Wisconsin family office agrees to near $11 million settlement for PPP loan violations
On April 2, Barrington Venture Holding Company LLC, The Club at Strawberry Creek LLC, The Garlands of Barrington LLC, Nuestro Queso LLC, SSCO LLC, and Tire Profiles LLC agreed to settle the claims.
Grassroots group in New London rallies in support of immigrant workers
The settlement resolves allegations that four of these companies — The Club at Strawberry Creek LLC, The Garlands of Barrington LLC, Nuestro Queso LLC, and Tire Profiles LLC — falsely certified their eligibility for PPP loans. These companies collectively received six PPP loans totaling more than $5 million in principal, despite having more than 500 employees, which made them ineligible for the program.
The PPP loan program, created in March 2020 through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, provided financial assistance to small businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The loans could be forgiven if used on payroll and other eligible expenses, with the government repaying the borrower.
Borrowers were required to certify their eligibility when applying for a loan and forgiveness, including an accurate employee count. Businesses with fewer than 500 employees were eligible for the loans, but businesses under common ownership or control had to aggregate employee counts.
The U.S. government alleges that the family office companies knew they were ineligible for the PPP loans but applied anyway, taking steps to conceal their ineligibility.
'This settlement reflects the continuing commitment of the Department of Justice and the Small Business Administration to hold accountable businesses that abused this emergency program,' said Acting U.S. Attorney Frohling.
Over 2,100 work zone crashes in Wisconsin last year, State Patrol issues safety reminder for 2025
SBA General Counsel Wendell Davis emphasized the collaborative efforts by federal agencies to recover the funds and impose penalties in such cases.
The claims settled are allegations only, with no determination of liability made.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs ‘could cover costs of big, beautiful bill tax cuts'
Donald Trump's tariffs could generate enough revenues to cover the costs of his sweeping tax cuts, according to one of the world's biggest credit rating agencies. S&P Global said the economic impact of the US president's 'one big beautiful bill' act – which was signed into law in July and includes $3.7 trillion (£2.7 trillion) of tax cuts over the next 10 years – could be offset by his aggressive trade war. The agency's optimistic outlook for the Act led to it holding firm on its AA+ long-term rating for the US. That is in contrast to fellow credit ratings agency Moody's, which downgraded the US from the gold standard AAA sovereign debt rating in May amid concerns about ballooning debt. S&P Global suggested tariffs could soften the blow to the US public finances. Lisa Schineller, an analyst at S&P, said: 'Amid the rise in effective tariff rates, we expect meaningful tariff revenue to generally offset weaker fiscal outcomes that might otherwise be associated with the recent fiscal legislation, which contains both cuts and increases in tax and spending. 'At this time, it appears that meaningful tariff revenue has the potential to offset the deficit-raising aspects of the recent budget legislation.' This will serve to strengthen Mr Trump's controversial tax-cutting bill, which was branded a 'disgusting abomination' by billionaire Elon Musk earlier this year. The bill faced significant opposition before it eventually passed through Congress, with many critics warning it would increase America's vast debt pile. It comes after Mr Trump was recently embroiled in a row with Goldman Sachs about the impact of his tariffs on the US economy. The president criticised David Solomon, the Goldman boss, by claiming that he should 'not bother running a major financial institution' after the bank said American companies would start passing on the costs from tariffs to consumers. He urged Mr Solomon to 'focus on being a DJ', in reference to the Goldman boss's previous hobby moonlighting as a disc jockey under the moniker DJ D-Sol. The US reported a $21bn jump in customs duty collections from Mr Trump's tariffs in July. However, in the same month, the government budget deficit grew by nearly 20pc to $291bn. Concerns about the US debt pile have sent the cost of government borrowing higher, with the US 30-year Treasury bond yield peaking at 5.09pc in May – although it has since fallen back to 4.94pc. Since returning to the White House in January, Mr Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on global trading partners. The president set a baseline 10pc tariff on all imports to the US, with various additional duties imposed on different countries and products. The US remains involved in trading negotiations with various nations. Mr Trump announced this month that he would extend a suspension of tariffs on China until at least early November after the world's two largest economies briefly imposed levies of more than 100pc on each other. S&P projected the American government deficit would average 6pc of GDP between 2025 and 2028, down from 7.5pc in 2024. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Gizmodo
5 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Bernie Sanders Likes Trump's Plan for Government Taking Ownership in Tech Companies
There aren't many things that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump agree on. But we may have found one idea where the two men see eye-to-eye. Sanders, an Independent Senator from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats, told Reuters on Wednesday that he's in favor of the Trump administration's plan to convert federal grants for tech companies like Intel and TSMC into equity stakes in those companies. 'If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,' Sanders reportedly told Reuters. The U.S. government is hoping to get a 10% equity stake in Intel in exchange for federal grants under the CHIPS Act, according to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who talked about the plan on Tuesday on CNBC. News broke of the idea last week, but Lutnick's appearance on CNBC was the first time anyone from the Trump regime had started talking about it publicly. 'The CHIPS Act was just a giveaway to rich companies,' Lutnick said on CNBC. 'I mean, why in the world is the United States of America taking money and giving it to companies like TSMC, which is worth a trillion dollars? I mean, why would we give them money to come to America?' U.S.