
Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies
State legislators clashed Monday over the final version of the state's two-year budget that was hailed by Democrats for providing additional money for Medicaid, nonprofit organizations, special education, and the working poor.
The plan calls for sending checks of $250 to about 85,000 lower-income households who already qualify for the earned income tax credit for the working poor. The money will be directed to the neediest families with children; budget negotiators dropped a previous Democratic plan that would have provided a child tax credit for families earning as much as $200,000 per year.
The massive, 693-page document pays for everything from dental care for prison inmates to pay raises of 3.5% for Superior Court judges and others whose salaries are tied to the judges.
Lawmakers were preparing to vote as early as Monday night on the two-year, $55.8 billion package. The debate did not start until 4:45 p.m. and was continuing Monday night.
House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford said Democrats are broadly pleased with the final compromises made in recent days with Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont.
'People are very happy to make the investments in child care that we're making, to have the child tax credit through the EITC program … to do the massive amounts of Medicaid funding we're doing, $20 million [in the first year] and $45 million,' Ritter said. 'People are really, really happy. A lot of people never thought we'd get to this point. It's a reminder that if you just keep going, if you keep negotiating, if you keep coming up with ideas, you can solve even the most difficult of problems.
But Republicans had a sharply different view, blasting the budget as a bloated document that did not closely follow the fiscal guardrails that were adopted in 2017 by the legislature and have been credited with restoring the state's fiscal health in recent years.
House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford quoted the phrase, traditionally credited to the French philosopher Voltaire, that the perfect should not be the enemy of the good.
'This budget is neither perfect nor good for the state of Connecticut,' Candelora told reporters Monday. 'This budget eviscerates all of our fiscal guardrails. They are destroying the volatility cap. It is creating a gimmick in the first year to get around the spending cap. Finally, we are devoting the surplus and the revenue cap permanently to an off-budget early childhood account. … In the long run, it is setting up the state of Connecticut for failure and tax increases. … I am shocked that the governor would agree to this budget.'
Democrats, though, said flatly that the budget remains under the spending cap in both years, as required by state law.
Candelora said Democrats are not setting aside enough money to pay down pension liabilities because some of the money will be earmarked for other programs like the early childhood endowment fund that is expected to receive $200 million this year.
'They are acting as if we are never going to see another recession for the rest of our lives,' Candelora told reporters at the state Capitol.
Rep. Tammy Nuccio of Tolland, the ranking House Republican on the budget committee, said the state is coming off the 'sugar high' of billions in federal money from the coronavirus pandemic and is now finding it difficult to pay for multiple programs. Even with the spending cap, the state is able to increase spending by about $1 billion next year to $27 billion, up from $26 billion.
A longtime accountant and financial analyst for large insurance companies like Cigna and Aetna, Nuccio said the breakneck pace of the legislative session, where staff members literally work through the night to cobble together documents at the last minute, is not common outside the Capitol building.
'In the real world, this doesn't happen,' Nuccio said on the House floor. 'They dropped a 700-page document at 4 o'clock in the morning. … We've gotta read it in less than 12 hours.'
Republicans and the Connecticut Business and Industry Association were also concerned that the budget includes Lamont's proposed change to the 'unitary' tax that they said would lead to tax increases for large, multi-state corporations like Electric Boat, Wal-Mart, Raytheon, Amazon, Home Depot, Lowe's, AT&T, Verizon, and the parent company of Sikorsky helicopters, among others. Amazon is now the fifth-largest employer in the state, and the unitary tax would hit about 20 major corporations, officials said. The tax has not been mentioned much at the state Capitol in recent years, but Fairfield-based General Electric Co. cited the tax among the reasons that the company decided to move its headquarters to Boston during the tenure of then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy.
But Lamont and his team are in frequent contact with top business leaders, and he said after the initial proposal was released that the leaders had not raised major objections.
Despite criticisms, Lamont's chief spokesman, Rob Blanchard, said Connecticut is in much better fiscal shape than some other states.
'This biennium budget makes smart investments in our future, our communities and schools, all while prioritizing affordability, holding the line on taxes, and keeping us on a sound fiscal path,' Blanchard said. 'More importantly, it averts the mistakes of the past by making significant payments on our pension liabilities, preserves the strength of our fiscal guardrails and continues to grow our historic $4.1 billion Rainy Day fund—all of which will guard against economic headwinds. While other states are cutting services, raising taxes or wishing for a Rainy Day fund as robust as our fund, Connecticut has worked hard to turn things around economically and maintain the progress that avoids those tough choices.'
Rep. Maria Horn, a Litchfield County Democrat who represents multiple towns, said the state is operating under various constraints that make budgeting difficult.
