Would-be football agents complain Fifa's faulty online exam causes one-year delay
New regulations on agents introduced at the start of this year mean candidates must complete 20 multiple‑choice questions online rather than attend a test in person, usually at their national federation's headquarters. It is understood the change was made by Fifa to provide consistency over the cost, with candidates now paying $100 (or the equivalent in pounds or Euros) to sit the annual exam, which took place for the first time on 18 June.
The Guardian has been contacted by applicants from several countries, including the United Kingdom, who have complained that they were unable to complete the one-hour test owing to the technical difficulties. It is understood candidates were asked before their test to download software, which was then checked by an online invigilator. But issues with the software meant they were often left with insufficient time to answer the questions or found some answers had not been recorded.
'I attempted several times to fix the issue by disconnecting and reconnecting, but it took over 25 minutes before the connection was restored,' wrote one candidate from Niger in a letter to Fifa seen by the Guardian. 'Once I was allowed to resume, there were only about 10 minutes remaining on the exam. On July 3, 2025, I received my results and was surprised to see that I had failed with a score of 11 out of 20. However, among the nine questions marked as incorrect, seven were shown as blank, even though I clearly remember answering them before submission, one displayed a choice that I am certain I never selected, and it does not match the answer I intended to choose.'
Another candidate from the UK said he had been told by his invigilator that 'the issue was not related to my device or internet connection, but rather to the platform itself. After several unsuccessful attempts, the invigilator advised me to disconnect and assured me that she would submit a detailed report to Fifa, explicitly stating that I had been unable to participate due to a force majeure situation, as defined in article 12 of the Fifa football agent exam rules (March 2025 edition). It is particularly frustrating to now see my application rejected without any clarification, despite having fulfilled all requirements, acted diligently, and paid the full registration fee.'
It is understood that some candidates were allowed to resit the exam on 30 June but that many have been informed, in an email that stated they had no right to appeal, they will have to wait until next year. 'This disparity raises serious concerns regarding consistency and equal treatment,' the UK candidate said.
The Guardian has forwarded all the complaints to Fifa. World football's governing body declined to comment but it is understood to be aware of some complaints that are being handled on a case-by-case basis and it is satisfied that the majority of the candidates were able to take the exam with no technical problems. Fifa is believed to be monitoring the situation but is understood to have been reassured by providers that there is no issue with the exam platform.
Sign up to Football Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football
after newsletter promotion
A candidate from Turkmenistan, who says he had 27 minutes to complete their exam owing to technical difficulties and the failure of the system's translation tool, described the experience as 'extremely upsetting'. 'The examiner promised to submit an official report and inform Fifa of the situation,' he wrote. 'She also told me that Fifa would contact me shortly regarding this incident. However, two weeks have now passed, and I have not received any response.' It is understood that a further fortnight later the situation has not changed.
A source told the Guardian: 'The system hasn't been working properly and there have been so many complaints but they aren't really doing anything about it. Lots of people have put loads of time and effort into revising and to not be able to take the exam is really unfair. It's a shambles.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
European missile group MBDA selling parts for bombs that have killed children in Gaza
Europe's largest missiles maker, MBDA, is selling key components for bombs that have been shipped in their thousands to Israel and used in multiple airstrikes where research indicates Palestinian children and other civilians were killed. With concerns mounting about the extent to which European companies may be profiting from the devastation of Gaza, a Guardian investigation with the independent newsrooms Disclose and Follow the Money has examined the supply chain behind the GBU-39 bomb, and the ways in which it has been deployed during the conflict. MBDA owns a factory in Alabama, US, which produces 'wings' that are fitted to the GBU-39, which is made by Boeing. They unfold after launch, allowing the bomb to be guided to its target. Revenues from the US company MBDA Incorporated flow through MBDA UK, based in Hertfordshire, England, which then passes any profits to MBDA group, headquartered in France. MBDA distributed almost £350m in dividends last year to its three shareholders – Britain's biggest defence firm BAE Systems, France's Airbus and Italy's Leonardo. In September, the UK foreign minister, David Lammy, suspended some weapons export licences to Israel, citing risk of 'serious violations' of international humanitarian