The Defensive Evolution Of Ottawa Senators Star Centre Tim Stützle
If the Ottawa Senators were ever going to take a marked step forward in their rebuild, the improvements would have to come from within.
Management obviously felt obligated to address the goaltending position in the offseason by acquiring Linus Ullmark, but the majority of the offseason was spent focusing on identifying and acquiring players who were better fits.
Michael Amadio, David Perron and Nick Jensen are fine players, but any evolution in becoming a sustainable winner within the Eastern Conference was predicated on the defensive growth of its youngest and most talented players.
At the forefront of this evolution was Tim Stützle.
The 23-year-old, German-born centre is unquestionably the team's most dynamic player. Every time he steps on the ice, his ability to skate and process the game at extremely high speeds allows him to take over shifts and tilt the ice in the Senators' favour.
He may not wear a letter within the Senators' publicly displayed leadership structure, but there is no mistaking how essential it was to get Stützle's buy-in. Even without a letter, his ability to influence the actions and behaviours of his teammates speaks to how powerful of a position he is in.
He recognizes his situation.
"Our leadership group goes far beyond this group," Stützle said. "A lot of guys we have here, not just wearing letters, but also the guys behind this group.
"We have done a great job, with everybody sticking together, whether it's good or bad. I always try to be a leader. I try to show it on the ice. Sometimes, I say things in the room, but obviously not as much. I bring my energy on the ice. I have worked a lot on my body language, too."
It is a responsibility he does not take lightly.
Stützle met with Travis Green several times over the offseason. The newly appointed head coach outlined his expectations for his franchise centre.
"He told me what he expects from me," Stützle recalled while describing those conversations. "(His expectations) were a lot, but I expect a lot from myself, too. I want to get better every day and listen to what the (coaches) say."
Throughout the offseason, Stützle's conversations with the well-decorated and respected veteran Claude Giroux resonated with him.
"I talked to (Giroux) about it last year," Stützle said. "It doesn't really matter what system you play defensively or offensively. If everybody buys in and everybody's on the same page, you have a chance to win every night.
"I really thought about that a lot because it makes a lot of sense. Whatever coach you have, maybe you disagree with (the staff's philosophies), but as long as everybody buys in with it and everybody does the same thing, you're not always on the winning side (every night), but most nights (you can win)."
That buy-in was paramount and noticed immediately by the aforementioned Giroux.
"When your top guys are doing the right things, other guys don't have a choice but to do so, too," explained Giroux. "It starts with him and Brady (Tkachuk).
"He has bought into what we're trying to do. He's also one of our best players, and offensively, he's dynamic. He's fun to watch, but you can see (the defensive growth). He has taken a big step defensively, and he's a kid who wants to win. (His defensive effort and numbers) reflect that."
The work began during the first week of training camp.
"It is something we have harped on since Travis (Green) and the new staff (arrived)," Drake Batherson said while reflecting on the team's defensive improvements. "It came right from the first week or so of training camp. We did not do much offensive stuff. It was a lot of detailed defensive work."
With Stützle, that work has continued on and off the ice. He acknowledged that a lot of time is spent watching and breaking down videos to identify areas or moments where he can improve. That video work is done with the coaching staff, but he is also quick to credit his teammates for developing a hardened mindset.
"It's not just the coaches, it's the players," he said. "We push each other every day in practice. It's a lot of video, for sure, but (we spend time learning) how to win stick battles and puck battles. There's a lot of mindset involved in that, too. But the willingness to do it is the biggest part."
There is a maturity in the way that Stützle speaks about his and his team's commitment to defence.
"It obviously helps when everybody's on the same page, and everybody's doing things like backchecking," Stützle remarked. "It makes it easier for our defencemen and for our goalies.
"They know where the puck is going if we all track the same way or come back together. As a centre, everybody looks at him as a defensive kind of guy, but when the wingers do a great job coming back, it makes everything easier. We have it this year that everybody's actually coming back; everybody's blocking shots. So, it's been a fun experience and really shows how our group has matured over the years."
From a qualitative standpoint, it is impossible to watch the Senators play without noticing Stützle's efforts on the defensive end. There is a commitment to creating backpressure on the opposing puck carriers and working deep in the defensive zone to create turnovers and transition the puck out of harm.
The numbers also reflect that this is Stützle's best defensive season.
Using Evolving-Hockey's proprietary data and modelling, their 'Total Defence' statistic that captures a player's defensive contributions at five-on-five and while on the penalty kill and puts it into one value, the 2024-25 campaign has been Stützle's best defensive season. Looking at its 'Wins Above Replacement' (WAR) metric, Evolving-Hockey's data also believes the 2024-25 season is where he has accrued the most value - which is more impressive, considering the Senators still have 25 games left for him to add to his numbers.
