logo
Dems can make all the demands they want on ICE arrests. They won't get answers.

Dems can make all the demands they want on ICE arrests. They won't get answers.

USA Today2 days ago

Dems can make all the demands they want on ICE arrests. They won't get answers. | Opinion There is nothing Democrats in Congress can do to stop the Trump administration's amoral actions unless Republicans decide to honor their oaths and help them.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Marco Rubio defends immigration actions to lawmakers
Secretary of State Marco Rubio was grilled by lawmakers over his implementation of immigration policies.
I'm picturing a giggling young aide skipping into Kristi Noem's office at the Department of Homeland Security and excitedly saying, "Would you like to see something really funny, Madam Secretary?'
Then, I see them handing over the letter sent to Noem on May 28 from Arizona's Democratic congressional delegation. Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, along with Reps. Greg Stanton and Yassamin Ansari, want to know why Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in plainclothes and masks were outside immigration court in Phoenix scooping up individuals who were following all the rules and reporting for asylum hearings before a judge.
A press release accompanying the letter the group sent to Noem said the two senators and two representatives 'demand answers from DHS and ICE.'
That would be the part that had Noem and her merry band of MAGA acolytes rolling in the aisles.
Opinion: Trump deports man with no convictions but pardons criminals. What due process?
Demand. Oooooooooooo, scary.
NOT.
Pointing out cruelties and flaws won't get them fixed
All the parties involved in this little exchange know that the only thing the Democrats can do is make noise.
Arizona's congressional members say in their letter that "targeting immigrants without a criminal record who are following the law by showing up for their scheduled immigration hearing has only created chaos and does not make our communities safer.'
That is true.
They say: "These tactics make our immigration system less efficient and fair and discourage individuals from appearing for future hearings.'
Opinion: Trump's administration is off the rails because it's unqualified to do the job
Also true.
They say that the operation is taking "law enforcement away from drug trafficking and human trafficking cases to target noncriminal immigrants," and that "serious criminals may be allowed to continue roaming the streets at large ‒ making Arizonans less safe.'
Again, right on the money. And again in response ‒ giggles.
A very funny thing, although not in a HAHA way. Not at all.
I'd guess Noem found it especially humorous because on the very day the Democratic lawmakers sent their letter to her, there were reports that ICE agents had resumed the practice of hauling off immigrants who showed up for court.
KJZZ quoted a man who said he saw ICE agents taking people into custody: "They took this lady and her child. The child couldn't be more than 3 or 4 years old.'
An ICE spokesperson declined to confirm the arrest or that the agency had resumed operations.
Of course they wouldn't confirm it. Just as Noem won't be in any particular hurry to answer the Arizona Democrats' letter, if she responds at all.
She knows there is nothing Democrats in Congress can do to stop the Trump administration's amoral actions unless Republicans decide to honor their oaths and help them.
And Republicans would rather have mothers and children hauled off by masked men with guns than risk angering Dear Leader.
Funny, isn't it?
Although, not in a haha way. Not at all.
EJ Montini is a columnist at the Arizona Republic, where this column originally appeared. Reach him at ed.montini@arizonarepublic.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homeland Security official says immigration roundups happening faster than ever before
Homeland Security official says immigration roundups happening faster than ever before

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Homeland Security official says immigration roundups happening faster than ever before

Homeland Security says they detained several people in South Fulton County on Monday who they said are in this country illegally. Homeland security agents say they have the lawful authority to do this and have always been on the books. They say agents just couldn't do their jobs because they didn't have support from government leaders. 'Today is just another day of immigration enforcement in the state of Georgia,' Homeland Security Special Agent Steve Schrank told Channel 2's Tyisha Fernandes. While a witness recorded video of what many are calling an ICE raid, Schrank said what police were doing on Cascade Road is called 'enforcement action,' and it was going on all over metro Atlanta on Monday. 'There were many operations going on simultaneously throughout the Atlanta area and greater Georgia on any day. We have many teams that are out conducting these operations. They are happening seven days a week at a faster pace than I've ever seen before,' Schrank said. TRENDING STORIES: Governor's office said it will start issuing special tax refund checks this week 'Real Housewives of Atlanta' star Dwight Eubanks diagnosed with stage 4 prostate cancer 'Nursing imposters': Man impersonating healthcare worker arrested, officials say He said many of the operations start with a tip. In the incident along Cascade, it was several tips that came into South Fulton police. They said many people complained about loitering and harassment in the area, and while local police were ensuring community safety, they realized many of the people accused of harassment were undocumented. Police arrested eight people. Schrank said anyone living in this country illegally, should expect more of this. 'The lawful authority to do this has been in place. However, under the prior administration, there were very strict rules and criteria for ICE to effect immigration arrests, and the priorities were very narrowly tailored. This president and this administration has mandated a very broad application of the laws that are on the books, and therefore many more people are being caught up and arrested and subsequently deported,' Schrank said. Schrank told Fernandes that there's also a focus on holding business owners accountable. If they get caught hiring undocumented workers, they could now face jail time.

