logo
What Cybersecurity Teams Can Learn From Product Management

What Cybersecurity Teams Can Learn From Product Management

Forbes2 days ago

Dan DeCloss is the founder and CTO of PlexTrac and has over 20 years of experience in cybersecurity.
What does it take to be a successful entrepreneur? The most obvious answers are passion, determination and a clear vision. But humility and a willingness to listen and accept feedback are just as—if not more—important.
In fact, many successful entrepreneurs will tell you that there's nothing more important than customer feedback.
Getting a continuous flow of feedback is a great scenario; however, it presents a big challenge: What do you prioritize first?
This is the exact question that product teams ask every day. Just as entrepreneurs look to make the biggest impact on their product in the shortest amount of time, product teams want to maximize efforts.
The challenge is determining what is actually going to move the needle while also taking into account which customer requests must be addressed first, which bugs and defects are make-or-break and what new features will outweigh the cost of technical debt.
Other teams, like cybersecurity, can also learn a lot from product teams.
Prioritization challenges are common among product teams, which is why they've developed mature processes and frameworks to manage them effectively. If you take these same challenges and apply them to cybersecurity teams, the similarities are striking.
Both disciplines ultimately share the same mission: to enable the business to succeed and serve its customers.
This alignment means both product and cybersecurity teams must base their plans and priorities on how best to support business goals.
While cybersecurity program management is still maturing, product management (PM) offers a well-established playbook to learn from. By drawing these parallels, security teams can uncover valuable insights and adopt proven practices to advance and streamline their own operations.
Let's dive into some of the challenges in cybersecurity and identify ways that product management is solving them.
Cybersecurity teams are always responding to alerts, leaving them in a constant state of reaction. This can lead to a common sense of 'alert fatigue' and burnout. Security teams also tend to get inundated with vulnerabilities and findings from proactive scans and assessments.
This problem has a direct correlation to the prioritization challenges within product management. Product management teams manage this with a systematic approach, using sprints, capacity planning and backlog grooming to plan for work. Each sprint is loaded with work for the team and a dedicated buffer to allow for any unplanned work, such as critical bugs, etc.
Security teams can make great strides in their journey to accomplish more work and move to a proactive state by following similar principles. If a security team operates in a sprint model, they can load planned work while leaving room for unplanned work. This feeds directly into the prioritization discussion.
Establishing a clear process around planning work is the foundation for meaningful prioritization discussions. In cybersecurity, this is especially vital as teams are inundated with all kinds of vulnerabilities, compliance items, alerts, etc.
By taking a page from the PM playbook, security teams can build a roadmap of initiatives based on their priority. One effective method is scoring each initiative based on its relative importance and impact on the business. Applying this framework helps security teams assess risk and prioritize efforts in the context of broader business goals.
Of course, prioritization becomes challenging when urgent injections or alerts arise. That's where a defined escalation process—similar to an incident response plan—becomes essential, enabling teams to handle interruptions in a structured and consistent manner.
Once you have defined your roadmap and established your work cadences, you're fully operational. But are you successful? This is where metrics come into play. PM teams measure how long it takes to get a feature or product to market as well as the adoption rate of the features. They also measure the allocation of time within each sprint.
Security teams should adopt a similar mindset, dedicating 60% of sprint time to proactive security measures and 40% to reactive tasks. Additional metrics should be used to track mean time to resolution, meant time to detection and risk reduction over time. There are many other metrics to consider, but the goal is to ensure you're able to show progress in achieving KPIs and reducing risk exposure.
Prioritization remains one of the toughest challenges for nearly everyone, from entrepreneurs sifting through customer feedback to cybersecurity leaders triaging vulnerabilities, alerts, compliance requirements and managing risks.
Product teams have spent years refining their approaches to prioritization—turning feedback overload into focused roadmaps and aligning work with business goals. It's time for cybersecurity to steal from that playbook.
By borrowing the frameworks, mindset and strategic discipline of product management, security teams can navigate complexity with greater clarity, build more impactful programs and, ultimately, drive better outcomes for the business. The blueprint already exists—are you bold enough to use it?
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)
Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)

Forbes

time17 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)

