logo
Anchorage abuzz ahead of Trump-Putin summit – but ‘please don't sell us back'

Anchorage abuzz ahead of Trump-Putin summit – but ‘please don't sell us back'

The Guardian6 days ago
It is set to be one of the last good summer weekends in Anchorage, Alaska – the peak of the salmon run and the middle of berry season – and residents hope that Friday's summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin isn't going to ruin it for them.
'I'm looking forward to taking my boat out on the water at Prince William Sound – that's my plan,' said Andy Moderow, who works at a conservation non-profit in Anchorage.
Jeff Landfield, owner of the Alaska Landmine news site, said: 'We've had a pretty good summer. Getting projects done, going out hunting, fishing, camping, four-wheeling. But it's coming to the close of the season, so I've seen several people say, 'They better not fuck up my plans.''
The largest city in Alaska, Anchorage sits farther north than Oslo and St Petersburg. With a population of just under 300,000 people, its low-slung downtown sits on mud flats above the Cook Inlet, at the base of the Chugach mountains. Its neighborhoods sprawl on wide streets between strip malls and stands of birch; its downtown shops sell Alaska Native handicrafts and bear and moose-themed souvenirs.
Residents refer to the rest of the US as 'the lower 48', and see themselves as having 'an independent streak', said Colleen Heaney-Mead, who runs a daycare in Anchorage.
'We don't want to be part of whatever is happening there,' she said, discussing the Trump administration's actions in the contiguous US. 'We don't have to do everything they do.'
Friday's summit won't mark the first time the city has been the setting for high-profile diplomacy. China's president, Xi Jinping, stopped off at the city in 2017, dining on king salmon and crab bisque on his way back from a meeting with Trump in Florida.
Two years later, Anchorage was the venue for a tense meeting between Chinese diplomats and officials from the Biden government who publicly rebuked each other over human rights abuses and systemic racism.
But this time around, things feels different.
In Alaska, Russia is not an abstract enemy but a close neighbor; its jets buzz Alaskan airspace, its government is said to be undercutting Alaskan fishermen. Anchorage residents are torn between excitement over a high-profile visit and trepidation over what that visit might mean.
'You feel like Anchorage is back on the map in a way, which I think everyone sort of enjoys,' said Hollis French, a retired state senator who served on the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
'Although I had dinner last night with two friends, and we're all sort of pessimistic and skeptical. You know, I would say we're expecting Trump to do something horrible.'
Trump's announcement that he was going to meet Putin 'in Russia' also set off alarm bells in a region which was part of the Russian empire until its sale to the US in 1867.
'There's the satirical response that Alaskans have: 'Please don't sell us back,'' said Heaney-Mead.
Moderow, who grew up at the end of the cold war, said fallout shelters and nuclear drills were some of his earliest memories, even if Alaskan politicians, such as the 2008 vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, at times make a bit much of the short distance between the two countries.
'Russia is a neighbor,' he said. 'If you've grown up in the state, you are aware of Russia, and its proximity – even though Sarah Palin kind of oversold it in her debate.'
French concurred, saying: 'We are aware that they're a hostile neighbor. We are aware that they probe our defenses and we respond accordingly. I think most people know that the leader of the country is not, you know, the embodiment of the country. But [Putin] certainly got his people cowed. And so I think Alaskans are wary of him.'
Landfield gestured to longstanding cultural ties between Russia and Alaska, including university exchange programs, and the Old Believers, a sect of the Russian Orthodox church, brought to Alaska by Russians fleeing repression over the years. 'People don't like Putin. It's not Russia or Russians,' he said. 'I don't think Russia is our enemy.'
Matt Acuña Buxton, a longtime political reporter based in Anchorage, said there was 'a really broad dissatisfaction' that Putin – the subject of an international criminal court (ICC) arrest warrant – is visiting the city.
'A lot of Alaskans really understand that Putin and Putin's administration are really not friends of Alaskans,' he said.
The White House has signalled that the summit will be held at the military base in north-east Anchorage, a letdown for locals, said Meade, as 'anything that happens on base isn't like it really happens in Alaska'.
That hasn't stopped Anchorage residents from offering other ideas: 49% of respondents to a poll from the Alaska Landmine suggested the two world leaders could meet 'at Sarah Palin's house'.
Another Anchorage newsletter, the Alaska Memo, proposed that Trump and Putin could hike Flattop mountain, the 'quintessential Anchorage-area date night', or stay at Skinny Dick's Halfway Inn on the road to Fairbanks.
'It's a meme-rich environment right now,' said Landfield.
Acuña Buxton, who writes the Alaska Memo, said such satire offers Alaskans a way of coping with the 'dystopian' and improbable scenario of Trump trading Alaska to Russia.
'Ultimately, in the big picture of things, this is about Ukraine,' he said of the Trump-Putin meeting. '[But] I think for Alaskans, it's just sort of like a chance to roll our eyes a little bit and make some jokes.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'
UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'