Senate Republicans divided over ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate Republicans divided over ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republicans divided over ‘big, beautiful bill'

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – Lawmakers return to Washington this week and Republicans are gearing up to pass the president's 'big, beautiful bill' which include sweeping tax cuts and a roll back of social services, like Medicaid. A handful of Senate Republicans have expressed concerns about the bill's proposed cuts. This week will be a test to see if the party will band together in the end. 'The math doesn't really add up,' said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul threw cold water on the plan. He argues the proposed spending cuts and tax breaks in the massive bill will only balloon the federal deficit. ' I don't want to raise the debt ceiling $5 trillion,' said Paul. On Truth Social President Donald Trump went after Paul, arguing if he joins Democrats to block the bill the great people of Kentucky will never forgive him. On Monday Senate Majority Leader John Thune pledged to get to work. 'Our biggest focus this month will be completing this tax relief legislation with the goal of getting the final bill to the president before the Fourth of July,' said Thune. Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley says he will not support the bill's $800 billion cut to Medicaid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates $7.6 million Americans would lose health care as a result. 'It's a nonstarter in this form,' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). Democrats are united against the bill. They say it will also slash food assistance for millions. 'This Republican budget bill is an absolute disaster for the country in particular for middle class in poor people,' said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). Senate Republicans are all but certain to make changes to the bill which will tee up another showdown among conservative and moderate Republicans in the House before it ever makes it to the president's desk. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies
Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies

State legislators clashed Monday over the final version of the state's two-year budget that was hailed by Democrats for providing additional money for Medicaid, nonprofit organizations, special education, and the working poor. The plan calls for sending checks of $250 to about 85,000 lower-income households who already qualify for the earned income tax credit for the working poor. The money will be directed to the neediest families with children; budget negotiators dropped a previous Democratic plan that would have provided a child tax credit for families earning as much as $200,000 per year. The massive, 693-page document pays for everything from dental care for prison inmates to pay raises of 3.5% for Superior Court judges and others whose salaries are tied to the judges. Lawmakers were preparing to vote as early as Monday night on the two-year, $55.8 billion package. The debate did not start until 4:45 p.m. and was continuing Monday night. House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford said Democrats are broadly pleased with the final compromises made in recent days with Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont. 'People are very happy to make the investments in child care that we're making, to have the child tax credit through the EITC program … to do the massive amounts of Medicaid funding we're doing, $20 million [in the first year] and $45 million,' Ritter said. 'People are really, really happy. A lot of people never thought we'd get to this point. It's a reminder that if you just keep going, if you keep negotiating, if you keep coming up with ideas, you can solve even the most difficult of problems. But Republicans had a sharply different view, blasting the budget as a bloated document that did not closely follow the fiscal guardrails that were adopted in 2017 by the legislature and have been credited with restoring the state's fiscal health in recent years. House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford quoted the phrase, traditionally credited to the French philosopher Voltaire, that the perfect should not be the enemy of the good. 'This budget is neither perfect nor good for the state of Connecticut,' Candelora told reporters Monday. 'This budget eviscerates all of our fiscal guardrails. They are destroying the volatility cap. It is creating a gimmick in the first year to get around the spending cap. Finally, we are devoting the surplus and the revenue cap permanently to an off-budget early childhood account. … In the long run, it is setting up the state of Connecticut for failure and tax increases. … I am shocked that the governor would agree to this budget.' Democrats, though, said flatly that the budget remains under the spending cap in both years, as required by state law. Candelora said Democrats are not setting aside enough money to pay down pension liabilities because some of the money will be earmarked for other programs like the early childhood endowment fund that is expected to receive $200 million this year. 'They are acting as if we are never going to see another recession for the rest of our lives,' Candelora told reporters at the state Capitol. Rep. Tammy Nuccio of Tolland, the ranking House Republican on the budget committee, said the state is coming off the 'sugar high' of billions in federal money from the coronavirus pandemic and is now finding it difficult to pay for multiple programs. Even with the spending cap, the state is able to increase spending by about $1 billion next year to $27 billion, up from $26 billion. A longtime accountant and financial analyst for large insurance companies like Cigna and Aetna, Nuccio said the breakneck pace of the legislative session, where staff members literally work through the night to cobble together documents at the last minute, is not common outside the Capitol building. 'In the real world, this doesn't happen,' Nuccio said on the House floor. 'They dropped a 700-page document at 4 o'clock in the morning. … We've gotta read it in less than 12 hours.' Republicans and the Connecticut Business and Industry Association were also concerned that the budget includes Lamont's proposed change to the 'unitary' tax that they said would lead to tax increases for large, multi-state corporations like Electric Boat, Wal-Mart, Raytheon, Amazon, Home Depot, Lowe's, AT&T, Verizon, and the parent company of Sikorsky helicopters, among others. Amazon is now the fifth-largest employer in the state, and the unitary tax would hit about 20 major corporations, officials said. The tax has not been mentioned much at the state Capitol in recent years, but Fairfield-based General Electric Co. cited the tax among the reasons that the company decided to move its headquarters to Boston during the tenure of then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. But Lamont and his team are in frequent contact with top business leaders, and he said after the initial proposal was released that the leaders had not raised major objections. Despite criticisms, Lamont's chief spokesman, Rob Blanchard, said Connecticut is in much better fiscal shape than some other states. 'This biennium budget makes smart investments in our future, our communities and schools, all while prioritizing affordability, holding the line on taxes, and keeping us on a sound fiscal path,' Blanchard said. 'More importantly, it averts the mistakes of the past by making significant payments on our pension liabilities, preserves the strength of our fiscal guardrails and continues to grow our historic $4.1 billion Rainy Day fund—all of which will guard against economic headwinds. While other states are cutting services, raising taxes or wishing for a Rainy Day fund as robust as our fund, Connecticut has worked hard to turn things around economically and maintain the progress that avoids those tough choices.' Rep. Maria Horn, a Litchfield County Democrat who represents multiple towns, said the state is operating under various constraints that make budgeting difficult. 'We cannot do everything,' Horn said, adding that choices were made to help the most vulnerable citizens. Republicans and hospitals were also concerned about an increase in the hospital tax that is designed to raise an additional $375 million in the first year and $400 million in the second year. They argued that the money is dependent on Connecticut receiving a waiver from the federal government, but the state has not received the waiver yet. 'It's really a hope and a prayer,' Candelora said. The Connecticut Hospital Association, whose lobbyists testify on multiple bills, said the budget would not be good for hospitals. 'The tax increase on hospitals and proposed cuts to healthcare providers contained in this budget will be devastating for hospitals, their workforce, and their patients,' the association said. 'This tax increase is far greater than what Governor Lamont proposed earlier this year. It will leave hospitals facing a staggering cut of hundreds of millions of dollars, while the state uses federal dollars to balance its budget without any action to increase Medicaid reimbursement for care provided to patients in hospitals. These policies will move Connecticut backward in our collaborative efforts to make healthcare more affordable and accessible.' Lawmakers were also concerned about a narrowly written provision that they believe could benefit only one company in the state. In order to obtain tax credits for research and development, the company must be 'a single member limited liability company that has more than three thousand employees in this state and is engaged in manufacturing, with expertise in mechatronics, alignment and sensor technology and optical fabrication.' Chris DiPentima, the president of CBIA, said the provision was designed to help ASML Wilton, a major company in Fairfield County. The company's website says it specializes 'in mechatronics, alignment and sensor technology,' which is exactly the language mentioned in the budget. DiPentima, though, says the research and development tax credits need to be expanded to much smaller companies like in Massachusetts, where companies with as few as five employees can earn the credits. Despite statements by various leaders that they had crafted a 'no-tax-increase budget,' DiPentima said that characterization is incorrect. 'There are business tax increases,' he told The Courant on Monday. 'We're losing sight of the importance of the business community to Connecticut's economy. … I've got major concerns with the work-around on the spending cap.' He added, 'This is the first time in five years where we've had business tax increases and a changing of the guardrails. … Is Connecticut losing its fiscal discipline again? That's this question mark. Are we going to get back to fiscal discipline?' Democrats have been pushing for years for a child tax credit, and their latest proposal called for a permanent, refundable credit of $150 per child for a maximum of three children, or $450 per year. That represented a sharp drop from an original proposal of $600 per child for an overall total of $1,800 per year. With various pressing needs on the tax and spending sides of the complicated state budget, lawmakers say they are often unable to award as much tax relief as they would like. The overall plan would have saved families a combined $82.7 million per year, but the idea was dropped as being too expensive and helping too many families at higher income levels. Lawmakers also dropped Lamont's proposal for an increase in the popular property tax credit to $350, up from $300, per tax filer. Lamont's proposal was expected to help 800,000 tax filers, officials said, as the income eligibility would have increased, an issue that had restricted the credit in the past. Nonprofit organizations, including those who hold contracts to perform various services that otherwise would be performed by state employees, were pleased with a funding increase in the second year. 'The budget is not everything we requested, but in the context of this year's discussions about budget restrictions, we are grateful for their choice to support programs that will improve thousands of lives and even save some,' said Gian Carl Casa, a former top state budget official who now leads the statewide nonprofit alliance. 'Rank-and-file lawmakers, including progressives, moderates and members of the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, responded by making it clear that the people served by community nonprofits are a priority.' The nonprofits are expecting to receive $76 million in the second year, plus an additional $30 million for non-developmental disability providers. The deal also calls for an additional $66 million union settlement for providers and an additional $15 million for Medicaid rates above the appropriations committee total, officials said. 'Is this a perfect budget? No,' said Rep. Toni Walker, a longtime New Haven Democrat who co-chairs the legislature's budget committee. 'But we have a situation where we have a spending cap problem and a revenue problem.' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store