A lump of gold on a stone floor getty Here's a surprise from a die-hard closed-end fund (CEF) fan like me: Sometimes CEFs aren't your best bet. I'll admit, that's tough for me to say—especially when the average CEF yields a historically high 9.1%. (CEF yields are usually around 8.5%). That high yield partly reflects the fact that many CEFs are trading at steep discounts to their net asset value (NAV). Translation: The fund is trading for less than what its underlying portfolio is worth. That, in turn, has resulted in lower prices among some CEFs, along with higher yields (as yields and prices move in opposite directions). All of this simply means that CEFs are generally out of favor right now, which is an opportunity for us. But not every CEF is ripe for buying. We especially want to avoid the three top performers among CEFs with market caps over $200 million: ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). The fact that these funds have booked strong runs this year shouldn't come as a surprise: They're all gold funds, and gold has taken off due to rising economic uncertainty (the usual fuel for the yellow metal). Even so, as you can see, there are some clear differences in performance here, and those are worth unpacking. Gold Funds Ycharts Above we see that the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust—with the somewhat confusing 'CEF' ticker, not to be confused with CEFs in general (in purple)—and PHYS (in blue) have similar returns to the benchmark SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF (in green), at around 25%. Then there's ASA (in orange), which has more than doubled even the best of these three other funds. There is some logic at work here. For starters, PHYS and GLD really should track each other, since they both devote almost 100% of their portfolios to physical gold (both own gold bars that are locked up in vaults), and both have similar expense ratios (0.4% for GLD, 0.41% for PHYS). The lower performance of 'CEF' is also not surprising, given that the fund also holds silver, and the 'poor man's gold' hasn't done as well as its yellow counterpart this year. ASA, however, is the clear outperformer. That's thanks in part to its ownership of several gold-mining stocks. Its largest position, G Mining Ventures Inc., a Canadian firm that explores for precious metals, has nearly doubled year to date. ASA's fast short-term gain is, of course, great, but it's unlikely to last. Here's why. Note that, if we go back to 2010, the year the last of these funds, PHYS, launched, we see that GLD (again in green) outran all three of the CEFs. This shows that CEFs were poor options in the case of gold. Moreover, ASA (again in orange) was actually the worst performer, returning just 53% over 15 years, and being in the red for most of that time. ASA Underperforms Ycharts In terms of key takeaways, there are a few here. First, if you want to hold gold, this is a rare case where an ETF, not a CEF, is the better choice. Second, gold is not a great play for income, given that the highest yielder among these funds is ASA, with a puny 0.2%. Third, gold itself is a poor play for the long term, no matter how you invest in it. To see why, all we need to do is splice the S&P 500's performance (in pink below) into that last chart. Gold Underperforms Ycharts It doesn't get much clearer than that! This, however, is where the good news ends for ETF investors. Because when it comes to investing in stocks (or pretty well any other asset class, for that matter), you're far better off with CEFs. Let's take a look at the Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX), a CEF we've held in my CEF Insider service since its earliest days: We bought ADX in July 2017, just a few months after CEF Insider's launch. Here's how the fund—current yield: 9% (and in orange below)—has done since, as compared to the S&P 500 index fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), in purple, with dividends reinvested: ADX Outperforms Ycharts This chart says it all: CEFs like ADX can crush the S&P 500 and pay us generously while doing so. Plus they give us access to top-notch management and upside-generating discounts to NAV, too. Those are strengths no index fund can match. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none

Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics
Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics

Very late on Friday afternoon, we got a massive end-of-the week news dump when a judge officially approved a settlement in the NCAA v. House case. With the ruling, the landscape of college athletics will soon look very different than it has prior. The goal of the settlement is to provide structure to the NIL landscape in college football, which is currently effectively a free-for-all. Following the ruling, On3 discussed some of the ramifications of the ruling. 'Since the NCAA was founded in 1906, institutions have never directly paid athletes, On3's Pete Nakos wrote. 'That will now change with the settlement ushering in the revenue-sharing era of college sports. Beginning July 1, schools will be able to share $20.5 million with athletes, with football expected to receive 75%, followed by men's basketball (15%), women's basketball (5%) and the remainder of sports (5%). The amount shared in revenue will increase annually. Advertisement 'Power Four football programs will have roughly $13 to $16 million to spend on rosters for the 2025 season. Many schools have front-loaded contracts ahead of the settlement's approval, taking advantage of contracts not being vetted by the newly formed NIL clearinghouse . . . ' . . . The settlement also imposes new restrictions on college sports. An NIL clearinghouse will be established, titled 'NIL Go' and run through Deloitte. All third-party NIL deals of $600 or more must be approved by the clearinghouse. If not approved, the settlement says a new third-party arbiter could deem athletes ineligible or result in a school being fined. In a gathering at the ACC spring meetings last week, Deloitte officials reportedly shared that 70% of past deals from NIL collectives would have been denied, while 90% of past deals from public companies would have been approved.' It remains to be seen exactly how the new rules will affect USC specifically. Given the Trojans' recent hire of Chad Bowden and the subsequent revamping of their recruiting operation, USC seemingly has the right people in place to bring the program into college football's new era. This article originally appeared on Trojans Wire: NCAA House settlement approved, as college sports braces for impact

WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says
WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says

Apple's (AAPL) upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference will do little to assuage fears that the iPhone maker is a laggard in AI, Blomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Instead, the event will focus on design and productivity enhancements for its long-established operating system franchises. The company's keynote address will introduce redesigned software interfaces for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV and Apple Watch, in addition to more minor tweaks to the Vision Pro headset. As part of the end-to-end overhaul, the company is also making a sweeping change to its software branding, which will shift from version numbers to a year-based system. That means Apple will introduce iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26, macOS 26 and watchOS 26 – named for 2026. Internally, the operating systems are known as Luck, Charisma, Discovery, Cheer and Nepali, respectively, the author notes. The AI changes will be surprisingly minor are unlikely to impress industry watchers, especially considering the rapid pace of innovation by Alphabet's (GOOG) (GOOGL) Google, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI, the publication adds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on AAPL: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Apple's growing list of issues hinders AI reboot, WSJ says Apple expands partnership in India with Tata, Reuters reports Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories Apple says App Store ecosystem facilitated $1.3T in developer sales in 2024 This Is How Much Analysts Expect Apple's (AAPL) EPS to Fall after Court Ruling

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store