Peters offers optimistic outlook for Michigan Dems in 2026 Senate Race
Following the conclusion of his term in 2027, U.S. Sen. Gary Peters (D-Bloomfield Township) said he plans to remain active in public policy.
Earlier this year, Peters, who has served in the U.S. Senate since 2015, announced he would not seek reelection in 2026, to the shock of many.
While sitting down with the Michigan Advance at last month's Mackinac Policy Conference, Peters said his post-Washington plans are still up in the air, but stressed that he's not retiring.
'I'll have a lot more control over my life when I'm not in the Senate, because it gives me a lot more flexibility to do a variety of things. But I'm going to stay active,' Peters said.
With a year and a half left in the Senate, Peters said he remains focused on the Great Lakes, specifically on securing funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and additional appropriations for the U.S. National Guard's Great Lakes Oil Spill Center of Expertise in Sault Ste. Marie, which he helped establish.
Alongside serving in the U.S. Senate, Peters also chaired the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from 2021 through 2025, with U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) taking over the role for the 2026 campaign cycle.
While Peter's decision not to run for reelection created uncertainty for Democrats' pathway back to a majority in the Senate, Peters said he's confident his party will retain the seat.
'Actually, that was part of my decision, because I want to make sure that the seat continues to be Democratic,' he said, pointing to two key factors that he said give the Democrats good odds.
First, 2026 will be a good year to be a Democrat, Peters said, with the party out of power typically performing better during midterm elections.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'You have that historical precedent. Plus just the increased chaos we're seeing out of the Trump administration will mean that people are going to be voting Democratic, and next year, I think you're going to see that similar to what we saw in the last Trump administration,' Peters said, referencing the 2018 mid-term election where Democrats were able to take control of the U.S. House of Representatives.
In another benefit, Democrats also have a deep bench of candidates, Peters said, noting that while others may declare for candidacy, the four Democratic candidates that have already jumped into the race 'are all very talented people.'
The Democratic slate is currently made up of U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Birmingham), state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak), former Michigan House Speaker Joe Tate (D-Detroit) and former Wayne County Health Director Abdul El-Sayed. Former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-White Lake) is currently the only Republican candidate, however reports say U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland) is also weighing a run, though he has yet to make a formal announcement.
That said, Democrats can't take anything for granted as Michigan is set to be a top battleground state, Peters said.
'The challenge for a race – Senate race in particular – when you have a primary is that you don't get your nominee till fairly late into August. And this race, it'll go from zero to 100 miles an hour within hours of the election,' Peters said.
However, the 2024 election illustrated a clear divide in the Democratic Party between its moderate members and the more progressive wing, best illustrated by the party's split over Israel and Gaza.
When looking for a pathway forward, Peters said Democrats need to remain focused on economic issues like affordable health care, job opportunities and voters' ability to save for and live a dignified retirement.
'All those issues are the most powerful. And you should always be focused on those. And that's not going to change,' Peters said.
When you think about the previous presidential election – where former Vice President Kamala Harris lost to Trump by just over 80,000 votes – a presidential loss would typically bring a Senate election loss with it, Peters said. However, that didn't happen in Michigan.
'We won here in Michigan. And if you look at Elissa Slotkin's campaign, it was focused on those bread and butter economic issues. We won Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin, and Nevada and Arizona and all of those Senate candidates, that's what they focused on. They outperformed the top of the ticket and they won,' Peters said.
Democrats still have to work to excite their base and cannot ignore them, but those economic issues are just as important to Democratic voters as they are to independents, Peters said.
As President Donald Trump works to radically reshape the federal government, congressional Democrats are tasked with both resisting the president and the Republican majority, and delivering results for their constituents.
While bringing home results for constituents is difficult, the Democratic minority has to use its position to call out Republicans' actions and paint a contrast in the minds of voters, Peters said, emphasizing elections are all about contrast.
Trump has violated pretty much every major norm of democracy, alongside several laws, Peters said, and while the judicial system has repeatedly been a check on the president, Democrats need to be aggressive in calling that out.
'I think we definitely have to be extremely aggressive in calling out just the blatant corruption we're seeing from the Trump administration,' Peters said, pointing to his decision to accept a $400 million jet as a gift from Qatar as well as his meeting with investors in his cryptocurrency business.
'We can't normalize that in any way, not just for the short term of getting rid of President Trump, but we can't normalize it for future administrations as well. The United States needs to be the place where corruption is never tolerated,' Peters said.
However, Democrats still need to walk and chew gum by retaining their focus on the economic issues, Peters said.
'I think those issues too are going to play out as we look at tariffs, which will increase costs. When people start paying more for the everyday goods that they have, they're going to realize that Donald Trump's promise that he was going to lower inflation on day one is not the case,' Peters said.
