logo
Investors weigh market impact of possible early Powell exit

Investors weigh market impact of possible early Powell exit

Yahoo25-07-2025
By Saqib Iqbal Ahmed
NEW YORK (Reuters) -Uncertainty over Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's tenure is prompting investors to assess potential market reactions should there be an premature change in leadership at the U.S. central bank.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell for not cutting U.S. rates quickly enough. He has frequently raised the possibility of ousting him before his term is up in ten months, while also saying that firing him would be "unlikely."
Trump said on Thursday he had a "good meeting" with Powell after he visited the Federal Reserve's headquarters in Washington to tour the site of a $2.5 billion renovation of two historical buildings the White House criticizes as overly costly and ostentatious. He said it is not necessary to fire Powell.
Investors have been considering various scenarios, including Trump dismissing Powell, the Fed chief stepping down, or a new nominee being named well before the scheduled end of Powell's term.
Forecasting how equities, the U.S. dollar, and Treasury yields would react to each outcome is difficult, market participants said.
However, brief turbulence last week — when reports emerged that Trump was considering firing Powell — triggered a 0.7% decline in the S&P 500 and a 0.9% drop in the dollar, offering some clues to possible market reactions, they added.
"Financial markets have sent clear warning signals about the consequences of political interference," Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital, said.
"YOU'RE FIRED"
While deemed the most unlikely scenario, the biggest risk for markets is if Trump were to fire Powell. Such a move would be viewed as an assault on the independence of the Fed, something the market counts on, investors said.
Based on the scale of gyrations markets recently experienced, strategists at Deutsche Bank estimate the dollar could tumble as much as 6%, potentially a record large drop.
Deutsche Bank's strategists estimate the 10-year yield could jump up about 20 basis points while the 30-year yield could soar 45 basis points. On Thursday, the 10-year yield was at 4.413%, while the 30-year bond was at 4.942%.
While equities might eventually find something to like in a new Fed Chair who might be more amenable to rate cuts, investors said stocks would likely initially sell off if Powell is shown the door.
Cresset's Ablin said the drop in stocks would be more extreme than the less than 1% slide spurred by last week's reports on Powell's imminent firing.
Ousting Powell would raise the risk that Trump would try to make an even bigger play to take over the Fed, David Seif, chief economist for developed markets at Nomura, said.
"Loss of Fed independence would lead to a very big increase, I think, in inflation uncertainty, and that would lead investors to demand much more compensation for locking their money up for that long, leading to a much steeper yield curve," Seif said.
Gold would be one asset that could benefit in the circumstance, Aaron Hill, chief analyst at broker FP Markets, said. The price of the safe haven metal, already near record highs set this year at around $3,400 an ounce, could leap higher, he said.
Nor is the market going to draw much distinction between Powell being fired for cause or otherwise, investors said.
"I QUIT"
Should Powell resign, concerns about the Federal Reserve's independence would linger, but markets may avoid a prolonged period of uncertainty that could arise from potential legal battles if Powell were dismissed. Powell has said he would refuse to leave office early even if Trump asked.
While that might yield a slightly less volatile reaction in the near term, it will confirm apprehensions about the Federal Reserve straying from its dual mandate of maximum employment and stable prices, analysts said.
The chair is only one of 12 voting members at the central bank's monetary policy meetings. Part of the role is to build consensus with a large group of policymakers.
"I think that's telling you that Trump is willing to work that hard to break down the leader of the board ... that he's going to come after the rest of the board if they don't do what the new Fed chair basically does," Benjamin Ford, researcher at macro research and strategy firm Macro Hive said.
"I think that almost cements Trump's view for interest rates."
The dollar would be particularly vulnerable, hit with the double whammy of rate cuts and loss of investor confidence.
"A politically compliant Federal Reserve could trigger severe and lasting market disruptions across multiple asset classes, fundamentally altering the global financial landscape," Cresset's Ablin said.
SHADOW FED
The most benign outcome for markets would be if Trump were to merely nominate a new chair and let Powell remain in place until his term expires in May.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Wednesday the Trump administration was not in a rush to nominate a new chair to replace Powell. The administration would likely announce a successor in December or January, he said.
"I don't know that the equity market would necessarily view that negatively," Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide, said.
"You're obviously going to believe that the next person is going to be more dovish on average than Powell would be, but I think that assumption is there anyway," he said.
An appointment who talks loudly about lowering interest rates could erode the value of the dollar, investors said.
"It would probably weigh on the dollar more and more as we go through and towards the new Fed chair," Macro Hive's Ford said.
While not as drastic as the other two scenarios, the presence of a shadow chair who offers potentially clashing views with the sitting central bank leader on monetary policy could sow confusion. Any choice deemed as being under Trump's thumb could do lasting damage to the public perception about the Fed's independence.
"It's really hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube," Nationwide's Hackett said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could the Treasury Revalue Gold for Bitcoin Reserve or Debt Relief?
Could the Treasury Revalue Gold for Bitcoin Reserve or Debt Relief?

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Could the Treasury Revalue Gold for Bitcoin Reserve or Debt Relief?