HockeyViz.com provides even more compelling visuals of how the Senators fare with Stützle on and off the ice.
When Stützle is on the ice, the Senators produce offence at an above-average clip (+4%). They generate offence at a below-average rate (-6%) when he is off it. On the defensive side of the puck, the Senators are a relatively decent defensive team (-2%) when Stützle is off the ice, but they fare exceptionally well when he is on the ice (-13%).
His teammates' 'With or Without You' (WOWY) numbers also reflect this phenomenon. When they play with Stützle, they benefit from the experience.
Even looking at the Senators' five-on-five rate stats when Stützle is on the ice, NaturalStatTrick's data shows that the team is giving up far fewer shots (CA/60), shots on goal (SA/60), goals (GA/60) and expected goals (xGA/60) when the centre is on the ice.
2020-21: 60.06 CA/60, 34.95 SA/60, 3.59 GA/60, 2.70 xGA/60
2021-22: 56.05 CA/60, 30.87 SA/60, 2.79 GA/60, 2.60 xGA/60
2022-23: 56.29 CA/60, 30.63 SA/60, 3.32 GA/60, 2.74 xGA/60
2023-24: 59.73 CA/60, 31.39 SA/60, 3.40 GA/60, 2.82 xGA/60
2024-25: 53.68 CA/60, 25.71 SA/60, 2.54 GA/60, 2.12 xGA/60
Stützle's efforts are notable because his improved play has come while facing tough competition.
"With Timmy, he's going to play either against the checking line or one of the top lines," Batherson described. "He is going to obviously be forced to play in our (defensive) zone for a bit, and he has done a great job of it - going head-to-head against some top lines and being able to shut those guys down while still producing (offensively). I know it has been a huge growth, and it has been fun to watch."
The work is paying off.
"I put a lot of time in it every day working on (defence)," Stützle admitted. "I just try and get better every day in practice. There's still a lot to improve, especially my defensive game, but in the end, I would rather play good defensively and try and (help the team) get as far as we can and hopefully make the playoffs.
"As a group, if we all have 90 points and don't make the playoffs, (it sucks). It's fun scoring goals, but it's even better winning. We've competed really hard this year so far. Hopefully, we can keep it going."
By Graeme NicholsThe Hockey News Ottawa
Other recommended articles from THN Ottawa:
Ottawa Senators Call Up Angus Crookshank: 'Any Day Where You Can Be In The NHL Is Always A Good One'
One on One With Former Ottawa Senator Goalie Andrew Hammond Ten Years After The Hamburglar Run
Gary Bettman Reduces Ryan Hartman's Suspension for Slamming Tim Stützle's Face Into The Ice

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indianapolis Star
37 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Will Caitlin Clark play for Indiana Fever against New York Liberty, 6/14/25? Prediction, TV
The Indiana Fever try to hand the New York Liberty their first loss of the season on Saturday, June 14. Indiana (4-5), which has been without Caitlin Clark and Sophie Cunningham for several games, struggled mightily in the second half in a loss earlier in the week to the Atlanta Dream. Indiana is 2-3 without Clark in the lineup. On Friday, June 13, the Fever announced Clark would return to the lineup against the Liberty. Clark had been out for about three weeks after suffering a quad strain on May 24 against the Liberty. In addition to Clark, Sophie Cunningham will also return after reaggravating a right ankle injury on May 30. DeWanna Bonner, however, will not be with the Fever for Saturday's game because of personal reasons. New York (9-0) is the WNBA's lone undefeated team, winning by an average of 19 points and leading the league in offensive and defensive rating, field goal shooting, 3-pointers made, steals and blocked shots. They edged the Fever 90-88 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on May 24. Chloe Peterson is your best Fever follow, and sign up for our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter. 3 p.m. ET Saturday, June 14, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis Chloe Peterson, IndyStar: Liberty 84, Fever 72 "The Fever are getting a significant boost with Caitlin Clark's return to the floor on Saturday, but I don't think it will be enough for them to take down the 9-0 Liberty. "Clark will be playing a game for the first time in about three weeks after she suffered a quad strain on May 24. It will definitely help with the Fever's up-tempo pace and scoring in transition, but don't expect Clark to be perfect off the bat -- she will need to "shake off a little rust" as she said so herself. "New York, however, has looked like how reigning champions should. They're undefeated nearly a quarter into the season and blew out the Connecticut Sun by 48 points last week. "The Liberty are shorthanded, as well, with Jonquel Jones questionable because of an ankle injury and Leonie Fiebich out because of German National Team commitments. Still, New York has a lot of firepower with Breanna Stewart, Sabrina Ionescu, and Natasha Cloud." Fever: DeWanna Bonner (personal reasons) is not with the team. Liberty: Leonie Fiebich has joined the German national team; Jonquel Jones (ankle) is questionable. In four games this season, Caitlin Clark averaged 19.0 points, 9.3 assists, 6.0 rebounds and 1.3 steals, making 31.4% of her 3-pointers. Buy IndyStar's book celebrating Caitlin Clark's rookie season TV: ABC Watch Fever games with a free Fubo trial Radio: 93.5 and 107.5 FM in Indianapolis, with John Nolan (play-by-play) and Bria Goss (analysis). via BetMGM Favorite: Liberty by 4.5 points Over/under: 171.5 total points Moneyline: Fever+165, Liberty -200 ESPN's matchup predictor gives the Liberty a 64.6% chance of winning. Fever-Liberty tickets start at $31 on StubHub (Season averages)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New York Knicks most to blame for ECF loss to Pacers
