US pulls embassy staff from parts of Middle East as threats emerge over potential Israel attack on Iran
The
US
ordered some staff to depart its embassy in Baghdad and authorised families of military service members to leave the region, officials said, after
Iran
threatened to strike American bases if it's attacked over its nuclear program.
The decision to reduce staffing in
Iraq
was 'based on our latest analysis,' according to the state department. defence secretary
Pete Hegseth
authorised family members of US military stationed across the region to leave, according to a Pentagon statement.
Neither statement cited a specific threat but the New York Post published an interview in which president
Donald Trump
said he's growing less confident about the prospects for negotiations to impose new limits on Iran's nuclear program. Iran, meanwhile, warned of retaliation against US military assets in the Middle East if the talks collapse and the Islamic Republic is attacked.
'I sincerely hope it won't come to that and that the talks reach a resolution,' Iran's defence minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in televised remarks. 'But if they don't, and conflict is imposed on us, the other side will undoubtedly suffer greater losses. We will target all US bases in host countries without hesitation.'
READ MORE
US officials have been told that Israel is ready to launch an operation into Iran, which is part of the reason why the Trump administration advised some Americans to leave the region, CBS News reported on Wednesday evening, citing multiple sources it did not name. The initial report did not offer a time frame for any operation.
[
US immigration officials raid California farms and Los Angeles area
Opens in new window
]
West Texas Intermediate futures surged as much as 5.2% after Reuters reported earlier that the US embassy was preparing for an ordered departure in response to heightened security risks in the region. Iraq is the second-largest OPEC producer.
Earlier in the day, the UK Navy issued a rare warning to mariners that higher tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping, including through the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping has often been risky in the Middle East, but UKMTO, which acts as a liaison between the navy and commercial shipping, rarely puts out general warnings such as this one.
'UKMTO has been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners,' the advisory said. 'Vessels are advised to transit the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz with caution.'
The Joint Maritime Information Center, an information sharing hub that comes under the Combined Maritime Forces, warned of heightened risks from the discord, including the possible use of missiles around chokepoints.
[
Israeli strikes kill at least 60 in Gaza, many at aid site, say health officials
Opens in new window
]
Hormuz is the world's most important oil chokepoint and Iran has frequently threatened to close it during times of geopolitical strife. However, it has never done so.
Hegseth's move applies to family of service members stationed across the US Central Command area of operation, which includes most of the region, according to the statement.
'Centcom is working in close coordination with our Department of State counterparts, as well as our Allies and partners in the region to maintain a constant state of readiness to support any number of missions around the world at any time,' the Pentagon said.
Tehran says it is preparing a fresh proposal regarding its atomic activities before a sixth round in Muscat, the Omani capital, on Sunday. That 'can be used as a basis for work,' Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi said on Tuesday, suggesting Iran is considering a temporary deal that acts as a framework while technical details — many of them highly complex — are worked on.
Trump has consistently said he wants an agreement that curbs Iran's atomic activities and that the US could strike Iran if the talks break down. Israel — which believes a nuclear-armed Iran would pose an existential threat — says it could attack Tehran, with or without US help.
Iran has long denied having plans to build a nuclear weapon. - Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Pay, perks and CEO prerogatives
It's good to be a US chief executive. Their pay packages are the envy of the corporate world, averaging $16 million (€13.9 million) for the S&P 500, more than double those for the UK's FTSE 100. And tucked inside are perks that mere mortals can only dream of. Thanks to tough US disclosure rules, we know pet supplier Chewy gave boss Sumit Singh a $29.3 million wad last year that included stock, cash, $424,474 for not one but two cars and $1,007,442 of 'security services' including 'meals and incidentals' for his guards. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz's $35 million package covers $898,426 in personal jet usage and sponsorship of a professional race car that Kurtz drives in competitions. The 2025 proxy cheerily paints this as a cost saving because it avoids 'hiring a professional driver'. Then there's Warner Bros Discovery . David Zaslav has been among America's highest paid CEOs since the company was created in a 2022 merger, and last year was no exception. He took home nearly $52 million and the gravy train included a $17,446 car allowance, $991,179 in personal security, $51,176 to cover the cost of taking personal guests to the Paris Olympics and 250 hours of personal flight time on the corporate jet worth $813,990. READ MORE Neither CrowdStrike nor Chewy has held its annual 'say on pay' vote yet, but Warner Bros Discovery has recently learned there are limits to what investors will tolerate. Last week, its advisory pay vote failed, with 59 per cent of shares voting against. The fury comes after Zaslav's pay climbed 4.4 per cent, even as the company posted an $11.5 billion loss for 2024 and its bond rating was recently cut to junk. Shares are down more than 60 per cent since the merger, and it just announced plans to break itself up. Both major proxy advisers flagged the pay package as problematic, and many investors agreed. The Warner Bros Discovery board said it took the result 'seriously' but investors in the streaming half of the business, which Zaslav will head, would do well to be wary. The directors have a history of setting bonus targets that require little effort because they fall below what the company has already achieved. Zaslav's grouchy investors remain very much the exception. So far this year, 95 per cent of the S&P 500 companies that have held 'say on