Revaluing Fort Knox's gold to fund a strategic bitcoin reserve or pay down the national debt is no longer unthinkable. Bettmann Archive Gold is up more than 40% in the past year, from under $2,400 an ounce to over $3,400. Meanwhile, the national debt is approaching $37 trillion. That's helped revive an idea long dismissed as fringe: revaluing the government's gold reserves to raise cash. It sounds far-fetched. But a new research note from the Federal Reserve suggests it may not be as out there as it seems. On August 1, the Federal Reserve published a research note called 'Official Reserve Revaluations: The International Experience.' It outlines how five countries used gains on their official gold holdings to raise funds. It does not propose the U.S. do the same, but it explains the steps involved and what to expect if it happens. The note covers Germany, Italy, Lebanon, Curacao and Saint Martin, and South Africa. Some used revaluation proceeds to reduce debt. Others used them to cover central bank losses. The examples are limited but show how governments have tapped into hidden value without raising taxes or issuing new bonds. The U.S. Treasury values its gold at $42.22 an ounce, a price set in 1973. It holds 261.5 million ounces, the majority of it at Fort Knox in Kentucky. At the official price, the gold is worth $11 billion. At today's market price, it would be worth more than $750 billion. Revaluation would not require selling the gold. It would simply update its book value. The Treasury could adjust the value of U.S. gold reserves through a few bookkeeping steps. It might retire its current $11 billion gold certificate (issued by the Treasury) and establish a higher official price for gold (which could be lower or even higher than the market price). Next, it could "transfer" the gold to the Fed at this new price, potentially gaining billions or trillions (remember, it need not revalue the gold to the current market price). The Fed would then return the gold to the Treasury for a new certificate. No gold physically moves, but the Treasury ends up with a significant amount of newly created funds. What would happen next depends on policy decisions. The cash infusion from the revalued gold could be used to pay down debt or finance new spending. A footnote in the Fed paper notes that recent U.S. legislation proposed by Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis (a Republican and crypto champion) contemplates using revaluation proceeds to create a sovereign wealth fund or a strategic bitcoin reserve. (Both the sovereign wealth fund and the bitcoin reserve are ideas that President Donald Trump has talked about.) Sounds good, but there are potential repercussions. Crediting the Treasury with new funds increases the money supply. That could stoke inflation. Critics have described the idea as backdoor money printing or, even, as plain old 'accounting manipulation.' Others point to the 1934 gold revaluation, which led to a sharp increase in the money supply. It also sidelined the Federal Reserve, giving the Treasury effective control over monetary policy until the 1951 Fed-Treasury Accord restored the central bank's independence. That history may be one reason the idea hasn't moved forward. With renewed criticism of the Federal Reserve from the Trump administration, including chiding the central bank over its decision to delay interest rate cuts, any move seen as potentially undermining Fed independence could draw political fire–and a negative reaction in the markets. That may help explain why officials have been quick to shut the door. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent addressed the issue earlier this year. On the All-In podcast in March, he said the Treasury is not considering revaluation. 'I can say today we're not revaluing the gold,' he declared. (The All-In podcast, hosted by investors Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks and David Friedberg, is popular in business and investing circles–and among those who have Trump's ear. Sacks, in fact, holds the title of chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.) Bessent's March disavowal of any thought of revaluation may still be the case. But the Federal Reserve publishing a note on how a revaluation has worked for others means the Overton window–that is, the realm of ideas that get seriously discussed–might have cracked open.

How DeepSeek and Open-Source Models Are Shaking Up AI
How DeepSeek and Open-Source Models Are Shaking Up AI

Bloomberg

time3 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

How DeepSeek and Open-Source Models Are Shaking Up AI

Tech companies and academics have long wrestled with the risks and rewards of building open-source software. But the frenzy around generative artificial intelligence has lent new significance to the debate. DeepSeek and other Chinese companies have pushed out a wave of low-cost, open source models that rival software from the top American AI developers. In response, OpenAI, a leading US AI company, has released a new open model, its first in six years. The Trump administration has called for more US tech companies to do the same.

Russia secondary sanctions still on track for Friday after Putin, Witkoff meeting
Russia secondary sanctions still on track for Friday after Putin, Witkoff meeting

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Russia secondary sanctions still on track for Friday after Putin, Witkoff meeting

WASHINGTON — US sanctions targeting nations that buy Russian oil will kick in on Friday after Vladimir Putin refused to end his invasion of Ukraine by President Trump's deadline, a senior White House official said following direct talks between Washington and Moscow on Wednesday. Following a three-hour meeting between Putin and Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff, the Kremlin said it wanted to continue talking — which Trump has publicly suspected of being a strategy to 'tap along' his administration. 'The Russians are eager to continue engaging with the United States,' the US official said in a statement, adding: 'The secondary sanctions are still expected to be implemented on Friday.' Advertisement US sanctions targeting nations that buy Russian oil will kick in on Friday after Vladimir Putin refused to end his invasion of Ukraine by President Trump's deadline, following direct talks between Washington and Moscow on Wednesday. GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/SPUTNIK/KREMLIN POOL/EPA/Shutterstock The official also said Witkoff's discussion with Putin 'went well.' Wednesday marked the first time the parties had met for such talks since April, when it became evident little progress was being made toward an end to Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store