocaine, the coca leaf is also chewed as a stimulant in Andean countries or brewed into a tea thought to combat altitude sickness.
Colombia's appeals for the leaf to be removed from a UN list of harmful narcotics so it can be commercialized in alternative products such as fertilizers or beverages, have so far fallen on deaf ears.
das/als/mr/mlr/dw

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump-Putin summit: Legacy of US-Russia personal diplomacy
The summit between President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin, held on August 15, 2025, at Alaska's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson, stands out both for its symbolic significance and the formidable challenges it sought to address. Set against the backdrop of Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine, this rare meeting marked Putin's first official visit to the US in a decade and the first time a Russian leader engaged in direct, high-level talks with the US on American soil since before the 2022 invasion. The stakes were immense: Russia's pariah status, underscored by an ICC arrest warrant for Putin, cast a shadow over the proceedings, while Trump, recently returned to office, aimed to demonstrate his capacity as a dealmaker and peacemaker in the world's most intractable conflict. US President Donald Trump (Bloomberg) Preparations for the summit were meticulous, signaling both the seriousness and the tension surrounding the event. Putin's travel route was shrouded in secrecy, a stark contrast to traditional state visits, and the presence of fighter jets and heightened security underscored both the risk and the hoped-for breakthrough. The meeting itself was staged with diplomatic choreography, red carpet, military courtesies, and a star-studded team that included US secretary of state Marco Rubio and Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov joining the expanded discussions after an initial one-on-one session between Trump and Putin. The central agenda was ambitious yet sharply focused: seeking a ceasefire or at least a significant de-escalation in Ukraine. Reports suggest Trump played the role of mediator and negotiator, pushing for terms that could bring about a pause in fighting. However, the outcome reflected the entrenched complexity of the situation. Despite productive talks, both sides candidly acknowledged that a comprehensive agreement had not been reached. Trump, in his post-meeting remarks, emphasized ongoing dialogue with NATO allies and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and projected confidence that discussions would yield fruit eventually. Putin, while highlighting new understandings, reiterated his view that direct US-Russia talks were long overdue but left specifics purposefully vague. The historical echoes of this summit are unavoidable. From the dramatic Reykjavik meeting between Reagan and Gorbachev in 1986, where the world teetered on the edge of a sweeping nuclear disarmament breakthrough, to the tense, sometimes secretive, Cold War summits held at key junctures, high-level dialogue has always reflected both hope and peril. More recently, Trump and Putin's own summit in Helsinki in 2018 raised hackles among allies for its secretive tone and ambiguous outcomes, a template not unlike what unfolded in Anchorage. The pattern of personal engagement, leaders attempting to bypass layers of diplomatic bureaucracy has carried the dual risks of unpredictable breakthroughs and missed opportunities for substantive, lasting change. International reaction to the Alaska summit mixed cautious relief with skepticism. Allies in Europe and officials in Kyiv closely scrutinised the proceedings, wary that any perceived softening of US policy might embolden Russia or weaken Ukraine's position. Markets, particularly those intertwined with Russia's sanctioned energy sector, closely monitored every announcement, as India and other oil importers faced immediate commercial consequences when Trump signaled stricter US tariffs on Russian oil as a negotiating tool. Yet, despite the media's breathless coverage and the leaders' attempts to cast the summit as 'historic,' critics, especially in Ukraine and opposition circles in the West, lamented that the lack of a breakthrough risked being interpreted as a lifeline for Putin's ongoing military campaign. At its core, the Alaska summit laid bare the limits of leader-driven diplomacy. While face-to-face meetings can serve as vital channels for communication, particularly when broader relations have sunk to historic lows, the notion that complex, entrenched conflicts can be resolved by force of personality alone has rarely withstood the test of time. History warns us that the substance behind the symbolism is what ultimately shapes outcomes. The 2025 Trump-Putin meeting, for all its drama and significance, ended with more questions than answers and illustrated the stubborn durability of deep strategic divides. Both leaders returned home claiming some measure of progress, but substantive change, true ceasefire, withdrawal of troops, or a broader strategic realignment, remained as elusive as ever. Ultimately, the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska joins a long and often fraught lineage of US-Russia summits: Moments where the spotlight of diplomacy is brightest, but the shadows of history often prove formidable. Whether future rounds will yield real transformation or more choreography depends not just on the willingness of powerful men to talk, but on their capacity and credibility to forge peace from conflict. This article is authored by Kamakshi Wason, global COO and director, academic programme, Tillotoma Foundation, Kolkata.


