Language row: Whose tongue is it anyway?
In the language business, north Indian politicians usually propose to replace English, the working language of the British Raj, with Hindi, the language in which governments after independence hoped to bind together the states, which were demarcated on linguistic basis. Indira Gandhi established the department of official language in the 1970s to give teeth to the Official Language Act, 1963. Its core project was to promote Hindi in the work of the Union government. The first step was to create vocabularies to describe the functions and processes of government.
Words like nyayalaya (court) were not in common use in the 1970s. The Urdu adalat prevailed. And newfangled terms like urja mantri (minister for energy) sounded unnatural. Delhi's governments had always relied on English, Urdu and Persian to conduct affairs of the state. Now, a new Hindi vocabulary had to be assembled quickly―and awkwardly. The news on state-controlled media baffled millions. State-sanctioned school curriculums featured monstrosities like vismaya dibodhakchinh, Hindi for the exclamation mark. Only a language bureaucrat could have dreamed that one up.
But yesteryears' monsters are now familiar friends. Across the land, we know what a nyayalaya is. Sporadically, political leaders from Devi Lal to members of the present government have even sought to make technical education accessible in Hindi, But the task of making up a fresh vocabulary is challenging. What's the Hindi for albedo? For the sternocleidomastoid muscle? It's better to teach children English, the language in which most of the world's useful knowledge is encoded today. The children of so many people in government have been educated in precisely that language, often overseas, and they do not want to be ashamed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
a minute ago
- Hans India
What happened in Parliament would bring shame to any civilised society: BJP on Trinamool MPs tearing, throwing Bills at HM
New Delhi: A major uproar broke out in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday after Opposition MPs, including members of the Trinamool Congress, tore and hurled copies of three key bills towards Union Home Minister Amit Shah while he was introducing them. The BJP has strongly condemned the incident, calling it a 'shameful act that would bring disgrace to any civilised society.' BJP MP and actor-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut said the Opposition's conduct had crossed all limits of parliamentary propriety. 'What we witnessed in Parliament today is something that would bring shame to any civilised society. When our Home Minister Amit Shah was proposing a bill, Opposition leaders tried to snatch away his microphone. Worse still, they tore the bill and threw it at his face. Some even came with stones and hurled them. But our party showed patience,' she added. BJP MP Aparajita Sarangi termed the behaviour 'truly unfortunate.' 'Opposition members created a ruckus from their seats and then crossed every line of decorum. Several women MPs and TMC members attempted to attack the Home Minister. They tore copies of the bill and hurled them in his direction. This was not dissent—it was an attack,' she said. BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj also described the scenes as 'nothing less than the murder of democracy.' 'Trinamool Congress MPs, particularly one of their women MPs, tried to snatch the microphone, tore pages, and threw them in the House. This act has embarrassed the voters, the public, and the very spirit of democracy. The BJP strongly condemns such behaviour," she told IANS. BJP leader Annpurna Devi also denounced the incident. 'The entire country is watching. The conduct displayed today, especially by Trinamool Congress members, was extremely inappropriate. Even senior and respected MPs behaved in this unruly manner when the Home Minister was presenting the Bill. The Opposition claims ruling party MPs also attacked them, but that is false. We were only standing, not attacking. What they did was against every norm of parliamentary decorum,' she said. The chaos unfolded as Union Home Minister Amit Shah tabled the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025, and amendments to the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. The first bill seeks automatic removal of Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and Union Ministers facing corruption or serious criminal charges if held for 30 consecutive days. Opposition MPs strongly opposed the move, tearing copies of the bills and shouting slogans. Amid the ruckus, Amit Shah proposed that the bills be referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament for further examination.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
Want to become a US citizen? Donald Trump wants you to have ‘good moral character'. But what does that mean?