'We cannot do everything,' Horn said, adding that choices were made to help the most vulnerable citizens.
Republicans and hospitals were also concerned about an increase in the hospital tax that is designed to raise an additional $375 million in the first year and $400 million in the second year. They argued that the money is dependent on Connecticut receiving a waiver from the federal government, but the state has not received the waiver yet.
'It's really a hope and a prayer,' Candelora said.
The Connecticut Hospital Association, whose lobbyists testify on multiple bills, said the budget would not be good for hospitals.
'The tax increase on hospitals and proposed cuts to healthcare providers contained in this budget will be devastating for hospitals, their workforce, and their patients,' the association said. 'This tax increase is far greater than what Governor Lamont proposed earlier this year. It will leave hospitals facing a staggering cut of hundreds of millions of dollars, while the state uses federal dollars to balance its budget without any action to increase Medicaid reimbursement for care provided to patients in hospitals. These policies will move Connecticut backward in our collaborative efforts to make healthcare more affordable and accessible.'
Lawmakers were also concerned about a narrowly written provision that they believe could benefit only one company in the state. In order to obtain tax credits for research and development, the company must be 'a single member limited liability company that has more than three thousand employees in this state and is engaged in manufacturing, with expertise in mechatronics, alignment and sensor technology and optical fabrication.'
Chris DiPentima, the president of CBIA, said the provision was designed to help ASML Wilton, a major company in Fairfield County. The company's website says it specializes 'in mechatronics, alignment and sensor technology,' which is exactly the language mentioned in the budget.
DiPentima, though, says the research and development tax credits need to be expanded to much smaller companies like in Massachusetts, where companies with as few as five employees can earn the credits.
Despite statements by various leaders that they had crafted a 'no-tax-increase budget,' DiPentima said that characterization is incorrect.
'There are business tax increases,' he told The Courant on Monday. 'We're losing sight of the importance of the business community to Connecticut's economy. … I've got major concerns with the work-around on the spending cap.'
He added, 'This is the first time in five years where we've had business tax increases and a changing of the guardrails. … Is Connecticut losing its fiscal discipline again? That's this question mark. Are we going to get back to fiscal discipline?'
Democrats have been pushing for years for a child tax credit, and their latest proposal called for a permanent, refundable credit of $150 per child for a maximum of three children, or $450 per year. That represented a sharp drop from an original proposal of $600 per child for an overall total of $1,800 per year. With various pressing needs on the tax and spending sides of the complicated state budget, lawmakers say they are often unable to award as much tax relief as they would like.
The overall plan would have saved families a combined $82.7 million per year, but the idea was dropped as being too expensive and helping too many families at higher income levels.
Lawmakers also dropped Lamont's proposal for an increase in the popular property tax credit to $350, up from $300, per tax filer. Lamont's proposal was expected to help 800,000 tax filers, officials said, as the income eligibility would have increased, an issue that had restricted the credit in the past.
Nonprofit organizations, including those who hold contracts to perform various services that otherwise would be performed by state employees, were pleased with a funding increase in the second year.
'The budget is not everything we requested, but in the context of this year's discussions about budget restrictions, we are grateful for their choice to support programs that will improve thousands of lives and even save some,' said Gian Carl Casa, a former top state budget official who now leads the statewide nonprofit alliance. 'Rank-and-file lawmakers, including progressives, moderates and members of the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, responded by making it clear that the people served by community nonprofits are a priority.'
The nonprofits are expecting to receive $76 million in the second year, plus an additional $30 million for non-developmental disability providers. The deal also calls for an additional $66 million union settlement for providers and an additional $15 million for Medicaid rates above the appropriations committee total, officials said.
'Is this a perfect budget? No,' said Rep. Toni Walker, a longtime New Haven Democrat who co-chairs the legislature's budget committee. 'But we have a situation where we have a spending cap problem and a revenue problem.'
Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@courant.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
9 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk may be the only person in the world who can criticize Donald Trump in public. For now.