The post New York Knicks most to blame for ECF loss to Pacers appeared first on ClutchPoints. The New York Knicks' 2024-25 season came to a bitter end on Saturday night. The Indiana Pacers closed out the Eastern Conference Finals in six games with a decisive 125-108 victory. Madison Square Garden became the backdrop of a team falling short in the biggest moment. The Knicks, who had overcome adversity all year long, saw their journey halted by self-inflicted wounds that Indiana exploited without mercy. As New York enters the offseason, attention now turns to the players most responsible for their latest playoff heartbreak. A Year of Progress And Pain In many ways, zooming out tells a far more positive story. The Knicks finished the regular season with a 51-31 record, their highest win total in 12 years. They navigated an injury-riddled campaign, with major roster changes that could have easily derailed a lesser team. On the eve of training camp, New York acquired Karl-Anthony Towns to fill the void left by the departures of Isaiah Hartenstein, Julius Randle, and Donte DiVincenzo. The transition wasn't always seamless. Still, Towns' offensive prowess provided a needed spark. Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images In the playoffs, the Knicks dispatched a pesky Detroit squad in the opening round before stunning the defending champion Boston Celtics in six games. By reaching the Eastern Conference Finals, they advanced one round further than the previous year. That's when Indiana knocked them out in the semifinals. However, once again, the Pacers proved to be their nemesis — and this time, on an even bigger stage. Advertisement Here we will discuss the New York Knicks players who are the most to blame for their Eastern Conference Finals loss to the Indiana Pacers. The Star Who Vanished When the Knicks acquired Karl-Anthony Towns, they knew exactly what they were getting. KAT was an elite offensive big man capable of stretching the floor and putting up gaudy stat lines. During the regular season, Towns delivered. He averaged 24.4 points, 12.8 rebounds, and shot an impressive 42 percent from beyond the arc. These were enough for him to earn his third All-NBA selection. On paper, Towns seemed like the missing piece New York needed to contend for a title. That said, in the postseason—and especially in the conference finals—his longstanding defensive liabilities resurfaced at the worst possible time. We all saw how Towns frequently blew defensive coverages without properly communicating with his teammates. This left the Knicks exposed against Indiana's high-powered offense. Players and coaches grew frustrated as his 'defensive habits' became a growing concern throughout the season. Advertisement In Game 6, those weaknesses were glaring. Indiana repeatedly attacked the Knicks in pick-and-roll sets, knowing Towns had a habit of dropping too far. Too often, his miscues allowed Pacers shooters open looks or created mismatches that New York couldn't recover from. For a player of his stature, Towns' inability to elevate his game defensively in the biggest moments is inexcusable. The Hart and Hustle That Fell Short Josh Hart has been one of the Knicks' most beloved players. He embodies the grit, hustle, and never-say-die attitude that fans adore. Last season, Hart was indispensable during New York's playoff run. He provided timely shooting, tough rebounding, and elite perimeter defense. This postseason told a different story, though. Hart's production dipped just when the Knicks needed his energy and versatility most. Averaging 13.6 points and 9.6 rebounds during the regular season, Hart was expected to be a stabilizing force. Instead, his inconsistency forced head coach Tom Thibodeau to make a difficult adjustment: moving him to the bench after New York fell behind in the series. Mitchell Robinson was inserted into the starting lineup in a desperate attempt to counter Indiana's size. Advertisement The change initially showed promise but ultimately backfired. Hart struggled to find rhythm off the bench. His inability to hit open shots or make decisive plays in crunch time further exposed the Knicks' lack of depth behind their stars. Hart shouldered blame afterward. He accepted responsibility for his diminished impact. Yes, his accountability is admirable. That said, it doesn't change the fact that his inability to deliver in the Eastern Conference Finals contributed heavily to New York's downfall. A Missing Level of Physicality When the Knicks acquired Mikal Bridges to fortify their wing depth, it was seen as a savvy move. His defensive versatility and scoring ability gave New York another tool to deploy against the NBA's top wings. During the regular season, Bridges