pay' votes have won approval from at least 70 per cent of shares voted. This is a tad more than prior years, according to Conference Board/Esgauge data. Critics of American capitalism say this shows that shareholders are too quiescent and have allowed companies to become unchecked engines of financial inequality. But the lopsided votes could also be seen as evidence that the system is doing what investors want. Detailed disclosures and vigilant proxy advisers keep shareholders informed, down to the last dollar and, except in egregious cases, they are happy to pay up. Now even that limited accountability is under threat. SEC chairman Paul Atkins is asking whether the current compensation disclosures are 'cost-effective' and avoid 'an overload of immaterial information'. It appears to be a prelude to cutting back on the detail investors get about how bonuses are calculated and the costs of private jets and other perks. Another commissioner, Hester Peirce, last week questioned the legality of 'pass through' voting, which gives fund investors the chance to participate in 'say on pay' votes, rather than being shut out of the proxy process. Congress is seeking to rein in the influence of proxy advisers and make it harder for them to galvanise shareholders against poorly run companies. One of them, Glass Lewis, plans to encourage clients to set their own policies on pay and other proxy votes rather than rely on its recommendations. Taken together, these moves would make it that much harder for investors both to keep track of who is getting paid what and to rebel when they think a company is overpaying or rewarding failure. CEOs may find the proposals attractive – few relish becoming the next Marc Benioff, whose board at Salesforce redesigned his pay package and capped his private jet payments after losing a pay vote last year. But reducing disclosure under the guise of cutting red tape carries risks. Huge payouts and perks are hard to attack if they have been fully disclosed and ratified. Things that smack of secret self-dealing would be more vulnerable. [ John McManus: Kenny Jacobs' €374,830 salary is a soft target; the problem lies elsewhere Opens in new window ] Former Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski is a cautionary example. Leaks about lavish parties and corporate art purchases stoked outrage and led to a prison conviction for unauthorised bonuses. Americans may be openhanded with CEO pay but they react badly if their generosity has been abused. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Thunderstorms may rain on Trump's military parade
US President Donald Trump's dream of hosting a grand military parade in Washington on his 79th birthday tomorrow could be clouded by thunderstorms. Forecasters say there is a threat of lightning at the same time as nearly 6,000 troops, 50 helicopters and 150 armored vehicles are meant to roll through the capital, watched by thousands of spectators. The Republican has been unlucky with the weather before, as freezing conditions meant that his inauguration for a second term in January had to be held indoors and a parade was canceled. The White House vowed that a "historic celebration" of the US army's 250th birthday would go on even if there were "changes" due to the weather. "Any changes to the Army Birthday Parade will be announced by the Department of Defense or America 250 Commission," White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement to AFP. "No matter what, a historic celebration of our military servicemembers will take place!" The army and the America 250 Commission, which is responsible for arranging the parade, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Hundreds of anti-Trump "No Kings" rallies are planned on Saturday in cities across the United States -- although not in Washington -- in protest against what critics call the president's growing authoritarianism. 'Very big force' The rare military parade, the largest since the end of the Gulf War in 1991, comes after Trump sent National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles following protests. Mr Trump said on a visit to an army base on Tuesday that "we want to show off a little bit" with the parade, and vowed "very big force" if protesters try to disrupt it. The army says the event could cost up to $45 million. Nearly 7,000 soldiers will take part, wearing a variety of uniforms including some that date back through all of America's major wars since the Revolutionary War against Britain. Roaring overhead will be more than 50 helicopters including Apache gunships, giant twin-rotor Chinook transport choppers and sleek Black Hawks. Around 150 military vehicles -- including 28 M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, 28 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and 28 Stryker eight-wheel vehicles -- will rumble past too. The route will take them past historic landmarks including the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument, ending up near the White House. The parade is meant to end with a parachute display as the army's Golden Knights team jump in and present Mr Trump with a US flag. 'Believe in democracy' The event is being held on Flag Day, which celebrates the Stars and Stripes -- but it also coincides with Mr Trump's own birthday. Long fascinated with military pomp, Mr Trump has openly envied the military spectacles seen in cities from Paris to Moscow and Pyongyang ever since his first term as president. Mr Trump has been particularly obsessed with having a parade since his first term as president when he attended France's annual Bastille Day parade in Paris at the invitation of president Emmanuel Macron in 2017. "One of the greatest parades I have ever seen," Mr Trump said shortly afterwards. "Because of what I witnessed, we may do something like that." Back then he was put off by the huge cost -- an estimated $92 million -- and warnings that heavy tanks could damage Washington's streets. But after his return to the White House in January, Mr Trump would not be dissuaded again. This time, the army says metal plates will protect the roads from damage Such displays of military might remain rare in the United States. "We were founded by a group of merchants and farmers who were tired of a standing army invading their streets in the name of keeping them safe," Peter Loge, director of George Washington University's School of Media, told AFP. "We've always looked down on grand military parades in Russia across Red Square or in North Korea, because we're not like that. We're Americans, and we believe in democracy, not in military shows of force."