Want to become a citizen of the United States? Having a 'good moral character' has long been considered one of the criteria for citizenship. However, now the administration of US President Donald Trump has expanded on the definition. But what has changed? What do experts think? Having a 'good moral character' has long been considered one of the criteria for US citizenship. Reuters Want to become a citizen of the United States? Having a 'good moral character' has long been considered one of the criteria for citizenship. However, now the administration of US President Donald Trump has told officials to expand on the definition. But what happened? What are the changes one needs to be cognisant of? Let's take a closer look: What happened? First let's briefly take a look at the 'good moral character' requirement for citizenship. This stipulation was added after the US passed the 1790 Naturalization Act. This had long been interpreted to mean that a person has no criminal convictions against him or her – for example murders, felonies and genocide. However, drink driving, for example, can also be a disqualifier. Those wanting to apply to become a citizen must show that they have undergone rehabilitation. This citizenship test is usually given to green card holders who have been in the country between three and five years and who want to become American citizens – a process known as naturalisation. Other than showing 'good moral character', those wanting to become citizens must also clear English and civics tests. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the change in policy in a memo on Friday. The agency ordered its employees to do a more complete and 'holistic' assessment of applicants' 'good moral character'. This includes being involved in their local community, positive contributions to the US, having family ties, having a long employment history, being a lawful resident of the us for a long time and paying taxes. The agency asked employees to consider applicants' 'positive attributes and not simply the absence of misconduct.' The applicant must show their character is 'commensurate with the standards of average citizens of the community in which the alien resides.' Officers have been told to bar applicants if they have committed 'any other acts that are contrary to the average behaviour of citizens in the jurisdiction where aliens reside. This even if those acts are 'technically lawful.' USCIS has also said it will check prospective citizens and visa applicants for 'anti-Americanism,' and in particular 'antisemitic ideologies' including their behaviour on social media. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has also said it will check prospective citizens and visa applicants for 'anti-Americanism,' and in particular 'antisemitic ideologies' including their behaviour on social media. AFP 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' USCIS chief spokesperson Matthew Tragesser said on Tuesday. '[USCIS] is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right,' he added. 'USCIS is adding a new element to the naturalization process that ensures America's newest citizens not only embrace America's culture, history, and language but who also demonstrate Good Moral Character,' Tragesser earlier said. 'US citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship—it should only be offered to the world's best of the best.' What do experts say? That this is the latest move from Trump to attempt to restrict immigration to the United States. Trump has also taken aim at birthright citizenship which he has vowed to do away with. Since 2015, anywhere from 600,000 to 1 million immigrants have become US citizens every year. There are around 25 million naturalised citizens in the US. Critics say the Trump administration is trying to keep the keep the number of people who enter the US and become naturalised citizens in check. 'They're trying to increase the grounds for denial of US citizenship by kind of torturing the definition of good moral character to encompass extremely harmless behaviour,' Doug Rand, a former senior USCIS official who worked in the Biden Administration, told CBS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Gabriel J Chin, a University of California, Davis, law professor, told The Washington Post that new USCIS guidance is 'so loose and discretionary that it is obviously susceptible to arbitrary enforcement.' 'Many birthright US citizens do not have sufficient educational or economic achievements that would entitle them to a visa to immigrate to the United States,' said Chin. 'If they had not been born here, they would not make the cut'. Some in the Trump administration have propounded 'the Great Replacement theory' – a conspiracy advanced by many on the far-right that accuses shadowy elitist figures of seeking to replace white citizens with non-white immigrants. While Trump has never explicitly referred to this theory, he has consistently put down immigrants, particularly from South American nations as 'animals' and 'rapists'. He has also repeatedly said that America is at risk of being invaded and its culture lost. 'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome,' Jane Lilly Lopez, an associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University, said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Experts say that this is the latest move from Donald Trump to attempt to restrict immigration to the United States. Trump has also taken aim at birthright citizenship which he has vowed to do away with. AFP Lopez said the development 'make it harder for noncitizens to obtain legal belonging in the United States' because officers have to 'evaluate something they cannot consistently describe or define.' Trump has also threatened to denaturalise US citizens – most prominently Elon Musk and Zoran Mandani. However, denaturalisation can only be done under the strictest of terms. The Trump administration has also cracked down on college students protesting against Israel's actions in Gaza under the guise of 'anti-Semitism'. The Trump administration has also vowed to deport 'pro-Hamas students'. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student with a green card, has already been deported for advocating for Palestinian rights. Meanwhile, Rümeysa Öztürk, a student from Turkey, was taken into custody by the government for writing an op-ed saying that her college should 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide' and cut all ties with Israel. A judge ordered Öztürk to be released after finding that the government had no grounds to hold her in custody, STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What does this mean? It means that if you are planning to apply for the United States for visa or a citizenship, the last thing you should do is criticise President Donald Trump on social media. Or even worse, take aim at Israel over the unfolding events in Gaza. This, of course, is steeped in irony given that Trump himself is a convicted felon. Trump in May 2024 was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records during the 2016 presidential election. Trump did so to cover up an affair with a porn star Karen McDougal, with whom he had carried on at a time when his wife Melania had just given birth to their son Baron. Trump also is the first president to enter office as a convict. A New York judge found Trump civilly liable for sexual abuse and defamation of E Jean Carroll. Trump also has been credibly accused of sexual harassment by dozens of women. Trump has also claimed that the late Jeffrey Epstein, who ran a sex trafficking ring, was a good friend for many years. The two men are said to have had a falling out. Trump has since distanced himself from the late disgraced financier. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump isn't exactly in a position to be the arbiter of moral standards, that has not deterred his administration from trying to do so anyway. Israel, meanwhile, is more and more being widely accused by experts of conducting a genocide in Gaza. The International Court of Justice has issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Experts are warning that Gaza faces a starvation crisis. Over 60,000 Palestinians are said to have died since the war in Gaza began according to the Palestinian Health Ministry. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
Wasim Akram responds to backlash against India vs Pakistan Asia Cup 2025 fixture: ‘Let's not go below the belt'
As the debate over whether India should play the upcoming Asia Cup 2025 encounter against Pakistan is open, former Pakistan pacer Wasim Akram has conveyed the stance of Pakistan on the matter. While the phase of speculations around the Team India squad finally culminated on Tuesday, when the BCCI chief selector Ajit Agarkar and T20I captain Suryakumar Yadav announced the 15-member unit for the upcoming Asia Cup 2025, the burning question about the tournament remains, and it has nothing to do with the squad. As the multi-nation tournament features both India and Pakistan, who are grouped together, it raises a contentious question, should India play Pakistan in the Asia Cup 2025? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD BCCI in major dilemma Given the ongoing tensions between the two nations following the gruesome Pahalgam terror attack, which prompted India to launch Operation Sindoor, a military operation against Pakistan, the prevailing opinion on social media and mainstream media is that India should not engage with Pakistan in any sector, be it trade or sports. Since the tournament schedule is already set, which requires the approval of all participating countries' governments, the BCCI and the Indian government are under severe pressure to act as per the nation's sentiments. However, if they choose this path, the BCCI will face another challenge. With organisers already committed and significant investments made in the tournament, withdrawing from the Pakistan encounter at this stage could be difficult for India. Wasim Akram conveys Pakistan's stance For Pakistan, there seems to be no dilemma. They are ready to play Team India and would not mind if the BCCI pulls out at the last minute. Former Pakistan cricketer Wasim Akram conveyed the same following the unveiling of India's Asia Cup squad. 'Asia Cup schedule is out, there is backlash,' Akram said on the on the Stick With Cricket podcast. 'But we in Pakistan are calm. We will be fine whether we play or don't play. The game must go on,' he said. 'Politics apart, I am not a politician. They are patriotic about their country, we are patriotic about ours. Let's not go below the belt. Talk about the triumphs of your country; the same goes for Pakistan, and the same goes for India. It is easier said than done.' As things stand, the India vs Pakistan Group A encounter is scheduled to take place on September 14 in Dubai.