law. Lammy said the move was designed to target 'items which could be used in the current conflict in Gaza'. Using open source information, and analysis by weapons experts, the investigation has verified 24 cases where the GBU-39 was deployed in attacks that left civilians dead. Each one included children among the fatalities. Many of the attacks took place at night, without warning, in school buildings and tent camps where displaced families were sheltering. A number have been examined by the United Nations and the humanitarian group Amnesty International, which flagged them as suspected war crimes. MBDA confirmed it had a contract with Boeing for the wings, and said it 'complies all relevant national and international laws applicable to the arms trade in the countries in which it operates … all of whom have export policies and operate robust export control regimes'. Campaigners said the case illustrates the limits of the UK's move to pause some arms shipments to Israel. Already criticised for excluding F-35 fighter jets, the government's measures have other limitations: they apply only to military equipment exported from Britain, which means the US arm of MBDA can continue supplying Boeing from its Alabama factory. At about 2am on 26 May this year, a bomb ripped through the roof of Fahmi al-Jarjawi school in the historic quarter of Gaza City while dozens of families sheltering there lay sleeping. Local emergency services said 36 people, half of them children, were killed that night as the building was engulfed in flames. In a video recorded by an onlooker, a tiny girl, silhouetted against the fire, stumbled forwards as she searched for a way out. The child was five-year-old Hanin al-Wadie, and she survived – just. Weeks later she was still in hospital, suffering second- and third-degree burns, and deep psychological trauma. Her parents and her only sibling, a sister, were killed in the attack. Sitting by her side, as Hanin nibbled on a piece of bread and plucked at her bandages, her uncle Ahmed al-Wadie spoke of what she remembered. 'The first thing is that she screamed at the sound of the missiles and the fire around her,' he said. 'When she walks, she says she is afraid to step on the bodies. Imagine a child in this situation seeing her parents in front of her in a fire, seeing them with her eyes.' Ahmed, who is a nurse, said she needed treatments that no hospital in Gaza could provide – plastic surgery on her face and her hands, and psychological support. In recent days, he has managed to secure her evacuation to Jordan. International humanitarian law prohibits attacks on civilian infrastructure such as schools, and requires steps to minimise harm. Failure to follow the rules can result in war crimes. 'Those launching attacks have a legal duty to take precautions so as to avoid harming civilians – even in cases where there may be a military target at the location – including by not striking locations full of civilians,' says Donatella Rovera, a senior investigator at Amnesty. Giving effective warning to evacuate, where feasible, is also a requirement. Witnesses said no such warning was given before the attack at Fahmi al-Jarjawi. The Israeli military said at the time it had targeted a command and control centre inside the school that Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad used to gather intelligence for attacks, adding it had taken 'numerous steps' to mitigate the risk of harming civilians, including the use of 'precise munitions'. Locating military objectives within densely populated civilian areas is also prohibited, said Rovera. Weapons experts later identified fragments of a GBU-39 bomb in the debris. Footage shot at the scene clearly showed the wings, which often shear off as the bomb hits its target. Trevor Ball, an associate at Armaments Research Services, which receives some EU funding, has compiled his own list of strikes involving the bomb. He said it could be identified by its wings, which are marked with the words 'NO LIFT ON WINGS' and by its tail piece, which has slots for fins and distinctive bolts. The GBU-39 is reaching Israel under the US military aid programme, which provides grants and loans to be spent on weapons. Bought from the Boeing Company directly, and also transferred from the US military's own reserves, an estimated 4,800 have been shipped since the 7 October 2023 Hamas massacre of Israeli citizens, to which Israel responded by launching a war on Gaza. The most recent consignment of 2,166 was announced in February of this year, just as the UN reported that almost 70% of Gaza had been reduced to rubble. The GBU-39 is launched from the air by fighter jets. With a comparatively light payload of under 250lb, it can take out one or two floors of a building, leaving the rest of the structure intact. Its use has been encouraged by the US state department, including under former president Joe Biden, because it was seen as preferable to the much heavier bombs used to flatten Gaza during the early months of the war. But in an enclosed space, it creates a lethal fireball. In the 24 cases verified for this article, which date from between January 2024 and May of this year, the reported death toll was more than 500, including at least 100 children. The first verified case since the start of the war was on 2 November, at the densely populated Bureij camp, when several buildings collapsed. The UN estimated Israeli jets had launched at least four