Annaly vs. Starwood: Which Mortgage REIT Offers More Resilience Now?
But which one offers the better opportunity for investors right now? Let us break down the strengths, risks and growth potential of NLY and STWD.
NLY's investment strategy is driven by the prudent selection of assets and effective capital allocation to achieve stable returns. The strategy includes traditional Agency MBSs, which provide downside protection, and investments in more non-agency and credit-focused asset classes that enhance returns.
A scaled mortgage servicing rights (MSR) platform will continue to benefit from a low prepayment environment. The company is focusing on improving its capabilities by acquiring newly originated MSRs from its partner network, which will continue to provide a strong advantage in expanding its MSR business. As of March 31, 2025, its investment portfolio aggregated $84.9 billion.
As mortgage rates are witnessing a declining trend lately, purchase originations and refinancing activities are improving. Hence, NLY will likely witness book value improvement in the coming period as spreads in the Agency market tighten, driving asset prices. This should boost net interest spread, improving the portfolio's overall yield. This is expected to support the company's financials in the upcoming period.
Annaly is focused on improving its liquidity and reducing leverage to support capital distribution activities. By the end of the first quarter of 2025, the company had $7.5 billion in total assets available for financing, including cash and unencumbered Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) of $4.7 billion, which can readily provide liquidity in times of adverse market conditions.
NLY has a record of paying out monthly dividends, currently yielding a staggering 14.6%. It presently sits at a payout ratio of 101%. In March, the company announced a cash dividend of 70 cents per share, marking a 7.7% hike from the prior payout. This move reflects confidence in its cash flow and growth prospects.
STWD's investment strategy includes investment in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and related commercial real estate assets, with a diversified portfolio of $1.02 billion as of March 31, 2025. This allows it to generate stable income streams while capitalizing on market opportunities. The company's asset management expertise and ability to navigate the complexities of the CMBS market contribute to its strong market position and growth potential.
Starwood has been engaged in acquisitions and divestitures to optimize its portfolio. In February 2024, the company sold 16 retail properties in its Master Lease Portfolio for $387.1 million, recognizing a gain of $92 million. Additionally, it sold an operating property within its Real Estate Investment and Services Equity Portfolio for $18.2 million, with a gain of $8.3 million, reflecting continued portfolio optimization.
The company also sold residential units in a New York conversion project, totaling $12.1 million in proceeds, though with no gain or loss recognized. Meanwhile, there were no significant acquisitions recently, aside from properties acquired through loan foreclosure. This strategy of selective sales and reinvestments supports the company's ongoing focus on enhancing its portfolio.
However, Starwood Property's weak liquidity position is concerning. As of March 31, 2025, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $692 million. Its long-term debt was $18.4 billion. This can be concerning if the macroeconomic situation worsens.
The company pays out a quarterly dividend of 48 cents currently. It has a dividend yield of 9.5% with a payout ratio of 108%. Over the last five years, STWD did not increase its dividend.
Over the past year, shares of Starwood and Annaly have risen 13.7% and 11.8%, respectively, compared with the industry's growth of 5.2%.
Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
In terms of valuation, STWD is currently trading at a 12-month forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 10.87X, higher than its five-year median of 10.58X. Alternatively, the NLY stock is currently trading at a 12-month forward P/E of 6.65X, which is lower than its five-year median of 7.27X.
Price-to-Earnings F12M
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
NLY is trading at a discount compared with the industry average of 7.96X, while STWD is trading at a premium. Hence, Annaly is a better choice for value investors.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NLY's 2025 and 2026 earnings reflects a year-over-year rise of 6.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Annaly's 2025 and 2026 earnings has been revised upward over the past 60 days, suggesting a bullish outlook from analysts.
NLY Estimates Revision Trend
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for STWD's 2025 earnings suggests a year-over-year decline of 10.9%, while that for 2026 indicates a rise of 7.8%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for STWD's 2025 and 2026 earnings has been revised downward over the past 60 days, suggesting a more cautious outlook from analysts.
STWD Estimates Revision Trend
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
While both Annaly and Starwood offer attractive dividend yields and operate in the same broader mREIT sector, NLY stands out as the more resilient and better-valued option for now. Its focus on lower-risk Agency MBS, a growing mortgage servicing rights platform, improved liquidity and positive earnings momentum provide a stronger foundation for long-term growth.
In contrast, STWD's heavier exposure to commercial real estate, higher debt levels and downward earnings revisions make it a riskier choice for now.
For investors looking for stable income with lower risk, Annaly offers the more compelling opportunity right now.
At present, Annaly carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), while Starwood carries a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell).