The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Justice Sudershan Reddy, a man of the masses, says Speaker Appavu
Justifying the DMK's decision to support joint Opposition parties' Vice-Presidential candidate Sudershan Reddy, a 'man of the masses', Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker M. Appavu has slammed the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance for reposing its faith in a 'RSS man', who has done nothing good for Tamil Nadu and the Tamils even though he is from this State. After garlanding the statue of freedom fighter Ondieervan at the memorial in Palayamkottai on Wednesday, Mr. Appavu said, Justice Reddy had passed a judgment that the governments, while taking back the lands assigned to the poor after a period, should ensure the disbursal of all compensation applicable to other patta lands, including compensation for structures if any created on the land. His judgment also paved way for the constitution of Special Investigation Team to retrieve the black money stashed in foreign banks. When Ambani brothers fought over winning the rights for oil and gas exploration in Krishna Godhavari Basin, Justice Sudershan Reddy's judgment stopped their attempt by giving the rights to Oil and Natural Gas Commission, a public sector undertaking. His ruling in 2010 on this issue led to Mukesh Ambani paying a hefty fine a couple of years ago. On the question of supporting Mr. Radhakrishnan, a Tamilian, the Speaker wondered if the BJP leaders from Tamil Nadu, including Union Minister L. Murugan and party's State president Nainar Nagenthiran had done anything good for the State and the Tamils. 'Will Mr. Radhakrishnan, if elected, take any effective step to permanently end the frequent attacks on the Tamil fishermen by the SriLankan navy? What did Mr. Murugan and Mr. Nainar Nagenthiran do to get Tamil Nadu's share of ₹2,151 crore under the Samagra Siksha Abhiyan from the Union Government?,' Mr. Appavu asked. On the Bill introduced in the Parliament on Wednesday by Home Minister Amit Shah empowering the Governors to sack Chief Ministers and the Ministers if they were held on serious charges and kept in custody for 30 days, the Speaker replied that it was nothing but ploy by the BJP government at the Centre to crush political opponents troubling the Union Government.


Economic Times
35 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Russian diplomat Babushkin 'quite hopeful' for India-Russia-China trilateral meet
Synopsis Russian diplomat Roman Babushkin expressed optimism about resuming the India-Russia-China trilateral dialogue, emphasizing its importance for regional stability amidst global challenges. He highlighted upcoming SCO summit engagements and dismissed narrow interpretations of the recent Russia-US summit in Alaska, stressing its broader aim of restoring diplomatic relations. ANI "Quite Hopeful": Russian diplomat Babushkin on India-Russia-China trilateral meet The Charge d'Affaires at the Russian Embassy in Delhi, Roman Babushkin, on Wednesday, expressed optimism about the resumption of the India-Russia-China trilateral format, describing it as a vital step toward regional stability. Speaking at a press briefing here in the national capital, Babushkin underscored the strategic importance of the dialogue, signalling hope for the revival of the trilateral format amid the growing global issues, particularly on the backdrop of the economic complexities due to the US's tariff imposition. "As far as the three-letter is concerned, we are quite hopeful that this format will be resumed sooner rather than later because its importance is not questioned. But we should wait until the right time comes. We would welcome these developments because they proved their efficiency when we had regular interaction at the ministerial level and even at the leaders' level," he stated."It is all about the regional stability of the region, which is mostly dependent on how the relations between the three countries, the largest countries in the region, Russia, India and China, are developing," he was referring to the RIC framework, initiated in the late 1990s among the three largest countries in the region. He also highlighted the upcoming diplomatic engagements in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, which is scheduled to take place from August 31 to September 1 at Tianjin, China. "We are all preparing to attend the SCO summit at the highest political level. Recently, in the engagements with the Chinese Foreign Minister, the Indian side confirmed the participation of the Prime Minister's attendance at the summit. There are also reports that the EU is preparing for a bilateral meeting between Prime Minister Modi and President Putin," he on the recent Russia-US summit in Alaska on August 15, Babushkin dismissed speculation, calling it a "breakthrough development" in global cautioned against reducing the summit to a single issue, particularly the Russia-Ukirane conflict and stressed that the talks were broad in scope, aimed at restoring fractured diplomatic relations between the two global powers."There are so many rumours and speculations about this summit in Alaska, which took place on the 15th of August. In fact, it was a breakthrough development, because you would see the leaders of the leading global powers sitting together and having a very warm, deep and very prolonged conversation. The agenda was a diversified one. We are absolutely not about to link it to just one particular question. We talk about the restoration of relations between Russia and the US. And for that, rebuilding trust is one of the most significant tasks," he also mentioned reports, based on US President Trump's assessments, that suggested the US may reconsider imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on India for New Delhi purchase of Russian oil; however, he noted that these reports were still unconfirmed."And as far as we heard here in the mission after this meeting, which was, according to assessments by President Trump, very successful and very positive, I think I heard that he decided not to impose an extra 25 per cent on India, according to media reports. I didn't see other reports," he stated.