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: We failed to stop war in the Balkans, so why are we repeating this with Gaza?
In 2017, I visited Bosnia as part of my Erasmus programme to Croatia. In Sarajevo, I saw the bullet holes in the buildings, the fields on the edge of town lined with white unmarked pillars representing the dead. My friend and I cried in the museum that displayed the horrors of what happened there. About 100,000 people died in the war – 80pc of those victims were Bosnian Muslims. I wondered how the conflict lasted four years. Remember, this was in the 1990s. How was there no intervention? Surely that could never happen again, we thought. In 2025, history is repeating itself as we watch the genocide of the Palestinians, and this time there is no way to pretend we don't know what's happening – we see it on our screens every day. In years to come, the next generation will ask why there was no intervention. Why did no one stop them? I wonder will there be anything left of Gaza and its people. How many unmarked graves will they need to represent their dead? Aisling Brady, Drumcondra, Dublin US should learn from the North – putting troops on the streets solves nothing Northern Ireland's bitter experience with military deployment offers a stark warning to the US ('Troops on the streets is a chilling moment for democracy in US' – Editorial, June 12). Soldiers are trained to confront enemies, not to police citizens. Their presence rarely calms tensions; in fact, it almost always inflames them. We had troops on the North's streets for 38 years – a 'short-term' intervention that became a decades-long occupation. The recent deployment of not only the National Guard but active-duty Marines to Los Angeles – against the wishes of local officials – should trouble anyone with a concern for democracy. Sending troops to silence protest rather than address its causes does not resolve crisis. It hardens it. As protests spread over Donald Trump's heavy-handed immigration raids, the danger of irreversible escalation grows. There are reports that ICE officers have been tasked with making 3,000 arrests a day. Putting Marines on city streets in such a context risks turning political grievance into a national trauma. History shows us that once soldiers are deployed domestically, it becomes exponentially harder to withdraw them. As John F Kennedy warned: 'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.' ADVERTISEMENT If America still values democracy, it would do well to learn from Northern Ireland's costly legacy before choosing force over dialogue. The military cannot secure the soul of a nation. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh With their RPZ policy, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have made things worse Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil's perma-government seems incapable of understanding that endless, piecemeal and reactionary market intervention is not the answer to our housing crisis ('Entire country to be brought under Rent Pressure Zone in major change agreed by Government leaders' – June 10). By capping rent increases everywhere, from Ballyfermot to Ballycotton, and further curtailing the rights of 'large' landlords with more than three properties, the Department of Housing will do nothing except encourage non-corporate landlords to finally bail out and put their properties up for sale. More ads on property websites will offer short-term hope to first-time buyers seeking to get on the ladder, but only until they run up against the inexhaustible wallets of national and international vulture funds raising asking prices by tens of thousands of euro. The rest of us will be left to continue fighting over the scraps, as we have done for the best part of two decades. All the while, the Government's reluctance to reduce the swathes of taxes and regulations it has introduced, in a way that would encourage investment by developers and the return of construction workers, gets worse. The Spanish policy that places a 100pc tax on foreign purchases of homes in that country is a rare bit of reasonable socialism that our lads won't countenance. These new measures give a sop to louder elements who believe state micromanagement of irrelevant minutiae is the only solution to the housing crisis. Eventually, the incompetence starts to look wilful. Killian Foley-Walsh, Kilkenny town To those who find Pride 'irritating' – it remains just as important as ever At a time when right-wing governments all over the world, including some within the EU, are attempting to roll back rights for LGBTQ+ people, Pride is more important than ever. I note that Eric Conway finds it 'irritating in the extreme' (Letters, June 12). However, the annual celebration remains a vital expression of solidarity for a minority that suffered terribly at the hands of both church and state here until very recently. Long may Pride continue. Bernie Linnane, Dromahair, Co Leitrim De Valera's championing of the presidency should always be remembered I read with interest Thomas Garvey's letter on the presidency (June 11). The writer notes in particular that Fianna Fáil has not featured in recent presidential contests, having monopolised the office for so long. It is interesting to note that it was Éamon de Valera who created the office of president of Ireland. He did so in the face of the most virulent opposition during the debates on the introduction of Bunreacht na hÉireann in 1937. When the Constitution was debated in the Dáil, the office of the president was the single most contentious issue. It came up about 60 times and De Valera was accused of trying to impose a type of dictatorship along the lines of Hitler or Mussolini. Issues such as 'the special position of the Catholic Church' and 'women in the home' were minor by comparison. As it turned out, these fears were wild exaggerations and the office has evolved into the most respected of all our political institutions. De Valera waited until the end of his active political career before opting for the Áras – the Phoenix Park was 'the ideal paddock for the old warhorse'. Fr Iggy O'Donovan, Thomas Street, Dublin