of the bombs. Gaza authorities initially reported 15 dead, including nine children, though the death toll rose as the days passed. Mourning the loss of 19 members of his family, Yasser Hassan Washah posted on Facebook: 'My remaining cousins are searching for their family, and the rest of my cousins are under the rubble.' Later that day, without specifying locations, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) stated its aircraft, directed by soldiers on the ground, had struck a number of military command and control centres used by senior Hamas terrorist operatives, some of which were 'deliberately located in civilian areas'. In a report published last year, the UN cited the attack as one of six examples in which it said Israel 'may have failed to adhere' to the principles of international humanitarian law. From just a handful of cases verified in 2023, the data suggests the Israeli military dramatically scaled up its use of GBU-39s in 2024. One of the most devastating attacks was during the night of 26 May 2024, when jets bombarded Kuwaiti Peace Camp 1 in Rafah, sparking a raging fire that set rows of tents alight. A toddler and a woman were decapitated by fragments from the explosives, Amnesty reported. The Gaza health ministry counted 45 dead and 249 wounded. The Israeli military said it had been targeting a Hamas compound, and that it suspected munitions or some other combustible substance it was unaware of caused a secondary explosion and a fire. Amnesty accused the military of failing to distinguish between civilians and military objectives, and called for the incident to be investigated as a war crime. 'The GBU-39s have been used a lot to target schools and areas where other people are sheltering,' said Ball. Of the verified attacks, 16 were against schools. While the buildings are no longer functioning as educational facilities, they have become places of shelter for Gaza's displaced population. The other strikes were on tent camps, family homes, and on a mosque during morning prayers. The Guardian wrote to the IDF with detailed accounts of nine attacks. A spokesperson declined to comment on the individual cases, saying it did not have the time or information needed to examine the claims. However, they insisted the IDF did not target civilians or civilian structures. 'The IDF strikes exclusively on the grounds of military necessity and in strict accordance with international law. The IDF pursues all feasible precautions in order to mitigate harm to both civilians and civilian structures.' In each case, it said the sensitivity of sites was taken into account with the aim of mitigating damage to sites and civilians in a 'rigorous approval process'. It said Hamas had made a habit of storing its weapons and ammunition inside civilian buildings, including hospitals, schools and mosques, and launched attacks from them routinely. In its marketing material for the patented Diamond Back wing system, MBDA describes it as a 'key component' of the Boeing bomb. Weapons experts say the GBU-39 is always sold with its wings, and MBDA is the sole known supplier. There are no public financial accounts for MBDA Inc, so the profits and revenues it generates are not visible. However, its revenues are consolidated within the UK division, according to a statement in the accounts. The profits are then passed to MBDA group. The most recent accounts for MBDA UK, which date from 2023, show it is a large part of the business, contributing more than 40% of revenues. Overall, the wider MBDA business is growing rapidly, taking £4.2bn in revenues in 2024. Last September, as the number of people killed in Gaza rose to more than 40,000, Britain's foreign minister, David Lammy, suspended 29 licences for arms exports to Israel, saying there existed a 'clear risk' the equipment could be used to commit 'serious violations' of international humanitarian law. However, the ban is limited in scope. Experts say the government has no power to block sales by firms based abroad, even if they are part of the same group as a British company. US subsidiary MBDA Inc is not affected by the ban, and it has a separate board of directors. It operates under local laws and is subject to US arms controls. 'MBDA are profiting from the arming of Israel,' said Sam Perlo-Freeman, the research coordinator at Campaign Against the Arms Trade. 'What MBDA could do if they wanted to not be complicit in arming Israel is they could sell MBDA Inc. We would support the UK government taking all actions that are within their powers to stop the genocide. Beyond an arms embargo, this includes sanctions on companies arming Israel, banning UK investments in such companies.' Such a ban would go beyond even the terms of the embargo imposed on Russia after its attack on Ukraine. With Israel, the UK and other western governments have taken a lighter touch approach. For example, Lammy allowed a carve-out so that British companies, including BAE Systems, could continue producing parts of the F-35 combat aircraft for Israel. Despite strong words and threats of more sanctions after Israel broke the ceasefire in March, and findings by the UN that the warfare methods in Gaza are consistent with genocide, European leaders have taken no further steps to prevent domestic armaments firms from profiting. In a report dated last month, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, examined corporate profits from the conflict. She concluded: 'The present report shows why the genocide carried out by Israel continues: because it is lucrative for many.' Neither MBDA nor Boeing are mentioned among the 40 companies named in the report, but Albanese said her research was 'just the tip of the iceberg'. 