India indicates it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trumps threats
The Indian foreign ministry said its relationship with Russia was 'steady and time-tested,' and should not be seen through the prism of a third country.
Addressing a weekly presser on Friday, spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said India's broader stance on securing its energy needs was guided by the availability of oil in the markets and prevailing global circumstances.
The comments follow an announcement by President Donald Trump that he intends to impose a 25% tariff on goods from India plus an additional import tax because of New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil.
The threat came as the U.S. president has increasingly soured on Russia for failing to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made.
India bought 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, but by June of same year oil imports rose to 1.12 million barrels per day. The daily imports peaked at 2.15 million in May 2023 and have varied since.
Supplies rose as high as nearly 40% of India's imports at one point, making Moscow the largest supplier of crude to New Delhi, the Press Trust of India reported, citing data from Kpler, a data analytics company.
India's daily oil consumption is pegged around 5.5 million barrels, of which nearly 88% is met through imports.
The country has historically bought most of its crude from the Middle East, but this has changed since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
India, the world's third-largest crude importer after China and the U.S., began buying Russian oil available at discounted rates after the West shunned it to punish Moscow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Like Lee Kuan Yew, Chandrababu Naidu epitomises visionary leadership
The trip proved instrumental in reigniting interest among international industrial giants to set up operations in the state. The new industrial policies introduced by Naidu's government are already instilling confidence in investors, both domestic and foreign. It is truly inspiring to witness the remarkable similarities between Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father and visionary architect of modern Singapore, and N. Chandrababu Naidu, who has been rebuilding Andhra Pradesh from the ground after the state's painful bifurcation. Both leaders have demonstrated visionary thinking, indomitable will, and relentless drive to steer their respective regions toward prosperity defying all odds. During Naidu's recent visit to Singapore for the World Cities Summit, several Singaporean dignitaries, including then Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, drew striking parallels between the leadership styles of Lee Kuan Yew and Naidu. Lee Kuan Yew transformed Singapore from a struggling third-world country into a first-world economic powerhouse within a few decades. Likewise, Naidu has taken on the herculean task of rebuilding the residual Andhra Pradesh, which was left bleeding after bifurcation, and is now steadily propelling toward becoming a leading state in India. The visionary governance, innovative reforms, and futuristic planning under Naidu's leadership during 2014–2019 were widely admired. The people of Singapore were already aware of his transformative governance. Both Lee and Naidu are known for setting ambitious goals and pursuing them with strategic acumen. Their perseverance and purpose-driven governance saved their respective regions from decline and enabled them to thrive. Naidu's four-day visit to Singapore, focused on attracting investments to Andhra Pradesh, which is testament to his proactive approach. Upon arrival, Telugu families in Singapore welcomed him and Minister Nara Lokesh with traditional fervour and treated them to classical Kuchipudi and kolatam renditions. Around 2,500 members of the Telugu diaspora gathered to meet the Chief Minister, who graciously interacted with every individual and posed for photographs for posterity. Naidu and Lokesh held back-to-back meetings with representatives of various global organizations, explaining the state's positive investment climate and inviting them to become stakeholders in the State's development. As part of an overwhelming 26 official engagements, they visited several key projects and studied the best practices for implementation back home. The Indian High Commissioner to Singapore, Shilpak Ambule, extended full support to the delegation. Notably, the Chief Minister engaged in critical discussions with leaders of major companies such as Temasek Holdings, CapitaLand Investment (India), Mandai Wildlife Group, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation. These conversations centred on industrial development, port-led infrastructure and logistics. Naidu presented Andhra Pradesh's economic potential through a detailed PP presentation highlighting the state's resources, strategic location, and pro-industry policies. As a result of Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy government's chaotic and investor-unfriendly policies, Andhra Pradesh's brand image had taken a severe beating. Naidu and Lokesh's tireless efforts during this visit were specifically aimed at restoring confidence among global investors. The trip proved instrumental in reigniting interest among international industrial giants to set up operations in the state. The new industrial policies introduced by Naidu's government are already instilling confidence in investors, both domestic and foreign. Andhra Pradesh is now poised to become a prime investment destination. With a growth target of over 15 per cent, the State's focus on ease of doing business and proactive governance is expected to trigger a fresh wave of industrialisation. The state government is working toward creating 20 lakh jobs within five years, fulfilling its electoral promise and laying golden paths for the youth. The Chief Minister also laid out region-specific industrial and trade development plans and emphasised the strategic importance of Andhra Pradesh's vast 974-km coastline. Six ports are operational, and four more are in the pipeline. Integrated development plans involving road, rail, and inland water transport are being pursued to foster port-based industries. Naidu assured the CEOs and investors he met that the government would provide all necessary infrastructure. 'Now is the right time to invest in Andhra Pradesh,' he reiterated. His vision is to transform Andhra Pradesh into a logistics hub along the East Coast, leveraging its long coastline and deep-water ports. Naidu's efforts to restore the state's credibility, rekindle ties with Singapore, and chart a new course for Andhra Pradesh's economic revival are commendable. As the state gears up to host the Partnership Summit 2025 in Visakhapatnam on November 14–15, the focus will be on reimagining the state's industrial landscape. The entire nation is now watching Andhra Pradesh with renewed interest. After five years of stagnation, the state is poised to rise again Phoenix-like. The government is exploring every possible avenue to ensure financial empowerment and economic resurgence. Indeed, it is a matter of great pride that a visionary like Chandrababu Naidu is drawing comparisons with none other than Lee Kuan Yew. Both leaders—through their foresight, discipline, and determination—have proven how transformational leadership can change and rewrite a region's destiny. (The writer represents Vizianagaram in the Lok Sabha)