He also pointed to Republican's tax and spending bill, warning the plan would increase the nation's deficit by trillions of dollars, prompting higher interest rates.
'So you pay more for your car, you're going to pay more for your mortgage, your credit card, all those costs as a result of what I believe is completely irresponsible fiscal policy from the Republicans right now,' Peters said.
As some Democrats have called on their officials to do more to resist the president, arguing they could do more to be a thorn in Trump's side, Peters said Democratic lawmakers are using the tools they have.
While they've been able to use procedures to delay votes on legislation, those efforts are only delays, Peters said.
'We currently live, and I hope we always live, in a democracy and that means the majority rules in a democracy, yep. And if, if the majority have the votes, you can't stop it,' Peters said, noting that Republicans were in a similar position during the first half of former President Joe Biden's term.
This is where elections have consequences, Peters said, prompting Democrats to put their energy into next year's election.
Given the current political circumstances, Peters predicts Democrats will take back control of the U.S. House in 2026. The chamber is currently split 220-212, with three open seats.
'When you take back the House, then the dynamic changes dramatically in Washington. And Donald Trump, we'll be able to stop him, because he won't be able to pass things through the House,' Peters said.
While retaking the Senate would prove more challenging, it's not something Democrats can write off, Peters said. The chamber is currently split 53-45 with two independents Senators, Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.) and Angus King (D-Maine), caucusing with Democrats.
While he understands the frustration among activists, Peters reiterated Democrats' limited options.
'You can slow down the majority, but eventually majority wins,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Charlamagne tha God lauds book reveal, shares skepticism about Harris in 2028
Charlamagne tha God shared skepticism on the possibility of another White House bid from former Vice President Harris on Thursday but encouraged her to connect with people by publishing a book. 'I don't know if she should run again, but I definitely would like to see her write a book. I definitely would like to see her start a podcast and just build a real connection with people,' Charlamagne said during a Thursday episode of 'The Breakfast Club.' 'And she is relatively young. I just don't know what's going to happen in 2028, man. I just think Democrats suck so bad. I don't know,' he added. Some have speculated Harris is planning to enter the presidential race in 2028, where her Democratic opponents could range from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) to California Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'I think Kamala can definitely be a leader in the Democratic Party. And I mean, I think the interesting thing about the former VP is I kind of like that strategy,' Charlamagne told listeners. On Wednesday, Harris announced she would not launch a bid for governor in the Golden State. However, she also promoted her new book ' 107 Days,' focused on the behind-the-scenes of the campaign trail she undertook months after former President Biden dropped out of the race. In the past, Charlamagne lauded Harris for reviving a ' dead ' campaign but said President Trump captured audiences and spoke to voter grievances better. Harris is expected to give her first formal post-election remarks in a Thursday interview on 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert. Colbert, whose show is ending next year, has been critical of both Trump and his network CBS's parent company, Paramount, in a lawsuit Trump brought against '60 Minutes' over its editing of an interview with Harris.


Business Wire
6 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Landmark Federal Court Ruling Favors No Labels Party of Arizona and Opens the Door for Independent Candidates Across the State
PHOENIX--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The No Labels Party of Arizona recently received a favorable ruling in federal court (No Labels Party of AZ v. Fontes), rewriting the state's political playbook by giving independent and unaffiliated voters, and candidates, unprecedented access to run for office without political party gatekeepers standing in the way. 'We're not here to play the old partisan game,' Chairman Paul Johnson added. 'We're here to encourage new ideas and real competition, offer more choices, and provide a platform for those in Arizona who are tired of tribal politics.' Following the groundbreaking decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the No Labels Party of Arizona became officially a viable option for candidates in every legislative and congressional district. Former Phoenix Mayor Paul Johnson has been appointed Chairman of the group and will work to reenergize the Arizona No Labels Party, including outreach to members about changing its name. Johnson brings decades of bipartisan and independent reform-oriented leadership to a new, energized movement committed to empowering independent-minded candidates and voters. 'For too long, Arizona's political system has shut out independent voices, voters and candidates,' said Johnson. 'Although we are proud of the Party's roots being in the national No Labels Party, and we deeply share their values, independence allows the No Labels Party of Arizona to focus on eliminating the discriminatory practices that have prohibited nonpartisan candidates from participating in elections.' Arizona law requires independent and unaffiliated candidates to collect tens of thousands more signatures to run for office, compared to candidates from the two major political parties, for example. This intentional barrier exponentially increases the cost for Independent candidates or those not aligned with the Republican or Democratic parties. The law was specifically created to prevent non-partisan candidates from running for office. 