The UK's top military chief is set to hold meetings in Washington DC today following Donald Trump 's promise of security guarantees for Ukraine. Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, is expected to attend talks at the Pentagon to thrash out how Ukraine would be defended from future attack in the event of a peace deal with Russia. It follows crunch talks at the White House on Monday between the US President and European leaders, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. After the emergency summit in the Oval Office - held in the wake of Mr Trump's talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week - Sir Keir said there had been a 'common understanding' about a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine. The PM added this was an 'Article 5-like guarantee', which could mirror the 'collective defence' clause of the NATO treaty that states that an attack against one NATO ally is considered an attack against all NATO allies. Sir Keir has pledged to put British troops on the ground in Ukraine as part of efforts by the so-called 'coalition of the willing' of Ukrainian allies to help ensure a potential peace agreement with Russia holds. But, during the Pentagon talks on Wednesday between military chiefs from the coalition of the willing and their American counterparts, Sir Tony is expected to state that UK peacekeeping troops would not be on the frontline with Russia. US President Donald Trump told Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday that America would help guarantee Ukraine's security in a deal with Russia A British official told The Guardian: 'Wednesday is a really important moment. 'Nothing happens in Washington without the President giving the green light, so Trump giving his support to security guarantees on Monday kickstarted a lot of activity.' Another said Sir Tony would echo pledges made by Defence Secretary John Healey, who recently said Britain was willing to deploy troops to Ukraine 'to secure the safe skies, safe seas and to build the strength of the Ukrainian forces'. They added that ministers envisaged this as meaning logistical and training support rather than sending battalions of frontline troops who could end up in combat. Security minister Dan Jarvis this morning said the flurry of diplomatic talks in recent days had 'brought the prospect of peace much closer' in Ukraine. Speaking on Times Radio, he said: 'We've always strongly supported Ukraine's integration, both in terms of their potential desire to be members of the European Union and membership of NATO. 'We don't think that any limitation should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its co-operation with third countries, and Russia certainly shouldn't be able to have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to the European Union or NATO.' Mr Jarvis added: 'I think it is important to make the point that very significant progress has been made. 'I think the Alaska summit and the talks in Washington over the previous days have brought the prospect of peace much closer than they had been previously.' But, despite the growing hopes that the three year-long conflict in Ukraine could soon be brought to an end, former Russian prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov warned that Mr Putin is 'absolutely not' ready for peace. He told Times Radio that the Russian leader was 'absolutely not' serious about striking a peace deal, despite Mr Trump's suggestion trilateral meeting - potentially in Budapest - between himself, Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. 'He doesn't want to have the high-level meeting. He doesn't want to meet to sit down with Zelensky,' Mr Kasyanov, a leading Putin critic, said. 'It will be some of a humiliating event for him. That's why he will be avoiding it. You're correct that the ball is on Putin's court, but he will continue dragging out time, continue his offensive operation, believing that he will win the war of attrition. 'He simply managed to avoid imposing just tough sanctions as a result of Alaska meeting.'

GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media
GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media

Daily Mail​

time14 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media

A Republican politician unintentionally provoked a wave of criticism in a misguided attempt to promote President Donald Trump's 'No Tax on Tips' initiative. Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks (pictured) shared two photos to X on Monday after she dined at Sundown Bar and Grill in Iowa for lunch on Sunday. In one of the pictures, Miller-Meeks smiles broadly while showing off the receipt for her meal - a chilly steak sandwich and some nuggets - which totaled $18.19 including tax. But it was her tip which has left online commentators so divided. Miller-Meeks left $21 in bills, along with several coins on the table to cover her bill, amounting to a tip of about $3. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns,' she wrote. Despite offering a 20 percent tip on her meal, Miller-Meeks has been slammed for the sum. 'Imagine showing the world you're a cheapskate,' one furious X user wrote. 'Did you really only tip $3? And broadcast it as a win?' Her defenders pointed out that she left a 20 percent tip on her bill, an amount generally considered a good - or at the very least, standard - tip at restaurants in the US. One person, defending Miller-Meeks, responded to another user who had been particularly critical of her tip. 'Why are you trying to make someone who tipped 20% seem stingy? Oh I know, you want internet clout from libs,' the commenter said. 'Further, what are your tipping habits? Do you think 20% is to [sic] little?' Anthony Fakhoury, a spokesperson with Miller-Meeks' office, told CBS : 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip. 'Unlike Democrats, she did not vote to increase taxes on hardworking Iowans. "No Tax on Tips" means more money in the pockets of servers, not the IRS.'

How many wars President Trump don really end?
How many wars President Trump don really end?

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

How many wars President Trump don really end?