averaged 17.6 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 3.7 assists per game. In theory, Bridges should have been a perfect fit for playoff basketball. However, when the stage got brightest, his lack of physicality became increasingly problematic. Against Indiana, Bridges was often outmuscled by the likes of Pascal Siakam and Aaron Nesmith. They attacked the Knicks' wings relentlessly. His offensive game also cooled. The Pacers effectively neutralized his perimeter shooting and forced him into uncomfortable situations. Advertisement For a player brought in to elevate New York's wing play, Bridges simply didn't deliver the consistent two-way production that was expected. He wasn't alone in his struggles, of course. Still, his inability to make a greater impact loomed large as the Pacers exploited every weakness. Minutes Management No analysis of the Knicks' playoff flameout is complete without discussing head coach Tom Thibodeau. As is tradition with Thibodeau-led teams, his heavy reliance on his starters became a point of controversy once again. Critics pointed to the massive minutes logged by Brunson, Towns, Bridges, and others throughout the regular season and playoffs, raising concerns about fatigue. Yet, any speculation about Thibodeau's job security seems premature—if not unfair. In five seasons under Thibodeau, the Knicks have reached the playoffs four times. By comparison, the nine coaches who preceded him managed just three postseason appearances in 16 combined seasons. Under his leadership, New York has returned to relevance. Brad Penner-Imagn Images Thibodeau's minute distribution may have contributed to worn-down legs late in the series. However, it's also the very approach that kept the Knicks competitive throughout an injury-filled year. His system demands buy-in and effort. For most of the season, his players delivered. The question moving forward is whether the Knicks can build more depth to avoid overextending their core players come playoff time. Progress with Lingering Questions In the end, the Knicks' Eastern Conference Finals loss to Indiana was not the result of one person or one decision. It was a convergence of several shortcomings. Towns' defensive lapses, Hart's diminished impact, Bridges' lack of physicality, and the strain of heavy minutes all played their part. For a franchise desperate to break through to the NBA Finals, these factors combined to create another painful exit. Advertisement Still, this was a season of meaningful progress. The Knicks are no longer an afterthought in the Eastern Conference. They're a legitimate contender. If they want to take the next step, though, tough conversations and roster evaluations await. Towns must become more disciplined defensively. Hart needs to rediscover his playoff form. Bridges has to develop a more physical edge. And Thibodeau, for all his success, may need to adapt his approach to minutes management. The foundation is strong. The question is whether this core—and its coach—can learn from their Eastern Conference Finals failure and finally deliver the championship-starved Knicks faithful the breakthrough they've waited decades for.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Josh Hart thinks Knicks ‘should have' beat Pacers
The post Josh Hart thinks Knicks 'should have' beat Pacers appeared first on ClutchPoints. The New York Knicks seemed destined to go all the way in the NBA Playoffs. However, the Knicks were upset by the Indiana Pacers in the Eastern Conference Finals in six games. Advertisement Shooting guard Josh Hart still maintains that the Knicks would have won, per Hoops Hype. On the Roommates Show with Jalen Brunson, Hart said part of the reason why the Knicks lost was by underestimating the Pacers. 'We still think we can beat them, and we probably- and we should have beat them, but…that's why you can't like underrate them cuz…they were playing extremely well in the playoffs,' Hart said. 'So…them being a four-seed and all that, like, it's kind of out the window because it's just how you're playing now. It's not like what it was in the regular season.' The Knicks entered the series as the favorites. The trifecta of Hart, Brunson, and Karl Anthony-Towns were looked at as the established team. On the flip side, the Pacers were the young, up-and-coming team. Ultimately, New York was denied the chance to reach their first NBA Finals since 1999, plus their first title since 1973. Immediately after losing, the Knicks abruptly fired coach Tom Thibedeau, leaving the franchise in a state of disarray. Advertisement But in truth, it was New York that was responsible for their demise. What did the Knicks do? The Knicks had all the tools in their toolbox to defeat the Pacers. But ultimately, they were malfunctioning at the worst possible times. The Pacers' defense was overpowering. New York couldn't match their opponent's physicality. Then, of course, turnovers turned the tide. New York had far more turnovers, which Indiana capitalized off of in significant ways. In the pivotal Game 6, the Knicks committed 18 turnovers, which the Pacers turned into 34 points. Related: Charles Barkley clowns Knicks' coaching search strategy with Rick Carlisle quip Related: Why Draymond Green wants Metta World Peace to get Knicks coaching job