'That's not democracy—it's a rigged system,' added Johnson. Sarah Smallhouse, also joined the group's State Committee. She agrees with the court affirming that the right to run belongs to voters, not political party leaders. The No Labels Party of Arizona is welcoming all Arizonans who want to run for office, serve their communities, and do so without needing the blessing of, what is now effectively, a two-party monopoly. Arizonans are registering in ever greater numbers as Independents, while membership in the Democratic and Republican parties is in decline. It is the right time to give all those who want to lead a chance to compete on a level playing field in Arizona. 'Our group—many of whom led the statewide Fair Elections initiative to open Arizona's primaries—has always believed that more competition produces better candidates and ultimately better policy solutions,' Smallhouse added. 'This ruling, combined with our commitment to open elections, where all candidates and voters have the same rights and requirements, finally gives us the vehicle to do just that.' An Invitation to Arizona ' s Brightest Minds This political movement opens the door to a new kind of politics, post partisan, calling on Arizona's brightest minds to lead it, regardless of party label. Those who are registered with the Republican or Democratic party may also compete as candidates in the new party. 'We stand for inclusion. Smart, principled leaders in every district—business owners, educators, engineers, veterans, healthcare professionals, students, and more—are invited to step forward and consider running for office under this fresh banner of political independence,' stated Johnson.'We're not here to play the old partisan game,' Johnson added. 'We're here to encourage new ideas and real competition, offer more choices, and provide a platform for those in Arizona who are tired of tribal politics.' Johnson emphasized that this effort will be led from the ground up. 'We're asking anyone who shares our vision to get involved early and be part of building something new—a new political era has begun,' he said. 'Email me at paul@ —start by suggesting a new name for the party. Those who reach out will be foundational in shaping the direction and decisions of this movement.' Engagement Efforts Registered independent voters, frustrated moderates, and those who believe in solutions over slogans now have a place where their voice and vote counts, and where they can run for office and lead. The No Labels Party of Arizona will have candidates running in the 2026 elections. Arizona residents can register or update their party affiliation today at: with the No Labels Party of Arizona and become part of the statewide movement to bring more sanity, integrity, and competition back to public decision-making in Arizona. Polling is set to begin in the coming weeks to No Labels Party of Arizona members to obtain input on major statewide issues, which will ensure the group represents the people, not just the political class.

Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
A Democrat in the middle of the Israel firestorm
BALANCING ACT — Democratic Rep. Sara Jacobs personifies the conflict within her party over U.S. support for Israel and the nightmare in Gaza — and the increasingly precarious balancing act for any politician trying to navigate it. The third-term member of Congress from San Diego is Jewish. She has family in Israel. So the country's security is not an abstract notion. As a millennial, and the youngest member of Democratic leadership in the House, she doesn't view criticism of Israel as off the table. But she also sits on the Armed Services Committee and represents one of the nation's most military-centric districts, so she is acutely aware of Israel's security needs and its role as a key U.S. ally in the Middle East. All of those roiling elements were on full display last night, in Washington and at a town hall meeting in her district. The Senate voted down a resolution from Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.) to block the sale of U.S. weapons to Israel. The measure failed, but 27 Democratic senators, more than half the caucus, voted in favor — a sign that the horrific images of starvation coming out of Gaza in recent months are starting to erode the largely unconditional support that Israel has long enjoyed among many Democrats. Jacobs says she would have voted in favor of the resolution, though she wants the U.S. to continue supporting Israel's defense, including by helping to pay for the Iron Dome missile defense system. She tried to lay out her nuanced position at the town hall, where pro-Palestinian protesters gathered noisily outside the high school auditorium in a suburban section of San Diego where the event was held. Inside, one of the first questions was what is she doing to ensure the people of Gaza are receiving humanitarian aid and whether Israel has committed genocide. Jacobs, who worked for the United Nations and State Department before she was elected to Congress in 2020, tried to thread the needle — saying that Israel 'might' have committed genocide. 'But I am not a lawyer, and that is a legal determination,' she told the restive audience. 'I think we've clearly seen serious atrocities. I think we've likely seen war crimes, and we've definitely seen forced displacement that could amount to ethnic cleansing.' Soon, members of the audience were yelling at her — and each other. Her efforts to explain her support for a ban on offensive weapons, but not for defense, were drowned out. 'Weapons are weapons,' a woman shouted. A man stood and chanted 'free free Palestine' while waving a black-and-white keffiyeh. Members of the crowd shouted back at him. After about 20 minutes, police escorted the man with the keffiyeh out of the auditorium and the town hall turned to other topics — mostly expressions of anger about various actions by President Donald Trump wrapped into a question. Jacobs said the next day that she welcomed the protests and is less worried about the politics of the issue within the Democratic Party than she is about addressing the larger issues. 'The thing that needs to be worked out is how we get unimpeded humanitarian access to Gaza, and then how we get back on a path to a situation where you have two states where Israelis can live safely and securely and where Palestinians can live with dignity and autonomy and self determination,' she told POLITICO today. The bitter politics of the conflict aside, Jacobs contends there's a middle position in which people can condemn both the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas and the Israeli response that authorities say has led to about 60,000 deaths, mostly civilians in Gaza. 