British fighter jets to carry nuclear weapons in face of ‘new era of threat' of Russia
The government is in talks with US officials over the move, which would be the UK's biggest deterrent development since the
Advertisement
6
Britain's tactical nukes and V-bombers were decommissioned after the Cold War
Credit: EPA
6
Britain's Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin has called for the move
Credit: AP
6
Investment in the aircraft would mean the UK would be able to launch nuclear weapons from both air and sea
Credit: Alamy
Sir Keir Starmer will launch a strategic defence
review
on Monday as the government looks to help Europe counter Putin's threat.
The review points to the UK expanding its contribution to NATO's nuclear deterrence across the continent.
It also recommends that the country's defence industry should be on standby for rearmament.
Defence Secretary
Advertisement
They are looking to purchase fighter jets capable of carrying gravity bombs with lower
power
than conventional nuclear weapons.
Britain's tactical nukes and V-bombers were decommissioned in favour of the Vanguard submarine programme after the Cold War.
Investment in the aircraft would mean the UK would be able to launch nuclear weapons from both air and sea.
At present, the military is only able to launch from one platform.
Advertisement
Most read in The Sun
Whereas US forces possess nuclear launch capabilities from land, air and sea.
Britain will be wiped off the map with nukes unless it stops helping Ukraine, warns Putin's guru 'Professor Doomsday'
American-built F-35 A
Lightning
stealth jets look to be the
target
for the government, with the jets having been recently procured by German military forces.
They have a range of almost 900 miles and are capable of carrying a B61 thermonuclear gravity bomb.
Radakin is understood to view the move as the UK's number one defence priority.
Advertisement
Speaking to The Times, the Defence Secretary admitted that nuclear risks across the globe are rising.
He said: "The world is definitely becoming more dangerous. Nuclear risks are rising.
"For the first time since the Cold War, we face seriously increasing risks of state-on-state conflict.
"The lesson from Ukraine is that a country's armed forces are only as strong as the industry behind them.'
Advertisement
It comes as the government insisted it would reach its target to hike defence spending to three per cent GDP by 2034.
Writing in The Sun on Sunday, Sir Keir said the time had come to 'transform how we defend these islands'.
6
Sir Keir Starmer will launch a strategic defence review on Monday
Credit: AFP
6
Defence Secretary John Healey admitted global nuclear risks are rising
Credit: AFP
Advertisement
6
Britain hopes to expand its contribution to NATO's nuclear deterrence against Russia
Credit: PA
He added: 'We will meet this moment head on — by mounting the kind of response not seen before in most of our lifetimes.
"We will restore Britain's war-fighting readiness as the central purpose of our Armed Forces.
"We are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces.
Advertisement
'So we must be ready to fight and win. After all, the best way to prevent conflict is by preparing for it.'
Read more on the Irish Sun
Revealing details of the long-awaited Strategic Defence Review, he revealed the UK will move to wartime levels of arms production by building six new munitions factories.
The £1.5billion investment will create or support nearly 2,000 jobs across the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
11 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Taliban mark fourth year in power in Afghanistan
Afghanistan's Taliban authorities have marked the fourth anniversary of their takeover, buoyed by Russia's first official recognition of their government, a step they hope other countries will follow. Parades were planned in several cities, including in central Kabul, where helicopters were set to drop flowers and the white-and-black flags of the Taliban's 'Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan' fluttered across the city to mark their capture of the capital on 15 August 2021. Taliban members gathered at a square near the shuttered US embassy - seat of their enemy during their 20-year insurgency - waving flags and setting off fireworks, an AFP journalist said. The military parade held last year with much fanfare at the Bagram airbase, once the linchpin for US-led operations, was cancelled this year, without public explanation. The Taliban government remains largely isolated on the global stage over restrictions imposed under their severe interpretation of Islamic law, targeting women in particular. The International Criminal Court issued in July arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity over the persecution of women and girls, who are banned from most education and work, as well as parks, gyms and travelling without a male guardian. But the authorities scored a victory in early July when Russia became the first country to officially recognise their administration. Kabul also enjoys close ties, despite lacking official recognition, with countries including Central Asian states, China and the United Arab Emirates. On the Western front, the Taliban government reported talks in Kabul with officials from Norway, Britain and the United States, among others. The authorities face almost no internal opposition, though steep challenges stem from economic fragility, international aid cuts and the influx of four million Afghans expelled from neighbouring countries. Independent experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council yesterday called on the international community not to normalise relations with the Taliban authorities and to reject their "violent and authoritarian rule". "Operating without legitimacy, the Taliban enforces an institutionalised system of gender oppression, crushes dissent, exacts reprisals, and muzzles independent media while showing outright contempt for human rights, equality and non-discrimination," the experts said in a statement.
