Starmer's Chagos surrender ‘will cost £5bn more than feared'
Sir Keir Starmer's deal to hand over the Chagos Islands will cost taxpayers £5 billion more than previously feared, the Tories have claimed.
The Prime Minister last month signed the agreement to cede the archipelago to Mauritius and then rent back the military base on Diego Garcia, its biggest island.
It had been calculated that the lease for the airbase, to be paid over the course of almost a century, would set the UK back at least £30 billion.
But ministers have now admitted that the inflation figure they are using to calculate payments for future years is higher than previously thought.
Mauritius, which has a GDP roughly the size of Leicester's, is going to use the huge windfall to deliver massive income tax breaks for its people.
Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said: 'Rachel Reeves has been unmasked as the 'spend today, tax tomorrow' Chancellor.
'It's a damning indictment of this government that not only are British taxpayers footing the bill for Mauritians to have their income tax cut but the costs of this terrible deal grow day by day.
'It is yet another kick in the teeth for hard-pressed British taxpayers who are already preparing for another tax raid later this year thanks to Labour's incompetence.'
Downing Street has claimed Treasury calculations show the total cost of the Chagos deal will come in at £3.4 billion in real terms over 99 years.
However that figure has been widely disputed, with critics saying the true tally once inflation and other payments are taken into account will top £30 billion.
Those calculations were based on inflation averaging out at the Bank of England's target rate of 2 per cent across the entire century of payments.
But this week Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, said that for most of the period the Treasury is assuming inflation will run at 2.3 per cent.
That would add £4.8 billion more than expected, according to Tory calculations, taking the final bill to the taxpayer up to just over £35 billion.
Ministers have confirmed in response to written questions that the cash will come out of the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Office budgets.
It could therefore count towards the Government's aim of spending at least 3 per cent of GDP on defence by the middle of the next decade, as well as any Nato targets.
Under the deal, the UK has given up sovereignty over the Chagos, a remote Indian Ocean archipelago, to Mauritius after 200 years of British rule.
Mauritius has agreed to lease back Diego Garcia, the biggest island in the chain and home to a British-US airbase, for the next century.
The agreement has been criticised over both the cost and security implications, with Mauritius growing closer to China, Iran and Russia in recent years.
Ministers have justified the pact by arguing the UK could have lost a future international court case brought by Mauritius, which claimed sovereignty.
They said that would have put the future of the base, which was used by jets operating during both Gulf wars and the Afghanistan war, in doubt.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Media Advisory - Sunday, June 15, 2025
OTTAWA, ON, June 14, 2025 /CNW/ - Note: All times local National Capital Region, Canada 11:00 a.m. The Prime Minister will meet with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Keir Starmer, and the Chief Executive Officer of Cohere, Aidan Floor FoyerWest BlockParliament HillNote for media:Pooled photo opportunity 11:15 a.m. The Prime Minister will meet with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Keir FloorWest BlockParliament HillNote for media:Pooled photo opportunity at the beginning of the meeting Calgary, Alberta 3:30 p.m. The Prime Minister will arrive in Calgary, for media:Pooled coverage and host broadcaster 4:30 p.m. The Prime Minister will meet with the Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony for media:Pooled photo opportunity at the beginning of the meeting 5:15 p.m. The Prime Minister will meet with the President of South Africa, Cyril for media:Pooled photo opportunity at the beginning of the meeting Kananaskis, Alberta 7:30 p.m. The Prime Minister will meet with representatives of the Treaty 7 First Nations. 8:30 p.m. The Prime Minister will meet with the Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich for media:Pooled photo opportunity at the beginning of the meeting This document is also available at SOURCE Prime Minister's Office View original content:
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool told how much Anthony Gordon transfer will cost as Newcastle stance clear
Liverpool has been told that it would likely have to pay well in excess of $100 million to sign Anthony Gordon from Newcastle this summer. The Reds were keen on a move for the former Everton winger last summer, and for a while it looked as though the Magpies might be forced to cash in on one of their star players as they worked to comply with the Premier League's Profit and Sustainability Rules. Advertisement In the end, Newcastle sold Yankuba Minteh and Elliott Anderson to Brighton and Nottingham Forest respectively, raising around $90 million and quelling the need to sell Gordon. READ MORE: Inside Florian Wirtz's Liverpool transfer - contract length, record fee, player's preference READ MORE: Xabi Alonso's Florian Wirtz comparison says everything about Liverpool's new star The 24-year-old went on to sign a new contract at Newcastle, and speculation linking him with a move to Liverpool has died down. It has not totally gone away though, and that could have something to do with the persistent rumors linking Luis Diaz with a move away from Liverpool. Advertisement Were Diaz to leave, Liverpool would likely enter the market for a new forward, and that could see Liverpool revisit