'I truly believe both that Oct. 7 was horrible and we should be calling for the release of the remaining hostages, and that what's going on in Gaza right now is horrible, and those don't have to be mutually exclusive,' she said. 'Civilians shouldn't be blamed for their government actions, and that's true of Israeli civilians, and it's true of Palestinian civilians, and it's true of American civilians.' Despite what happened at her town hall, the protests over the war in Gaza around the U.S. have, for now at least, ebbed since last year and many Democratic voters in general have turned their attention to other issues. But it's not clear how long politicians like Jacobs, or her party, will be able to walk this precarious middle ground. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at bfox@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @ben_foxed. What'd I Miss? — Witkoff and Huckabee to visit Gaza, inspect food distribution centers: Special envoy Steve Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will visit Gaza on Friday to inspect aid distribution sites and meet with Gazans, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced today, amid intensifying global criticism of the humanitarian crisis in the region. The administration officials' planned trip into the besieged Gaza Strip comes amid escalating pressure both globally and from within MAGA circles to intervene, as well as a string of declarations from U.S. allies who plan to support Palestinian statehood ahead of a United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. — State Department sanctions Palestinian leadership organizations amid global statehood push: The State Department announced sanctions against the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority today, denying organization members visas for the United States, citing claims that the groups are 'continuing to support terrorism.' The move comes as Canada and a growing number of European countries have vowed to recognize Palestinian statehood ahead of September's United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York, amid warnings from global leaders that Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip face mass starvation due to Israeli aid blockages. — Kamala Harris to release book focused on presidential campaign: Kamala Harris announced today that she will release a book recounting her 2024 campaign for the presidency. 'I believe there is value in sharing what I saw, what I learned, and what I know it will take to move forward,' the former vice president said in the announcement, posted to X. 'In writing this book, one truth kept coming back to me: sometimes, the fight takes a while.' The announcement comes just one day after Harris announced she would not run for governor in California next year, while still not closing the door on a 2028 run. — White House raising the pressure ahead of Friday tariff deadline: President Donald Trump has settled on tariff rates for most of the country's largest trading partners. The rest of the world stands in limbo. A White House official confirmed that Trump plans to sign new executive orders today imposing higher tariff rates on several countries that have been unable to reach negotiated trade agreements by his self-imposed Friday deadline. It could include a number of America's biggest trading partners, including Canada, Mexico and Taiwan. That's sent their leaders, as well as officials from other sizable economies scrambling to try and secure a last-minute deal or extension — although most are downbeat about that prospect. — Trump's tariffs get frosty reception at federal appeals court: Federal appeals court judges sharply questioned President Donald Trump's authority to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign trading partners today under an unprecedented use of emergency powers. Several judges of the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly wondered how Trump could justify the broad tariffs using a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, that presidents have used to set economic sanctions and other penalties on foreign countries — but never previously tariffs. FLIPPING THE SCRIPT — Past German governments sought to temper Europe's most hardline impulses on migration. Now, under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Berlin is vying to lead Europe's anti-immigration charge. The stark shift in Germany's migration stance under its new government promises to accelerate the EU's hard-right turn on migration as the bloc prepares to implement a series of new measures aimed at drastically reducing the number of asylum seekers entering Europe — and deporting more of those who do make it. As European leaders negotiate on how to put these measures into place, those from some of the EU's most hardline countries are welcoming Germany's new role. TRADE TALKS STALL — President Donald Trump said late Wednesday that Canada's move to recognize Palestinian statehood threatened to jeopardize trade deal talks between the two countries. On Wednesday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that his country intends to recognize a Palestinian state ahead of September's United Nations General Assembly, joining France and the U.K. on that path. With a Friday deadline looming to strike a deal or face steep U.S. tariffs, negotiations between Canada and the U.S. have stalled, and no deal framework has been set. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP THE WORLD'S HARDEST EXAM — Are you smart enough to get a public sector job? In India, college graduates spend years studying for job entrance exams to learn general knowledge like the pH of the human body and the largest Bauxite producing state in the country. Even though these general knowledge exams have no set schedule, lifetime public sector jobs are coveted and respected for their pension and benefits. But as the number of public sector jobs shrink and private sector roles aren't growing to meet graduation numbers, the competition for jobs has reached new levels. In the most recent round of exams for the Ministry of Railways, about 30 million people applied for 90,000 spots. Harriet Shawcross and Dipanjan Sinha report on the world of Indian job entrance exams for The Economist. Parting Image Jacqueline Munis contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.