RTÉ News
41 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Why the Trump-Putin meeting worries Europe
Confirmation last week that US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin would hold a summit in Alaska raised a red flag for Europe and Ukraine. With no Ukrainian or European involvement, and the expiry of a US deadline to impose sanctions on Moscow coming to nothing, it looked like Russia was getting it all its own way. Ukraine and Europe's chief concern for most of the past week has been that Mr Trump and Mr Putin could strike a deal in Alaska that would force Ukraine to cede about one-fifth of its territory to Russia - regions in eastern and southern Ukraine currently occupied by Russian forces. There would be some "land swapping", Mr Trump told reporters in the White House earlier this week. It was beginning to sound like another Yalta, the conference held in Crimea in February 1945 between Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin where the two Western allies gave in to the Soviet leader's demands to redraw the map of Eastern Europe and control it. Of course, Russia's leader wants more Ukrainian land than the 19% currently occupied by his forces. He wants Ukraine to withdraw entirely from the four regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia and to have Russia's annexation of those regions, along with Crimea, internationally recognised as the main price for stopping the war. Official recognition of Russian control of any seized territory is unacceptable for Europe, and naturally for Ukraine. Problematically for Europe, in April the Trump administration offered the Kremlin a very generous deal to stop the war that reportedly included official US recognition of Russia's control of Crimea and de facto recognition of Russian-occupied territory in eastern and southern Ukraine. US recognition of Crimea still on table Though Russia rejected the offer at the time, the US position had not changed. That would mean that official US recognition of Crimea as part of Russia is still on the table. In the eyes of European governments, allowing Russia to change international borders through force would simply embolden Mr Putin to rearm and invade Ukraine again in the coming years, and next time take it all. Or Russia could threaten the security of a NATO member state in Eastern Europe. Either scenario threatens the future of European security. It explains why this week there was a flurry of diplomatic activity in European capitals to impress upon Mr Trump the need to distrust the Russian leader's assurances. On Tuesday, the leaders of all EU member states except Hungary endorsed a letter supporting Ukraine's right to decide its own future and also that any diplomatic solution to the war in Ukraine must protect the security interests of Ukrainians and Europeans - which brings Ukraine's future security needs a step closer to Europe's. Then followed a meeting called by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz between Mr Trump, other European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump now reading territorial issue European lobbying seems to have had an effect on how Mr Trump is now reading the territorial issue. According to sources familiar with the meeting, the US president told the other leaders during Wednesday's call that he would not negotiate a division of Ukrainian territory. That assurance bodes well for Ukraine and Europe. It was also reported by US media that Mr Trump told the other attendees that the US could play a role in offering a security guarantee to Ukraine, though no details have emerged of what level of engagement that might be. If that is the case, then it would be the first time that Mr Trump has committed to protecting Ukraine's post-war security alongside the Europeans. There is also a strong possibility that during the Alaska meeting Mr Putin will bring up Russia's original list of demands given to the Biden administration in December 2021 just two months before Russia invaded Ukraine. Presented by Russian officials at the time as a formula for decreasing geopolitical tension in Europe, one of the demands required the West to give security guarantees to Russia. In reality, the demands looked like a Russian attempt to regain its former sphere of influence over all of Eastern Europe. The most notable demand was for NATO to withdraw its troops and weapons from countries in Eastern Europe that joined the alliance from the late 1990s onwards. Doing so would leave countries like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia particularly exposed to the threat of Russian aggression. For almost 80 years, the US has provided Europe (first Western Europe and then Eastern Europe from the late 1990s onwards) with a security guarantee, and American and European leaders have always worked in lockstep when it comes to the continent's security. Mr Trump is the first post-war US president to cast doubts about the future of that ironclad security guarantee, leading to commitments earlier this year from European governments to ramp up spending on their national defence budgets. Another point of concern for Europe is that some kind of economic deal between the US and Russia could come from the Alaska meeting. This scenario would be to the detriment of US-Europe relations given that the Europe is already hitting Russia with heavy sanctions. Back in March when the Trump-Putin relationship had briefly blossomed, the White House spoke about the "enormous economic deals" that could arise from better US-Russia relations. At the same time, Mr Putin spoke about the possibility of energy sector cooperation. Not surprisingly, the Kremlin returned to the theme of US-Russia economic cooperation this week. Yesterday, a senior member of the Russian delegation was talking about the "huge untapped potential" of trade cooperation between the two countries. That kind of talk will make Europe feel nervous that Mr Trump could preference business over decades-old alliances. Mr Putin is bringing both Russia's finance minister and the head of Russia's direct investment fund as part of his delegation which indicates that Russia is going to lay out business opportunities for the US. Mr Trump is a businessman and may be won over. But just as Mr Trump is unpredictable, so too is the outcome of the meeting later today at the Elmendorf-Richardson Joint Base outside Anchorage. European leaders, like the rest of us, will have to wait and see what Mr Trump and Mr Putin agree upon and what it will mean for Ukraine.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Putin-Trump summit: What each side wants
The US and Russian presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are to meet at a US air base in Alaska for talks on the Ukraine war. Expectations are high for the first summit between sitting US and Russian presidents in more than four years, but Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart in their visions on how to end the conflict. It will be Mr Putin's first trip to a Western country since launching his invasion in February 2022, as well as his first US visit in 10 years. Here is a look at what each side hopes to achieve from the talks: Russia For Mr Putin, who has faced years of isolation from the West since the invasion, the summit is an opportunity to press Russia's hardline demands for ending the conflict. In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its NATO ambitions, and for Western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies - something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the "rights and freedoms" of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the "glorification of Nazism". It also wants Western sanctions lifted. Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukraine Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without its involvement. He has called the meeting a "personal victory" for Mr Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. United States Mr Trump promised he would end the war within "24 hours" after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Mr Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US president, author of the book "Trump: The Art of the Deal" said on Wednesday that Russia would face "very severe consequences" if it did not halt its offensive. The US leader initially said there would be some "land swapping going on" at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders on Wednesday. Mr Trump has said he would "like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly". But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a "listening exercise" for the former reality TV star. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Mr Trump said, hinting Mr Zelensky could take part in a subsequent summit. Europe Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, European leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. "Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president," French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Mr Trump on Wednesday. Mr Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected.