its interest in Gordon. If Luis Diaz departs, Liverpool will need to replace him -Credit:AFP or licensors Addressing the possibility of Gordon joining Liverpool, Football Insider claimed that the Reds will only be in the market for a left winger if Diaz departs. It's claimed Liverpool is keeping an eye on Gordon and still like the player, but Newcastle does not want to sell. Thanks to Gordon's long-term deal, Newcastle would only sell him if an offer between $101 million and $115 million is tabled. Newcastle's PSR situation is much better thanks to securing Champions League soccer for the upcoming season. Advertisement Al-Nassr is reportedly willing to spend $97 million on Diaz, which could seriously test the Reds' resolve during the summer transfer window. Liverpool has no intention of selling Diaz, but an offer of that magnitude could prompt club bosses to sit up and take notice, particularly considering the player is on course to leave for free in two years' time. Liverpool made it clear to Barcelona last week that Diaz is not for sale after rebuffing an approach from the Catalan club. However, there is said to be little expectation that Diaz will pen an extension to his current contract at Liverpool, which is due to expire in 2027.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Unionist Irish language fears can be addressed - former Welsh first minister
Unionists in Northern Ireland have "legitimate concerns" over the Irish language but they "can be addressed", the former first minister of Wales has said. Mark Drakeford, the Welsh government's language secretary, said political agreement on Irish would be "healing rather than divisive". It comes amid continuing disputes at Stormont over the Irish language, including rows about bilingual signage and its cost. Drakeford, a Welsh speaker who encourages bilingualism in Wales, said unionists have nothing to fear if Irish "is done in a way that is sensitive to their concerns". Speaking to BBC News NI's Sunday Politics programme, he said language should not be used "as a political football". "I think, done the right way, concerns can be addressed," he said. "That's not to say that concerns aren't legitimate." The development of policies in Northern Ireland to promote the Irish language has long been a point of dispute between unionists and Irish nationalists. In Wales, the Welsh language is more widely accepted and is commonly displayed alongside English in public spaces, such as on road markings and street signs. Drakeford, former leader of the Welsh Labour Party, said he was "perfectly comfortable" with having a Welsh and British identity. Asked about unionist concerns over Irish, he said that being "undoubtedly Welsh doesn't diminish your sense of being part of the United Kingdom". But Drakeford said unionists have "legitimate concerns" and are "entirely entitled to make sure that's part of the public debate". Northern Ireland's devolved government is currently recruiting an Irish language commissioner and a commissioner for the Ulster-Scots and Ulster British tradition. The roles were key parts of language legislation introduced in 2022 by Westminster, which stepped in following a political stalemate at Stormont over the laws. Interviews for the posts are due to take place this month, Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly told the Northern Ireland Assembly on Monday. She added that she and First Minister Michelle O'Neill were committed to making the appointments "as soon as possible". Wales has had a Welsh language commissioner since 2012. Their powers include investigating complaints against public bodies. Efa Gruffudd Jones, who has held the role for more than two years, said that "languages don't need to divide us". "Languages are special things, and people can express themselves differently in different languages," she said. "So I would hope that people can respect other people's languages and ensure that they can enjoy using it." Irish signage has been a key point of contention at Stormont, with parties clashing over proposals to spend £150,000 on bilingual displays at Belfast's Grand Central Station. The plan by the infrastructure minister is being challenged in the courts. At local council level, there have also been disputes over the introduction of dual-language street signs in some neighbourhoods. They have been vandalised more than 300 times in five years. Northern Ireland's 11 local authorities have varying policies on installing dual-language street signs. In Belfast, proposals for a street are considered by a council committee if 15% or more of all occupants surveyed express support. More than 200 have been approved since the policy was introduced a few years ago. Of those approved, the average survey received about 34% of replies in favour, 4% against, 1% no preference, and 61% no response. The figures were obtained by BBC News NI through a Freedom of Information (FoI) request. Belfast councillor Ron McDowell, deputy leader of Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), said many unionists felt Irish was being "thrust upon them". "People are vehemently opposed to the Irish dual-language street signs because they see it as a weapon - it's a cultural warfare," he said. "It's being used by nationalist politics for identity politics - to mark territory." Ian Malcolm, from Lurgan in County Armagh, is a Protestant, a unionist and an Irish language teacher. He said that Irish "does not in any way diminish a person's Britishness", but should also not be "forced down anyone's throat". Describing it as a "beautiful, wonderful language", he added: "It tells us so much about who we are, about our history. "I think that everyone can embrace that, without surrendering one inch of your unionism." Irish street sign vandalism cost councils £60,000 NI language law could spell significant change