You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. (STWD) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Annaly Capital Management Inc (NLY) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Labor union accuses 3 companies contracted by Hennepin, Ramsey counties of stealing $700K in wages
A union representing thousands of workers is accusing three Twin Cities businesses contracted by Hennepin and Ramsey counties of stealing wages. The stolen funds could surpass $700,000, according to SEIU Local 26. More than 70 workers for these contractors have been underpaid between five to twelve dollars an hour, the union said. SEIU Local 26 is pointing the finger at cleaning companies PK Services and Squeaky Services, and security guard service Black Knight Protection Agency. "These workers deserve every cent that they have earned, they've worked so hard for. They need to be made whole," said Jen Guertin, an officer at the St. Paul Regional Labor Federation. The union said they have reviewed pay stubs and spoken with workers, like Jhonnier Gazo. Gazo said he makes $18 per hour working for PK Services. He said he found he should be making what's called a prevailing wage, a required pay of $27.80 per hour in Ramsey County, accounting for pay and benefits. "Although I'm afraid of losing my job, I am not afraid to raise my voice," said Gazo through an interpreter. Paul Beckfeld, the founder of PK Services, said the wage theft allegations are not true. A department of labor audit from a few years ago did find pay errors, but they've since been corrected, he said. Gregory Murphy said he works for Black Knight Security and found he was underpaid by nearly $6 an hour. "I demand that Black Knight pays us what they owe us. This is not fair and we will not stay silent," said Murphy. Neither Black Knight Security nor Squeaky Services would comment on the allegations. The union said there are active investigations, by both the Hennepin and Ramsey County attorneys offices, but neither would comment on if there's an investigation. "We would call on the counties to terminate the contracts with these contractors, as the counties are legally entitled to do," said Greg Nammacher, president of SEIU Local 26.
Business Wire
2 days ago
- Business Wire
KBRA Assigns Ratings to PNMAC GMSR ISSUER TRUST MSR COLLATERALIZED NOTES, Series 2025-GT1
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns ratings of 'BBB (sf)' to the Series 2025-GT1 Term Notes from PNMAC GMSR ISSUER TRUST, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC's (PLS) master trust issuer of notes backed by participation certificates evidencing participation interest in mortgage servicing rights (MSR) on loans underlying Ginnie Mae guaranteed mortgage backed securities. KBRA's rating on the notes is primarily dependent upon the rating of Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC (PNMAC), as repurchase guarantor. KBRA's rating on the Series 2025-GT1 Term Notes is primarily dependent on the credit rating of PNMAC (KBRA Rating: BBB-/Stable) as repurchase guarantor under a repo facility in support of the Issuer's rights to MSRs granted by Ginnie Mae to PNMAC's affiliate, PLS, with certain transaction features described more fully in KBRA's new issue report providing one notch uplift on the rating of the notes. Generally, these transaction features are factors that KBRA believes reduce the risk of extinguishment of the MSRs by Ginnie Mae which include but are not limited to (i) the alignment of interest between PLS and Ginnie Mae based on PLS's size and market share, (ii) a tri-party acknowledgement agreement which includes PLS, Ginnie Mae, and the Indenture Trustee, (iii) an uncapped MBS Advance VFN existing for the purpose of advancing Ginnie Mae MBS payments on behalf of PLS where the MBS Advance VFN holder must also be a holder of the MSR VFN, and (iv) structural tests and triggers designed to amortize the term notes upon test failure. The notes are not a direct debt obligation of PLS or its affiliates; however, PNMAC's guarantee of PLS's obligations under the PC Repurchase Agreement creates a significant indirect dependency on PNMAC to make payments on the rated notes. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Related Publication Methodologies Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1010812
Business Wire
2 days ago
- Business Wire
KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to MHP 2025-MHIL2
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA announces the assignment of preliminary ratings to seven classes of MHP 2025-MHIL2, a CMBS single-borrower securitization. The collateral for the transaction is a $425.0 million floating rate, interest-only mortgage loan. The loan is expected to have an initial two-year term with three, one-year extension options and require monthly interest-only payments. The loan will be secured by the borrowers' fee simple interests in 78 self-storage assets encompassing 4.7 million sf located across 20 states, the five largest of which are California (32.4% of loan balance), Texas (13.5%), Florida (9.9%), Missouri (7.6%), and Colorado (7.0%). As of June 2025, the portfolio was 88.9% leased. KBRA's analysis of the transaction included a detailed evaluation of the property's cash flows using our North American CMBS Property Evaluation Methodology and the application of our North American CMBS Single Borrower & Large Loan Rating Methodology. In addition, KBRA also relied on its Global Structured Finance Counterparty Methodology for assessing counterparty risk in this transaction, and its ESG Global Rating Methodology, to the extent deemed applicable. The results of our analysis yielded a KBRA net cash flow (KNCF) for the subject of approximately $27.6 million, which is 7.1% below the issuer's NCF, and a KBRA value of approximately $345.0 million, which is 39.6% below the appraiser's aggregate as-is values. The resulting in-trust KBRA Loan to Value (KLTV) is 123.2%. In our analysis of the transaction, we also reviewed and considered third party engineering, environmental, and appraisal reports, the results of our site inspections of the properties, and legal documentation review. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Methodologies Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1010825