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin ROARS At Trump; Russia Deploys Deadliest Knyaz Pozharsky Submarine To Counter US Threat
Russia deploys the nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine Knyaz Pozharsky at the Northern Fleet's home base in the Murmansk region on Saturday. This comes after US President Donald Trump announced the deployment of two US submarines near Russia in response to former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev's 'dead hand' threat. Watch this video to know more.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK deal shows how much India will — or won't — bend on tariffs
India is gradually breaking down barriers by signing trade deals and lowering tariffs while President Trump is pushing the US inward, erecting a wall of tariff to the world's largest import market. On Wed, he announced that India would face 25% tariffs from August plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian military equipment and oil. Then came the executive order on the new tariff rates. This may not have come as a total surprise but it's a blow for India, which sees gaining a competitive edge in the US market as key—not just for boosting exports of electronics, pharmaceuticals, machinery, footwear, and textiles, but also for positioning itself as a global manufacturing hub for exporting to large markets like the US, EU, and UK. And, thus, lowering that 25% tariff rate to a level that is not just lower than China (35%) but also more competitive than its peers in emerging markets is crucial to its ambition to seize the opportunity presented by the West's disillusionment with China. Negotiators will no doubt be headed back to the table in pursuit of that elusive breakthrough, and India could manage to settle on a lower number. Trump made a similar threat against Japan and gave it a reprieve later. So far, the lowest rate secured is the UK's 10% and even allies such as the EU and Japan have only managed 15%. In the emerging markets of Asia, the Philippines and Indonesia got 19% versus Vietnam's 20%, and that includes conditional details and extra levy on Chinese transshipment. Beyond the headline reciprocal tariff rate, India is also trying to gain concessions on sectoral tariffs, from auto parts to pharma, as well as limiting the fallout to its participation in BRICS and secondary Russian oil sanctions. Trade Tangle: India's tariffs could still settle somewhere close to what Southeast Asian countries got — 19% to 20% with caveats — but this would still be only a 6-7% reduction from Trump's initial 26% threat With a population of 1.4bn, which is projected to grow to 1.6bn by 2040, India's domestic market is a big prize for American exporters. The two big sectors where Trump wants concessions are autos and agriculture. In the auto sector, high tariffs (such as 110% on completely built internal combustion engines) have kept imports low. Only 15,000 cars are imported into India annually versus a domestic market of 4.35m passenger cars. The recent India-UK deal shows that while India is willing to lower tariffs, the quotas remain relatively small in sectors such as autos and limited to luxury segments where Indian players are uncompetitive. This approach largely protects the domestic auto market. Trump is likely to demand tariff reciprocity on autos if India seeks a deal similar to what the US has with the EU or Japan. Could India make him an offer he can't refuse? Perhaps it could offer to lower tariffs on high-end cars that will not upset domestic car players but allow for more import of American cars. Even this seems very unlikely, going by the details of the UK deal. In other words, the US is unlikely to pry open the Indian auto market. Agriculture, which is seen as a red line in India, is another sticking point. Despite being a potentially large market, Indian imports from the US are primarily restricted to fish and nuts. India's rural vote bank (40% of the labour force is employed in farming) makes farming reform difficult and increasing market access for US soybeans, corn and canola oil will be highly contentious. India did not budge on farming and dairy even in the UK trade deal. What it can do is propose to shift imports from countries such as Indonesia for palm oil to US canola oil even while keeping aggressive liberalisation off the cards. Overall, a big bold promise of more purchases of US energy, defence equipment, aircraft, and even some agricultural products is much easier to do than opening its farm sector but doing so would mean reshuffling existing imports to favour the US at the expense of other competitors. Can India have its cake and eat it too? The EU and Japan deals offer a sobering reality check. Both got a reprieve but not without concessions, especially in the auto sector. South Korea and Japan didn't have to open up their agriculture sector but got a deal at 15% in return for purchases and investment pledges. India's tariffs could still settle somewhere close to what Southeast Asian countries got — 19% to 20% with caveats, which would be only a 6-7% reduction from Trump's initial 26% threat. India has always been a coveted market, given its unrivalled and rapidly growing domestic demand. And a more transactional US under President Trump is increasingly insistent on reciprocal market access. India could still beat Southeast Asian countries at the tariff game, but this comes at a price. We will have to see whether Prime Minister Modi is willing to take that gamble. So far, it does not look like it. The UK deal shows that India's policy risk appetite has risen but it will do so at its own pace. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