-based Intel and Taiwan-based TSMC have both been incentivized by the CHIPS Act to invest more in manufacturing in the U.S., but it seems folks across the political spectrum have started to wonder whether it's smart to just hand out money to enormous companies without getting something more substantial in return. News broke Tuesday that Trump didn't just want an equity stake in Intel, but also chipmakers like Micron, TSMC, and Samsung. The idea behind grants for private companies is that they spur further investment in a given community and help create jobs. But the government taking an equity stake would theoretically come with a say in how that company does business, whether it's through employment decisions or any number of other choices. Lutnick insisted to CNBC that the government would not get any governance role at Intel along with its potential 10% stake, but it's hard to imagine that would be true. The government received a 'golden share' on the U.S. Steel deal when Japan-based Nippon Steel purchased the company in June. That allows Trump to appoint a board member in a very unusual arrangement. Under the CHIPS Act, TSMC received $6.6 billion in grants, while Intel has received about $7.9 billion, according to CNBC. Intel has slowed its expansion plans, which has left billions of dollars in funds on the table that haven't been allocated yet. And as the New York Times recently noted, converting $10.86 billion in government grants for Intel into equity would be one of the largest interventions into private industry since U.S. auto companies were bailed out during the Great Recession. Trump has also called for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to be fired over his alleged links to China, portrayed by the president as a potential national security concern. But Trump publicly changed his tune after meeting with Tan last week. It's not at all clear what kind of understanding the two men have come to. Needless to say, all of this potential government tinkering makes Wall Street very nervous. An editorial from the Wall Street Journal on Monday explained that details of the Intel deal were vague, 'but you can bet the feds wouldn't be passive investors.' Which brings us to the question of whether Bernie Sanders will actually like any potential arrangement Intel gets with Trump. Sanders may approve of an equity stake on paper, but President Trump's history of bending institutions to his will looks a lot different in practice. Trump has strong-armed universities, corporate media, and now has his sights set on museums and the way they present history. Lefties should be cautious when saying they support any idea from Trump without making it clear that any support comes with caveats. If the past six to eight months of Trumpism are any guide, an equity stake in Intel comes with plenty of strings attached.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 Estate Planning Changes To Make After Retirement
The average American spends so much time planning for retirement that when the end of their work-life finally arrives, they don't think there's anything left to do. Your financial and familial dynamics have changed since you began the process of estate planning years ago, so updating your affairs after retirement is essential to provide for your loved ones and get the best out of the rest of your life. Trending Now: Consider This: This is particularly true with Secure 2.0 Act measures coming into effect this year that will benefit retirees. According to Fidelity, people in or near retirement (or years away from it) need to address new rules concerning catch-up contributions, required minimum distributions (RMDs), automatic enrollment changes, Roth IRA matching and more. For those who've already stopped working, here are five basic things you should be reviewing and updating every three to five years or after any major life event, like the death of a spouse, a new grandchild or a significant change in tax law. Revise Your Current Estate Documents Make sure the beneficiaries, executors and trustees in your will or revocable living trust represent your current desires. After retirement, power of attorney agreements for financial and medical decisions frequently need to be updated. If you have a trust, think about using a pour-over will to capture any assets that aren't already titled in the trust. For You: Review Your Beneficiary Designations Relationships change throughout your life, so you should be on top of adding new beneficiaries and removing any that are out of date in retirement. According to Roulet Law Firm, PA, beneficiary delegation override the conditions set out in your will, so life insurance policies, retirement and investment accounts and payable-on-death (POD) designations have to be updated when you retire. Minimize Your Tax Burden You should always be looking to minimize your taxable estate and gaining advantages by gifting up to the yearly exclusion (19,000 per recipient in 2025, per the IRS), about making charitable contributions through a charitable trust or donor-advised fund (DAF). Examine IRA distribution plans (such as Roth conversions) to reduce heirs' tax obligations. Plan for Long-Term Care Costs You'll need to consider long-term care planning — for example, Medicaid asset protection trusts — if nursing care costs are going to be a problem, per Hargrave Law, PC. But you'll also need to know the nitty gritty of policies, like Medicaid's asset transfer rules and Look Back Period. Alternatives like hybrid life insurance plans with long-term care (LTC) riders or LTC insurance from an independent coverer should always be explored. Account for New Assets Think of your estate plan as a flexible document to be updated when new assets are acquired in retirement. A new property or valuable collectible will be need to be appraised and designated to a specific person to whom you wish to entrust your newer assets. This includes any digital asset directives for online accounts and cryptocurrencies, which the IRS treats as personal property for federal tax purposes. Updating your estate documents can ensure your retirement plans remain up-to-date, minimize your tax responsibility and provide for your loved ones according to your wishes. Consulting a financial advisor or estate planning lawyer is a smart move, but a smarter one is discussing your wishes and explaining any trusts or special arrangements to your family and heirs to avoid confusion and disputes down the line. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact RetireesMark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on 5 Estate Planning Changes To Make After Retirement Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