As President Donald Trump dey try negotiate to end di Russia-Ukraine war, im bin dey tok about im track record for peace negotiations since im start im second term for office. Im bin tok for White House on 18 August, wen European leader put pressure on am to push for ceasefire, im claim say: "I don end six wars… all of dis deals I make am without even mentioning di word 'ceasefire'." Di following day di number im tok rise to "seven wars". Di Trump administration say a Nobel Peace Prize na "something wey suppose don happun " for di "peacemaker-in-chief", and dem list di "wars" im claim to end. Some last just days - although na di result of long-standing tensions - and e no dey clear whether some of di peace deals go last. Trump also use di word "ceasefire" plenty times wen im tok about dem for im Truth Social platform. BBC Verify dey torchlight dis conflicts and how much credit di president go take for ending dem. Israel and Iran Di 12-day conflict begin wen Israel hit targets for Iran on 13 June. Trump confam say Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu inform am ahead of di strikes. Di US bin carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites - a move wey many feel say sharpely end di conflict. On 23 June, Trump post say: "Officially, Iran go start di CEASEFIRE and, on di 12th Hour, Israel go start di CEASEFIRE and, on di 24th Hour, di world go salute Officially di END to DI 12 DAY WAR." Afta di war end, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei insist say im kontri don secure a "decisive victory" and im no mention a ceasefire. Israel dey suggest say dem fit strike Iran again to counter new threats. "No agreement on permanent peace or on how to monitor Iran nuclear programme going forward," Michael O'Hanlon argue, im be a senior fellow for di Brookings Institution think tank. "So wetin we get hia na more of a de facto ceasefire dan an end to war, but I go give am some credit, as di weakening of Iran by Israel - wit US help - dey strategically significant." Pakistan and India Tensions between dis two nuclear-armed kontris don dey for many years, but for May kasala break out sake of di attack for Indian-administered Kashmir. Afta four days of strikes, Trump post say India and Pakistan don agree to a "FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE". Im say dis na di result of "a long night of talks wey United States". Pakistan thank Trump and later recommend am for di Nobel Peace Prize, im torchlight Trump "decisive diplomatic intervention". India, however, play down tok of US involvement: "Di tok regarding cessation of military action happun directly between India and Pakistan under di existing channels wey dey established between both militaries," Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri tok. Rwanda and di Democratic Republic of Congo Di long-standing wahala between dis two kontri enta anoda afta di M23 rebel group seize di mineral-rich territory for eastern DR Congo earlier in di year. For June, di two kontris sign a peace agreement for Washington wit di aim to end decades of conflict. Trump say e gohelp increase trade between dem and US. Di text call for "respect for di ceasefire" agreement between Rwanda and DRC for August 2024. Since di latest deal, both sides dey accuse each oda of violating di ceasefire and di M23 rebels - wey di UK and US say get links to Rwanda - don threatened to walk away from di peace toks. "Fight-fight still dey between Congo and Rwanda - so dat ceasefire never really hold water," na so Margaret MacMillan, one professor of history wey bin teach for di University of Oxford. Thailand and Cambodia On 26 July, Trump post for im Truth Social say: "I dey call di Acting Prime Minister of Thailand, right now, to request a Ceasefire, and END to di War, wey currently dey happun." A couple of days later, di two kontris agree to an "immediate and unconditional ceasefire" after less dan a week of fighting for di border. Malaysia bin hold di peace toks, but President Trump bin threaten to stop separate negotiations on reducing US tariffs (dat na taxes on imports) unless Thailand and Cambodia stop dia fight- fight. Both of dem dey heavily depend on exports to US. On 7 August, Thailand and Cambodia reach agreement wit di aim to reducing tensions along dia shared border. Armenia and Azerbaijan Di leaders of both kontris say Trump suppose receive di Nobel Peace Prize for im efforts to secure a peace deal, wey White House announce on 8 August. "I think im go get good credit hia - di Oval Office signing ceremony fit don push di parties to peace," na so Oga O'Hanlon tok. For March, di two goment bin tok say dem ready to end dia nearly 40-year conflict wey dey centred on di status of Nagorno-Karabakh. Di most recent, serious outbreak of fight-fight na for September 2023 wen Azerbaijan bin seize di enclave (wia many ethnic Armenians dey live). Egypt and Ethiopia No "war" hia for di president to end, but tension don dey for long between dis two kontris sake of one dam on for River Nile. Ethiopia Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam dem complete am dis summer, Egypt argue say di water e dey get from di Nile fit dey affected. Afta 12 years of disagreement, Egypt's foreign minister tok on 29 June say tok-tok with Ethiopia don stop completly. Trump say: "If I be Egypt, I'go want get water for di Nile." Im promise say US go resolve di issue sharp-sharp Egypt welcome Trump words, but Ethiopian officials no too happy wit di tok. No official deal dey ground between Egypt and Ethiopia to resolve dia differences. Serbia and Kosovo On 27 June, Trump claim say im prevent outbreak of war between dem, e say: "Serbia, Kosovo bin ready fight each oda, e for be big war. I tell dem if un try am, na im be say una no go do trade wit United States. Dem say, well, maybe we no go fight again." E don tey wey dis two kontris get issue wit each oda - na legacy of di Balkan wars wey happun for 1990s – di tensions begin rise again in recent years. "Serbia and Kosovo no dey fight or fire each oda, so dis no be war to end," Prof MacMillan tell us. Di White House point us towards Trump diplomatic efforts for im first term. Wia di two kontris sign economic normalisation agreements for Oval Office wit di president for 2020, but war no dey dat time. Additional reporting na from Peter Mwai, Shruti Menon and Eve Webster.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store