'Ending it will not happen without holding the private sector accountable,' she said. Under the UN guiding principles on business and human rights, companies are expected to undertake periodic due diligence to identify concerns and adjust their conduct, particularly during armed conflicts. MBDA's own code of ethics points to these responsibilities, stating the company is 'committed to taking the utmost care in identifying and preventing negative direct and indirect impacts our activities may have on human rights, fundamental freedoms and people health and safety'. In its response to the Guardian, the company declined to say whether it had considered divesting its US operations or ceasing the supply of components for equipment sold to Israel. It added: 'Activities that could involve the company in unlawful practices are prohibited.' BAE Systems and Airbus said they had nothing to add to MBDA's response. Leonardo said it has 'has always acted in full compliance with national and international regulations regarding the export of military equipment'. Boeing referred inquiries to the US government. A state department spokesperson said the US supported Israel's right to defend itself and Donald Trump and his foreign secretary were focused on peace in the region.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How EU's largest missile maker is selling parts for bombs that have killed children in Gaza
Exclusive: Britain has paused some weapons sales to Israel, but a Guardian investigation shows revenues from the GBU-39 bomb generated by the US arm of MBDA flow through the UK. The bombs have been shipped in their thousands to Israel and used in airstrikes where research indicates Palestinian children and other civilians were killed. With concerns mounting about the extent to which European companies may be profiting from the devastation of Gaza, the Guardian, along with independent newsrooms Disclose and Follow the Money, has examined the supply chain behind the GBU-39 bomb, and the ways in which it has been deployed during the conflict
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Competition watchdog is on the prowl so business must be alert
A recent investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority into Amazon in some ways typifies the regulator's old way of doing things. Yes, the investigation centred around potentially fake or misleading reviews, which is very much an area of focus for the authority today, but this investigation started well before the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 came into effect. The case appears to have dragged on for almost half a decade and, after some back-and-forth between Amazon and the regulator, it has ended with Amazon providing undertakings to promise to take enhanced measures to tackle fake reviews on its platform. Provided it does so, Amazon will not face any financial penalties. Importantly, there is no finding of any breach. Amazon has promised to enhance its efforts to tackle fake reviews DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP Following the legislation coming into force in April this year, the authority's investigations will take on a different complexion. The organisation now has strong powers to investigate businesses and compel co-operation under threat of large daily fines, to conduct the investigation in a swift manner and to decide for itself — without needing to persuade the courts — whether the business under investigation has breached consumer law. If it concludes there has been a breach, the authority can impose a range of sanctions, including a financial penalty of up to 10 per cent of a business's annual global turnover. These are not theoretical powers — as the authority has made clear, it intends to use them, so large fines may become the norm. Unlike the Amazon case, which rumbled on for several years, the watchdog is now committed to conducting and concluding investigations quickly. Businesses under investigation will have significantly less time to gather information and prepare their responses, and the authority is much less likely to engage in protracted negotiations over undertakings. If undertakings are involved — most likely in addition to, rather than instead of, financial penalties — the CMA will want them to be crisp. And it will punish breaches of those undertakings with further financial penalties. This means retailers doing business in the UK — including those headquartered outside the country — will need to ensure they are complying with all the latest rules and guidance. It is advisable to focus on the authority's high priority areas, including fake and misleading reviews, which means that businesses can no longer take a hands-off approach to hosting them. Other areas include pricing and discount claims, and hidden fees. The CMA will also be looking at a range of other unfair commercial behaviour, including aggressive practices and misleading actions or omissions, across a range of businesses. Meanwhile, consumer organisations will be doing even more to draw to the authority's attention claims and activities by businesses that breach the law. Geraint Lloyd-Taylor is a partner at the law firm Lewis Silkin