If you come at Donald Trump, he's going to respond. Unless, apparently, you're Elon Musk. Trump hasn't said a word about Musk's public complaints about Trump's budget bill. It's hard to imagine Trump staying silent forever. But even this restraint tells you a lot about the Musk/Trump alliance. A pretty fundamental rule of political physics in our age: If you criticize Donald Trump, he roars back. Which makes what's happening now worth noting: Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump, and Trump … isn't responding. As you likely know by now, on Monday afternoon, Musk used his X account to complain about the Republican budget bill — the one that's supposed to be Trump's signature legislation, and the one that's literally called the " One Big Beautiful Bill" act because that's the name Trump likes. More specifically: Musk called the bill " a disgusting abomination." "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he added. That story — the richest man in the world, and for at least several months, a key Trump ally, blasting a Trump project in public — dominated Monday's news cycle. Even Fox News had to cover it. And under normal circumstances, Trump would rage back. Not this time, though. Trump has yet to acknowledge Musk's broadside out loud, or on his Truth Social platform. When a Fox News reporter asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt "how mad" Trump would be when he learned about Musk's comments, she had a restrained answer ready: "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." And when I asked the White House press office for comment Wednesday morning, they referred me to Leavitt's previous statement. Obvious conclusion: For now, at least, the Trump team is going out of its way not to stoke a feud with Musk. It seems very unlikely that Trump's silence is going to be permanent: Trump loves holding forth in front of the press, so someone's going to ask him about it at some point. Still, this level of what seems to be restraint is remarkable for a man who doesn't usually restrain himself, and who loathes people who poke at him in public. What's happening? For starters, it's worth noting that Trump has already gone through a version of this. Last week, Musk used much more muted language to criticize the same bill in a CBS interview, and those comments also became a news story. And Trump didn't fire back at Musk then, either — even when asked about it at a press conference. It's also worth noting that even though Musk used scathing language to condemn the bill on Monday, he never once criticized Trump directly. That gives both men rhetorical wiggle room: Musk can argue that his problems with the bill have nothing to do with the man who's promoting it. And Trump can lump in Musk's critique along with everyone else who has problems with the bill, including some Republicans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. But it's also likely that the most likely thing is the most likely thing: That Donald Trump has enormous admiration for Elon Musk, and treats him differently than just about anyone else in the world. And that even though Musk has officially left his role as a part-time White House advisor, Trump still wants him on his side.


The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Schumer: Republican bill will raise energy prices 10 percent
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) is warning that the House-passed budget reconciliation bill will cause energy prices to increase by 10 percent because it will 'kill' clean energy programs around the country, increasing the nation's reliance on fossil fuels. 'Donald Trump and Republicans seem ready to kill clean energy in its tracks and raise people's energy costs in the process,' Schumer said Wednesday on the Senate floor. He argued that the nation will likely need 'ten times as much energy' as it currently consumers to power 'breakthroughs in artificial intelligence.' 'The Republican plan will increase average national electricity prices by about 10 percent. The Republican plan will increase total household energy costs by $32 billion,' the New York Democrat continued. 'That means American families will pay $32 billion more.' The House bill, which Senate Republicans are now reviewing, would terminate most clean-energy tax breaks after 2025. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that 21 percent of electricity generation in the United States in 2023 came from renewable energy sources. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said the GOP bill would reduce energy prices by unleashing domestic oil and gas drilling. 'It will open up leases on America's lands and waters for responsible conventional energy development. It will expand production opportunities for essential energy resources that the Biden administration tried to put on the sidelines,' Thune said. Their claims come as the Congressional Budget Office predicted earlier Wednesday that Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit over roughly the next decade.


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ex-WH press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claims she's no longer a Democrat in teasing memoir of ‘broken' Biden admin
WASHINGTON — Joe Biden's longtime White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre announced Wednesday that she has left the Democratic Party and is writing a tell-all book about the 'broken' administration she served. Jean-Pierre, 50, worked as Biden's top spokeswoman for two years and eight months and stunned fellow White House alums by announcing the looming release of 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines' due out on Oct. 21. 3 Karine Jean-Pierre repeatedly denied Joe Biden was cognitively impaired while she was the White House spokeswoman. Getty Images 'Jean-Pierre didn't come to her decision to be an Independent lightly,' Hachette Book Group says in a promotional release, which hints that she may focus her ire on figures aside from Biden in the account. 'She has served two American presidents, Obama and Biden… She takes us through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision,' the tease goes. 3 Jean-Pierre is attempting to sell her book— in which she urges Americans to be independents. AP 'In a hard-hitting yet hopeful critique, Jean-Pierre defines what it means to be part of the growing percentage of our fractured electorate that is Independent, why it can be worthwhile to carve a political space more loyal to personal beliefs than a party affiliation, and what questions you need to ask yourself to determine where you fit politically.' 3 KJP stunned Democrats by announcing she left the party. AP Biden stood by Jean-Pierre amid criticism by detractors and rivals inside the administration who viewed her as ineloquent and often unprepared. 'I think we need to stop thinking in boxes and think outside of our boxes, and not be so partisan,' Jean-Pierre said in an Instagram post Wednesday, '… this book 'Independent', it's about looking outside of boxes, not just always being in a partisan stance.'